journal article·2016-07

Role of surface composition upon the photocatalytic hydrogen production of Cr-doped and La/Cr-codoped SrTiO3

Xiaoxiang Xu, Meilin Lv, Xiaoqin Sun, Gang Liu

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 51· Issue 13
Publisher page

Abstract

Surface properties play a vital role in many heterogeneous catalytic reactions, particularly in photocatalytic water splitting, where photo-generated electron and holes must migrate to and be transferred at the very top surface of a photocatalyst. Here, we carried out a detailed investigation on the role of surface composition towards photocatalytic hydrogen production of perovskite-based materials, namely, Cr-doped and La/Cr-codoped SrTiO3. Our findings showed that a depletion of B site cations occurred at the surface of these high-temperature annealed samples and a severe diminishing of B site cations took place after introducing La cations at the A site. Although the presence of La helps to improve surface alkalinity and inhibit the formation of detrimental Cr6+ species, La/Cr-codoped sample showed a poor photocatalytic activity. Such a correlation between surface composition and photocatalytic activity suggests that surface tailoring or composition control is highly necessary in the design and development of these perovskite-based photocatalysts. Since surface rearrangements can be kinetically hindered at low temperatures, low temperature synthetic methods are therefore strongly preferred during the synthesis of these perovskite-based photocatalysts.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides · Perovskite Materials and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. Osterloh FE (2008) Inorganic materials as catalysts for photochemical splitting of water. Chem Mater 20:35–54. doi: 10.1021/cm702420310.1021/cm7024203 ↗
2. Listorti A, Durrant J, Barber J (2009) Artificial photosynthesis solar to fuel. Nat Mater 8:929–930. doi: 10.1038/Nmat257810.1038/nmat2578 ↗
3. Hoffmann MR, Martin ST, Choi WY, Bahnemann DW (1995) Environmental applications of semiconductor photocatalysis. Chem Rev 95:69–9610.1021/cr00033a004 ↗
4. Xu XX, Liu G, Azad AK (2015) Visible light photocatalysis by in situ growth of plasmonic Ag nanoparticles upon AgTaO3. Int J Hydrog Energy 40:3672–3678. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.01.04610.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.01.046 ↗
5. Xu XX, Xie YH, Ni S, Azad AK, Cao TC (2015) Photocatalytic H2 production from spinels ZnGa2−xCrxO4 (0 ≤ x ≤ 2) solid solutions. J Solid State Chem 230:95–10110.1016/j.jssc.2015.05.029 ↗
6. Lv ML, Ni S, Wang Z, Cao TC, Xu XX (2016) Cation ordering/disordering effects upon photocatalytic activity of CrNbO4, CrTaO4, Sr2CrNbO6 and Sr2CrTaO6. Int J Hydrog Energy 41:1550–155810.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.11.057 ↗
7. Wu FF et al (2015) Efficient photocatalytic oxygen production over nitrogen doped Sr4Nb2O9 under visible light irradiation. ChemCatChem 8:615–623. doi: 10.1002/cctc.201501035R1
8. Sun XQ et al (2015) Photocatalytic hydrogen production over chromium doped layered perovskite Sr2TiO4. Inorg Chem 54:7445–7453. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5b0104210.1021/acs.inorgchem.5b01042 ↗
9. Xie YH et al (2016) Quinary wurtzite Zn-Ga-Ge-N-O solid solutions and their photocatalytic properties under visible light irradiation. Sci Rep 5:19060. doi: 10.1038/srep19060(2015)10.1038/srep19060 ↗
10. Chen HM et al (2015) Efficient charge separation based on type-II g-C3N4/TiO2-B nanowire/tube heterostructure photocatalysts. Dalton Trans 44:13030–13039. doi: 10.1039/c5dt01757b10.1039/C5DT01757B ↗
11. Scaife DE (1980) Oxide semiconductors in photoelectrochemical conversion of solar-energy. Sol Energy 25:41–5410.1016/0038-092X(80)90405-3 ↗
12. Bak T, Nowotny J, Rekas M, Sorrell CC (2002) Photo-electrochemical hydrogen generation from water using solar energy: materials-related aspects. Int J Hydrog Energy 27:991–1022. doi: 10.1016/S0360-3199(02)00022-810.1016/S0360-3199(02)00022-8 ↗
13. Mitchell RH (2002) Perovskites: modern and ancient. Almaz Press Inc., Ontario
14. Tufte ON, Chapman PW (1967) Electron mobility in semiconducting strontium titanate. Phys Rev 155:796–80210.1103/PhysRev.155.796 ↗
15. Yagi E, Hasiguti RR, Aono M (1996) Electronic conduction above 4 K of slightly reduced oxygen-deficient rutile TiO2−x. Phys Rev B 54:7945–7956. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.794510.1103/PhysRevB.54.7945 ↗
16. Chen SY, Wang LW (2012) Thermodynamic oxidation and reduction potentials of photocatalytic semiconductors in aqueous solution. Chem Mater 24:3659–3666. doi: 10.1021/Cm302533s10.1021/cm302533s ↗
17. Ishii T, Kato H, Kudo A (2004) H2 evolution from an aqueous methanol solution on SrTiO3 photocatalysts codoped with chromium and tantalum ions under visible light irradiation. J Photochem Photobiol A 163:181–186. doi: 10.1016/S1010-6030(03)00442-810.1016/S1010-6030(03)00442-8 ↗
18. Sulaeman U, Yin S, Sato T (2011) Solvothermal synthesis and photocatalytic properties of chromium-doped SrTiO3 nanoparticles. Appl Catal B Environ 105:206–210. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2011.04.01710.1016/j.apcatb.2011.04.017 ↗
19. Li HH et al (2013) Roles of Cr3+ doping and oxygen vacancies in SrTiO3 photocatalysts with high visible light activity for NO removal. J Catal 297:65–69. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2012.09.01910.1016/j.jcat.2012.09.019 ↗
20. Wang DF, Ye JH, Kako T, Kimura T (2006) Photophysical and photocatalytic properties of SrTiO3 doped with Cr cations on different sites. J Phys Chem B 110:15824–15830. doi: 10.1021/Jp062487p10.1021/jp062487p ↗
21. Niishiro R, Kato H, Kudo A (2005) Nickel and either tantalum or niobium-codoped TiO2 and SrTiO3 photocatalysts with visible-light response for H2 or O2 evolution from aqueous solutions. Phys Chem Chem Phys 7:2241–2245. doi: 10.1039/B502147b10.1039/b502147b ↗
22. Xie TH, Sun X, Lin J (2008) Enhanced photocatalytic degradation of RhB driven by visible light-induced MMCT of Ti(IV)-O-Fe(II) formed in Fe-doped SrTiO3. J Phys Chem C 112:9753–9759. doi: 10.1021/Jp711797a
23. Zhou X, Shi JY, Li C (2011) Effect of metal doping on electronic structure and visible light absorption of SrTiO3 and NaTaO3 (Metal = Mn, Fe, and Co). J Phys Chem C 115:8305–8311. doi: 10.1021/Jp200022x10.1021/jp200022x ↗
24. Konta R, Ishii T, Kato H, Kudo A (2004) Photocatalytic activities of noble metal ion doped SrTiO3 under visible light irradiation. J Phys Chem B 108:8992–8995. doi: 10.1021/Jp049556p10.1021/jp049556p ↗
25. Asai R et al (2014) A visible light responsive rhodium and antimony-codoped SrTiO3 powdered photocatalyst loaded with an IrO2 cocatalyst for solar water splitting. Chem Commun 50:2543–2546. doi: 10.1039/C3cc49279f10.1039/C3CC49279F ↗
26. Ouyang SX et al (2012) Surface-alkalinization-induced enhancement of photocatalytic H2 evolution over SrTiO3-based photocatalysts. J Am Chem Soc 134:1974–1977. doi: 10.1021/Ja210610h10.1021/ja210610h ↗
27. Reunchan P et al (2013) Theoretical design of highly active SrTiO3-based photocatalysts by a codoping scheme towards solar energy utilization for hydrogen production. J Mater Chem A 1:4221–4227. doi: 10.1039/C2ta00450j10.1039/c2ta00450j ↗
28. Wang Q, Hisatomi T, Ma SSK, Li YB, Domen K (2014) Core/shell structured La- and Rh-codoped SrTiO3 as a hydrogen evolution photocatalyst in Z-scheme overall water splitting under visible light irradiation. Chem Mater 26:4144–4150. doi: 10.1021/Cm501198310.1021/cm5011983 ↗
29. Jia AZ, Liang XQ, Su ZQ, Zhu T, Liu SX (2010) Synthesis and the effect of calcination temperature on the physical-chemical properties and photocatalytic activities of Ni, La codoped SrTiO3. J Hazard Mater 178:233–242. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.01.06810.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.01.068 ↗
30. Liu JW, Chen G, Li ZH, Zhang ZG (2006) Electronic structure and visible light photocatalysis water splitting property of chromium-doped SrTiO3. J Solid State Chem 179:3704–3708. doi: 10.1016/j.jssc.2006.08.01410.1016/j.jssc.2006.08.014 ↗
31. Van der Heide P (2012) X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy: an introduction to principles and practices. Wiley, Hoboken
32. Xu XX, Liu G, Randorn C, Irvine JTS (2011) g-C3N4 coated SrTiO3 as an efficient photocatalyst for H2 production in aqueous solution under visible light irradiation. Int J Hydrog Energy 36:13501–1350710.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.08.052 ↗
33. Xu XX, Randorn C, Efstathiou P, Irvine JTS (2012) A red metallic oxide photocatalyst. Nat Mater 11:595–598. doi: 10.1038/Nmat331210.1038/nmat3312 ↗
34. Shannon RD, Prewitt CT (1969) Effective ionic radii in oxides and fluorides. Acta Crystallogr A B25:925–94610.1107/S0567740869003220 ↗
35. Kingery WD, Bowen HK, Uhlmann DR (1975) Introduction to ceramics. Wiley, New York
36. Rahman A, Mohamed MH, Ahmed M, Aitani AM (1995) Characterization of chromia alumina catalysts by X-Ray photoelectron-spectroscopy, proton-induced X-ray-emission and thermogravimetric analysis. Appl Catal A Gen 121:203–216. doi: 10.1016/0926-860x(94)00204-510.1016/0926-860X(94)00204-5 ↗
37. Merryfield R, McDaniel M, Parks G (1982) An XPS study of the phillips Cr/silica polymerization catalyst. J Catal 77:348–35910.1016/0021-9517(82)90178-6 ↗
38. Liu GJ et al (2014) A tantalum nitride photoanode modified with a hole-storage layer for highly stable solar water splitting. Angew Chem Int Ed 53:7295–7299. doi: 10.1002/anie.20140469710.1002/anie.201404697 ↗
39. Pilleux ME, Grahmann CR, Fuenzalida VM (1994) Hydrothermal strontium-titanate films on titanium: an XPS and AES depth-profiling study. J Am Ceram Soc 77:1601–1604. doi: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1994.tb09763.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1994.tb09763.x ↗
40. Vasquez RP (1991) X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy study of Sr and Ba compounds. J Electron Spectrosc 56:217–24010.1016/0368-2048(91)85005-E ↗
41. Druce J, Ishihara T, Kilner J (2014) Surface composition of perovskite-type materials studied by low energy ion scattering (LEIS). Solid State Ion 262:893–896. doi: 10.1016/j.ssi.2013.09.01010.1016/j.ssi.2013.09.010 ↗
42. Jung W, Tuller HL (2012) Investigation of surface Sr segregation in model thin film solid oxide fuel cell perovskite electrodes. Energy Environ Sci 5:5370–5378. doi: 10.1039/C1ee02762j10.1039/C1EE02762J ↗
43. Lv ML et al (2015) Bismuth and chromium co-doped strontium titanates and their photocatalytic properties under visible light irradiation. Phys Chem Chem Phys 17:26320–26329. doi: 10.1039/c5cp03889h10.1039/C5CP03889H ↗
44. Liu HF, Dong HF, Meng XQ, Wu FM (2013) First-principles study on strontium titanate for visible light photocatalysis. Chem Phys Lett 555:141–144. doi: 10.1016/j.cplett.2012.11.00510.1016/j.cplett.2012.11.005 ↗