journal article·2023-06-27

Negative Capacitance and Intrinsic Ferroelectric Behavior in α-MoO3 Culminating as a Robust Piezoelectric Energy Harvester

Rahul Mitra, Unnikrishnan Manju

Publisher page

Abstract

Driven by the notion that the spectrum of ferroelectric applications can be widened and the current subset of materials could be replaced with earth-abundant, lead-free materials, single-phase α-MoO 3 (MO) with biaxial van der Waals gap was synthesized, revealing an orthorhombic Pmcn symmetry with a layered ABAB... sequence, with mirrored A and B layers. The force-driven dielectric constant of MO was found to be 12.5 at 0.5 N force level, which showed dielectric saturation behavior with increasing dynamic force. Ferroelectric studies revealed a maximum of 46% efficiency at 10 kV/cm external electric field, and piezoelectric modulus ( d 33 ) of 30 pC/N was obtained using the Berlincourt method. Negative capacitance (NC) effects were observed and attributed to the ferroelectric-induced emf and the inductive reactance, in accordance with Lenz’s law. Based on the confluence of the aforementioned features, a piezoelectric energy harvester (PEH) was fabricated, which reached a peak voltage of 4 V under repetitive finger tapping. The power density of the PEH under 100 MΩ resistive load was found to be 7.32 × 10 –1 μW/cm 2 . This enshrines MO as a promising piezoelectric candidate with exotic properties that can be tailored to have multifaceted applications in the realm of sensing and energy harvesting to drive Internet-of-Things and Industry 4.0.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials · Conducting polymers and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Materials Chemistry Department, CSIR─Institute of Minerals and Materials Technology, Bhubaneswar 751 013, India

Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad 201 002, India

Funding

Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India

References (67)

Show source-provided references
1. Uchino K. · 201810.1201/b15852 ↗
2. 10.1088/1468-6996/16/4/04600110.1088/1468-6996/16/4/046001 ↗
3. 10.1038/sdata.2015.5310.1038/sdata.2015.53 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2014.12.01310.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2014.12.013 ↗
5. 10.1038/s41597-020-0407-910.1038/s41597-020-0407-9 ↗
6. 10.1038/s41524-020-0337-210.1038/s41524-020-0337-2 ↗
7. 10.1039/d0nr06609e10.1039/d0nr06609e ↗
8. 10.1146/annurev.pc.40.100189.00145110.1146/annurev.pc.40.100189.001451 ↗
9. 10.1126/science.116829410.1126/science.1168294 ↗
10. 10.1117/12.58210510.1117/12.582105 ↗
11. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2011.04792.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2011.04792.x ↗
12. 10.1016/j.materresbull.2022.11203810.1016/j.materresbull.2022.112038 ↗
13. 10.1142/s2010135x1430002310.1142/s2010135x14300023 ↗
14. 10.12693/aphyspola.131.154010.12693/aphyspola.131.1540 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.240865010.1063/1.2408650 ↗
16. 10.1021/nl071804g10.1021/nl071804g ↗
17. 10.1038/nnano.2008.1810.1038/nnano.2008.18 ↗
18. 10.1007/s12633-022-01918-x10.1007/s12633-022-01918-x ↗
19. 10.1002/aenm.20200172610.1002/aenm.202001726 ↗
20. 10.1063/1.305604910.1063/1.3056049 ↗
21. 10.1063/1.166277010.1063/1.1662770 ↗
22. 10.1021/ja805224910.1021/ja8052249 ↗
23. 10.1038/s41578-022-00484-310.1038/s41578-022-00484-3 ↗
24. 10.1016/0167-2738(92)90403-c10.1016/0167-2738(92)90403-c ↗
25. 10.1021/cm020623710.1021/cm0206237 ↗
26. 10.1007/s00339-019-2779-210.1007/s00339-019-2779-2 ↗
27. 10.1002/pssa.221109021110.1002/pssa.2211090211 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.mssp.2019.10488010.1016/j.mssp.2019.104880 ↗
29. 10.1063/5.006071810.1063/5.0060718 ↗
30. 10.1063/5.001996610.1063/5.0019966 ↗
31. 10.1107/s205252061502480410.1107/s2052520615024804 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.ssc.2009.07.04310.1016/j.ssc.2009.07.043 ↗
33. Birkholz M. · 2006 · 1
34. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.07.32910.1016/j.jallcom.2016.07.329 ↗
35. 10.1063/1.481232310.1063/1.4812323 ↗
36. 10.1016/0584-8539(94)00247-910.1016/0584-8539(94)00247-9 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.jssc.2017.05.00610.1016/j.jssc.2017.05.006 ↗
38. 10.1016/0378-4363(81)90278-310.1016/0378-4363(81)90278-3 ↗
39. 10.1021/ja994376s10.1021/ja994376s ↗
40. 10.1007/bf0304728810.1007/bf03047288 ↗
41. 10.3390/s1811361410.3390/s18113614 ↗
42. 10.1088/1361-6528/ac6df510.1088/1361-6528/ac6df5 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2012.11.02710.1016/j.jallcom.2012.11.027 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2012.10.21810.1016/j.ceramint.2012.10.218 ↗
45. Fang D. · 201310.1515/9783110297997 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.matlet.2005.06.01610.1016/j.matlet.2005.06.016 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.sna.2018.05.04410.1016/j.sna.2018.05.044 ↗
48. 10.1063/1.496198810.1063/1.4961988 ↗
49. 10.1039/c8tc02560f10.1039/c8tc02560f ↗
50. Stewart, M.; Cain, M. G. Direct Piezoelectric Measurement: The Berlincourt Method; Springer, 2014; pp 37–64.10.1007/978-1-4020-9311-1_3 ↗
51. 10.1021/acsaelm.0c0111010.1021/acsaelm.0c01110 ↗
52. 10.1023/a:100996292594810.1023/a:1009962925948 ↗
53. 10.1039/c5dt00444f10.1039/c5dt00444f ↗
54. 10.3390/s2012354510.3390/s20123545 ↗
55. 10.1143/jjap.42.614310.1143/jjap.42.6143 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.11.36310.1016/j.jallcom.2017.11.363 ↗
57. 10.1039/c7tc05911f10.1039/c7tc05911f ↗
58. 10.1088/0256-307x/34/9/09770110.1088/0256-307x/34/9/097701 ↗
59. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c0354310.1021/acs.jpcc.2c03543 ↗
60. 10.1038/s42005-019-0120-110.1038/s42005-019-0120-1 ↗
61. 10.1109/16.72525410.1109/16.725254 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.mseb.2005.02.03910.1016/j.mseb.2005.02.039 ↗
63. 10.1038/s41578-019-0089-010.1038/s41578-019-0089-0 ↗
64. 10.1103/physrevb.98.02410710.1103/physrevb.98.024107 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.mseb.2022.11602910.1016/j.mseb.2022.116029 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.sna.2017.07.03610.1016/j.sna.2017.07.036 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.01.07210.1016/j.nanoen.2019.01.072 ↗