Nanospike Electrode Designs for Improved Electrical Performance in Nanoscale Organic Thin-Film Transistors
Source abstract
Abstract
This work presents a design approach for substantial improvement of the electrical performance in short-channel organic thin-film transistors (TFTs). The design combines features that can improve charge injection to significantly reduce the contact resistance which limits performance of short-channel organic TFTs. Additionally, this design is very effective at mitigating short-channel effects that can be dominant in nanoscale TFTs. TFTs were fabricated by using the semiconductors dinaphtho[2,3-b:2′,3′-f]thieno[3,2-b]thiophene (DNTT) and pentacene with channel lengths in the ranges 200–800 nm and 10–100 nm, respectively. The total source-to-drain resistance is reduced to about 50 ohm·cm, which is among the lowest values reported for organic TFTs.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Thin-Film Transistor Technologies · Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Nanowire Synthesis and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, United States
Microelectronics Research Center, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, United States
Funding
National Science Foundation
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41467-019-09119-810.1038/s41467-019-09119-8 ↗
2. 10.1126/sciadv.aaz515610.1126/sciadv.aaz5156 ↗
3. 10.1002/aelm.20170047410.1002/aelm.201700474 ↗
4. 10.1038/srep2981110.1038/srep29811 ↗
5. 10.1002/adfm.20190457610.1002/adfm.201904576 ↗
6. 10.1109/DRC52342.2021.946723310.1109/DRC52342.2021.9467233 ↗
7. 10.1038/srep4636510.1038/srep46365 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.orgel.2014.10.02310.1016/j.orgel.2014.10.023 ↗
9. 10.1039/c0jm03363d10.1039/c0jm03363d ↗
10. 10.1002/adfm.20150242810.1002/adfm.201502428 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.orgel.2017.07.03210.1016/j.orgel.2017.07.032 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.orgel.2008.01.00410.1016/j.orgel.2008.01.004 ↗
13. 10.1038/nmat212210.1038/nmat2122 ↗
14. Lee C.-G. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 95 · 1
15. 10.1109/55.97458010.1109/55.974580 ↗
16. 10.1063/1.282871110.1063/1.2828711 ↗
17. Kim W.-K. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 89 · 1
18. 10.1002/adfm.20070029410.1002/adfm.200700294 ↗
19. 10.1038/ncomms400510.1038/ncomms4005 ↗
20. 10.1021/jacs.5b0110810.1021/jacs.5b01108 ↗
21. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0456710.1021/acs.chemmater.5b04567 ↗
22. 10.1002/adma.20190388210.1002/adma.201903882 ↗
23. 10.1038/nature1385410.1038/nature13854 ↗
24. 10.1021/am404364610.1021/am4043646 ↗
25. 10.1021/ja508798s10.1021/ja508798s ↗
26. 10.1021/nl303612z10.1021/nl303612z ↗
27. 10.1021/ja068429z10.1021/ja068429z ↗
28. 10.1117/12.56388110.1117/12.563881 ↗
29. 10.1007/s00216-005-0150-210.1007/s00216-005-0150-2 ↗
30. 10.1109/TED.2009.203554010.1109/TED.2009.2035540 ↗