journal article·2001-03

Oxide ion conductivity in La0.8Sr0.2Ga0.8Mg0.2−XNiXO3 perovskite oxide and application for the electrolyte of solid oxide fuel cells

T. Ishihara, T. Shibayama, H. Nishiguchi, Y. Takita

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 36· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

Although hole conduction was present, it was found that doping with Ni was effective in improving the oxide ion conductivity in La0.8Sr0.2Ga0.8Mg0.2O3 based perovskite oxides. Considering the ionic transport number and the electrical conductivity, the optimized composition for Ni doped samples was La0.8Sr0.2Ga0.8Mg0.13Ni0.07O3 (LSGMN). In this composition, electrical conductivity was found to be virtually independent of the oxygen partial pressure from 1 to 10−21 atm. Consequently, the oxide ion conductivity was still dominant in this optimized composition. In agreement with the improved oxide ionic conductivity, the power density of the solid oxide fuel cell using LaGaO3 as an electrolyte increased by doping with a small amount of Ni on the Ga site. In particular, the power density of 224 mW/cm2 at 873 K, which is the maximum power density in the cells using LaGaO3 based oxide as the electrolyte, was attained using LSGMN in spite of the use of electrolyte plates with a thickness of 0.5 mm. Therefore, LSGMN is highly attractive for the electrolyte material of low temperature operating SOFCs.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells · Chemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes · Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (16)

Show source-provided references
1. B. C. H. Steele, J. Power Source 49 (1994) 1.10.1016/0378-7753(93)01789-K ↗
2. N. Q. Minh and T. Takahashi, “Science and Technology of Ceramic Fuel Cells” (Elsevier, 1995).
3. T. Ishihara, H. Matsuda and Y. Takita, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 116 (1994) 3801.10.1021/ja00088a016 ↗
4. Idem., Solid State Ionics 79 (1995) 147.10.1016/0167-2738(95)00054-A ↗
5. M. Feng and J. B. Goodenough, Eur. J. Solid State Inorg. Chem. 31 (1994) 663.
6. P. N. Huang and A. Petric, J. Electrochem. Soc. 143(1996) 1644.10.1149/1.1836692 ↗
7. J. W. Stevenson, T. R. Armstrong, D. E. Mccready, L. R. Pederson and W. J. Weber, ibid. 144 (1997) 3613.10.1149/1.1838057 ↗
8. R. T. Baker, B. Gharbage and F. M. B. Marques, ibid. 144 (1997) 3130.10.1149/1.1837970 ↗
9. T. Ishihara, H. Minami, H. Matsuda, H. Nishiguchi and Y. Takita, Chemical Communications (1996) 929.10.1039/cc9960000929 ↗
10. T. Ishihara, M. Honda, T. Shibayama, H. Nishiguchi and Y. Takita, J. Electrochem. Soc. 145 (1998) 3177.10.1149/1.1838783 ↗
11. R. Maric, S. Ohara, T. Fukui, H. Yoshida, M. Nishimura, T. Inagaki and K. Miura, ibid. 146 (1999) 2006.10.1149/1.1391882 ↗
12. M. Feng, J. B. Goodenough, K. Huang and C. Miliken, J. Power Sources 63 (1996) 47.10.1016/S0378-7753(96)02441-X ↗
13. A. Khandkar, S. Elangovan, A. Hartvigsen, D. Rowley, R. Privette and M. Tharp, in Proc. of SOFCVI, edited by S. Signhal, M. Dokiya, and O. Yamamoto (1999) Vol. 99, 19, p. 88.
14. J. P. P. Huijsmans, F. P. F. Van berkel and G. M. Christie, J. Power Sorces 71 (1998) 107.10.1016/S0378-7753(97)02789-4 ↗
15. T. Ishihara, T. Akbay, H. Furutani, H. Nishiguchi and Y. Takita, Solid State Ionics 113-115 (1998) 583.
16. T. Ishihara, T. Shibayama, M. Honda, H. Nishiguchi and Y. Takita, Solid State Ionic Device, Electrochem. Soc. Proceeding Volume, in press.