Insight into Copper Doping Ratio on Optoelectronics Performance of Two-Dimensional Cu-Doped SnO2 Nanosheets: an Experiment and DFT Study
Source abstract
Abstract
The optoelectronics performances of two-dimensional Cu-doped SnO 2 nanosheets were investigated by first-principles calculations on the basis of density functional theory (DFT) and experiments. First, the crystal structures of Cu-doped SnO 2 were built and analyzed by using DFT within the generalized gradient approximation (GGA). The total energy of Cu-doped SnO 2 was discussed qualitatively and quantitatively from three aspects: charge density, band structure, and state density. The results show that copper doping has little effect on the charge density distribution because of the similar ionic radius of Cu 2+, Sn 4+, and the close bond lengths of Cu–O and Sn–O. The calculation results of band structure and state density show that the doping of a copper acceptor leads to the appearance of a new energy level at the top of the valence band and decreases the band gap of SnO 2 . With the guidance of theoretical calculation, the nanosheets of Cu-doped SnO 2 are constructed experimentally, and their optoelectronics performances are investigated. The experimental results exhibit that the Cu atom replaces the Sn atom in the SnO 2 lattice, while the Cu-doped SnO 2 retains the original rutile phase of the intrinsic SnO 2 . The sample with a doping ratio of 12.5% has more uniform particle morphology and dispersion characteristics. In addition, the 12.5% Cu-doped SnO 2 obtained the largest transient photocurrent of 3 μA/cm 2 and the lowest resistance to charge transfer, thereby indicating that the material has a remarkably higher optoelectronics performance under this ratio. The theoretical calculation and experimental results are consistent, which indicates that Cu doping effectively enhances the charge transfer in SnO 2 and enables it for high-quality application in optoelectronic catalysis.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors · ZnO doping and properties · Transition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Chemistry & Chemical Engineering, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing 163318, China
Funding
Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province · National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (60)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/ja800835q10.1021/ja800835q ↗
2. 10.1021/acsami.0c0082510.1021/acsami.0c00825 ↗
3. 10.1039/C4DT01658K10.1039/C4DT01658K ↗
4. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c0367710.1021/acs.jpclett.1c03677 ↗
5. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b0639810.1021/acssuschemeng.9b06398 ↗
6. 10.1021/es303413q10.1021/es303413q ↗
7. 10.1021/acsami.0c0072910.1021/acsami.0c00729 ↗
8. 10.1021/acsami.9b2085710.1021/acsami.9b20857 ↗
9. 10.1021/acsami.7b0023210.1021/acsami.7b00232 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.progsurf.2005.09.00210.1016/j.progsurf.2005.09.002 ↗
11. 10.1021/ic200343610.1021/ic2003436 ↗
12. 10.1142/S179329201650035110.1142/S1793292016500351 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.physb.2011.03.04810.1016/j.physb.2011.03.048 ↗
14. 10.1088/0022-3727/37/8/01410.1088/0022-3727/37/8/014 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2006.10.04310.1016/j.apsusc.2006.10.043 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.10.00310.1016/j.jallcom.2014.10.003 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.03.04610.1016/j.jallcom.2014.03.046 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsanm.2c0196310.1021/acsanm.2c01963 ↗
19. 10.1021/cm401824810.1021/cm4018248 ↗
20. 10.1021/acsaem.2c0141210.1021/acsaem.2c01412 ↗
21. 10.1002/anie.20090392610.1002/anie.200903926 ↗
22. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b0407910.1021/acs.jpcc.7b04079 ↗
23. 10.1021/acsanm.1c0261510.1021/acsanm.1c02615 ↗
24. 10.1021/jp312191c10.1021/jp312191c ↗
25. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c0293710.1021/acs.jpcc.1c02937 ↗
26. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.6b0291410.1021/acs.inorgchem.6b02914 ↗
27. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c0107010.1021/acssuschemeng.0c01070 ↗
28. 10.1021/acssensors.6b0059710.1021/acssensors.6b00597 ↗
29. 10.1021/acsaem.8b0020310.1021/acsaem.8b00203 ↗
30. 10.1021/acsami.1c2034710.1021/acsami.1c20347 ↗
31. 10.1021/acs.est.9b0548810.1021/acs.est.9b05488 ↗
32. 10.1021/acsami.9b0146510.1021/acsami.9b01465 ↗
33. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b1187510.1021/acs.jpcc.9b11875 ↗
34. 10.1021/acsaelm.9b0008710.1021/acsaelm.9b00087 ↗
35. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b0668210.1021/acs.jpcc.6b06682 ↗
36. 10.1021/acsami.0c0007310.1021/acsami.0c00073 ↗
37. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b0286510.1021/acs.jpcc.9b02865 ↗
38. 10.1021/acsanm.9b0147410.1021/acsanm.9b01474 ↗
39. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c0034410.1021/acs.jpcc.1c00344 ↗
40. 10.1021/acsami.0c0896410.1021/acsami.0c08964 ↗
41. 10.1038/ncomms1212310.1038/ncomms12123 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.12213910.1016/j.apcatb.2022.122139 ↗
43. 10.1021/jacs.2c0692010.1021/jacs.2c06920 ↗
44. 10.1021/jacs.1c0094610.1021/jacs.1c00946 ↗
45. 10.1002/adma.20220930710.1002/adma.202209307 ↗
46. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c0488610.1021/acs.chemmater.0c04886 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.physb.2013.04.01810.1016/j.physb.2013.04.018 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.03.16010.1016/j.electacta.2014.03.160 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2012.03.01810.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2012.03.018 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.09.03010.1016/j.electacta.2018.09.030 ↗
51. 10.1021/acscatal.8b0513410.1021/acscatal.8b05134 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.tsf.2018.03.00910.1016/j.tsf.2018.03.009 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.snb.2018.02.03510.1016/j.snb.2018.02.035 ↗
54. 10.1039/C6CP01758D10.1039/C6CP01758D ↗
55. 10.1039/C3RA43709D10.1039/C3RA43709D ↗
56. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.12.11710.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.12.117 ↗
57. 10.1021/acsaem.8b0014610.1021/acsaem.8b00146 ↗
58. 10.1021/jacs.7b0026110.1021/jacs.7b00261 ↗
59. 10.1021/ja210879910.1021/ja2108799 ↗
60. 10.1149/1.205517710.1149/1.2055177 ↗