Reinforcement Learning-Assisted Ferroelectric Domain Wall Design Using a Machine Learning Phase-Field Surrogate
Source abstract
Abstract
Precise manipulation of ferroelectric domain walls (DWs) has garnered increasing interest for applications in DW memory devices. Although recent advancements in scanning probe microscopy-based automated experiments have improved tip control efficiency, achieving real-time optimization of the tip trajectory to configure arbitrary domain structures remains challenging. In this study, we introduce a reinforcement learning (RL) framework for autonomous DW manipulation, leveraging a 3-D machine learning phase-field surrogate model to accelerate environment dynamics. The RL agent is trained to optimize the tip trajectory, enabling it to achieve target DW configurations within both single-goal and goal-augmented RL frameworks while effectively generalizing across a range of target structures. This framework offers a promising approach for facilitating the real-time design of 2-D ferroelectric DWs.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials · Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices · Piezoelectric Actuators and Control
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
INSA Lyon, CNRS, Ecole Centrale de Lyon
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CPE Lyon, INL, UMR5270
Funding
Agence Nationale de la Recherche · European Commission
References (62)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.20517/microstructures.2023.5210.20517/microstructures.2023.52 ↗
2. 10.1126/sciadv.170051210.1126/sciadv.1700512 ↗
3. 10.1038/nnano.2014.32010.1038/nnano.2014.320 ↗
4. 10.1002/adfm.20211026310.1002/adfm.202110263 ↗
5. 10.1038/s41467-022-30983-410.1038/s41467-022-30983-4 ↗
6. 10.1002/adfm.20130008510.1002/adfm.201300085 ↗
7. 10.1038/nmat237310.1038/nmat2373 ↗
8. 10.1038/ncomms412010.1038/ncomms4120 ↗
9. 10.1038/ncomms175110.1038/ncomms1751 ↗
10. 10.1146/annurev.matsci.28.1.10110.1146/annurev.matsci.28.1.101 ↗
11. 10.1557/mrs2009.17610.1557/mrs2009.176 ↗
12. 10.1126/science.121869310.1126/science.1218693 ↗
13. 10.1002/aelm.20220007710.1002/aelm.202200077 ↗
14. 10.1146/annurev-matsci-070218-12184310.1146/annurev-matsci-070218-121843 ↗
15. 10.1002/aelm.20200030010.1002/aelm.202000300 ↗
16. 10.1002/aelm.20230074410.1002/aelm.202300744 ↗
17. 10.1088/0957-4484/20/25/25570110.1088/0957-4484/20/25/255701 ↗
18. 10.1088/2632-2153/ad52e910.1088/2632-2153/ad52e9 ↗
19. 10.1002/smtd.20230174010.1002/smtd.202301740 ↗
20. 10.1021/nn102099z10.1021/nn102099z ↗
21. 10.1038/nnano.2009.29310.1038/nnano.2009.293 ↗
22. 10.1038/s41565-024-01792-110.1038/s41565-024-01792-1 ↗
23. 10.1021/acsnano.1c0210410.1021/acsnano.1c02104 ↗
24. 10.1021/acsnano.0c1023910.1021/acsnano.0c10239 ↗
25. 10.1088/2632-2153/acccd510.1088/2632-2153/acccd5 ↗
26. 10.1088/1361-6528/ac394a10.1088/1361-6528/ac394a ↗
27. 10.1038/s41524-023-01142-010.1038/s41524-023-01142-0 ↗
28. 10.1038/s41524-023-00985-x10.1038/s41524-023-00985-x ↗
29. 10.1063/5.007921710.1063/5.0079217 ↗
30. 10.1021/acsnano.4c0638010.1021/acsnano.4c06380 ↗
31. 10.1002/adma.20220134510.1002/adma.202201345 ↗
32. 10.1021/acsnano.2c0530310.1021/acsnano.2c05303 ↗
33. 10.1038/s42256-022-00460-010.1038/s42256-022-00460-0 ↗
34. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.3c0022310.1021/acs.jpclett.3c00223 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.patter.2023.10070410.1016/j.patter.2023.100704 ↗
36. 10.1038/s41524-023-01191-510.1038/s41524-023-01191-5 ↗
37. 10.1063/5.019831610.1063/5.0198316 ↗
38. 10.1039/D3DD00126A10.1039/D3DD00126A ↗
39. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2023.11257710.1016/j.commatsci.2023.112577 ↗
40. Mianroodi, J. R.; Siboni, N. H.; Raabe, D. Computational Discovery of Energy-Efficient Heat Treatment for Microstructure Design using Deep Reinforcement Learning. 2022, arXiv:2209.11259. arXiv.org e-Printarchive. https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.11259.
41. 10.1088/2632-2153/aca00410.1088/2632-2153/aca004 ↗
42. 10.1021/acsaelm.3c0060110.1021/acsaelm.3c00601 ↗
43. 10.1038/s41524-020-00471-810.1038/s41524-020-00471-8 ↗
44. 10.1039/D3NA01115A10.1039/D3NA01115A ↗
45. 10.1038/s42256-021-00302-510.1038/s42256-021-00302-5 ↗
46. 10.1038/s41524-024-01319-110.1038/s41524-024-01319-1 ↗
47. 10.1038/s41524-024-01375-710.1038/s41524-024-01375-7 ↗
48. 10.1038/ncomms1163010.1038/ncomms11630 ↗
49. 10.1038/s41467-022-34777-610.1038/s41467-022-34777-6 ↗
50. Ng, A. Y.; Harada, D.; Russell, S. Policy Invariance under Reward Transformations: Theory and Application to Reward Shaping, In Sixteenth International Conference on Machine Learning, 1999; pp 278–287.
51. 10.1007/s10845-021-01805-z10.1007/s10845-021-01805-z ↗
52. Braylan, A.; Hollenbeck, M.; Meyerson, E.; Miikkulainen, R. Frame Skip Is a Powerful Parameter for Learning to Play Atari Space 2000; Vol. 1600, p 1800.
53. Schulman, J.; Wolski, F.; Dhariwal, P.; Radford, A.; Klimov, O.Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms. 2017, pp 1–12.
54. Konda, V. R.; Tsitsiklis, J. N.Actor-critic algorithms Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 2000, pp 1008–1014.
55. 10.1146/annurev.matsci.32.112001.13204110.1146/annurev.matsci.32.112001.132041 ↗
56. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1998.tb02367.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1998.tb02367.x ↗
57. Liu M. · IJCAI Int. Jt. Conf. Artif. Intell. · 2022 · 5502
58. Chane-Sane, E.; Schmid, C.; Laptev, I. Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learning with Imagined Subgoals, In Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, PMLR 139, 2021; pp 1430–1440.
59. 10.1126/sciadv.abj803010.1126/sciadv.abj8030 ↗
60. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.12680510.1103/PhysRevLett.107.126805 ↗
61. 10.1561/220000008610.1561/2200000086 ↗
62. Huang, Z.; Heng, W.; Zhou, S. Learning to Paint with Model-Based Deep Reinforcement Learning, In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, 2019; pp 8709–8718.10.1109/ICCV.2019.00880 ↗