Template-assisted synthesis of core–shell α-Fe2O3@TiO2 nanorods and their photocatalytic property
Source abstract
Abstract
Novel core–shell α-Fe2O3@TiO2 composites were synthesized using α-FeOOH nanorods as hard template via a facile hydrothermal process. The as-prepared α-Fe2O3@TiO2 composites were characterized by transmission electron microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, and X-ray powder diffraction. The effects of various experimental parameters, including thickness of TiO2 coating and calcination temperature on the morphologies of the resulted products, were systematically investigated. Then, the photocatalytic degradation Rhodamine B (RhB) is chosen as a model reaction to evaluate the catalytic performance of the as-prepared α-Fe2O3@TiO2 composites. The results confirmed that the present core–shell α-Fe2O3@TiO2 composite nanorods exhibit the efficient optical response and the photocatalytic activity from the ultraviolet to the visible region. The thickness and crystal structure of TiO2 affect the photocatalytic activity. The proposed synthesis strategy might provide a facile and effective method for developing noble semiconductors core–shell architecture nanocomposites.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Iron oxide chemistry and applications · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (66)
Show source-provided references
1. Bach U, Lupo D, Comte P, Moser JE, Weissörtel F, Salbeck J, Spreitzer H, Grätzel M (1998) Solid-state dye-sensitized mesoporous TiO2 solar cells with high photon-to-electron conversion efficiencies. Nature 395:583–58510.1038/26936 ↗
2. Péchy P, Renouard T, Zakeeruddin SM, Humphry-Baker R, Comte P, Liska P, Cevey L, Costa E, Shklover V, Spiccia L, Deacon GB, Bignozzi CA, Grätzel M (2001) Engineering of efficient panchromatic sensitizers for nanocrystalline TiO2-based solar cells. J Am Chem Soc 123:1613–162410.1021/ja003299u ↗
3. Konstantinou IK, Albanis TA (2004) TiO2-assisted photocatalytic degradation of azo dyes in aqueous solution: kinetic and mechanistic investigations: a review. Appl Catal B 49:1–1410.1016/j.apcatb.2003.11.010 ↗
4. Han F, Kambala VSR, Srinivasan M, Rajarathnam D, Naidu R (2009) Tailored titanium dioxide photocatalysts for the degradation of organic dyes in wastewater treatment: a review. Appl Catal A 359:25–4010.1016/j.apcata.2009.02.043 ↗
5. Gaya UI, Abdullah AH (2008) Heterogeneous photocatalytic degradation of organic contaminants over titanium dioxide: a review of fundamentals, progress and problems. J Photochem Photobiol C 9:1–1210.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2007.12.003 ↗
6. Henderson MA (2011) A surface science perspective on photocatalysis. Surf Sci Rep 66:185–29710.1016/j.surfrep.2011.01.001 ↗
7. Hernández-Alonso MD, Fresno F, Suárez S, Coronado JM (2009) Development of alternative photocatalysts to TiO2: challenges and opportunities. Energy Environ Sci 2:1231–125710.1039/b907933e ↗
8. Wold A (1993) Photocatalytic properties of titanium dioxide (TiO2). Chem Mater 5:280–28310.1021/cm00027a008 ↗
9. Anpo M, Takeuchi M (2003) The design and development of highly reactive titanium oxide photocatalysts operating under visible light irradiation. J Catal 216:505–51610.1016/S0021-9517(02)00104-5 ↗
10. Chen C, Ma W, Zhao J (2010) Semiconductor-mediated photodegradation of pollutants under visible-light irradiation. Chem Soc Rev 39:4206–421910.1039/b921692h ↗
11. Nakamura I, Negishi N, Kutsuna S, Ihara T, Sugihara S, Takeuchi K (2000) Role of oxygen vacancy in the plasma-treated TiO2 photocatalyst with visible light activity for NO removal. J Mol Catal Chem 161:205–21210.1016/S1381-1169(00)00362-9 ↗
12. Diwald O, Thompson TL, Zubkov T, Walck SD, Yates JT (2004) Photochemical activity of nitrogen-doped rutile TiO2(110) in visible light. J Phys Chem B 108:6004–600810.1021/jp031267y ↗
13. Agrios AG, Pichat P (2006) Recombination rate of photogenerated charges versus surface area: opposing effects of TiO2 sintering temperature on photocatalytic removal of phenol, anisole, and pyridine in water. J Photochem Photobiol Chem 180:130–13510.1016/j.jphotochem.2005.10.003 ↗
14. Shkrob IA, Sauer MC (2004) Hole scavenging and photo-stimulated recombination of electron–hole pairs in aqueous TiO2 nanoparticles. J Phys Chem B 108:12497–1251110.1021/jp047736t ↗
15. Berger T, Sterrer M, Diwald O, Knözinger E, Panayotov D, Thompson TL, Yates JT (2005) Light-induced charge separation in anatase TiO2 particles. J Phys Chem B 109:6061–606810.1021/jp0404293 ↗
16. Litter MI (1999) Heterogeneous photocatalysis: transition metal ions in photocatalytic systems. Appl Catal B 23:89–11410.1016/S0926-3373(99)00069-7 ↗
17. Dvoranová D, Brezová V, Mazúr M, Malati MA (2002) Investigations of metal-doped titanium dioxide photocatalysts. Appl Catal B 37:91–10510.1016/S0926-3373(01)00335-6 ↗
18. Chang S, Liu W (2014) The roles of surface-doped metal ions (V, Mn, Fe, Cu, Ce, and W) in the interfacial behavior of TiO2 photocatalysts. Appl Catal B 156–157:466–47510.1016/j.apcatb.2014.03.044 ↗
19. Huang SY, Schlichthörl G, Nozik AJ, Grätzel M, Frank AJ (1997) Charge recombination in dye-sensitized nanocrystalline TiO2 solar cells. J Phys Chem B 101:2576–258210.1021/jp962377q ↗
20. Mor GK, Shankar K, Paulose M, Varghese OK, Grimes CA (2006) Use of highly-ordered TiO2 nanotube arrays in dye-sensitized solar cells. Nano Lett 6:215–21810.1021/nl052099j ↗
21. Subramanian V, Wolf EE, Kamat PV (2004) Catalysis with TiO2/Gold nanocomposites. Effect of metal particle size on the fermi level equilibration. J Am Chem Soc 126:4943–495010.1021/ja0315199 ↗
22. Hirakawa T, Kamat PV (2005) Charge separation and catalytic activity of Ag@TiO2 core–shell composite clusters under UV–Irradiation. J Am Chem Soc 127:3928–393410.1021/ja042925a ↗
23. Dawson A, Kamat PV (2001) Semiconductor–metal nanocomposites. Photoinduced fusion and photocatalysis of gold-capped TiO2 (TiO2/Gold) nanoparticles. J Phys Chem B 105:960–96610.1021/jp0033263 ↗
24. Gomes Silva C, Juárez R, Marino T, Molinari R, García H (2011) Influence of excitation wavelength (UV or Visible light) on the photocatalytic activity of titania Containing gold nanoparticles for the generation of hydrogen or oxygen from water. J Am Chem Soc 133:595–60210.1021/ja1086358 ↗
25. Murdoch M, Waterhouse GIN, Nadeem MA, Metson JB, Keane MA, Howe RF, Llorca J, Idriss H (2011) The effect of gold loading and particle size on photocatalytic hydrogen production from ethanol over Au/TiO2 nanoparticles. Nat Chem 3:489–49210.1038/nchem.1048 ↗
26. Li XZ, Li FB, Yang CL, Ge WK (2001) Photocatalytic activity of WOx-TiO2 under visible light irradiation. J Photochem Photobiol Chem 141:209–21710.1016/S1010-6030(01)00446-4 ↗
27. Sajjad AKL, Shamaila S, Tian B, Chen F, Zhang J (2009) One step activation of WOx/TiO2 nanocomposites with enhanced photocatalytic activity. Appl Catal B 91:397–40510.1016/j.apcatb.2009.06.005 ↗
28. Li Y, Zhang H, Guo Z, Han J, Zhao X, Zhao Q, Kim SJ (2008) Highly efficient visible-light-induced photocatalytic activity of nanostructured AgI/TiO2 photocatalyst. Langmuir 24:8351–835710.1021/la801046u ↗
29. Bessekhouad Y, Robert D, Weber JV (2004) Bi2S3/TiO2 and CdS/TiO2 heterojunctions as an available configuration for photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutant. J Photochem Photobiol Chem 163:569–58010.1016/j.jphotochem.2004.02.006 ↗
30. Yu J, Dai G, Huang B (2009) Fabrication and characterization of visible-light-driven plasmonic photocatalyst Ag/AgCl/TiO2 nanotube arrays. J Phys Chem C 113:16394–1640110.1021/jp905247j ↗
31. Vinodgopal K, Bedja I, Kamat PV (1996) Nanostructured Semiconductor films for photocatalysis. photoelectrochemical behavior of SnO2/TiO2 composite systems and its role in photocatalytic degradation of a textile azo dye. Chem Mater 8:2180–218710.1021/cm950425y ↗
32. Du J, Qi J, Wang D, Tang Z (2012) Facile synthesis of Au@TiO2 core–shell hollow spheres for dye-sensitized solar cells with remarkably improved efficiency. Energy Environ Sci 5:6914–691810.1039/c2ee21264a ↗
33. Alayoglu S, Nilekar AU, Mavrikakis M, Eichhorn B (2008) Ru–Pt core–shell nanoparticles for preferential oxidation of carbon monoxide in hydrogen. Nat Mater 7:333–33810.1038/nmat2156 ↗
34. Zhao Y, Meng Y, Jiang P (2014) Carbon@MnO2 core–shell nanospheres for flexible high-performance supercapacitor electrode materials. J Power Sources 259:219–22610.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.02.086 ↗
35. Chen M, Li W, Shen X, Diao G (2014) Fabrication of core–shell α-Fe2O3@ Li4Ti5O12 composite and its application in the lithium ion batteries. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:4514–452310.1021/am500294m ↗
36. Xue X, Xing L, Chen Y, Shi S, Wang Y, Wang T (2008) Synthesis and H2S sensing properties of CuO–SnO2 core/shell PN-junction nanorods. J Phys Chem C 112:12157–1216010.1021/jp8037818 ↗
37. Sertchook H, Avnir D (2003) Submicron silica/polystyrene composite particles prepared by a one-step sol–gel process. Chem Mater 15:1690–169410.1021/cm020980h ↗
38. Zhou W, Cao X, Zeng Z, Shi W, Zhu Y, Yan Q, Liu H, Wang J, Zhang H (2013) One-step synthesis of Ni3S2 nanorod@Ni(OH)2 nanosheet core–shell nanostructures on a three-dimensional graphene network for high-performance supercapacitors. Energy Environ Sci 6:2216–222110.1039/C3EE40155C ↗
39. Xu C, Yuan Y, Cui A, Yuan R (2012) In situ controllable synthesis of Ag@AgCl core–shell nanoparticles on graphene oxide sheets. J Mater Sci 48:967–973. doi: 10.1007/s10853-012-6823-210.1007/s10853-012-6823-2 ↗
40. Hossain MM, Shima H, Ku B-C, Hahn JR (2014) Nanoforests composed of ZnO/C core–shell hexagonal nanosheets: fabrication and growth in a sealed thermolysis reactor and optical properties. J Mater Sci 50:93–103. doi: 10.1007/s10853-014-8569-510.1007/s10853-014-8569-5 ↗
41. Chen LY, Fujita T, Ding Y, Chen MW (2010) A three-dimensional gold-decorated nanoporous copper core–shell composite for electrocatalysis and nonenzymatic biosensing. Adv Funct Mater 20:2279–228510.1002/adfm.201000326 ↗
42. Zhao W, Du N, Xiao C, Wu H, Zhang H, Yang D (2014) Large-scale synthesis of Ag–Si core–shell nanowall arrays as high-performance anode materials of Li-ion batteries. J Mater Chem A 2:13949–1395410.1039/C4TA03238A ↗
43. Leary R, Westwood A (2011) Carbonaceous nanomaterials for the enhancement of TiO2 photocatalysis. Carbon 49:741–77210.1016/j.carbon.2010.10.010 ↗
44. Williams G, Seger B, Kamat PV (2008) TiO2-graphene nanocomposites. UV-assisted photocatalytic reduction of graphene oxide. ACS Nano 2:1487–149110.1021/nn800251f ↗
45. Vinodgopal K, Kamat PV (1995) Enhanced rates of photocatalytic degradation of an azo dye using SnO2/TiO2 coupled semiconductor thin films. Environ Sci Technol 29:841–84510.1021/es00003a037 ↗
46. Liu Z, Sun DD, Guo P, Leckie JO (2007) An efficient bicomponent TiO2/SnO2 nanofiber photocatalyst fabricated by electrospinning with a side-by-side dual spinneret method. Nano Lett 7:1081–108510.1021/nl061898e ↗
47. Li J, Chen J, Ke R, Luo C, Hao J (2007) Effects of precursors on the surface Mn species and the activities for NO reduction over MnOx/TiO2 catalysts. Catal Commun 8:1896–190010.1016/j.catcom.2007.03.007 ↗
48. Somasundaram S, Chenthamarakshan CR, de Tacconi NR, Ming Y, Rajeshwar K (2004) Photoassisted deposition of chalcogenide semiconductors on the titanium dioxide surface: mechanistic and other aspects. Chem Mater 16:3846–385210.1021/cm049293b ↗
49. Kay A, Cesar I, Grätzel M (2006) New benchmark for water photooxidation by nanostructured α-Fe2O3 films. J Am Chem Soc 128:15714–1572110.1021/ja064380l ↗
50. Zhong LS, Hu JS, Liang HP, Cao AM, Song WG, Wan LJ (2006) Self-assembled 3D flowerlike iron oxide nanostructures and their application in water treatment. Adv Mater 18:2426–243110.1002/adma.200600504 ↗
51. Wei Z, Xing R, Zhang X, Liu S, Yu H, Li P (2013) Facile template-free fabrication of hollow nestlike α-Fe2O3 nanostructures for water treatment. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5:598–60410.1021/am301950k ↗
52. Sun L, Wu W, Yang S, Zhou J, Hong M, Xiao X, Ren F, Jiang C (2014) Template and silica interlayer tailorable synthesis of spindle-like multilayer α-Fe2O3/Ag/SnO2 ternary hybrid architectures and their enhanced photocatalytic activity. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:1113–112410.1021/am404700h ↗
53. Wu W, Zhang S, Xiao X, Zhou J, Ren F, Sun L, Jiang C (2012) Controllable synthesis, magnetic properties, and enhanced photocatalytic activity of spindlelike mesoporous α-Fe2O3/ZnO core–shell heterostructures. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 4:3602–360910.1021/am300669a ↗
54. Shi Y, Li H, Wang L, Shen W, Chen H (2012) Novel α-Fe2O3/CdS cornlike nanorods with enhanced photocatalytic performance. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 4:4800–480610.1021/am3011516 ↗
55. Peng L, Xie T, Lu Y, Fan H, Wang D (2010) Synthesis, photoelectric properties and photocatalytic activity of the Fe2O3/TiO2 heterogeneous photocatalysts. Phys Chem Chem Phys 12:8033–804110.1039/c002460k ↗
56. Wu Q, Ouyang J, Xie K, Sun L, Wang M, Lin C (2012) Ultrasound-assisted synthesis and visible-light-driven photocatalytic activity of Fe-incorporated TiO2 nanotube array photocatalysts. J Hazard Mater 199–200:410–41710.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.11.031 ↗
57. Tang H, Zhang D, Tang G, Ji X, Li W, Li C, Yang X (2013) Hydrothermal synthesis and visible-light photocatalytic activity of α-Fe2O3/TiO2 composite hollow microspheres. Ceram Int 39:8633–864010.1016/j.ceramint.2013.04.040 ↗
58. Xia Y, Yin L (2013) Core–shell structured α-Fe2O3@TiO2 nanocomposites with improved photocatalytic activity in the visible light region. Phys Chem Chem Phys 15:18627–1863410.1039/c3cp53178c ↗
59. Li W, Yang J, Wu Z, Wang J, Li B, Feng S, Deng Y, Zhang F, Zhao D (2012) A versatile kinetics-controlled coating method to construct uniform porous TiO2 shells for multifunctional core–shell structures. J Am Chem Soc 134:11864–1186710.1021/ja3037146 ↗
60. Li GL, Wang GH (1999) Synthesis of nanometer-sized TiO2 particles by a microemulsion method. Nanostructured Mater 11:663–66810.1016/S0965-9773(99)00354-2 ↗
61. Natarajan TS, Natarajan K, Bajaj HC, Tayade RJ (2013) Enhanced photocatalytic activity of bismuth-doped TiO2 nanotubes under direct sunlight irradiation for degradation of Rhodamine B dye. J Nanoparticle Res 15:1–1810.1007/s11051-013-1669-3 ↗
62. Dong F, Wang H, Wu Z (2009) One-step “green” synthetic approach for mesoporous C-doped titanium dioxide with efficient visible light photocatalytic activity. J Phys Chem C 113:16717–1672310.1021/jp9049654 ↗
63. Zhang Z, Shao C, Li X, Sun Y, Zhang M, Mu J, Zhang P, Guo Z, Liu Y (2012) Hierarchical assembly of ultrathin hexagonal SnS2 nanosheets onto electrospun TiO2 nanofibers: enhanced photocatalytic activity based on photoinduced interfacial charge transfer. Nanoscale 5:606–61810.1039/C2NR32301J ↗
64. Liu C, Meng D, Li Y, Wang L, Liu Y, Luo S (2015) Hierarchical architectures of ZnS–In2S3 solid solution onto TiO2 nanofibers with high visible-light photocatalytic activity. J Alloys Compd 624:44–5210.1016/j.jallcom.2014.11.096 ↗
65. Boppella R, Basak P, Manorama SV (2012) Viable method for the synthesis of biphasic TiO2 nanocrystals with tunable phase composition and enabled visible-light photocatalytic performance. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 4:1239–124610.1021/am201354r ↗
66. Sclafani A, Herrmann JM (1996) Comparison of the photoelectronic and photocatalytic activities of various anatase and rutile forms of titania in pure liquid organic phases and in aqueous solutions. J Phys Chem 100:13655–1366110.1021/jp9533584 ↗