journal article·2018-09Open access

Solution-processed all-oxide solar cell based on electrodeposited Cu2O and ZnMgO by spray pyrolysis

Nina Winkler, Stefan Edinger, Jatinder Kaur, Rachmat Adhi Wibowo, Wolfgang Kautek, Theodoros Dimopoulos

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 53· Issue 17

Abstract

The paper reports on all-solution-processed, all-oxide solar cells, based on an electrodeposited Cu2O absorber. The transparent indium-doped zinc oxide (IZO) contact and buffer layers of zinc oxide or zinc magnesium oxide (Zn1−xMg x O) were fabricated by ultrasonic spray pyrolysis. The cells were completed with graphite paste top contacts. The focus was set on using exclusively environment-friendly and low-cost raw materials, deposited from aqueous solutions without organic solvents. The latter is especially important for spray pyrolysis, where high process temperatures restrict the use of flammable solvents. The developed spray pyrolysis recipes yielded conductive (25 Ω/sq.) and transparent IZO and various compositions of transparent Zn1−xMg x O layers, with a linear dependence of the energy band gap (3.28–3.50 eV) as a function of the Mg content (0–16 mol %), as seen for layers deposited by vacuum-based techniques. Solar cells with a Zn0.88Mg0.12O buffer showed an improved photovoltaic performance compared to cells with ZnO buffer or without buffer, reaching a power conversion efficiency of 0.67% with a short-circuit current density of 3.76 mA/cm2, an open-circuit voltage of 0.34 V and a fill factor of 52.7%. The study correlated the improved cell performance with structural and electronic properties of the heterojunction.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Copper-based nanomaterials and applications · ZnO doping and properties · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (58)

Show source-provided references
1. Yu X, Marks TJ, Facchetti A (2016) Metal oxides for optoelectronic applications. Nat Mater 15:383. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat459910.1038/nmat4599 ↗
2. Ohta H, Hosono H (2004) Transparent oxide optoelectronics. Mater Today 7:42–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-7021(04)00288-310.1016/S1369-7021(04)00288-3 ↗
3. Pérez-Tomás A, Mingorance A, Tanenbaum D, Lira-Cantú M (2018) Metal oxides in photovoltaics: all-oxide, ferroic, and perovskite solar cells. In: Lira-Cantu M (ed) The future of semiconductor oxides in next-generation solar cells. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 267–35610.1016/B978-0-12-811165-9.00008-9 ↗
4. Rühle S, Anderson AY, Barad H-N et al (2012) All-oxide photovoltaics. J Phys Chem Lett 3:3755–3764. https://doi.org/10.1021/jz301703910.1021/jz3017039 ↗
5. Fortunato E, Ginley D, Hosono H, Paine DC (2007) Transparent conducting oxides for photovoltaics. MRS Bull 32:242–24710.1557/mrs2007.29 ↗
6. Gesheva K, Ivanova T, Bodurov G et al (2016) Technologies for deposition of transition metal oxide thin films: application as functional layers in “Smart windows” and photocatalytic systems. J Phys: Conf Ser 682:12011. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/682/1/01201110.1088/1742-6596/682/1/012011 ↗
7. Lee YS, Chua D, Brandt RE et al (2014) Atomic layer deposited gallium oxide buffer layer enables 1.2 V open-circuit voltage in cuprous oxide solar cells. Adv Mater 26:4704–4710. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20140105410.1002/adma.201401054 ↗
8. Brandt IS, Tumelero MA, Pelegrini S et al (2017) Electrodeposition of Cu2O: growth, properties, and applications. J Solid State Electrochem 21:1999–2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10008-017-3660-x10.1007/s10008-017-3660-x ↗
9. Pavan M, Rühle S, Ginsburg A et al (2015) TiO2/Cu2O all-oxide heterojunction solar cells produced by spray pyrolysis. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 132:549–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2014.10.00510.1016/j.solmat.2014.10.005 ↗
10. Pawar SM, Pawar BS, Kim JH et al (2011) Recent status of chemical bath deposited metal chalcogenide and metal oxide thin films. Curr Appl Phys 11:117–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cap.2010.07.00710.1016/j.cap.2010.07.007 ↗
11. Hariskos D, Spiering S, Powalla M (2005) Buffer layers in Cu(In, Ga)Se2 solar cells and modules. Thin Solid Films 480:99–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2004.11.11810.1016/j.tsf.2004.11.118 ↗
12. Elumalai NK, Vijila C, Jose R et al (2015) Metal oxide semiconducting interfacial layers for photovoltaic and photocatalytic applications. Mater Renew Sustain Energy 4:11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40243-015-0054-910.1007/s40243-015-0054-9 ↗
13. Calnan S (2014) Applications of oxide coatings in photovoltaic devices. Coatings 4:162–202. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings401016210.3390/coatings4010162 ↗
14. Grondahl LO, Geiger PH (1927) A new electronic rectifier. J AIEE 46:215–222. https://doi.org/10.1109/JAIEE.1927.653418610.1109/JAIEE.1927.6534186 ↗
15. Young AP, Schwartz CM (1969) Electrical conductivity and thermoelectric power of Cu2O. J Phys Chem Solids 30:249–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3697(69)90306-010.1016/0022-3697(69)90306-0 ↗
16. Shockley W, Queisser HJ (1961) Detailed balance limit of efficiency of p-n junction solar cells. J Appl Phys 32:510–519. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.173603410.1063/1.1736034 ↗
17. Minami T, Nishi Y, Miyata T (2016) Efficiency enhancement using a Zn1−x Gex -O thin film as an n-type window layer in Cu2O-based heterojunction solar cells. Appl Phys Express 9:52301. https://doi.org/10.7567/APEX.9.05230110.7567/APEX.9.052301 ↗
18. Minami T, Nishi Y, Miyata T (2013) High-efficiency Cu2O-based heterojunction solar cells fabricated using a Ga2O3 thin film as N-type layer. Appl Phys Express 6:44101. https://doi.org/10.7567/APEX.6.04410110.7567/APEX.6.044101 ↗
19. Mittiga A, Salza E, Sarto F et al (2006) Heterojunction solar cell with 2% efficiency based on a Cu2O substrate. Appl Phys Lett 88:163502. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.219431510.1063/1.2194315 ↗
20. Ievskaya Y, Hoye RLZ, Sadhanala A et al (2015) Fabrication of ZnO/Cu2O heterojunctions in atmospheric conditions: improved interface quality and solar cell performance. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 135:43–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2014.09.01810.1016/j.solmat.2014.09.018 ↗
21. Izaki M, Shinagawa T, Mizuno K-T et al (2007) Electrochemically constructed p-Cu 2 O/n-ZnO heterojunction diode for photovoltaic device. J Phys Appl Phys 40:3326. https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/40/11/01010.1088/0022-3727/40/11/010 ↗
22. Musselman KP, Wisnet A, Iza DC et al (2010) Strong efficiency improvements in ultra-low-cost inorganic nanowire solar cells. Adv Mater 22:E254–E258. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20100145510.1002/adma.201001455 ↗
23. Seog Lee Y, Heo J, Cheng Siah S et al (2013) Ultrathin amorphous zinc-tin- oxide buffer layer for enhancing heterojunction interface quality in metal- oxide solar cells. Energy Environ Sci 6:2112–2118. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3EE24461J10.1039/c3ee24461j ↗
24. Kaur J, Bethge O, Wibowo RA et al (2017) All-oxide solar cells based on electrodeposited Cu2O absorber and atomic layer deposited ZnMgO on precious-metal-free electrode. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 161:449–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2016.12.01710.1016/j.solmat.2016.12.017 ↗
25. Tsur Y, Riess I (1999) Self-compensation in semiconductors. Phys Rev B 60:8138–8146. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.60.813810.1103/PhysRevB.60.8138 ↗
26. McShane CM, Choi K-S (2012) Junction studies on electrochemically fabricated p–n Cu2O homojunction solar cells for efficiency enhancement. Phys Chem Chem Phys 14:6112–6118. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2CP40502D10.1039/c2cp40502d ↗
27. Elfadill NG, Hashim MR, Chahrour KM, Mohammed SA (2016) Preparation of p-type Na-doped Cu 2 O by electrodeposition for a p-n homojunction thin film solar cell. Semicond Sci Technol 31:65001. https://doi.org/10.1088/0268-1242/31/6/06500110.1088/0268-1242/31/6/065001 ↗
28. Nishi Y, Miyata T, Minami T (2012) Effect of inserting a thin buffer layer on the efficiency in n-ZnO/p-Cu2O heterojunction solar cells. J Vac Sci Technol Vac Surf Films 30:04D103. https://doi.org/10.1116/1.369859610.1116/1.3698596 ↗
29. Chen C-C, Chen L-C, Lee Y-H (2012) Fabrication and optoelectrical properties of IZO/heterostructure solar cells by thermal oxidation. In: Adv. Condens Matter Phys. https://www.hindawi.com/journals/acmp/2012/129139/ . Accessed 9 Oct 2017
30. Brandt RE, Young M, Park HH et al (2014) Band offsets of n-type electron-selective contacts on cuprous oxide (Cu2O) for photovoltaics. Appl Phys Lett 105:26390110.1063/1.4905180 ↗
31. Hultqvist A, Platzer-Björkman C, Pettersson J et al (2009) CuGaSe2 solar cells using atomic layer deposited Zn(O, S) and (Zn, Mg)O buffer layers. Thin Solid Films 517:2305–2308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2008.10.10910.1016/j.tsf.2008.10.109 ↗
32. Kramm B, Laufer A, Reppin D et al (2012) The band alignment of Cu2O/ZnO and Cu2O/GaN heterostructures. Appl Phys Lett 100:94102. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.368571910.1063/1.3685719 ↗
33. Duan Z, Pasquier AD, Lu Y et al (2012) Effects of Mg composition on open circuit voltage of Cu2OMg × Zn1−xO heterojunction solar cells. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 96:292–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2011.09.04710.1016/j.solmat.2011.09.047 ↗
34. Minami T, Nishi Y, Miyata T, Abe S (2013) Photovoltaic properties in Al-doped ZnO/non-doped Zn1-XMgXO/Cu2O heterojunction solar cells. ECS Trans 50:59–68. https://doi.org/10.1149/05051.0059ecst10.1149/05051.0059ecst ↗
35. Trunk M, Venkatachalapathy V, Galeckas A, Kuznetsov AY (2010) Deep level related photoluminescence in ZnMgO. Appl Phys Lett 97:211901. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.351848010.1063/1.3518480 ↗
36. Jeong SS, Mittiga A, Salza E et al (2008) Electrodeposited ZnO/Cu2O heterojunction solar cells. Electrochim Acta 53:2226–2231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2007.09.03010.1016/j.electacta.2007.09.030 ↗
37. Chatterjee S, Saha SK, Pal AJ (2016) Formation of all-oxide solar cells in atmospheric condition based on Cu2O thin-films grown through SILAR technique. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 147:17–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2015.11.04510.1016/j.solmat.2015.11.045 ↗
38. Musselman KP, Marin A, Wisnet A et al (2011) A novel buffering technique for aqueous processing of zinc oxide nanostructures and interfaces, and corresponding improvement of electrodeposited ZnO-Cu2O photovoltaics. Adv Funct Mater 21:573–582. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20100195610.1002/adfm.201001956 ↗
39. Dimopoulos T, Peić A, Abermann S et al (2014) Effect of thermal annealing in vacuum on the photovoltaic properties of electrodeposited Cu2O-absorber solar cell. EPJ Photovolt 5:50301. https://doi.org/10.1051/epjpv/201400510.1051/epjpv/2014005 ↗
40. Haynes WM (2003) CRC Handbook of chemistry and physics, 84th edition. In: CRC Press. https://www.crcpress.com/CRC-Handbook-of-Chemistry-and-Physics-84th-Edition/Lide/p/book/9780849304842 . Accessed 15 Mar 2017
41. Maldonado A, Asomoza R, Cañetas-Ortega J et al (1999) Effect of the pH on the physical properties of ZnO: in thin films deposited by spray pyrolysis. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 57:331–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-0248(98)00170-610.1016/S0927-0248(98)00170-6 ↗
42. Edinger S, Bansal N, Bauch M et al (2017) Highly transparent and conductive indium-doped zinc oxide films deposited at low substrate temperature by spray pyrolysis from water-based solutions. J Mater Sci 52:8591–8602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1084-810.1007/s10853-017-1084-8 ↗
43. Wienke J, Booij AS (2008) ZnO: in deposition by spray pyrolysis: influence of the growth conditions on the electrical and optical properties. Thin Solid Films 516:4508–4512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2007.05.07810.1016/j.tsf.2007.05.078 ↗
44. Dimopoulos T (2018) All-oxide solar cells. In: Lira-Cantu M (ed) The future of semiconductor oxides in next-generation solar cells. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 439–48010.1016/B978-0-12-811165-9.00011-9 ↗
45. Niu W, Zhou M, Ye Z, Zhu L (2016) Photoresponse enhancement of Cu2O solar cell with sulfur-doped ZnO buffer layer to mediate the interfacial band alignment. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 144:717–723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2015.10.01310.1016/j.solmat.2015.10.013 ↗
46. Diler E, Rioual S, Lescop B et al (2012) Stability of ZnMgO oxide in a weak alkaline solution. Thin Solid Films 520:2819–2823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2011.10.03310.1016/j.tsf.2011.10.033 ↗
47. Nguyen HD, Pandey R, Yuldashev S et al (2012) Growth of ZnO and ZnMgO nanorods on Si substrates by using ultrasonic spray pyrolysis. J Korean Phys Soc 60:1539–1542. https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.60.153910.3938/jkps.60.1539 ↗
48. Zhang X, Li XM, Chen TL et al (2005) p-type conduction in wide-gap Zn1−xMg x O films grown by ultrasonic spray pyrolysis. Appl Phys Lett 87:92101. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.203532610.1063/1.2035326 ↗
49. Beverskog B, Puigdomenech I (1997) Revised Pourbaix diagrams for copper at 25 to 300°C. J Electrochem Soc 144:3476–3483. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.183803610.1149/1.1838036 ↗
50. Khan OFZ, O’Brien P (1989) On the use of zinc acetate as a novel precursor for the deposition of ZnO by low-pressure metal-organic chemical vapour deposition. Thin Solid Films 173:95–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-6090(89)90541-510.1016/0040-6090(89)90541-5 ↗
51. Tauc J (1968) Optical properties and electronic structure of amorphous Ge and Si. Mater Res Bull 3:37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-5408(68)90023-810.1016/0025-5408(68)90023-8 ↗
52. Ohtomo A, Kawasaki M, Koida T et al (1998) MgxZn1−xO as a II–VI widegap semiconductor alloy. Appl Phys Lett 72:2466–2468. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.12138410.1063/1.121384 ↗
53. Platzer-Björkman C, Törndahl T, Hultqvist A et al (2007) Optimization of ALD-(Zn, Mg)O buffer layers and (Zn, Mg)O/Cu(In, Ga)Se2 interfaces for thin film solar cells. Thin Solid Films 515:6024–6027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2006.12.04710.1016/j.tsf.2006.12.047 ↗
54. Minemoto T, Negami T, Nishiwaki S et al (2000) Preparation of Zn1−xMgxO films by radio frequency magnetron sputtering. Thin Solid Films 372:173–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-6090(00)01009-910.1016/S0040-6090(00)01009-9 ↗
55. Ma Q-B, Hofmann JP, Litke A, Hensen EJM (2015) Cu2O photoelectrodes for solar water splitting: tuning photoelectrochemical performance by controlled faceting. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 141:178–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2015.05.02510.1016/j.solmat.2015.05.025 ↗
56. Woon Lee Sang, Seog Lee Yun, Jaeyeong Heo et al (2014) Improved Cu2O-based solar cells using atomic layer deposition to control the cu oxidation state at the p-n junction. Adv Energy Mater 4:1301916. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20130191610.1002/aenm.201301916 ↗
57. Elfadill NG, Hashim MR, Chahrour KM et al (2015) The influence of Cu2O crystal structure on the Cu2O/ZnO heterojunction photovoltaic performance. Superlattices Microstruct 85:908–917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spmi.2015.07.01010.1016/j.spmi.2015.07.010 ↗
58. Fedorenko YG, Major JD, Pressman A et al (2015) Modification of electron states in CdTe absorber due to a buffer layer in CdTe/CdS solar cells. J Appl Phys 118:165705. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.493468010.1063/1.4934680 ↗