journal article·2019-09Open access

Two-dimensional silicon chalcogenides with high carrier mobility for photocatalytic water splitting

Yun-Lai Zhu, Jun-Hui Yuan, Ya-Qian Song, Sheng Wang, Kan-Hao Xue, Ming Xu, Xiao-Min Cheng, Xiang-Shui Miao

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 54· Issue 17

Abstract

Highly-efficient water splitting based on solar energy is one of the most attractive research focuses in the energy field. Searching for more candidate photocatalysts that can work under visible-light irradiation are highly demanded. Herein, using first principle calculations based on density functional theory, we predict that the two dimensional silicon chalcogenides, i.e. SiX (X=S, Se, Te) monolayers, as semiconductors with 2.43 eV~3.00 eV band gaps, exhibit favorable band edge positions for photocatalytic water splitting. The optical adsorption spectra demonstrate that the SiX monolayers have pronounced optical absorption in the visible light region. Moreover, the band gaps and band edge positions of silicon chalcogenides monolayers can be tuned by applying biaxial strain or increasing the number of layers, in order to better fit the redox potentials of water. The combined novel electronic, high carrier mobility, and optical properties render the two dimensional SiX a promising photocatalyst for water splitting.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: 2D Materials and Applications · Nanowire Synthesis and Applications · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (93)

Show source-provided references
1. Kirubasankar B, Murugadoss V, Lin J et al (2018) In situ grown nickel selenide on graphene nanohybrid electrodes for high energy density asymmetric supercapacitors. Nanoscale 10:20414–20425. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8NR06345A10.1039/C8NR06345A ↗
2. Le K, Wang Z, Wang F et al (2019) Sandwich-like NiCo layered double hydroxide/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite cathodes for high energy density asymmetric supercapacitors. Dalton Trans 48:5193–5202. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9DT00615J10.1039/C9DT00615J ↗
3. Lin C, Hu L, Cheng C et al (2018) Nano-TiNb2O7/carbon nanotubes composite anode for enhanced lithium-ion storage. Electrochim Acta 260:65–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2017.11.05110.1016/j.electacta.2017.11.051 ↗
4. Lou X, Lin C, Luo Q et al (2017) Crystal structure modification enhanced FeNb11O29 anodes for lithium-ion batteries. ChemElectroChem 4:3171–3180. https://doi.org/10.1002/celc.20170081610.1002/celc.201700816 ↗
5. Yuan L, Zhang Y, Wang Z et al (2019) Plant oil and lignin-derived elastomers via thermal azide-alkyne cycloaddition click chemistry. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 7:2593–2601. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b0561710.1021/acssuschemeng.8b05617 ↗
6. Zhao W, Li X, Yin R et al (2019) Urchin-like NiO–NiCo2O4 heterostructure microsphere catalysts for enhanced rechargeable non-aqueous Li–O2 batteries. Nanoscale 11:50–59. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8NR08457B10.1039/C8NR08457B ↗
7. Zhao Y-H, Tian X-L, Zhao B et al (2018) Precipitation sequence of middle al concentration alloy using the inversion algorithm and microscopic phase field model. Sci Adv Mater 10:1793–1804. https://doi.org/10.1166/sam.2018.343010.1166/sam.2018.3430 ↗
8. Ge R, Wang S, Su J et al (2018) Phase-selective synthesis of self-supported RuP films for efficient hydrogen evolution electrocatalysis in alkaline media. Nanoscale 10:13930–13935. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8NR03554G10.1039/C8NR03554G ↗
9. Shindume LH, Zhao Z, Wang N et al (2019) Enhanced photocatalytic activity of B, N-codoped TiO2 by a new molten nitrate process. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 19:839–849. https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2019.1574510.1166/jnn.2019.15745 ↗
10. Tian J, Shao Q, Zhao J et al (2019) Microwave solvothermal carboxymethyl chitosan templated synthesis of TiO2/ZrO2 composites toward enhanced photocatalytic degradation of Rhodamine B. J Colloids Interface Sci 541:18–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2019.01.06910.1016/j.jcis.2019.01.069 ↗
11. Wang C, Lan F, He Z et al (2019) Iridium—based catalysts for solid polymer electrolyte electrocatalytic water splitting. Chemsuschem 12:1576–1590. https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.20180287310.1002/cssc.201802873 ↗
12. Esswein AJ, Nocera DG (2007) Hydrogen production by molecular photocatalysis. Chem Rev 107:4022–4047. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr050193e10.1021/cr050193e ↗
13. Ball M, Wietschel M (2009) The future of hydrogen—opportunities and challenges. Int J Hydrogen Energy 34:615–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.11.01410.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.11.014 ↗
14. Chang Kwon K, Choi S, Lee J et al (2017) Drastically enhanced hydrogen evolution activity by 2D to 3D structural transition in anion-engineered molybdenum disulfide thin films for efficient Si-based water splitting photocathodes. J Mater Chem A 5:15534–15542. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7TA03845C10.1039/C7TA03845C ↗
15. Hu X, Li G, Yu JC (2010) Design, fabrication, and modification of nanostructured semiconductor materials for environmental and energy applications. Langmuir 26:3031–3039. https://doi.org/10.1021/la902142b10.1021/la902142b ↗
16. Liu J, Liu Y, Liu N et al (2015) Metal-free efficient photocatalyst for stable visible water splitting via a two-electron pathway. Science 347:970–974. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa314510.1126/science.aaa3145 ↗
17. Maeda K, Domen K (2010) Photocatalytic water splitting: recent progress and future challenges. J Phys Chem Lett 1:2655–2661. https://doi.org/10.1021/jz100796610.1021/jz1007966 ↗
18. Rahman MA, Bazargan S, Srivastava S et al (2015) Defect-rich decorated TiO2 nanowires for super-efficient photoelectrochemical water splitting driven by visible light. Energy Environ Sci 8:3363–3373. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5EE01615K10.1039/C5EE01615K ↗
19. Chen X, Shen S, Guo L, Mao SS (2010) Semiconductor-based photocatalytic hydrogen generation. Chem Rev 110:6503–6570. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr100164510.1021/cr1001645 ↗
20. Sun Y, Cheng H, Gao S et al (2012) Freestanding tin disulfide single-layers realizing efficient visible-light water splitting. Angew Chem 124:8857–8861. https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.20120467510.1002/ange.201204675 ↗
21. Zhang L, Qin M, Yu W et al (2017) Heterostructured TiO2/WO3 nanocomposites for photocatalytic degradation of toluene under visible light. J Electrochem Soc 164:H1086–H1090. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0881714jes10.1149/2.0881714jes ↗
22. Zhang L, Yu W, Han C et al (2017) Large scaled synthesis of heterostructured electrospun TiO2/SnO2 nanofibers with an enhanced photocatalytic activity. J Electrochem Soc 164:H651–H656. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.1531709jes10.1149/2.1531709jes ↗
23. Pan D, Ge S, Zhao J et al (2018) Synthesis, characterization and photocatalytic activity of mixed-metal oxides derived from NiCoFe ternary layered double hydroxides. Dalton Trans 47:9765–9778. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8DT01045E10.1039/C8DT01045E ↗
24. Song B, Wang T, Sun H et al (2017) Two-step hydrothermally synthesized carbon nanodots/WO3 photocatalysts with enhanced photocatalytic performance. Dalton Trans 46:15769–15777. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7DT03003G10.1039/C7DT03003G ↗
25. Zhao J, Ge S, Pan D et al (2018) Solvothermal synthesis, characterization and photocatalytic property of zirconium dioxide doped titanium dioxide spinous hollow microspheres with sunflower pollen as bio-templates. J Colloids Interface Sci 529:111–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2018.05.09110.1016/j.jcis.2018.05.091 ↗
26. Sun H, Yang Z, Pu Y et al (2019) Zinc oxide/vanadium pentoxide heterostructures with enhanced day-night antibacterial activities. J Colloids Interface Sci 547:40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2019.03.06110.1016/j.jcis.2019.03.061 ↗
27. Zhao Z, An H, Lin J et al (2018) Progress on the Photocatalytic Reduction Removal of Chromium Contamination. Chem Rec. https://doi.org/10.1002/tcr.20180015310.1002/tcr.201800153 ↗
28. Dervin S, Dionysiou DD, Pillai SC (2016) 2D nanostructures for water purification: graphene and beyond. Nanoscale 8:15115–15131. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6NR04508A10.1039/C6NR04508A ↗
29. Varghese JO, Agbo P, Sutherland AM et al (2015) The influence of water on the optical properties of single-layer molybdenum disulfide. Adv Mater 27:2734–2740. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20150055510.1002/adma.201500555 ↗
30. Singh AK, Mathew K, Zhuang HL, Hennig RG (2015) Computational screening of 2D Materials for photocatalysis. J Phys Chem Lett 6:1087–1098. https://doi.org/10.1021/jz502646d10.1021/jz502646d ↗
31. Su T, Shao Q, Qin Z et al (2018) Role of interfaces in two-dimensional photocatalyst for water splitting. ACS Catal 8:2253–2276. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.7b0343710.1021/acscatal.7b03437 ↗
32. Zhang X, Zhang Z, Wu D et al (2018) Computational screening of 2D materials and rational design of heterojunctions for water splitting photocatalysts. Small Methods 2:1700359. https://doi.org/10.1002/smtd.20170035910.1002/smtd.201700359 ↗
33. Lin Z, Lin B, Wang Z et al (2019) Facile preparation of 1T/2H—Mo(S1−x Sex)2 nanoparticles for boosting hydrogen evolution reaction. ChemCatChem 11:2217–2222. https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.20190009510.1002/cctc.201900095 ↗
34. Sheng Y, Yang J, Wang F et al (2019) Sol–gel synthesized hexagonal boron nitride/titania nanocomposites with enhanced photocatalytic activity. Appl Surf Sci 465:154–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.09.13710.1016/j.apsusc.2018.09.137 ↗
35. Zhuang HL, Hennig RG (2013) Computational search for single-layer transition-metal dichalcogenide photocatalysts. J Phys Chem C 117:20440–20445. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp405808a10.1021/jp405808a ↗
36. Guo Z, Zhou J, Zhu L, Sun Z (2016) MXene: a promising photocatalyst for water splitting. J Mater Chem A 4:11446–11452. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6TA04414J10.1039/C6TA04414J ↗
37. Zhuang HL, Hennig RG (2013) Single-layer group-III monochalcogenide photocatalysts for water splitting. Chem Mater 25:3232–3238. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm401661x10.1021/cm401661x ↗
38. Bai Y, Luo G, Meng L et al (2018) Single-layer ZnMN2 (M = Si, Ge, Sn) zinc nitrides as promising photocatalysts. Phys Chem Chem Phys 20:14619–14626. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8CP01463A10.1039/C8CP01463A ↗
39. Fang DQ, Chen X, Gao PF et al (2017) Mono- and bilayer ZnSnN2 sheets for visible-light photocatalysis: first-principles predictions. J Phys Chem C 121:26063–26068. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b0711510.1021/acs.jpcc.7b07115 ↗
40. Zhang X, Zhao X, Wu D et al (2016) MnPSe3 monolayer: a promising 2D visible-light photohydrolytic catalyst with high carrier mobility. Adv Sci 3:1600062. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.20160006210.1002/advs.201600062 ↗
41. Fei R, Li W, Li J, Yang L (2015) Giant piezoelectricity of monolayer group IV monochalcogenides: SnSe, SnS, GeSe, and GeS. Appl Phys Lett 107:173104. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.493475010.1063/1.4934750 ↗
42. Guan S, Liu C, Lu Y et al (2018) Tunable ferroelectricity and anisotropic electric transport in monolayer β-GeSe. Phys Rev B. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.97.14410410.1103/PhysRevB.97.144104 ↗
43. Jiang H, Zhao T, Ren Y et al (2017) Ab initio prediction and characterization of phosphorene-like SiS and SiSe as anode materials for sodium-ion batteries. Sci Bull 62:572–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2017.03.02610.1016/j.scib.2017.03.026 ↗
44. Li L, Chen Z, Hu Y et al (2013) Single-layer single-crystalline SnSe nanosheets. J Am Chem Soc 135:1213–1216. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja310801710.1021/ja3108017 ↗
45. Lv X, Wei W, Sun Q et al (2017) Two-dimensional germanium monochalcogenides for photocatalytic water splitting with high carrier mobility. Appl Catal B Environ 217:275–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.05.08710.1016/j.apcatb.2017.05.087 ↗
46. Niu C, Buhl PM, Bihlmayer G et al (2015) Topological crystalline insulator and quantum anomalous Hall states in IV–VI-based monolayers and their quantum wells. Phys Rev B. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.91.20140110.1103/PhysRevB.91.201401 ↗
47. Patel M, Kim H-S, Kim J (2017) Wafer-scale production of vertical SnS multilayers for high-performing photoelectric devices. Nanoscale 9:15804–15812. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7NR03370B10.1039/C7NR03370B ↗
48. Ramasamy P, Kwak D, Lim D-H et al (2016) Solution synthesis of GeS and GeSe nanosheets for high-sensitivity photodetectors. J Mater Chem C 4:479–485. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5TC03667D10.1039/C5TC03667D ↗
49. Wan W, Liu C, Xiao W, Yao Y (2017) Promising ferroelectricity in 2D group IV tellurides: a first-principles study. Appl Phys Lett 111:132904. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.499617110.1063/1.4996171 ↗
50. Zhou X, Zhang Q, Gan L et al (2016) Booming development of group IV–VI semiconductors: fresh blood of 2D family. Adv Sci 3:1600177. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.20160017710.1002/advs.201600177 ↗
51. Kamal C, Chakrabarti A, Ezawa M (2016) Direct band gaps in group IV–VI monolayer materials: binary counterparts of phosphorene. Phys Rev B 93:125428. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.93.12542810.1103/PhysRevB.93.125428 ↗
52. Chowdhury C, Karmakar S, Datta A (2017) Monolayer group IV–VI Monochalcogenides: low-dimensional materials for photocatalytic water splitting. J Phys Chem C 121:7615–7624. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b1208010.1021/acs.jpcc.6b12080 ↗
53. Ji Y, Yang M, Dong H et al (2017) Two-dimensional germanium monochalcogenide photocatalyst for water splitting under ultraviolet, visible to near-infrared light. Nanoscale 9:8608–8615. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7NR00688H10.1039/C7NR00688H ↗
54. Kresse G, Furthmüller J (1996) Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys Rev B 54:11169–11186. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.54.1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
55. Kresse G, Furthmüller J (1996) Efficiency of ab initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput Mater Sci 6:15–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-010.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
56. Blöchl PE (1994) Projector augmented-wave method. Phys Rev B 50:17953–17979. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.50.1795310.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
57. Kresse G, Joubert D (1999) From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys Rev B 59:1758–1775. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.59.175810.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
58. Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M (1996) Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys Rev Lett 77:3865–3868. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
59. Heyd J, Scuseria GE, Ernzerhof M (2003) Hybrid functionals based on a screened Coulomb potential. J Chem Phys 118:8207–8215. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.156406010.1063/1.1564060 ↗
60. Grimme S (2006) Semiempirical GGA-type density functional constructed with a long-range dispersion correction. J Comput Chem 27:1787–1799. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.2049510.1002/jcc.20495 ↗
61. Togo A, Oba F, Tanaka I (2008) First-principles calculations of the ferroelastic transition between rutile-type and CaCl2-type SiO2 at high pressures. Phys Rev B 78:134106. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.78.13410610.1103/PhysRevB.78.134106 ↗
62. Martyna GJ, Klein ML, Tuckerman M (1992) Nosé–Hoover chains: the canonical ensemble via continuous dynamics. J Chem Phys 97:2635–2643. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.46394010.1063/1.463940 ↗
63. Zhao J, Wu L, Zhan C et al (2017) Overview of polymer nanocomposites: computer simulation understanding of physical properties. Polymer 133:272–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2017.10.03510.1016/j.polymer.2017.10.035 ↗
64. Zhao Y, Deng S, Liu H et al (2018) First-principle investigation of pressure and temperature influence on structural, mechanical and thermodynamic properties of Ti3AC2 (A = Al and Si). Comput Mater Sci 154:365–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.07.00710.1016/j.commatsci.2018.07.007 ↗
65. Zhao Y, Qi L, Jin Y et al (2015) The structural, elastic, electronic properties and Debye temperature of D022–Ni3V under pressure from first-principles. J Alloys Compd 647:1104–1110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.05.26810.1016/j.jallcom.2015.05.268 ↗
66. Chen Y, Sun Q, Jena P (2016) SiTe monolayers: Si-based analogues of phosphorene. J Mater Chem C 4:6353–6361. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6TC01138A10.1039/C6TC01138A ↗
67. Ding Y, Wang Y (2013) Density functional theory study of the silicene-like SiX and XSi3 (X = B, C, N, Al, P) honeycomb lattices: the various buckled structures and versatile electronic properties. J Phys Chem C 117:18266–18278. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp407666m10.1021/jp407666m ↗
68. Guan J, Zhu Z, Tománek D (2014) Phase coexistence and metal-insulator transition in few-layer phosphorene: a computational study. Phys Rev Lett. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.04680410.1103/PhysRevLett.113.046804 ↗
69. Kamal C, Ezawa M (2015) Arsenene: Two-dimensional buckled and puckered honeycomb arsenic systems. Phys Rev B. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.91.08542310.1103/PhysRevB.91.085423 ↗
70. Mouhat F, Coudert F-X (2014) Necessary and sufficient elastic stability conditions in various crystal systems. Phys Rev B. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.90.22410410.1103/PhysRevB.90.224104 ↗
71. Sun Z, Zhang L, Dang F et al (2017) Experimental and simulation-based understanding of morphology controlled barium titanate nanoparticles under co-adsorption of surfactants. CrystEngComm 19:3288–3298. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7CE00279C10.1039/C7CE00279C ↗
72. Yuan J-H, Gao B, Wang W et al (2015) First-principles calculations of the electronic structure and optical properties of Y–Cu Co-Doped ZnO. Acta Phys-Chim Sin 31:1302–1308. https://doi.org/10.3866/PKU.WHXB20150508110.3866/PKU.WHXB201505081 ↗
73. Song Y-Q, Yuan J-H, Li L-H et al (2019) KTlO: a metal shrouded 2D semiconductor with high carrier mobility and tunable magnetism. Nanoscale 11:1131–1139. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8NR08046A10.1039/C8NR08046A ↗
74. Shirayama M, Kadowaki H, Miyadera T et al (2016) Optical transitions in hybrid perovskite solar cells: ellipsometry, density functional theory, and quantum efficiency analyses for CH3NH3PbI3. Phys Rev Appl 5:014012. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.5.01401210.1103/PhysRevApplied.5.014012 ↗
75. Yuan J, Yu N, Xue K, Miao X (2017) Ideal strength and elastic instability in single-layer 8-Pmmn borophene. RSC Adv 7:8654–8660. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA28454J10.1039/C6RA28454J ↗
76. Yuan J, Yu N, Wang J et al (2018) Design lateral heterostructure of monolayer ZrS2 and HfS2 from first principles calculations. Appl Surf Sci 436:919–926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.12.09310.1016/j.apsusc.2017.12.093 ↗
77. Qiao M, Chen Y, Wang Y, Li Y (2018) The germanium telluride monolayer: a two dimensional semiconductor with high carrier mobility for photocatalytic water splitting. J Mater Chem A 6:4119–4125. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7TA10360C10.1039/C7TA10360C ↗
78. Rahman MZ, Kwong CW, Davey K, Qiao SZ (2016) 2D phosphorene as a water splitting photocatalyst: fundamentals to applications. Energy Environ Sci 9:709–728. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5EE03732H10.1039/C5EE03732H ↗
79. Chakrapani V, Angus JC, Anderson AB et al (2007) Charge transfer equilibria between diamond and an aqueous oxygen electrochemical redox couple. Science 318:1424–1430. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.114884110.1126/science.1148841 ↗
80. Miao N, Zhou J, Sa B et al (2017) Few-layer arsenic trichalcogenides: emerging two-dimensional semiconductors with tunable indirect-direct band-gaps. J Alloys Compd 699:554–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.12.35110.1016/j.jallcom.2016.12.351 ↗
81. Jeon NJ, Noh JH, Kim YC et al (2014) Solvent engineering for high-performance inorganic–organic hybrid perovskite solar cells. Nat Mater 13:897–903. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat401410.1038/nmat4014 ↗
82. Ji Y, Yang M, Lin H et al (2018) Janus structures of transition metal dichalcogenides as the heterojunction photocatalysts for water splitting. J Phys Chem C 122:3123–3129. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b1158410.1021/acs.jpcc.7b11584 ↗
83. Guo S, Zhu Z, Hu X et al (2018) Ultrathin tellurium dioxide: emerging direct bandgap semiconductor with high-mobility transport anisotropy. Nanoscale 10:8397–8403. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8NR01028E10.1039/C8NR01028E ↗
84. Li J, Miranda HPC, Niquet Y-M et al (2015) Phonon-limited carrier mobility and resistivity from carbon nanotubes to graphene. Phys Rev B. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.92.07541410.1103/PhysRevB.92.075414 ↗
85. Bardeen J, Shockley W (1950) Deformation potentials and mobilities in non-polar crystals. Phys Rev 80:72–80. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.80.7210.1103/PhysRev.80.72 ↗
86. Qiao J, Kong X, Hu Z-X et al (2014) High-mobility transport anisotropy and linear dichroism in few-layer black phosphorus. Nat Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms547510.1038/ncomms5475 ↗
87. Schusteritsch G, Uhrin M, Pickard CJ (2016) Single-layered Hittorf’s phosphorus: a wide-bandgap high mobility 2D material. Nano Lett 16:2975–2980. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b0506810.1021/acs.nanolett.5b05068 ↗
88. Cai Y, Zhang G, Zhang Y-W (2014) Polarity-reversed robust carrier mobility in monolayer MoS2 nanoribbons. J Am Chem Soc 136:6269–6275. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja410978710.1021/ja4109787 ↗
89. Miao N, Xu B, Bristowe NC et al (2017) Tunable magnetism and extraordinary sunlight absorbance in indium triphosphide monolayer. J Am Chem Soc 139:11125–11131. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.7b0513310.1021/jacs.7b05133 ↗
90. Dai J, Zeng XC (2015) Titanium trisulfide monolayer: theoretical prediction of a new direct-gap semiconductor with high and anisotropic carrier mobility. Angew Chem Int Ed 54:7572–7576. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20150210710.1002/anie.201502107 ↗
91. Lang H, Zhang S, Liu Z (2016) Mobility anisotropy of two-dimensional semiconductors. Phys Rev B. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.94.23530610.1103/PhysRevB.94.235306 ↗
92. Zhou M, Chen X, Li M, Du A (2017) Widely tunable and anisotropic charge carrier mobility in monolayer tin(ii) selenide using biaxial strain: a first-principles study. J Mater Chem C 5:1247–1254. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6TC04692D10.1039/C6TC04692D ↗
93. Jing Y, Ma Y, Wang Y et al (2017) Ultrathin layers of PdPX (X = S, Se): two dimensional semiconductors for photocatalytic water splitting. Chem Eur J 23:13612–13616. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.20170368310.1002/chem.201703683 ↗