Oxygen nonstoichiometry and defect structure of undoped and doped lanthanum cobaltites
Source abstract
Abstract
The results of oxygen nonstoichiometry are presented for the perovskite-type undoped cobaltite LaCoO3-δ, doped with strontium La0.7Sr0.3CoO3-δ, and doped with copper LaCo0.7Cu0.3O3-δ as a function of oxygen partial pressure \({p_{\rm {O_2}}}\) and temperature. The modeling of the defect structure of these oxygen deficient perovskites is carried out. Two different defect structure models are evolved. Within the framework of the first model electrons are treated as quasi-free in LaCoO3-δ, partly trapped in La0.7Sr0.3CoO3-δ and LaCo0.7Cu0.3O3-δ, whereas holes are assumed to be itinerant in all oxides studied. The intrinsic electronic disordering process is taken into account as well. According to the second model electrons and holes are assumed to be localized. Thermal excited charge disproportionation of cobalt is considered as well. The corresponding equations for the law of mass action, electroneutrality condition, and mass balance give a set of nonlinear equations in the both cases. The analytical solutions of these sets yield general expressions which are used for the verification of the defect models proposed by nonlinear curve fitting. The latter showed that both models of the defect structure of all lanthanum cobaltites studied fit the experimental data about equally good. It is, therefore, difficult to rule out either of defect structure models on the basis of equilibrium data on oxygen nonstoichiometry solely.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials · Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (16)
Show source-provided references
1. Jonker GH (1969) Philips Res Rep 24:1
2. Zuev AYu, Petrov AN, Pankov DV (1999) In: Singhal SC, Dokia M (eds) Solid oxide fuel cells VI, The Electrochemical Society Proceedings Series, PV 99–19, 424, Pennington, NJ10.1149/199919.0424PV ↗
3. Yasumoto K, Inagaki Y, Shiono M, Dokiya M (2002) Solid State Ionics 148:54510.1016/S0167-2738(02)00115-7 ↗
4. Mizusaki J, Mima Y, Yamauchi S, Fueki K, Tagawa H (1989) J Solid State Chem 80:10210.1016/0022-4596(89)90036-4 ↗
5. Petrov AN, Cherepanov VA, Kononchuk OF, Gavrilova LYa (1990) J Solid State Chem 87:6910.1016/0022-4596(90)90066-7 ↗
6. Petrov AN, Kononchuk OF, Andreev AV, Cherepanov VA, Kofstad P (1995) Solid State Ionic 80:18910.1016/0167-2738(95)00114-L ↗
7. Lankhorst MHR, Bouwmeester HJM, Verweij H (1996) Physical Rev Lett 77:298910.1103/PhysRevLett.77.2989 ↗
8. Lankhorst MHR, Bouwmeester HJM, Verweij H (1997) J Solid State Chem 133:55510.1006/jssc.1997.7531 ↗
9. Lankhorst MHR, Bouwmeester HJM, Verweij H (1997) Solid State Ionics 96:2110.1016/S0167-2738(96)00620-0 ↗
10. Patrakeev MV, Leonidov IA, Mitberg EB, Lakhtin AA, Vasiliev VG, Kozhevnicov VL, Poeppelmeier KR (1999) Ionics 5:44410.1007/BF02376011 ↗
11. Kozhevnikov VL, Leonidov IA, Mitberg EB, Patrakeev MV, Petrov AN, Poeppelmeier KR (2003) J Solid State Chem 172:29610.1016/S0022-4596(03)00088-4 ↗
12. Petrov AN, Zuev AYu, Pankov DV, Bujanova EC (2004) Russian J Phys Chem 78:220
13. Petrov AN, Zuev AYu, Pankov DV (2004) Russian J Phys Chem 78:1616
14. Seppaenen M, Kytoe M, Taskinen P (1980) Scand J Met 9:3
15. Petrov AN, Cherepanov VA, Zuev AYu (1987) Russian J Phys Chem 61:630
16. Zuev A, Singheiser L, Hilpert K (2005) Solid State Ionics 176:41710.1016/j.ssi.2004.08.003 ↗