Iontronic Electroluminescence Devices: Comparing Halide Perovskites and Conjugated Polymers
Source abstract
Abstract
Halide perovskites and polymer light-emitting electrochemical cells exhibit similar iontronic properties, wherein ion migration under an external bias can be coupled with electronic doping of the perovskites and conjugated polymers, leading to efficient electroluminescence devices with an ultrasimplified device architecture. In this work, it is discovered that a major difference exists between halide perovskites and polymer light-emitting electrochemical cells through low-temperature measurements of photovoltaic properties, photoluminescence spectra, and current–voltage characteristics using precharged devices. In perovskites, ion migration is simultaneously accompanied by doping, and both n-type and p-type doping can occur at a bias much lower than the bandgap/e of the perovskite. On the contrary, ion migration in polymer light-emitting electrochemical cells leads to doping only when the bias exceeds the bandgap/e of the conjugated polymer.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Perovskite Materials and Applications · Conducting polymers and applications · Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, FAMU-FSU College of Engineering, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32310, United States
High-Performance Materials Institute, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32310, United States
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Henry Samueli School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095, United States
Funding
Air Force Office of Scientific Research
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b0053910.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00539 ↗
2. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c0010710.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00107 ↗
3. 10.1038/nnano.2014.14910.1038/nnano.2014.149 ↗
4. 10.1002/adma.20160524210.1002/adma.201605242 ↗
5. 10.1038/s41467-019-08981-w10.1038/s41467-019-08981-w ↗
6. 10.1002/9780470166499.ch110.1002/9780470166499.ch1 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.chempr.2017.02.00410.1016/j.chempr.2017.02.004 ↗
8. 10.1002/adma.20150249010.1002/adma.201502490 ↗
9. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b0194210.1021/acs.jpclett.6b01942 ↗
10. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0750610.1021/acsnano.5b07506 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsnano.7b0262910.1021/acsnano.7b02629 ↗
12. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b0076310.1021/acs.jpclett.7b00763 ↗
13. 10.1126/science.269.5227.108610.1126/science.269.5227.1086 ↗
14. 10.1038/nmat212810.1038/nmat2128 ↗
15. 10.1021/ja953695q10.1021/ja953695q ↗
16. 10.1021/jz200071b10.1021/jz200071b ↗
17. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(199811)10:16<1340::AID-ADMA1340>3.0.CO;2-G10.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(199811)10:16<1340::AID-ADMA1340>3.0.CO;2-G ↗
18. 10.1063/1.11987510.1063/1.119875 ↗
19. 10.1021/ar00118a00510.1021/ar00118a005 ↗
20. Heeger A. J. · Philos. T R Soc. A · 1985 · 314 · 17
21. 10.1063/1.11970910.1063/1.119709 ↗
22. 10.1002/adfm.20110243310.1002/adfm.201102433 ↗
23. 10.1063/1.494750410.1063/1.4947504 ↗
24. 10.1063/1.501935010.1063/1.5019350 ↗
25. 10.1038/nphoton.2014.17110.1038/nphoton.2014.171 ↗
26. 10.1038/s41578-021-00286-z10.1038/s41578-021-00286-z ↗
27. 10.1038/ncomms849710.1038/ncomms8497 ↗