Impact of Arsenic- and Indium-Terminated InGaAs Stressors on Carrier Confinement, Strain, Defects, and Transport Properties of Tensile-Strained Ge
Source abstract
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Device-quality tensile-strained Ge (ε-Ge) grown on a large bandgap semiconductor with superior electrical and optical carrier confinement is essential for group-IV-based optoelectronics. Properties of ε-Ge active layers synthesized on In 0.24 Ga 0.76 As buffers with two different surface terminations─arsenic-rich and indium-rich─were experimentally demonstrated, highlighting the factors not considered in theoretical calculations. High-resolution X-ray diffraction and Raman spectroscopy analyses of these ε-Ge/In 0.24 Ga 0.76 As heterostructures confirmed the fully strained (1.6%) and partially relaxed (0.82%) nature of the ε-Ge bonded with arsenic-terminated (Ge As-terminated ) and indium-terminated (Ge In-terminated ) In 0.24 Ga 0.76 As stressors, respectively. High-resolution cross-sectional transmission electron microscopy showed a coherent, sharp, and fully strained ε-Ge/In 0.24 Ga 0.76 As heterointerface in the Ge As-terminated heterostructure, whereas microtwin defects were present in the Ge In-terminated heterostructure. These heterostructures were further characterized by evaluating the minority carrier lifetimes, high for Ge As-terminated (525 ns) and low for Ge In-terminated (69 ns), using the photoconductive decay technique. Moreover, band alignment was constructed using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, where the Ge As-terminated heterostructure revealed that both holes and electrons were confined within the ε-Ge active layer as a type-I band alignment with Δ E V, As-terminated = 0.22 eV and Δ E C,As-terminated = 0.38 eV. On the other hand, the Ge In-terminated heterostructure exhibited a type-II band alignment with Δ E V,In-terminated = – 0.02 eV and Δ E C,In-terminated = 0.53 eV. Furthermore, the magnetotransport properties revealed high mobility (321 cm 2 /(V s)) with single-electron transport in Ge As-terminated heterostructure and low mobility (3.34 cm 2 /(V s)) with multihole transport in the Ge In-terminated heterostructure. Therefore, preferring the ε-Ge on the arsenic-rich surface of In 0.24 Ga 0.76 As stressor over the indium-rich surface during material synthesis offers device-quality materials with high carrier lifetime and superior carrier confinement, which can provide an opportunity to fabricate efficient group-IV-based optoelectronic devices.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices · solar cell performance optimization · Silicon and Solar Cell Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Advanced Devices & Sustainable Energy Laboratory (ADSEL), Bradley Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
Virginia Tech
Department of Physics
National Renewable Energy Laboratory
Bradley Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
Funding
Division of Electrical, Communications and Cyber Systems
References (70)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/978352765020010.1002/9783527650200 ↗
2. 10.1021/acsaelm.1c0066010.1021/acsaelm.1c00660 ↗
3. 10.1109/JSTQE.2023.332333610.1109/JSTQE.2023.3323336 ↗
4. 10.1021/acsami.5b0738510.1021/acsami.5b07385 ↗
5. 10.1063/5.004351110.1063/5.0043511 ↗
6. 10.1063/5.000671110.1063/5.0006711 ↗
7. 10.1364/OE.47356410.1364/OE.473564 ↗
8. 10.1109/JSTQE.2024.343458110.1109/JSTQE.2024.3434581 ↗
9. 10.1039/D2TC00830K10.1039/D2TC00830K ↗
10. 10.1109/TED.2022.318111210.1109/TED.2022.3181112 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsaelm.3c0056810.1021/acsaelm.3c00568 ↗
12. 10.1109/JEDS.2015.239474310.1109/JEDS.2015.2394743 ↗
13. 10.1021/am405988f10.1021/am405988f ↗
14. 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.19530410.1103/PhysRevB.97.195304 ↗
15. 10.1109/TED.2015.246953610.1109/TED.2015.2469536 ↗
16. 10.1021/acsanm.0c0337310.1021/acsanm.0c03373 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2019.12546810.1016/j.jcrysgro.2019.125468 ↗
18. 10.1063/1.486627810.1063/1.4866278 ↗
19. 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.10.04405210.1103/PhysRevApplied.10.044052 ↗
20. 10.1103/PhysRevB.38.1268710.1103/PhysRevB.38.12687 ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevB.35.815410.1103/PhysRevB.35.8154 ↗
22. 10.1039/D3TC01018J10.1039/D3TC01018J ↗
23. 10.1021/acsomega.1c0620310.1021/acsomega.1c06203 ↗
24. 10.1063/1.476488010.1063/1.4764880 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.17740410.1103/PhysRevLett.110.177404 ↗
26. 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.18.06408310.1103/PhysRevApplied.18.064083 ↗
27. 10.1063/1.9620610.1063/1.96206 ↗
28. 10.1063/1.36733110.1063/1.367331 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2013.07.01410.1016/j.jcrysgro.2013.07.014 ↗
30. 10.1557/PROC-340-34910.1557/PROC-340-349 ↗
31. 10.1116/1.474290410.1116/1.4742904 ↗
32. 10.1201/978131537244010.1201/9781315372440 ↗
33. 10.1109/JQE.2025.358323810.1109/JQE.2025.3583238 ↗
34. Ebert, C. W.; Reynolds, C. L., Jr.; Wellenius, P.; Reynolds, J. G.; Muth, J. F.; Pulwin, Z.; Lee, D.; Lu, F.; Dyer, D. Optimization of InGaAs metamorphic buffers for triple junction solar cells. 2011 37th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference , Seattle, WA, USA, June 19–24, 2011; IEEE, 2012; pp 000469–000473. 10.1109/PVSC.2011.6185995.10.1109/PVSC.2011.6185995 ↗
35. Hudait, M. K.; Dewey, G.; Datta, S.; Fastenau, J. M.; Kavalieros, J.; Liu, W. K.; Lubyshev, D.; Pillarisetty, R.; Rachmady, W.; Radosavljevic, M.; Heterogeneous integration of enhancement mode In 0.7 Ga 0.3 As quantum well transistor on silicon substrate using thin (les 2 μm) composite buffer architecture for high-speed and low-voltage (0.5 v) logic applications. 2007 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting , Washington, DC, USA, December 10–12, 2007; IEEE, 2007; pp 625–628. 10.1109/IEDM.2007.4419017.10.1109/IEDM.2007.4419017 ↗
36. 10.1021/acsaelm.4c0034710.1021/acsaelm.4c00347 ↗
37. Svensson, S. Procedure for Substrate Temperature Control Using the Pyrometer During MBE Growth . ARL-MR-491; Army Research Laboratory, Adelphi, MD, 2000. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA383900.pdf.10.21236/ADA383900 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2020.12568810.1016/j.jcrysgro.2020.125688 ↗
39. 10.1021/acsaelm.9b0061510.1021/acsaelm.9b00615 ↗
40. 10.1063/5.008635910.1063/5.0086359 ↗
41. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.44.162010.1103/PhysRevLett.44.1620 ↗
42. 10.1063/1.309823210.1063/1.3098232 ↗
43. 10.1063/1.473746210.1063/1.4737462 ↗
44. 10.1142/864810.1142/8648 ↗
45. 10.1002/0471749095.ch710.1002/0471749095.ch7 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.optcom.2015.11.06010.1016/j.optcom.2015.11.060 ↗
47. 10.1039/D3NR05904A10.1039/D3NR05904A ↗
48. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2014.233949110.1109/JPHOTOV.2014.2339491 ↗
49. 10.1557/PROC-0994-F07-0410.1557/PROC-0994-F07-04 ↗
50. Swaminathan V. · 1991 · 1
51. 10.1063/1.311018410.1063/1.3110184 ↗
52. Anastassakis E. · 1998 · 5510.1016/S0080-8784(08)60081-2 ↗
53. 10.1063/1.247227310.1063/1.2472273 ↗
54. 10.1039/D4TC01587H10.1039/D4TC01587H ↗
55. 10.1007/978-0-387-76501-310.1007/978-0-387-76501-3 ↗
56. 10.1007/BF0339895510.1007/BF03398955 ↗
57. 10.1007/978-1-4899-6475-510.1007/978-1-4899-6475-5 ↗
58. 10.1080/0141861020824319610.1080/01418610208243196 ↗
59. 10.1557/PROC-618-5310.1557/PROC-618-53 ↗
60. 10.1063/1.495922210.1063/1.4959222 ↗
61. 10.1142/9789814503464_001710.1142/9789814503464_0017 ↗
62. 10.1063/5.019004310.1063/5.0190043 ↗
63. 10.1142/S021797921006468X10.1142/S021797921006468X ↗
64. 10.1038/srep0948710.1038/srep09487 ↗
65. 10.1016/0370-1573(84)90103-010.1016/0370-1573(84)90103-0 ↗
66. 10.1021/acsami.5b0581410.1021/acsami.5b05814 ↗
67. 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.24531110.1103/PhysRevB.70.245311 ↗
68. 10.1063/1.480778710.1063/1.4807787 ↗
69. 10.1002/pssa.221034022310.1002/pssa.2210340223 ↗
70. 10.1007/978-3-662-02403-4_910.1007/978-3-662-02403-4_9 ↗