In Situ Observation of Ion Migration in a Ferroelectric Ionic Conductor Rb-KTP during Thermal Annealing
Source abstract
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Ion exchange in Rb-doped KTiOPO 4 has facilitated significant advancements in ferroelectric domain engineering, yet understanding the underlying mechanisms remains in its infancy. We perform time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry analysis on multiple periodically ion-exchanged and periodically poled Rb-doped KTiOPO 4 samples under different temperatures and annealing durations. The results are compared between annealing in air, which involved ex situ annealing before periodic poling, and vacuum annealing conducted in situ after periodic poling. The Rb + diffusion profile after periodic ion exchange forms a tooth-shaped pattern. We show that in situ annealing causes a surface pinning effect on the nonpolar face, limiting Rb + migration along the polar axis at the surface. Once the pinned layer is removed through milling, the underlying Rb + diffusion is distinctively different from the surface. Additionally, the rate of Rb + diffusion during in situ annealing is linear, while the periodic domain structures remain stable after annealing. These results contribute to understanding the ionic diffusion process in a ferroelectric ionic conductor and using ion exchange to tailor the linear and nonlinear properties of KTiOPO 4 .
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Photorefractive and Nonlinear Optics · Perovskite Materials and Applications · Photonic and Optical Devices
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Applied Physics, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Roslagstullsbacken 21, 114 21 Stockholm, Sweden
Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Funding
Vetenskapsr?det · Carl Tryggers Stiftelse f?r Vetenskaplig Forskning
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1103/PhysRev.127.191810.1103/PhysRev.127.1918 ↗
2. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.7.11810.1103/PhysRevLett.7.118 ↗
3. 10.1063/1.149612510.1063/1.1496125 ↗
4. 10.1364/OE.24.01468210.1364/OE.24.014682 ↗
5. 10.1364/OL.48169410.1364/OL.481694 ↗
6. 10.1038/nphoton.2007.13710.1038/nphoton.2007.137 ↗
7. 10.1063/5.013558910.1063/5.0135589 ↗
8. 10.1107/S002188989100783510.1107/S0021889891007835 ↗
9. 10.1103/PhysRevB.110.21411510.1103/PhysRevB.110.214115 ↗
10. 10.1364/OME.49195010.1364/OME.491950 ↗
11. 10.1063/1.9791310.1063/1.97913 ↗
12. 10.1063/1.34962710.1063/1.349627 ↗
13. 10.1038/s44310-024-00042-510.1038/s44310-024-00042-5 ↗
14. 10.1063/5.006009610.1063/5.0060096 ↗
15. 10.1364/OE.39707410.1364/OE.397074 ↗
16. 10.1364/OE.41077310.1364/OE.410773 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2021.11346110.1016/j.ultramic.2021.113461 ↗
18. 10.1002/mas.2012410.1002/mas.20124 ↗
19. 10.1021/acsami.8b0753710.1021/acsami.8b07537 ↗
20. 10.1021/acsnano.1c0209710.1021/acsnano.1c02097 ↗
21. 10.1002/adfm.20200199510.1002/adfm.202001995 ↗
22. 10.1063/5.009007110.1063/5.0090071 ↗
23. 10.1107/S002188981101253210.1107/S0021889811012532 ↗
24. Mutter P. · 2022
25. 10.1143/JPSJ.62.18310.1143/JPSJ.62.183 ↗
26. 10.1063/1.149483710.1063/1.1494837 ↗
27. 10.1002/pssa.221093023210.1002/pssa.2210930232 ↗