Analysis methods for characterizing ferroelectric/ferroelastic domain reorientation in orthorhombic perovskite materials and application to Li-doped Na0.5K0.5NbO3
Source abstract
Abstract
Ferroelectric and ferroelastic domains can be reoriented during the application of electric field through domain wall motion. This study develops a method to quantify the domain reorientation in perovskite ferroelectrics with orthorhombic crystal lattices. In situ, high-energy X-ray diffraction was utilized to obtain intensity ratios that are necessary for the calculation. Domain reorientation in orthorhombic Li-doped Na0.5K0.5NbO3 is then quantified using this method. The preference of domain orientations is explained by considering the angle between spontaneous polarization of the respective domains and the applied electric field direction. The extent of domain reorientation increases as the Li substitution increases which additionally correlates to increased piezoelectric coefficient d33 and field-induced strain. Increased domain wall motion is further proposed to originate due to the increased compositional proximity to the morphotropic phase boundary, a proposed universal behavior in ferroelectric compositions-containing phase boundaries.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials · Multiferroics and related materials · Microwave Dielectric Ceramics Synthesis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Scott JF, Paz de Araujo CA (1989) Science 246:140010.1126/science.246.4936.1400 ↗
2. Park SE, Shrout TR (1997) J Appl Phys 82:180410.1063/1.365983 ↗
3. Tutuncu G, Damjanovic D, Chen J, Jones JL (2012) Phys Rev Lett 108:17760110.1103/PhysRevLett.108.177601 ↗
4. Pramanick A, Daniels JE, Jones JL (2009) J Am Ceram Soc 92:230010.1111/j.1551-2916.2009.03219.x ↗
5. Gopalan V, Mitchell TE (1999) J Appl Phys 85:230410.1063/1.369542 ↗
6. Grigoriev A, Do DH, Kim DM, Eom CB, Adams B, Dufresne EM, Evans PG (2006) Phys Rev Lett 96:18760110.1103/PhysRevLett.96.187601 ↗
7. Pojprapai S, Russell J, Man H, Jones JL, Daniels JE, Hoffman M (2009) Acta Mater 57:393210.1016/j.actamat.2009.04.054 ↗
8. Subbarao EC, McQuarrie MC, Buessem WR (1957) J Appl Phys 28:119410.1063/1.1722606 ↗
9. Bedoya C, Muller C, Baudour JL, Madigou V, Anne M, Roubin M (2000) Mater Sci Eng B 75:4310.1016/S0921-5107(00)00383-4 ↗
10. Jones JL, Slamovich EB, Bowman KJ (2005) J Appl Phys 97:03411310.1063/1.1849821 ↗
11. Hall DA, Azough F, Middleton-Stewart N, Cernik RJ, Freer R, Mori T, Kungl H, Curfs C (2010) Funct Mater Lett 03:3110.1142/S1793604710000944 ↗
12. Tutuncu G, Chang Y, Poterala S, Messing GL, Jones JL (2012) J Am Ceram Soc 95:265310.1111/j.1551-2916.2012.05268.x ↗
13. Lai F, Li JF, Zhu ZX, Xu Y (2009) J Appl Phys 106:06410110.1063/1.3223320 ↗
14. Jaeger RE, Egerton L (1962) J Am Ceram Soc 45:20910.1111/j.1151-2916.1962.tb11127.x ↗
15. Saito Y, Takao H, Tani T, Nonoyama T, Takatori K, Homma T, Nagaya T, Nakamura M (2004) Nature 432:8410.1038/nature03028 ↗
16. Guo Y, Kakimoto KI, Ohsato H (2004) Appl Phys Lett 85:412110.1063/1.1813636 ↗
17. Sun X, Deng J, Chen J, Sun C, Xing X (2009) J Am Ceram Soc 92:303310.1111/j.1551-2916.2009.03303.x ↗
18. Klein N, Hollenstein E, Damjanovic D, Trodahl HJ, Setter N, Kuball M (2007) J Appl Phys 102:01411210.1063/1.2752799 ↗
19. Jaffe B, Cook WR, Jaffe H (1971) Piezoelectric Ceramics. Academic, New York
20. Ge W, Ren Y, Zhang J, Devreugd CP, Li J, Viehland D (2012) J Appl Phys 111:10350310.1063/1.4716027 ↗
21. Wu L, Zhang JL, Wang CL, Li JC (2008) J Appl Phys 103:08411610.1063/1.2907866 ↗
22. Wang K, Li JF (2007) Appl Phys Lett 91:26290210.1063/1.2825280 ↗
23. Pramanick A, Damjanovic D, Daniels JE, Nino JC, Jones JL (2011) J Am Ceram Soc 94:29310.1111/j.1551-2916.2010.04240.x ↗
24. Jones JL, Slamovich EB, Bowman KJ, Lupascu DC (2005) J Appl Phys 98:10410210.1063/1.2128475 ↗