Tuning polythiophene/titanium dioxide (PTh/TiO2) hybrid nanocomposite photoanodes for DSSCs: linking composition, morphology, and enhanced efficiency
Source abstract
Abstract
Dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) have gained significant attention as a promising class of third-generation photovoltaic devices owing to their low cost, ease of fabrication, and tunable optical properties. However, their practical use is still limited by poor electron transport, charge recombination, and low power conversion efficiency. This study tackles the persistent challenge of low efficiency in dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) by introducing a novel polythiophene/titanium dioxide (PTh/TiO2) hybrid nanocomposite photoanode. The photoanode was fabricated using the tape-casting technique, which enabled the deposition of a uniform TiO2 film. This TiO2 photoanode was later sensitized with cis-Bis(isothiocyanato)bis(2,2′-bipyridyl-4,4′-dicarboxylato)ruthenium(II) (N3dye), allowing efficient light absorption and electron transportation. The device performance was further improved by employing a graphene-based counter electrode. The fabricated photoanodes were systematically characterized using SEM, ellipsometry, UV–Vis spectroscopy, and Hall measurements to investigate the link between material properties and photovoltaic performance. By integrating conductive polymer networks with TiO2 nanoparticles, the hybrid photoanode was developed to boost electron transport and light harvesting. The systematic investigation of PTh/TiO2 loadings revealed that the photoanode containing 9 wt% PTh/TiO₂ achieved the highest DSSC efficiency of 0.86%, with an open-circuit voltage (Voc) of 0.56 V, short-circuit current density (Jsc) of 2.53 mA/cm2, and a fill factor of 58.96%. This composition significantly outperformed devices with lower (5%, 7%) and higher (11%) PTh contents, underscoring the pivotal role of optimized nanocomposite architecture in enhancing charge transport and light harvesting. Furthermore, the results highlighted that increasing nanocomposite concentration directly influenced morphology, film thickness, light absorption capacity, and carrier mobility, ultimately shaping device performance.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells · Conducting polymers and applications · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. Mahmoud MS, Akhtar MS, Mohamed IMA, Hamdan R, Dakka YA, Barakat NAM (2018) Demonstrated photons to electron activity of S-doped TiO2 nanofibers as photoanode in the DSSC. Mater Lett 225:77–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATLET.2018.04.10810.1016/J.MATLET.2018.04.108 ↗
2. Sasikumar R, Thirumalaisamy S, Kim B, Hwang B (2024) Dye-sensitized solar cells: insights and research divergence towards alternatives. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 199:114549. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2024.11454910.1016/J.RSER.2024.114549 ↗
3. Kaur M et al (2023) Molecular-engineering of Tb2O3@TiO2 complexes sensitized with N719 dye photoanodes and evaluation of their realistic efficiencies in DSSC systems. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 34(1):55. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10854-022-09472-310.1007/S10854-022-09472-3 ↗
4. Singh P, Sachdeva A (2024) DSSC Fundamentals and Optimization Materials : A Review. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 1285(1):012003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1285/1/01200310.1088/1755-1315/1285/1/012003 ↗
5. Das TK, Ilaiyaraja P, Sudakar C (2018) Template assisted nanoporous TiO2 nanoparticles: the effect of oxygen vacancy defects on photovoltaic performance of DSSC and QDSSC. Sol Energy 159:920–929. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOLENER.2017.11.06110.1016/J.SOLENER.2017.11.061 ↗
6. Korir BK, Kibet JK, Ngari SM (2024) A review on the current status of dye-sensitized solar cells: toward sustainable energy. Energy Sci Eng 12(8):3188–3226. https://doi.org/10.1002/ESE3.181510.1002/ESE3.1815 ↗
7. Drakopoulou N, Giannakopoulou T, Trapalis C, Tarantili PA (2025) Solution mixing synthesis of epoxy nanocomposites reinforced with MWCNTs and graphene: thermal stability and EMI shielding effectiveness study. J Compos Sci 9(7):326. https://doi.org/10.3390/JCS907032610.3390/JCS9070326 ↗
8. Vesco S, Salvi D, Almonti D (2024) High performance particle-reinforced epoxy composites with industrial grade graphite, GNPs and hBN: a comparative study. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 136(3):1379–1391. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00170-024-14941-610.1007/S00170-024-14941-6 ↗
9. Mehmood U, Rahman SU, Harrabi K, Hussein IA, Reddy BVS (2014) Recent advances in dye sensitized solar cells. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2014(1):974782. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/97478210.1155/2014/974782 ↗
10. Kokkonen M et al (2021) Advanced research trends in dye-sensitized solar cells. J Mater Chem A 9(17):10527–10545. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1TA00690H10.1039/D1TA00690H ↗
11. Ye M et al (2015) Recent advances in dye-sensitized solar cells: From photoanodes, sensitizers and electrolytes to counter electrodes. Mater Today 18(3):155–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2014.09.00110.1016/j.mattod.2014.09.001 ↗
12. Kou Y, Oya T (2023) Unique dye-sensitized solar cell using carbon nanotube composite papers with gel electrolyte. J Compos Sci 7(6):232. https://doi.org/10.3390/JCS706023210.3390/JCS7060232 ↗
13. MaçAira J, Andrade L, Mendes A (2013) Modeling, simulation and design of dye sensitized solar cells. RSC Adv 4(6):2830–2844. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3RA46295A10.1039/C3RA46295A ↗
14. Mahmoud ZH, AL-Bayati RA, Khadom AA (2022) Electron transport in dye-sanitized solar cell with tin-doped titanium dioxide as photoanode materials. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 33(8):5009–5023. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10854-021-07690-910.1007/S10854-021-07690-9 ↗
15. Ting C-C, Chao W-S (2010) Efficiency improvement of the DSSCs by building the carbon black as bridge in photoelectrode. Appl Energy 87(8):2500–2505. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APENERGY.2010.02.02410.1016/J.APENERGY.2010.02.024 ↗
16. Asghar H, Riaz T, Mannan HA, Khan SM, Butt OM (2024) Rheology and modeling insights into dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) material: bridging the gap to solar energy advancements. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 193:114298. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2024.11429810.1016/J.RSER.2024.114298 ↗
17. M. Zahoor, S. Khan, M. Ikram, S. Ali, and G. Yasin (2024) “Coordination Nanomaterial-Based Nanohybrids for Solar Cells,” Multifunctional Coordination Materials for Green Energy Technologies, pp. 218–241 https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003345886-1510.1201/9781003345886-15 ↗
18. Yang XY, Chen LH, Li Y, Rooke JC, Sanchez C, Su BL (2017) Hierarchically porous materials: synthesis strategies and structure design. Chem Soc Rev 46(2):481–558. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6CS00829A10.1039/C6CS00829A ↗
19. Cai J et al (2015) Enhanced conversion efficiency of dye-sensitized solar cells using a CNT-incorporated TiO2 slurry-based photoanode. AIP Adv 5(2):027118. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.490817910.1063/1.4908179 ↗
20. Kim DY, Kim J, Kim J, Kim A-Y, Lee G, Kang M (2012) The photovoltaic efficiencies on dye sensitized solar cells assembled with nanoporous carbon/TiO2 composites. J Ind Eng Chem 18(1):1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JIEC.2011.11.09010.1016/J.JIEC.2011.11.090 ↗
21. Kang SH, Kim JY, Kim YK, Sung YE (2007) Effects of the incorporation of carbon powder into nanostructured TiO2 film for dye-sensitized solar cell. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem 186(2–3):234–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JPHOTOCHEM.2006.08.01210.1016/J.JPHOTOCHEM.2006.08.012 ↗
22. Ramar A, Chen TW, Chen SM, Mutharasu D, Rwei SP (2018) Photoelectrochemical effect of poly(N-vinylcarbazole) as electrolyte additive in a N719 dye sensitized TiO2 solar cell. Int J Electrochem Sci 13(10):9721–9730. https://doi.org/10.20964/2018.10.4810.20964/2018.10.48 ↗
23. M. C. Tolu, B. B. Carbas, and S. Sonmezoglu (2016) “Cost–effective polythiophene counter electrodes for dye sensitized solar cells,” E3S Web of Conferences, vol 10, p 00006 https://doi.org/10.1051/E3SCONF/20161000006.10.1051/E3SCONF/20161000006 ↗
24. Chakraborty M, Kadir ES, Gayen RN (2023) Fabrication of transparent TiO2-GO nanocomposites deposited on vertically aligned ZnO nanowire arrays as hybrid nanostructured photo-anode for dye-sensitized solar cells. Opt Mater 142:114116. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.OPTMAT.2023.11411610.1016/J.OPTMAT.2023.114116 ↗
25. Ahmadi S et al (2014) The role of physical techniques on the preparation of photoanodes for dye sensitized solar cells. Int J Photoenergy 2014(1):198734. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/19873410.1155/2014/198734 ↗
26. Hara K, Horiguchi T, Kinoshita T, Sayama K, Sugihara H, Arakawa H (2000) Highly efficient photon-to-electron conversion with mercurochrome-sensitized nanoporous oxide semiconductor solar cells. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 64(2):115–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-0248(00)00065-910.1016/S0927-0248(00)00065-9 ↗
27. Gracia F, Holgado JP, González-Elipe AR (2004) Photoefficiency and optical, microstructural, and structural properties of TiO2 thin films used as photoanodes. Langmuir 20(5):1688–1697. https://doi.org/10.1021/LA034998Y10.1021/LA034998Y ↗
28. Bonaccorso F, Sun Z, Hasan T, Ferrari AC (2010) Graphene photonics and optoelectronics. Nat Photon 4(9):611–622. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2010.18610.1038/nphoton.2010.186 ↗
29. Dutta A et al (2024) Precipitation-assisted, low-temperature-annealed TiO2 and its nanocomposites-based photoanode for DSSCs. J Mater Sci: Mater Electron 35(4):1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10854-024-12055-Z/FIGURES/1310.1007/S10854-024-12055-Z/FIGURES/13 ↗
30. Amini S, Mohammadi MR, Li Y (2025) Enhancing photovoltaic performance of dye-sensitized solar cells through TiO2/g-C3N4 nanocomposite photoanodes for improved charge carrier management. Electrochim Acta 509:145331. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ELECTACTA.2024.14533110.1016/J.ELECTACTA.2024.145331 ↗
31. Kandasamy M et al (2024) Fabrication of ternary zinc-nickel-copper oxide microsphere nanocomposite photoanode material for boosting dye-sensitized solar cell efficiency. J Alloys Compd 1000:175039. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JALLCOM.2024.17503910.1016/J.JALLCOM.2024.175039 ↗
32. Rangel D, Gallegos JC, Vargas S, García F, Rodríguez R (2019) Optimized dye-sensitized solar cells: a comparative study with different dyes, mordants and construction parameters. Results Phys 12:2026–2037. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RINP.2019.01.09610.1016/J.RINP.2019.01.096 ↗
33. C. O. Sreekala, R. Pragash, K. S. Sreelatha, and I. Jinchu (2018) “Influence of film thickness of photoanode on dye sensitized solar cell performance,” Proceedings of 2017 IEEE international conference on technological advancements in power and energy: Exploring energy solutions for an intelligent power grid, TAP energy 2017, pp. 1–4 https://doi.org/10.1109/TAPENERGY.2017.8397335.10.1109/TAPENERGY.2017.8397335 ↗
34. Kumar Y, Chhalodia T, Bedi PKG, Meena PL (2022) Photoanode modified with nanostructures for efficiency enhancement in DSSC: a review. Carbon Lett 33(1):35–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/S42823-022-00422-X10.1007/S42823-022-00422-X ↗
35. Aljabri MD et al (2025) Electrochemical detection of salicylic acid in fruit products with ternary ZnO/CuO/Y2O3 nanocomposites embedded PEDOT:PSS by differential pulse voltammetry. Meas 240:115583. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MEASUREMENT.2024.11558310.1016/J.MEASUREMENT.2024.115583 ↗
36. Shinde DV et al (2015) Revisiting metal sulfide semiconductors: a solution-based general protocol for thin film formation, Hall effect measurement, and application prospects. Adv Funct Mater 25(36):5739–5747. https://doi.org/10.1002/ADFM.20150096410.1002/ADFM.201500964 ↗
37. Johnson J, Jiao L (Heidi) (2014) Inkjet printing of titanium dioxide photoanodes for dye sensitized solar cells. MRS Proc 1667:mrss14-1667-b12-03. https://doi.org/10.1557/opl.2014.90110.1557/opl.2014.901 ↗
38. Raman APS et al (2024) Composite Nanoarchitectonics based on Graphene Oxide in Energy Storage and Conversion: Status, Challenges & Opportunities. J Inorg Organomet Polym Mater 34(11):5035–5065. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10904-024-03154-910.1007/S10904-024-03154-9 ↗
39. Shahroosvand H, Najafi L, Khanmirzaei L, Tarighi S (2015) Artificial photosynthesis based on ruthenium(II) tetrazole-dye-sensitized nanocrystalline TiO2 solar cells. J Photochem Photobiol B 152:4–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JPHOTOBIOL.2015.03.02010.1016/J.JPHOTOBIOL.2015.03.020 ↗
40. Sunarya RR, Hidayat R, Radiman CL, Suendo V (2020) Electrocatalytic activation of a DSSC graphite composite counter electrode using in situ polymerization of aniline in a water/ethanol dispersion of reduced graphene oxide. J Electron Mater 49(5):3182–3190. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11664-020-07977-310.1007/S11664-020-07977-3 ↗
41. Deogratias G, Al-Qurashi OS, Wazzan N, Seriani N, Pogrebnaya T, Pogrebnoi A (2020) Investigation of optoelectronic properties of triphenylamine-based dyes featuring heterocyclic anchoring groups for DSSCs’ applications: a theoretical study. Struct Chem 31(6):2451–2461. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11224-020-01596-810.1007/S11224-020-01596-8 ↗
42. Atia DM, Ahmed NM (2023) Mathematical modeling, parameter identification, and electrical performance of a DSSC based on nature-inspired optimization techniques. J Comput Electron 22(2):723–741. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10825-023-02018-8/FIGURES/2610.1007/S10825-023-02018-8/FIGURES/26 ↗
43. S. Afnan and R. Gayathri (2024) “Research tendency route to extremely efficient and stable dye-sensitised solar cell applications,” Introduction to Functional Nanomaterials, pp. 250–259 https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003495437-2510.1201/9781003495437-25 ↗
44. Yang N, Zhai J, Wang D, Chen Y, Jiang L (2010) Two-dimensional graphene bridges enhanced photoinduced charge transport in dye-sensitized solar cells. ACS Nano 4(2):887–894. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn901660v10.1021/nn901660v ↗