The materials characteristic and the efficiency degradation of solar cells from solar grade silicon from a metallurgical process route
Source abstract
Abstract
The rising conventional energy prices have opened up the market for photovoltaic, but the lack of polycrystalline silicon from the chemical route restricts the growth of crystalline silicon solar cells. Recently there is a trend that produces solar cells by using the newly developed solar grade silicon feedstock from a metallurgical process route. In this article, the chemical components of solar grade silicon feedstock are analyzed. The single crystalline silicon solar cells from 100% solar grade silicon feedstock from a metallurgical process route are investigated. The outdoor performance of solar modules encapsulated by such cells is reported. The experimental evidence suggests that such solar cells can achieve the average efficiency higher than 14% on single crystalline silicon wafers. However, the efficiency degradation of solar cells under natural sunlight is significant, and the electrical uniformity of small cells diced from the whole cell is too bad. The metal impurities, oxygen, carbon, and their complexes influence the performance stabilization. The article proves that the module made by such cells has a big cell mismatch loss than normal cells made by electronic grade silicon, even if these cells come from the same sort. And the operating temperature of the cells of the modules is 15–22 °C higher than normal modules under the same conditions. The solar grade silicon feedstock from a metallurgical process route has to be improved farther in order to be used in photovoltaic industry.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Silicon and Solar Cell Technologies · Photovoltaic System Optimization Techniques · Photovoltaic Systems and Sustainability
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (14)
Show source-provided references
1. Braga AFB, Moreira SP et al (2008) Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 92:41810.1016/j.solmat.2007.10.003 ↗
2. Muller A, Ghosh M et al (2006) Mater Sci Eng B 134:25710.1016/j.mseb.2006.06.054 ↗
3. Khattak CP, Joyce DB et al (2002) Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 74:7710.1016/S0927-0248(02)00051-X ↗
4. Degoulange J, Perichaud I et al (2008) Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 92:126910.1016/j.solmat.2008.04.020 ↗
5. Peter K, Kopecek R et al. (2005) In: Conference record of the 31st IEEE photovoltaic specialists conference, FL, USA, pp 927–930
6. Kaes M, Hahn G et al. (2006) In: Conference record of the 2006 IEEE 4th world conference on photovoltaic energy conversion, HI, USA, pp 873–87810.1109/WCPEC.2006.279596 ↗
7. Macdonald D, Tan J et al. (2007) The 22nd European photovoltaic solar energy conference, 3–7 September, Milan, Italy, pp 820–827
8. Wang He, Yang Hong et al (2003) Solid-State Electronics 47:136310.1016/S0038-1101(03)00067-4 ↗
9. Graff K (2000) Metal impurities in silicon-device fabrication. Springer-Verlag, Berlin10.1007/978-3-642-57121-3 ↗
10. Vazquez M, Stolle IR (2008) Prog Photovolt Res Appl 16:41910.1002/pip.825 ↗
11. Saitoh T, Hashigami H, Rein S, Glunz S (2000) Prog Photovoltaic Res Appl 8:53710.1002/1099-159X(200009/10)8:5<537::AID-PIP349>3.0.CO;2-W ↗
12. Flamant G, Kurtcuoglu V et al (2006) Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 90:209910.1016/j.solmat.2006.02.009 ↗
13. De Wolf S, Szlufcik J et al (2002) Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 72:4910.1016/S0927-0248(01)00149-0 ↗
14. Hofstetter J, Lelievre JF et al (2009) Mater Sci Eng B 159:29910.1016/j.mseb.2008.05.021 ↗