Indentation strength method to determine the fracture toughness of La0.58Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3-δ and Ba0.5Sr0.5Co0.8Fe0.2O3-δ
Source abstract
Abstract
The temperature-dependent fracture toughness of brittle ceramics can be conveniently assessed from bending tests of specimens with defined cracks introduced by indentation. However, the validity of this indentation strength in bending method (ISM) depends critically on the correct consideration of the residual stress induced by the indentation process. The ISM has been applied to La0.58Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3-δ (LSCF) and, for comparison, on Ba0.5Sr0.5Co0.2Fe0.8O3-δ (BSCF) perovskite. LSCF with rhombohedral phase exhibits ferro-elastic behavior at ambient temperature, whereas BSCF deforms linear-elastically. Pre-indented specimens of both perovskites were fractured at room temperature in biaxial bending, some of them after an additional annealing step. The fracture toughness values of BSCF match reasonably well when determined with equations which consider the presence or absence of residual indentation stress. Interestingly, annealing has little influence on the apparent toughness results obtained for rhombohedral LSCF, which appears to be related with stress relaxation by ferro-elastic deformation.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Advanced materials and composites · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Huang BX, Malzbender J, Steinbrech RW, Grychtol P, Schneider CM, Singheiser L (2009) Appl Phys Lett 95:05190110.1063/1.3193657 ↗
2. Huang AS, Lin YS, Yang WS (2004) J Membr Sci 245:4110.1016/j.memsci.2004.08.001 ↗
3. Barsoum MW (2003) Fundamentals of ceramics, 2nd edn. Institute Of Physics Publishing (Gb), London10.1887/0750309024 ↗
4. Anstis GR, Chantikul P, Lawn BR, Marshall DB (1981) J Am Ceram Soc 64:53310.1111/j.1151-2916.1981.tb10320.x ↗
5. Chantikul P, Anstis GR, Lawn BR, Marshall DB (1981) J Am Ceram Soc 64:53910.1111/j.1151-2916.1981.tb10321.x ↗
6. Oliver WC, Pharr GM (1992) J Mater Res 7:156410.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
7. Malzbender J, Toonder JMJD, Balkenende AR, de With G (2002) Mater Sci Eng R 36:4710.1016/S0927-796X(01)00040-7 ↗
8. Marshall DB, Lawn BR (1977) J Am Ceram Soc 60:8610.1111/j.1151-2916.1977.tb16106.x ↗
9. Quinn GD, Bradt RC (2007) J Am Ceram Soc 90:67310.1111/j.1551-2916.2006.01482.x ↗
10. Fessler H, Fricker DC (1984) J Am Ceram Soc 67:58210.1111/j.1151-2916.1984.tb19598.x ↗
11. Fett T, Rizzi G, Guin JP, Wiederhorn SM (2007) J Mater Sci 42:393. doi: 10.1007/s10853-006-1102-810.1007/s10853-006-1102-8 ↗
12. Ingelstrom N, Nordberg H (1974) Eng Fract Mech 6:59710.1016/0013-7944(74)90016-2 ↗
13. Petrovic JJ, Dirks RA, Jacobson LA, Mendiratta MG (1976) J Am Ceram Soc 59:17710.1111/j.1151-2916.1976.tb09468.x ↗
14. Marshall DB, Lawn BR (1979) J Mater Sci 14:2001. doi: 10.1007/BF0055104310.1007/BF00551043 ↗
15. Fett T, Kounga Njiwa AB, Rödel J (2005) Eng Fract Mech 72:64710.1016/j.engfracmech.2004.07.003 ↗
16. Kountouros P, Förthmann R, Naoumidis A, Stochniol G, Syskakis E (1995) Ionics 1:4010.1007/BF02426007 ↗
17. Huang BX, Malzbender J, Steinbrech RW, Wessel E, Penkalla HJ, Singheiser L (2010) J. Membr Sci 349:18310.1016/j.memsci.2009.11.047 ↗
18. Freiman S, Mecholsky J (2010) J Mater Sci 45:4063. doi: 10.1007/s10853-010-4491-710.1007/s10853-010-4491-7 ↗
19. Albayrak IC, Basu S, Sakulich A, Yeheskel O, Barsoum MW (2010) J Am Ceram Soc 93:202810.1111/j.1551-2916.2010.03669.x ↗
20. Asmani M, Kermel C, Leriche A, Ourak M (2001) J Eur Ceram Soc 21:108110.1016/S0955-2219(00)00314-9 ↗
21. Feng W, Yan D, He J, Zhang G, Chen G, Gu W, Yang S (2005) Appl Surf Sci 243:20410.1016/j.apsusc.2004.09.064 ↗