journal article·2008-08

Preparation, proton conduction, and application in ammonia synthesis at atmospheric pressure of La0.9Ba0.1Ga1–xMgxO3–α

Cheng Chen, Guilin Ma

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 43· Issue 15
Publisher page

Abstract

La0.9Ba0.1Ga1–xMgxO3–α (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.25) was prepared by the microemulsion method. A single phase of LaGaO3 perovskite structure was formed when x was ≥0.15. Electrochemical hydrogen permeation (hydrogen pumping) proved that La0.9Ba0.1Ga1–xMgxO3–α had proton conduction, and the proton conduction was measured by AC impedance spectroscopy method from 400 to 800 °C in hydrogen atmospheres. Among these samples, La0.9Ba0.1Ga0.8Mg0.2O3–α has the highest proton conductivity with the values of 9.51 × 10−4 to 4.68 × 10−2 S cm−1 at 400–800 °C. Ammonia was synthesized from nitrogen and hydrogen at atmospheric pressure in an electrolytic cell using La0.9Ba0.1Ga0.8Mg0.2O3–α as electrolyte. The rate of NH3 formation was 1.89 × 10−9 mol s−1 cm−2 at 520 °C upon imposing a current of 1 mA through the cell.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells · Ammonia Synthesis and Nitrogen Reduction · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. Ishihara T, Matsuda H, Takita Y (1994) J Am Chem Soc 116:3801. doi:https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00088a01610.1021/ja00088a016 ↗
2. Feng M, Goodenough JB (1994) Eur J Solid State Inorg Chem 31:663
3. Ma G, Zhang F, Zhu J, Meng G (2006) Chem Mater 18:6006. doi:https://doi.org/10.1021/cm061295410.1021/cm0612954 ↗
4. Zhang F, Sun L, Zhu J et al (2008) J Mater Sci 43:1587. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-007-2328-910.1007/s10853-007-2328-9 ↗
5. Zhu JL, Zhang F, Chen C et al (2007) Chin J Inorg Chem 23:1621
6. Zhang F, Yang Q, Pan B et al (2007) Mater Lett 61:4144. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2007.01.06010.1016/j.matlet.2007.01.060 ↗
7. Marnellos E, Labeau M (1998) J Eur Ceram Soc 18:1397. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-2219(98)00016-810.1016/S0955-2219(98)00016-8 ↗
8. Zhang J, Wen Z, Han J et al (2007) J Alloys Compd 440:270. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2006.09.01610.1016/j.jallcom.2006.09.016 ↗
9. Brunckova H, Medvecky L, Mihalik J (2008) J Eur Ceram Soc 28:123. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2007.09.02610.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2007.09.026 ↗
10. Navale SC, Samuel V, Gaikwad AB et al (2007) Ceram Int 33:297. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2005.08.01210.1016/j.ceramint.2005.08.012 ↗
11. Lemos FCD, Melo DMA, Silva da JEC (2005) Mater Res Bull 40:187. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2004.08.01010.1016/j.materresbull.2004.08.010 ↗
12. Athawale AA, Chandwadkar A, Karandikar P et al (2005) Mater Sci Eng B 119:87. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2005.01.00710.1016/j.mseb.2005.01.007 ↗
13. Marnellos G, Stoukides M (1998) Science 282:98. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.282.5386.9810.1126/science.282.5386.98 ↗
14. Choi SM, Lee KT, Lee HL et al (2000) Solid State Ionics 131:221. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2738(00)00673-110.1016/S0167-2738(00)00673-1 ↗
15. Kim S, Chun MC, Lee KT et al (2001) J Power Sources 93:279. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7753(00)00567-X10.1016/S0378-7753(00)00567-X ↗
16. Mather GC, Islam MS (2005) Chem Mater 17:1736. doi:https://doi.org/10.1021/cm047976l10.1021/cm047976l ↗
17. Sata N, Hiramoto K, Ishigame M et al (1996) Phys Rev B 54:15795. doi:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.54.1579510.1103/PhysRevB.54.15795 ↗
18. Li ZJ, Liu RQ, Xie YH et al (2005) Solid State Ionics 176:1063. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2005.01.00910.1016/j.ssi.2005.01.009 ↗
19. Wang JD, Xie YH, Li RQ et al (2005) Mater Res Bull 40:1294. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2005.04.00810.1016/j.materresbull.2005.04.008 ↗