journal article·2025-10-14Open access

Lanthanide-Mediated Spectral Conversion and Electrochemical Charge Dynamics in Gadolinium Oxyselenide for High-Performance Solar Cells

Kelechi Chiemezie Nwambaekwe, Ziyanda Zamaswazi Tshobeni, Meleskow Cox, Ruidong Xia, Shimelis Admassie, Linxin Zhong, Xinwen Peng, Emmanuel Iheanyichukwu Iwuoha

ACS Applied Electronic Materials· Volume 7· Issue 19

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide To improve visible-light absorption and charge transport in wide-band-gap oxide-based solar absorbers, photovoltaic (PV) devices were developed using terbium (Tb)- and europium (Eu)-doped gadolinium oxyselenide (GOSe) as the photoactive material. GOSe was selected for its thermal stability, optoelectronic tunability, and capacity to accommodate lanthanide dopants that introduce energy levels favorable for photon conversion and defect passivation. The nanophosphors were synthesized using a microwave-assisted solvothermal method to ensure controlled morphology and crystallinity. Structural analysis confirmed hexagonal Gd 2 O 2 Se phase formation, with dopant-induced modifications in unit cell parameters and bond lengths. Eu doping resulted in denser atomic packing and shorter bond lengths, while Tb doping introduced lattice strain, both influencing optical and charge-transport behavior. Optical characterization showed significant band-gap reduction from 3.8 eV in GOSe to 3.1 eV (GOSeT) and 2.8 eV (GOSeE), expanding absorption into the visible region. Photoluminescence confirmed characteristic 4f emissions at 543 nm (Tb) and 615 nm (Eu), indicating successful energy transfer and validating activation of Tb 3+ and Eu 3+ transitions. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and voltammetry analyses revealed improved electron mobility, reduced charge-transfer resistance (GOSeE: 0.60 kΩ), and enhanced surface kinetics. The doped nanophosphors were incorporated into thin-film solar cells with the architecture Ag/GOSe:Ln/CdS/ZnO/Al:ZnO/ITO. GOSeE-based devices achieved a power conversion efficiency of 3.22%, with a short-circuit current of 8.20 mA cm –2 and an open-circuit voltage of 1.20 V, outperforming both GOSeT (1.40%) and undoped GOSe (0.12%). Energy-band analyses of the device layers showed favorable band alignment in doped samples, supporting efficient charge separation. 24-h stability tests under AM 1.5G conditions revealed that GOSeE had better device performance retention, indicating reduced recombination and better structural stability. This study confirm that RE-metal doping is an effective strategy to tune optical and electronic properties of GOSe for use in high-efficiency thin-film PV devices.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Semiconductor materials and interfaces

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

SensorLab (University of the Western Cape Sensor Laboratories), Fourth Floor of the Chemical Sciences Building, University of the Western Cape, Robert Sobukwe Road, Bellville, Cape Town 7535, South Africa

State Key Laboratory for Organic Electronics and Information Displays and Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Biosensors, Institute of Advanced Materials, Jiangsu National Synergetic Innovation Center for Advanced Materials, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, 9 Wenyuan Road, Nanjing 210023, P. R. China

Department of Chemistry

Addis Ababa University

School of Light Industry and Engineering

South China University of Technology

Funding

Department of Science and Innovation, South Africa

References (65)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.oceram.2023.10036210.1016/j.oceram.2023.100362 ↗
2. 10.1021/acsnano.4c1069710.1021/acsnano.4c10697 ↗
3. 10.1021/acsomega.2c0018610.1021/acsomega.2c00186 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ssc.2024.11572510.1016/j.ssc.2024.115725 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2024.13124010.1016/j.surfcoat.2024.131240 ↗
6. 10.3390/cryst1109109410.3390/cryst11091094 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.mineng.2024.10862010.1016/j.mineng.2024.108620 ↗
8. 10.1007/s10895-022-02920-710.1007/s10895-022-02920-7 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.cplett.2022.13949510.1016/j.cplett.2022.139495 ↗
10. 10.1016/S0022-2313(99)00499-810.1016/S0022-2313(99)00499-8 ↗
11. 10.1039/c2dt31610b10.1039/c2dt31610b ↗
12. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.14743410.1016/j.apsusc.2020.147434 ↗
13. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.807.110.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.807.1 ↗
14. Xu G. · Optoelectron. Adv. Mater. Rapid Commun. · 2017 · 11 · 703
15. 10.1107/S056773947600155110.1107/S0567739476001551 ↗
16. 10.3390/nano1108214310.3390/nano11082143 ↗
17. 10.1002/adma.20230485510.1002/adma.202304855 ↗
18. 10.1038/s41598-019-49904-510.1038/s41598-019-49904-5 ↗
19. 10.1111/jace.1957710.1111/jace.19577 ↗
20. 10.1107/S056773947600155110.1107/S0567739476001551 ↗
21. 10.1088/2053-1591/ab903910.1088/2053-1591/ab9039 ↗
22. 10.1038/s41598-020-67589-z10.1038/s41598-020-67589-z ↗
23. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.0c0083410.1021/acs.inorgchem.0c00834 ↗
24. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c0070810.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c00708 ↗
25. Yalamanchili, S.; Lewis, N. S.; Atwater, H. A. Role of Doping Dependent Radiative and Non-Radiative Recombination in Determining the Limiting Efficiencies of Silicon Solar Cells. 2018 IEEE 7th World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion (WCPEC) (A Joint Conference of 45th IEEE PVSC, 28th PVSEC & 34th EU PVSEC); IEEE, 2018; pp 3223–3226. 10.1109/PVSC.2018.8547758.10.1109/PVSC.2018.8547758 ↗
26. 10.1002/aenm.20170088610.1002/aenm.201700886 ↗
27. 10.3389/fchem.2020.0081310.3389/fchem.2020.00813 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.infrared.2006.04.00110.1016/j.infrared.2006.04.001 ↗
29. 10.1038/s41560-018-0206-010.1038/s41560-018-0206-0 ↗
30. 10.1039/C7TA06808E10.1039/C7TA06808E ↗
31. 10.1088/1742-6596/1052/1/01206810.1088/1742-6596/1052/1/012068 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jre.2020.09.02110.1016/j.jre.2020.09.021 ↗
33. 10.1166/mex.2021.190110.1166/mex.2021.1901 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.optmat.2020.10969210.1016/j.optmat.2020.109692 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.02.05610.1016/j.jallcom.2017.02.056 ↗
36. 10.1177/1477153521103433010.1177/14771535211034330 ↗
37. 10.1149/07711.1015ecst10.1149/07711.1015ecst ↗
38. 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.07.12910.1016/j.electacta.2015.07.129 ↗
39. 10.1016/B978-0-12-813840-3.00001-610.1016/B978-0-12-813840-3.00001-6 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.02.27710.1016/j.apsusc.2018.02.277 ↗
41. 10.3390/nano1103079410.3390/nano11030794 ↗
42. 10.5772/intechopen.9447010.5772/intechopen.94470 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.jcis.2005.08.05110.1016/j.jcis.2005.08.051 ↗
44. 10.1016/B978-0-12-813840-3.00002-810.1016/B978-0-12-813840-3.00002-8 ↗
45. 10.1021/acsmaterialsau.4c0012910.1021/acsmaterialsau.4c00129 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.03.04710.1016/j.jmrt.2021.03.047 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.solener.2019.04.07210.1016/j.solener.2019.04.072 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.solmat.2010.11.00610.1016/j.solmat.2010.11.006 ↗
49. 10.1063/1.487487810.1063/1.4874878 ↗
50. 10.1021/nl904057p10.1021/nl904057p ↗
51. 10.1002/solr.20240079810.1002/solr.202400798 ↗
52. 10.1002/9781118845721.ch910.1002/9781118845721.ch9 ↗
53. 10.1002/tcr.20190000810.1002/tcr.201900008 ↗
54. 10.1021/acsomega.3c0003910.1021/acsomega.3c00039 ↗
55. 10.3390/photonics1205045410.3390/photonics12050454 ↗
56. 10.1038/am.2016.8910.1038/am.2016.89 ↗
57. 10.1038/srep1387610.1038/srep13876 ↗
58. 10.1186/s11671-015-1034-910.1186/s11671-015-1034-9 ↗
59. 10.1002/masy.20210044110.1002/masy.202100441 ↗
60. 10.1039/D2CP00702A10.1039/D2CP00702A ↗
61. 10.1038/s43246-022-00281-z10.1038/s43246-022-00281-z ↗
62. 10.1002/pip.351710.1002/pip.3517 ↗
63. 10.1021/acsmaterialsau.1c0004510.1021/acsmaterialsau.1c00045 ↗
64. 10.3390/en1414427810.3390/en14144278 ↗
65. 10.1039/D3NR01162C10.1039/D3NR01162C ↗