journal article·2024-02-27

Efficiency Enhancement and Life Cycle Assessment of 2D/3D Mixed-Dimensional Tin Perovskite Plasmonic Solar Cells

Atanu Purkayastha, Manoranjan Minz, Ramesh Kumar Sonkar, Arun Tej Mallajosyula

Publisher page

Abstract

In this work, the impact of spherical silver nanoparticles (Ag NPs) on the performance of mixed-dimensional tin perovskite solar cells (Sn-PSCs) was explored using Silvaco 2D TCAD and Lumerical software. Embedding 10 nm spherical Ag NPs within the electron transport layer at the cathode interface led to an increase of 8.65% boost in photocurrent density ( J PH ) through a plasmonic effect, resulting in a maximum power conversion efficiency of 23.16%. However, the presence of metal NPs in the hole transport layer reduced the absorption efficiency of the active layer. Notably, our experiments revealed that the mixed-dimensional Sn PSCs (0.15 M phenylethylammonium iodide in precursor solution) displayed an average grain size of 257 nm, surpassing that of the 3D Sn PSCs by 48.55%. Additionally, XRD studies showed that these mixed-dimensional films exhibited a minimized full width at half-maximum value of 0.342° for the (100) perovskite plane, confirming superior crystallinity compared to other types of films. Furthermore, material and energy inventories have been developed for a tin perovskite solar module (Sn-PSM) embedded with Ag NPs, facilitating a comprehensive life cycle assessment. The total primary energy demand (TPED) for the development of Sn-PSM was estimated to be 643.98 MJ·m –2 . The production of ITO glass contributes to nearly 37.09% of the TPED and is the major bottleneck for reducing the energy consumption. The deposition of PEDOT/PSS and FASnI 3 (spin coating and annealing) accounted for 33.30 and 34.99% of the energy required, respectively, for module fabrication. The energy payback time has been predicted to be 0.53 years, which is lower by 34.57 and 75.90% compared to those of lead-based solar module (Pb-PSM) and c-Si solar modules, respectively. Furthermore, the greenhouse gas emission factor has been evaluated to be 0.07 kg-CO 2 ·kW h –1, indicating substantial reductions by 36.36 and 77.85% when compared to those of Pb-PSM and c-Si solar modules, respectively.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Perovskite Materials and Applications · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Conducting polymers and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Electronics and Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Assam 781039, India

Funding

Ministry of Electronics and Information technology · Science and Engineering Research Board · Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India · Ministry of Education, India

References (70)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.3390/su905078310.3390/su9050783 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.rser.2009.08.00310.1016/j.rser.2009.08.003 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.solmat.2021.11127710.1016/j.solmat.2021.111277 ↗
4. 10.1007/s43615-021-00101-510.1007/s43615-021-00101-5 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.renene.2020.09.05410.1016/j.renene.2020.09.054 ↗
6. 10.1002/pip.337110.1002/pip.3371 ↗
7. 10.1021/acsami.3c0951510.1021/acsami.3c09515 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.rser.2022.11214610.1016/j.rser.2022.112146 ↗
9. 10.1007/s00706-017-1933-910.1007/s00706-017-1933-9 ↗
10. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b0053910.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00539 ↗
11. 10.1002/adma.20210205510.1002/adma.202102055 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.solener.2021.01.05410.1016/j.solener.2021.01.054 ↗
13. 10.1021/acsaem.1c0041310.1021/acsaem.1c00413 ↗
14. 10.1002/adma.20180450610.1002/adma.201804506 ↗
15. Purkayastha, A.; Minz, M.; Sonkar, R. K.; Mallajosyula, A. T. Investigation of lead-free 2D/3D mixed-dimensional tin perovskite solar cell embedded with plasmonic metal nanoparticles. 2022 IEEE 49th Photovoltaics Specialists Conference (PVSC), 2022; pp 0504–0506.10.1109/PVSC48317.2022.9938955 ↗
16. 10.1038/s41467-020-15078-210.1038/s41467-020-15078-2 ↗
17. 10.1088/2516-1083/ab7e8410.1088/2516-1083/ab7e84 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.solmat.2021.11128810.1016/j.solmat.2021.111288 ↗
19. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c0502910.1021/acssuschemeng.1c05029 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.01.04510.1016/j.egyr.2022.01.045 ↗
21. 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c0102210.1021/acsenergylett.0c01022 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.optmat.2020.10973810.1016/j.optmat.2020.109738 ↗
23. Purkayastha, A.; Mallajosyula, A. T. Effect of active layer thickness and angle of incidence on the efficiency of planar heterojunction lead-free tin perovskite solar cell. 2021 IEEE 48th Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC), 2021; pp 1236–1239.10.1109/PVSC43889.2021.9518909 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.joule.2018.09.01210.1016/j.joule.2018.09.012 ↗
25. 10.1038/s41467-020-15078-210.1038/s41467-020-15078-2 ↗
26. 10.1021/jz502471h10.1021/jz502471h ↗
27. 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b0008910.1021/acsenergylett.8b00089 ↗
28. 10.1103/PhysRevB.34.701810.1103/PhysRevB.34.7018 ↗
29. 10.1002/eom2.1200410.1002/eom2.12004 ↗
30. 10.1002/aenm.20170201910.1002/aenm.201702019 ↗
31. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c0121610.1021/acssuschemeng.0c01216 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.cej.2022.14086210.1016/j.cej.2022.140862 ↗
33. 10.1021/acsami.3c0567110.1021/acsami.3c05671 ↗
34. 10.1039/D2CP01475K10.1039/D2CP01475K ↗
35. 10.1016/j.cej.2023.14626710.1016/j.cej.2023.146267 ↗
36. 10.1002/solr.20220008810.1002/solr.202200088 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.solener.2021.09.04610.1016/j.solener.2021.09.046 ↗
38. 10.1039/C8EE00956B10.1039/C8EE00956B ↗
39. 10.1109/TED.2021.307806310.1109/TED.2021.3078063 ↗
40. 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c0118610.1021/acsenergylett.1c01186 ↗
41. 10.1063/1.508564310.1063/1.5085643 ↗
42. 10.1021/acsenergylett.2c0077610.1021/acsenergylett.2c00776 ↗
43. 10.1039/C7RA00274B10.1039/C7RA00274B ↗
44. 10.1016/j.solmat.2015.04.02110.1016/j.solmat.2015.04.021 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.orgel.2017.11.01310.1016/j.orgel.2017.11.013 ↗
46. 10.1002/aenm.20150164010.1002/aenm.201501640 ↗
47. 10.1039/C5TA05286F10.1039/C5TA05286F ↗
48. 10.1016/j.solmat.2015.11.02610.1016/j.solmat.2015.11.026 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.16017710.1016/j.jallcom.2021.160177 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.17099410.1016/j.jallcom.2023.170994 ↗
51. 10.1021/jp309415u10.1021/jp309415u ↗
52. 10.1021/acsami.7b1108410.1021/acsami.7b11084 ↗
53. 10.1039/c1jm12820e10.1039/c1jm12820e ↗
54. 10.1039/C7CP04053A10.1039/C7CP04053A ↗
55. 10.1016/j.physe.2022.11553410.1016/j.physe.2022.115534 ↗
56. 10.1039/D3RA02589F10.1039/D3RA02589F ↗
57. 10.1038/s41598-020-67741-910.1038/s41598-020-67741-9 ↗
58. 10.1364/OE.27.03114410.1364/OE.27.031144 ↗
59. 10.1038/s41893-021-00737-z10.1038/s41893-021-00737-z ↗
60. 10.1109/TDMR.2021.310634010.1109/TDMR.2021.3106340 ↗
61. 10.1126/sciadv.abb005510.1126/sciadv.abb0055 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.solmat.2017.03.00810.1016/j.solmat.2017.03.008 ↗
63. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c0561910.1021/acssuschemeng.0c05619 ↗
64. 10.1002/pip.96710.1002/pip.967 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.solener.2016.08.02510.1016/j.solener.2016.08.025 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.10467610.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104676 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.solener.2021.10.07110.1016/j.solener.2021.10.071 ↗
68. 10.3389/fenrg.2021.73288610.3389/fenrg.2021.732886 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.joule.2022.05.00210.1016/j.joule.2022.05.002 ↗
70. 10.1002/cssc.20150084810.1002/cssc.201500848 ↗