Efficiency Enhancement and Life Cycle Assessment of 2D/3D Mixed-Dimensional Tin Perovskite Plasmonic Solar Cells
Source abstract
Abstract
In this work, the impact of spherical silver nanoparticles (Ag NPs) on the performance of mixed-dimensional tin perovskite solar cells (Sn-PSCs) was explored using Silvaco 2D TCAD and Lumerical software. Embedding 10 nm spherical Ag NPs within the electron transport layer at the cathode interface led to an increase of 8.65% boost in photocurrent density ( J PH ) through a plasmonic effect, resulting in a maximum power conversion efficiency of 23.16%. However, the presence of metal NPs in the hole transport layer reduced the absorption efficiency of the active layer. Notably, our experiments revealed that the mixed-dimensional Sn PSCs (0.15 M phenylethylammonium iodide in precursor solution) displayed an average grain size of 257 nm, surpassing that of the 3D Sn PSCs by 48.55%. Additionally, XRD studies showed that these mixed-dimensional films exhibited a minimized full width at half-maximum value of 0.342° for the (100) perovskite plane, confirming superior crystallinity compared to other types of films. Furthermore, material and energy inventories have been developed for a tin perovskite solar module (Sn-PSM) embedded with Ag NPs, facilitating a comprehensive life cycle assessment. The total primary energy demand (TPED) for the development of Sn-PSM was estimated to be 643.98 MJ·m –2 . The production of ITO glass contributes to nearly 37.09% of the TPED and is the major bottleneck for reducing the energy consumption. The deposition of PEDOT/PSS and FASnI 3 (spin coating and annealing) accounted for 33.30 and 34.99% of the energy required, respectively, for module fabrication. The energy payback time has been predicted to be 0.53 years, which is lower by 34.57 and 75.90% compared to those of lead-based solar module (Pb-PSM) and c-Si solar modules, respectively. Furthermore, the greenhouse gas emission factor has been evaluated to be 0.07 kg-CO 2 ·kW h –1, indicating substantial reductions by 36.36 and 77.85% when compared to those of Pb-PSM and c-Si solar modules, respectively.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Perovskite Materials and Applications · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Conducting polymers and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Electronics and Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Assam 781039, India
Funding
Ministry of Electronics and Information technology · Science and Engineering Research Board · Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India · Ministry of Education, India
References (70)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.3390/su905078310.3390/su9050783 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.rser.2009.08.00310.1016/j.rser.2009.08.003 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.solmat.2021.11127710.1016/j.solmat.2021.111277 ↗
4. 10.1007/s43615-021-00101-510.1007/s43615-021-00101-5 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.renene.2020.09.05410.1016/j.renene.2020.09.054 ↗
6. 10.1002/pip.337110.1002/pip.3371 ↗
7. 10.1021/acsami.3c0951510.1021/acsami.3c09515 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.rser.2022.11214610.1016/j.rser.2022.112146 ↗
9. 10.1007/s00706-017-1933-910.1007/s00706-017-1933-9 ↗
10. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b0053910.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00539 ↗
11. 10.1002/adma.20210205510.1002/adma.202102055 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.solener.2021.01.05410.1016/j.solener.2021.01.054 ↗
13. 10.1021/acsaem.1c0041310.1021/acsaem.1c00413 ↗
14. 10.1002/adma.20180450610.1002/adma.201804506 ↗
15. Purkayastha, A.; Minz, M.; Sonkar, R. K.; Mallajosyula, A. T. Investigation of lead-free 2D/3D mixed-dimensional tin perovskite solar cell embedded with plasmonic metal nanoparticles. 2022 IEEE 49th Photovoltaics Specialists Conference (PVSC), 2022; pp 0504–0506.10.1109/PVSC48317.2022.9938955 ↗
16. 10.1038/s41467-020-15078-210.1038/s41467-020-15078-2 ↗
17. 10.1088/2516-1083/ab7e8410.1088/2516-1083/ab7e84 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.solmat.2021.11128810.1016/j.solmat.2021.111288 ↗
19. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c0502910.1021/acssuschemeng.1c05029 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.01.04510.1016/j.egyr.2022.01.045 ↗
21. 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c0102210.1021/acsenergylett.0c01022 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.optmat.2020.10973810.1016/j.optmat.2020.109738 ↗
23. Purkayastha, A.; Mallajosyula, A. T. Effect of active layer thickness and angle of incidence on the efficiency of planar heterojunction lead-free tin perovskite solar cell. 2021 IEEE 48th Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC), 2021; pp 1236–1239.10.1109/PVSC43889.2021.9518909 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.joule.2018.09.01210.1016/j.joule.2018.09.012 ↗
25. 10.1038/s41467-020-15078-210.1038/s41467-020-15078-2 ↗
26. 10.1021/jz502471h10.1021/jz502471h ↗
27. 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b0008910.1021/acsenergylett.8b00089 ↗
28. 10.1103/PhysRevB.34.701810.1103/PhysRevB.34.7018 ↗
29. 10.1002/eom2.1200410.1002/eom2.12004 ↗
30. 10.1002/aenm.20170201910.1002/aenm.201702019 ↗
31. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c0121610.1021/acssuschemeng.0c01216 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.cej.2022.14086210.1016/j.cej.2022.140862 ↗
33. 10.1021/acsami.3c0567110.1021/acsami.3c05671 ↗
34. 10.1039/D2CP01475K10.1039/D2CP01475K ↗
35. 10.1016/j.cej.2023.14626710.1016/j.cej.2023.146267 ↗
36. 10.1002/solr.20220008810.1002/solr.202200088 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.solener.2021.09.04610.1016/j.solener.2021.09.046 ↗
38. 10.1039/C8EE00956B10.1039/C8EE00956B ↗
39. 10.1109/TED.2021.307806310.1109/TED.2021.3078063 ↗
40. 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c0118610.1021/acsenergylett.1c01186 ↗
41. 10.1063/1.508564310.1063/1.5085643 ↗
42. 10.1021/acsenergylett.2c0077610.1021/acsenergylett.2c00776 ↗
43. 10.1039/C7RA00274B10.1039/C7RA00274B ↗
44. 10.1016/j.solmat.2015.04.02110.1016/j.solmat.2015.04.021 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.orgel.2017.11.01310.1016/j.orgel.2017.11.013 ↗
46. 10.1002/aenm.20150164010.1002/aenm.201501640 ↗
47. 10.1039/C5TA05286F10.1039/C5TA05286F ↗
48. 10.1016/j.solmat.2015.11.02610.1016/j.solmat.2015.11.026 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.16017710.1016/j.jallcom.2021.160177 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.17099410.1016/j.jallcom.2023.170994 ↗
51. 10.1021/jp309415u10.1021/jp309415u ↗
52. 10.1021/acsami.7b1108410.1021/acsami.7b11084 ↗
53. 10.1039/c1jm12820e10.1039/c1jm12820e ↗
54. 10.1039/C7CP04053A10.1039/C7CP04053A ↗
55. 10.1016/j.physe.2022.11553410.1016/j.physe.2022.115534 ↗
56. 10.1039/D3RA02589F10.1039/D3RA02589F ↗
57. 10.1038/s41598-020-67741-910.1038/s41598-020-67741-9 ↗
58. 10.1364/OE.27.03114410.1364/OE.27.031144 ↗
59. 10.1038/s41893-021-00737-z10.1038/s41893-021-00737-z ↗
60. 10.1109/TDMR.2021.310634010.1109/TDMR.2021.3106340 ↗
61. 10.1126/sciadv.abb005510.1126/sciadv.abb0055 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.solmat.2017.03.00810.1016/j.solmat.2017.03.008 ↗
63. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c0561910.1021/acssuschemeng.0c05619 ↗
64. 10.1002/pip.96710.1002/pip.967 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.solener.2016.08.02510.1016/j.solener.2016.08.025 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.10467610.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104676 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.solener.2021.10.07110.1016/j.solener.2021.10.071 ↗
68. 10.3389/fenrg.2021.73288610.3389/fenrg.2021.732886 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.joule.2022.05.00210.1016/j.joule.2022.05.002 ↗
70. 10.1002/cssc.20150084810.1002/cssc.201500848 ↗