journal article·2020-07-28Open access

Effect of the Gate Volume on the Performance of Printed Nanosheet Network-Based Transistors

Domhnall O’Suilleabhain, Adam G. Kelly, Ruiyuan Tian, Cian Gabbett, Dominik Horvath, Jonathan N. Coleman

Abstract

Demonstration of high-performance, all-printed transistors fabricated only from networks of two-dimensional nanosheets would represent a significant advance in printed electronics. However, such devices have only been shown to work via electrolytic gating. Under those circumstances, both channel/electrolyte and gate/electrolyte interfaces show significant capacitances which, when unoptimized, lead to reduced device performance. Here, we fabricate a range of printed thin-film transistors (TFTs) with WSe2 and graphene nanosheet networks acting as the channel and gate electrodes. We find that transistor operation depends sensitively on the ratio of the gate electrode to channel volume such that effective mobility is only maximized when the gate volume is >10 times larger than the channel volume. These results indicate that all-printed, all-nanosheet stacked heterostructure TFTs will require relatively thick gates to operate effectively.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanowire Synthesis and Applications · 2D Materials and Applications · Thin-Film Transistor Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Physics, CRANN & AMBER Research Centres, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland

Funding

European Commission · Science Foundation Ireland · H2020 European Research Council

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/c8cs00084k10.1039/c8cs00084k ↗
2. 10.1126/science.122641910.1126/science.1226419 ↗
3. 10.1021/acsnano.9b0161310.1021/acsnano.9b01613 ↗
4. 10.1002/adma.20140071910.1002/adma.201400719 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.carbon.2016.04.01210.1016/j.carbon.2016.04.012 ↗
6. 10.1126/science.aal406210.1126/science.aal4062 ↗
7. 10.1038/s41467-019-13079-410.1038/s41467-019-13079-4 ↗
8. 10.1039/c3tc31993h10.1039/c3tc31993h ↗
9. 10.1002/smll.20130300010.1002/smll.201303000 ↗
10. 10.1021/acsnano.9b0433710.1021/acsnano.9b04337 ↗
11. 10.1088/2053-1583/aa641a10.1088/2053-1583/aa641a ↗
12. 10.1002/smll.20090206610.1002/smll.200902066 ↗
13. O’Neill A. · Chem. Mater. · 2012 · 24 · 241410.1021/cm301515z ↗
14. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0722810.1021/acsnano.5b07228 ↗
15. 10.1021/jz502431r10.1021/jz502431r ↗
16. 10.1002/adma.20150641010.1002/adma.201506410 ↗
17. 10.1038/s41467-017-01210-210.1038/s41467-017-01210-2 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.07.00410.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.07.004 ↗
19. 10.1/nn102204460910.1/nn1022044609 ↗
20. 10.1038/nnano.2014.3510.1038/nnano.2014.35 ↗
21. O’Suilleabhain D. · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2019 · 11 · 854510.1021/acsami.8b21416 ↗
22. 10.1038/s41467-017-01210-210.1038/s41467-017-01210-2 ↗
23. 10.1002/advs.20180144510.1002/advs.201801445 ↗
24. 10.1038/s41586-018-0574-410.1038/s41586-018-0574-4 ↗
25. 10.1002/adfm.20140098410.1002/adfm.201400984 ↗
26. 10.1002/adma.20120279010.1002/adma.201202790 ↗
27. 10.1038/natrevmats.2017.8610.1038/natrevmats.2017.86 ↗
28. 10.1126/sciadv.140025110.1126/sciadv.1400251 ↗
29. 10.1038/nnano.2010.8910.1038/nnano.2010.89 ↗
30. 10.1063/1.135042710.1063/1.1350427 ↗
31. 10.1002/adma.20120504110.1002/adma.201205041 ↗
32. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b0172210.1021/acs.chemmater.9b01722 ↗
33. 10.1109/tcapt.2005.85967210.1109/tcapt.2005.859672 ↗
34. 10.1002/adma.20090232910.1002/adma.200902329 ↗
35. 10.1063/1.497448510.1063/1.4974485 ↗
36. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0000910.1021/acs.chemmater.6b00009 ↗
37. 10.1039/c5nr08047a10.1039/c5nr08047a ↗
38. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b0290510.1021/acs.chemmater.9b02905 ↗
39. 10.1021/acsnano.9b0223410.1021/acsnano.9b02234 ↗
40. 10.1088/2053-1583/3/2/02501610.1088/2053-1583/3/2/025016 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.physrep.2009.02.00310.1016/j.physrep.2009.02.003 ↗
42. 10.1039/c4nr04951a10.1039/c4nr04951a ↗
43. 10.1002/adfm.20180438710.1002/adfm.201804387 ↗