journal article·2025-08-26Open access

Facile Ethylvanillin Passivation for High-Performance CsFA Perovskite Solar Cells in Variable Lighting Environments

Sukhanidhan Singh, Chukwuebuka Emmanuel Usulor, Warunee Khampa, Wongsathon Musikpan, Woraprom Passatorntaschakorn, Pattanasak Tipparak, Chaowaphat Seriwattanachai, Hideki Nakajima, Athipong Ngamjarurojana, Atcharawon Gardchareon, Pongsakorn Kanjanaboos, Pipat Ruankham, Duangmanee Wongratanaphisan

ACS Applied Electronic Materials· Volume 7· Issue 16

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Carbon-based hybrid halide perovskite solar cells (C-PSCs) have emerged as one of the most attractive photovoltaics due to their exceptional performance and cost-effectiveness. However, defects in the perovskite photoactive layer, particularly undercoordinated Pb 2+ and halide migration, lead to nonradiative recombination, limiting efficiency and stability. Herein, a simple, low-temperature, and cost-effective surface passivation method was employed to mitigate defects in the CsFA-based perovskite surface with 3-ethoxy-4-hydroxybenzaldehye (ethylvanillin: EVL). The –CHO and –OH groups in EVL effectively passivate Pb 2+ defects and suppress I – migration, as confirmed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and full-range infrared analysis, including mid-infrared region and far-infrared region FIR. This passivation significantly enhances the power conversion efficiency (PCE) of C-PSCs by 9.4% (13.03% to 14.26%) with Spiro-OMeTAD and 11.1% (10.14% to 11.26%) with CuSCN as a hole transporting layer (HTL) under 1 sun illumination and 0.09 cm 2 active area. Notably, CuSCN demonstrates a superior hole extraction with 4.1% V oc and 6.5% fill factor gains. Furthermore, unencapsulated C-PSCs with Spiro-OMeTAD devices retain ∼91% of their initial PCE after 2160 h under the ISOS-D-1 protocol and 86% after 80 min under an ISOS-L-1 protocol, demonstrating exceptional stability and reproducibility with EVL at 7.5 mg/mL. Under low-intensity LED illumination (simulating indoor environments), EVL-passivated C-PSCs with Spiro-OMeTAD achieve remarkable PCEs of 28.12%, 28.05%, and 30.65% at 1000, 500, and 200 lx, respectively. These results highlight EVL-passivated C-PSCs as a cost-effective, stable, and high-efficiency solution for both outdoor and indoor photovoltaic applications.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Perovskite Materials and Applications · Conducting polymers and applications · Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physics and Materials Science, Faculty of Science

Chiang Mai University

Materials Science Research Center, Faculty of Science

School of Materials Science and Innovation, Faculty of Science

Mahidol University

Synchrotron Light Research Institute

Thailand Center of Excellence in Physics (ThEP Center), Ministry of Higher Education, Science

Research and Innovation

Funding

Program Management Unit for Human Resources Institutional Development, Research and Innovation

References (86)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adma.20231367310.1002/adma.202313673 ↗
2. 10.1039/D0SE00549E10.1039/D0SE00549E ↗
3. 10.1016/j.solener.2021.08.05510.1016/j.solener.2021.08.055 ↗
4. 10.1021/acsami.0c1567610.1021/acsami.0c15676 ↗
5. 10.1021/acsami.1c0346010.1021/acsami.1c03460 ↗
6. 10.1021/acsami.1c0200410.1021/acsami.1c02004 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.orgel.2024.10715310.1016/j.orgel.2024.107153 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.solener.2018.09.00210.1016/j.solener.2018.09.002 ↗
9. 10.1021/ja809598r10.1021/ja809598r ↗
10. 10.1038/s41586-023-06784-010.1038/s41586-023-06784-0 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.07.04910.1016/j.nanoen.2018.07.049 ↗
12. 10.1126/science.abb594010.1126/science.abb5940 ↗
13. 10.1039/C9MH00500E10.1039/C9MH00500E ↗
14. 10.1039/d1ee00116g10.1039/d1ee00116g ↗
15. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.15305110.1016/j.apsusc.2022.153051 ↗
16. 10.1039/C5TA03802B10.1039/C5TA03802B ↗
17. 10.1021/jz501706910.1021/jz5017069 ↗
18. 10.1038/s41467-017-02039-510.1038/s41467-017-02039-5 ↗
19. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b0305410.1021/acs.jpclett.7b03054 ↗
20. 10.1002/aenm.20200017310.1002/aenm.202000173 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.joule.2020.06.00410.1016/j.joule.2020.06.004 ↗
22. 10.1002/adma.20190042810.1002/adma.201900428 ↗
23. 10.1002/adma.20190712310.1002/adma.201907123 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.07.04610.1016/j.nanoen.2017.07.046 ↗
25. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b0398710.1021/acs.jpcc.9b03987 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.joule.2018.04.02410.1016/j.joule.2018.04.024 ↗
27. 10.1002/adfm.20190502110.1002/adfm.201905021 ↗
28. 10.1038/nenergy.2016.20710.1038/nenergy.2016.207 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.mattod.2018.04.00210.1016/j.mattod.2018.04.002 ↗
30. 10.1002/aenm.20190369610.1002/aenm.201903696 ↗
31. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b0055810.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00558 ↗
32. 10.1002/aenm.20190310610.1002/aenm.201903106 ↗
33. 10.1021/acsaem.9b0233610.1021/acsaem.9b02336 ↗
34. 10.1038/nenergy.2016.8110.1038/nenergy.2016.81 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.joule.2019.04.00510.1016/j.joule.2019.04.005 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.mtener.2018.03.00610.1016/j.mtener.2018.03.006 ↗
37. 10.1039/C8EE01101J10.1039/C8EE01101J ↗
38. 10.1021/acsenergylett.6b0006010.1021/acsenergylett.6b00060 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.10704410.1016/j.nanoen.2022.107044 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.jechem.2021.04.02310.1016/j.jechem.2021.04.023 ↗
41. 10.1039/D0TA02222E10.1039/D0TA02222E ↗
42. 10.1007/s40820-019-0282-010.1007/s40820-019-0282-0 ↗
43. 10.35848/1347-4065/ac7dd210.35848/1347-4065/ac7dd2 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.joule.2019.03.02610.1016/j.joule.2019.03.026 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.solmat.2019.11007110.1016/j.solmat.2019.110071 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.11604910.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116049 ↗
47. 10.1021/acsaem.3c0046310.1021/acsaem.3c00463 ↗
48. 10.1021/jacs.9b0694010.1021/jacs.9b06940 ↗
49. 10.1021/acsami.0c1693910.1021/acsami.0c16939 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.15125910.1016/j.apsusc.2021.151259 ↗
51. 10.32604/jrm.2022.02319210.32604/jrm.2022.023192 ↗
52. 10.1038/ncomms1230510.1038/ncomms12305 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.10719310.1016/j.nanoen.2022.107193 ↗
54. 10.1039/D2TA02084J10.1039/D2TA02084J ↗
55. 10.1016/j.mssp.2022.10724110.1016/j.mssp.2022.107241 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.cej.2022.13953510.1016/j.cej.2022.139535 ↗
57. Shurvell H. F. · 2006 · 3 · 1783
58. 10.1002/adma.20200840510.1002/adma.202008405 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.04.05610.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.04.056 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.12506210.1016/j.cej.2020.125062 ↗
61. 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c0113010.1021/acsenergylett.0c01130 ↗
62. 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c0079410.1021/acsenergylett.1c00794 ↗
63. 10.1002/admi.20220063610.1002/admi.202200636 ↗
64. 10.3390/coatings801000210.3390/coatings8010002 ↗
65. 10.1002/solr.20210094510.1002/solr.202100945 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2024.16054210.1016/j.apsusc.2024.160542 ↗
67. 10.1039/d0cp04950f10.1039/d0cp04950f ↗
68. 10.1021/acsaem.4c0247410.1021/acsaem.4c02474 ↗
69. 10.1109/JPHOT.2016.260861910.1109/JPHOT.2016.2608619 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.15596910.1016/j.apsusc.2022.155969 ↗
71. 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c0164210.1021/acsenergylett.0c01642 ↗
72. 10.1016/j.apmt.2023.10189510.1016/j.apmt.2023.101895 ↗
73. 10.1038/srep3815010.1038/srep38150 ↗
74. 10.1039/c6ee01337f10.1039/c6ee01337f ↗
75. 10.1016/j.joule.2019.10.00310.1016/j.joule.2019.10.003 ↗
76. 10.1021/acsaem.0c0289510.1021/acsaem.0c02895 ↗
77. 10.1039/D2CP00341D10.1039/D2CP00341D ↗
78. 10.1002/adfm.20201118710.1002/adfm.202011187 ↗
79. 10.1021/acsaem.3c0236910.1021/acsaem.3c02369 ↗
80. 10.1021/acsaem.3c0258110.1021/acsaem.3c02581 ↗
81. 10.1039/d0tc03390a10.1039/d0tc03390a ↗
82. 10.1016/j.solmat.2019.11001010.1016/j.solmat.2019.110010 ↗
83. 10.1002/admi.20220119110.1002/admi.202201191 ↗
84. 10.1039/d0ta03951a10.1039/d0ta03951a ↗
85. 10.1002/aesr.20220004510.1002/aesr.202200045 ↗
86. 10.1021/acsenergylett.6b0050110.1021/acsenergylett.6b00501 ↗