DataVXJournal of Materials SciencePaper
journal article·2024-06

Optimizing the performance of vapor-deposited perovskite solar cells through advanced predictive modeling

Seyed Hamed Godasiaei

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 59· Issue 21
Publisher page
Bibliographic record

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

Electronic materials

OpenAlex topics: Perovskite Materials and Applications · Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films · Conducting polymers and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (66)

Show source-provided references
1. Kojima A, Teshima K, Shirai Y, Miyasaka T (2009) Organometal halide perovskites as visible-light sensitizers for photovoltaic cells. J Am Chem Soc 131(17):6050–6051. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja809598r10.1021/ja809598r ↗
2. Wang M, Wang H, Li W, Hu X, Sun K, Zang Z (2019) Defect passivation using ultrathin PTAA layers for efficient and stable perovskite solar cells with a high fill factor and eliminated hysteresis. J Mater Chem A 7(46):26421–26428. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9TA08314F10.1039/C9TA08314F ↗
3. Park NG (2015) Perovskite solar cells: an emerging photovoltaic technology. Mater Today 18(2):65–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2014.07.00710.1016/j.mattod.2014.07.007 ↗
4. Yin WJ, Shi T, Yan Y (2014) Unusual defect physics in CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite solar cell absorber. Appl Phys Lett. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.486477810.1063/1.4864778 ↗
5. Brandt RE et al (2017) Searching for ‘defect-tolerant’ photovoltaic materials: combined theoretical and experimental screening. Chem Mater 29(11):4667–4674. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0549610.1021/acs.chemmater.6b05496 ↗
6. Wehrenfennig C, Eperon GE, Johnston MB, Snaith HJ, Herz LM (2014) High charge carrier mobilities and lifetimes in organolead trihalide perovskites. Adv Mater 26(10):1584–1589. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20130517210.1002/adma.201305172 ↗
7. Zhang C, Li H, Gong C, Zhuang Q, Chen J, Zang Z (2023) Crystallization manipulation and holistic defect passivation toward stable and efficient inverted perovskite solar cells. Energy Environ Sci 16(9):3825–3836. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3EE00413A10.1039/D3EE00413A ↗
8. Ono LK, Liu S, Qi Y (2020) Reducing detrimental defects for high-performance metal halide perovskite solar cells. Angew Chemie Int Ed 59(17):6676–6698. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20190552110.1002/anie.201905521 ↗
9. Li H et al (2023) 2D/3D heterojunction engineering at the buried interface towards high-performance inverted methylammonium-free perovskite solar cells. Nat Energy 8(9):946–955. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-023-01295-810.1038/s41560-023-01295-8 ↗
10. Liu M, Johnston MB, Snaith HJ (2013) Efficient planar heterojunction perovskite solar cells by vapour deposition. Nature 501(7467):395–398. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature1250910.1038/nature12509 ↗
11. Bhattarai S, Sharma A, Muchahary D, Gogoi D, Das TD (2021) Numerical simulation study for efficiency enhancement of doubly graded perovskite solar cell. Opt Mater (Amst) 118:111285. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.OPTMAT.2021.11128510.1016/J.OPTMAT.2021.111285 ↗
12. Grancini G et al (2017) One-year stable perovskite solar cells by 2D/3D interface engineering. Nat Commun 8:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1568410.1038/ncomms15684 ↗
13. Wu T et al (2021) The main progress of perovskite solar cells in 2020–2021. Nano-Micro Lett 13(1):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-021-00672-w10.1007/s40820-021-00672-w ↗
14. Stranks SD et al (2013) Electron-hole diffusion lengths exceeding 1 micrometer in an organometal trihalide perovskite absorber. Science 342(6156):341–34410.1126/science.1243982 ↗
15. DeQuilettes DW et al (2015) Impact of microstructure on local carrier lifetime in perovskite solar cells. Science 348(6235):683–686. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa533310.1126/science.aaa5333 ↗
16. Hu Z, Lin Z, Su J, Zhang J, Chang J, Hao Y (2019) A review on energy band-gap engineering for perovskite photovoltaics. Sol RRL 3(12):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/solr.20190030410.1002/solr.201900304 ↗
17. Bansal NK, Mishra S, Dixit H, Porwal S, Singh P, Singh T (2023) Machine learning in perovskite solar cells: recent developments and future perspectives. Energy Technol 11(12):1–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/ente.20230073510.1002/ente.202300735 ↗
18. Li G et al (2023) Highly efficient p-i-n perovskite solar cells that endure temperature variations. Science 379(6630):399–403. https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIENCE.ADD7331/SUPPL_FILE/SCIENCE.ADD7331_SM.PDF10.1126/SCIENCE.ADD7331/SUPPL_FILE/SCIENCE.ADD7331_SM.PDF ↗
19. Fang Z et al (2023) Charge transport materials for monolithic perovskite-based tandem solar cells: a review. Sci China Mater 66(6):2107–2127. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40843-022-2437-910.1007/S40843-022-2437-9 ↗
20. Hu Y et al (2022) Machine-learning modeling for ultra-stable high-efficiency perovskite solar cells. Adv Energy Mater 12(41):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20220146310.1002/aenm.202201463 ↗
21. Isikgor FH, Zhumagali S, Luis LV, De Bastiani M, McCulloch I, De Wolf S (2023) Molecular engineering of contact interfaces for high-performance perovskite solar cells. Nat Rev Mater 8(2):89–108. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-022-00503-310.1038/s41578-022-00503-3 ↗
22. Kumar NS, Naidu KCB (2021) A review on perovskite solar cells (PSCs), materials and applications. J Mater 7(5):940–956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmat.2021.04.00210.1016/j.jmat.2021.04.002 ↗
23. Hui Z, Wang M, Yin X, Wang Y, Yue Y (2023) Machine learning for perovskite solar cell design. Comput Mater Sci 226:112215. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMMATSCI.2023.11221510.1016/J.COMMATSCI.2023.112215 ↗
24. Kim JY, Lee JW, Jung HS, Shin H, Park NG (2020) High-efficiency perovskite solar cells. Chem Rev 120(15):7867–7918. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACS.CHEMREV.0C00107/ASSET/IMAGES/MEDIUM/CR0C00107_0033.GIF10.1021/ACS.CHEMREV.0C00107/ASSET/IMAGES/MEDIUM/CR0C00107_0033.GIF ↗
25. Yılmaz B, Yıldırım R (2021) Critical review of machine learning applications in perovskite solar research. Nano Energy 80(2020):105546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.10554610.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105546 ↗
26. Park SM et al (2023) Engineering ligand reactivity enables high-temperature operation of stable perovskite solar cells. Science 381(6654):209–215. https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIENCE.ADI4107/SUPPL_FILE/SCIENCE.ADI4107_SM.PDF10.1126/SCIENCE.ADI4107/SUPPL_FILE/SCIENCE.ADI4107_SM.PDF ↗
27. Zhang H, Pfeifer L, Zakeeruddin SM, Chu J, Grätzel M (2023) Tailoring passivators for highly efficient and stable perovskite solar cells. Nat Rev Chem 7(9):632–652. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41570-023-00510-010.1038/s41570-023-00510-0 ↗
28. Zhang J et al (2023) Optimizing perovskite thin-film parameter spaces with machine learning-guided robotic platform for high-performance perovskite solar cells. Adv Energy Mater 13(48):2302594. https://doi.org/10.1002/AENM.20230259410.1002/AENM.202302594 ↗
29. Hussain W, Sawar S, Sultan M (2023) Leveraging machine learning to consolidate the diversity in experimental results of perovskite solar cells. RSC Adv 13(32):22529–22537. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3RA02305B10.1039/D3RA02305B ↗
30. Zhi C et al (2023) Machine-learning-assisted screening of interface passivation materials for perovskite solar cells. ACS Energy Lett 8(3):1424–1433. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACSENERGYLETT.2C02818/SUPPL_FILE/NZ2C02818_SI_001.PDF10.1021/ACSENERGYLETT.2C02818/SUPPL_FILE/NZ2C02818_SI_001.PDF ↗
31. Chen C, Maqsood A, Jacobsson TJ (2023) The role of machine learning in perovskite solar cell research. J Alloys Compd 960:170824. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JALLCOM.2023.17082410.1016/J.JALLCOM.2023.170824 ↗
32. Graniero P et al (2023) The challenge of studying perovskite solar cells’ stability with machine learning. Front Energy Res 11:1118654. https://doi.org/10.3389/FENRG.2023.1118654/BIBTEX10.3389/FENRG.2023.1118654/BIBTEX ↗
33. Li W et al (2023) Performance prediction and optimization of perovskite solar cells based on the Bayesian approach. Sol Energy 262:111853. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOLENER.2023.11185310.1016/J.SOLENER.2023.111853 ↗
34. Lu Y et al (2023) Predicting the device performance of the perovskite solar cells from the experimental parameters through machine learning of existing experimental results. J Energy Chem 77:200–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JECHEM.2022.10.02410.1016/J.JECHEM.2022.10.024 ↗
35. Fan J et al (2018) Comparison of support vector machine and extreme gradient boosting for predicting daily global solar radiation using temperature and precipitation in humid subtropical climates: a case study in China. Energy Convers Manag 164:102–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.02.08710.1016/j.enconman.2018.02.087 ↗
36. Bang HT, Yoon S, Jeon H (2020) Application of machine learning methods to predict a thermal conductivity model for compacted bentonite. Ann Nucl Energy 142:107395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2020.10739510.1016/j.anucene.2020.107395 ↗
37. Zhou L, Garg D, Qiu Y, Kim SM, Mudawar I, Kharangate CR (2020) Machine learning algorithms to predict flow condensation heat transfer coefficient in mini/micro-channel utilizing universal data. Int J Heat Mass Transf 162:120351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.12035110.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.120351 ↗
38. Acikgoz O, Çolak AB, Camci M, Karakoyun Y, Dalkilic AS (2022) Machine learning approach to predict the heat transfer coefficients pertaining to a radiant cooling system coupled with mixed and forced convection. Int J Therm Sci 178:107624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2022.10762410.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2022.107624 ↗
39. Kwon B, Ejaz F, Hwang LK (2020) Machine learning for heat transfer correlations. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 116:104694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2020.10469410.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2020.104694 ↗
40. Mammeri M, Dehimi L, Bencherif H, Pezzimenti F (2023) Paths towards high perovskite solar cells stability using machine learning techniques. Sol Energy 249(2022):651–660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2022.12.00210.1016/j.solener.2022.12.002 ↗
41. Yan W et al (2022) Machine learning enabled development of unexplored perovskite solar cells with high efficiency. Nano Energy 99:107394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.10739410.1016/j.nanoen.2022.107394 ↗
42. Wang J et al (2023) Advancing vapor-deposited perovskite solar cells via machine learning. J Mater Chem A 11(25):13201–13208. https://doi.org/10.1039/d3ta00027c10.1039/d3ta00027c ↗
43. Chen H, Lin C, Xue HM, Chen C, Yang M (2023) The heat shock protein DNAJB2 as a novel biomarker for essential thrombocythemia diagnosis associated with immune infiltration. Thromb Res 223:131–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.THROMRES.2023.01.02910.1016/J.THROMRES.2023.01.029 ↗
44. Thangavelu M, Parthiban VJ, Kesavaraman D, Murugesan T (2023) Forecasting of solar radiation for a cleaner environment using robust machine learning techniques. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30(11):30919–30932. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11356-022-24321-W/FIGURES/1710.1007/S11356-022-24321-W/FIGURES/17 ↗
45. I. Kasireddy, V. M. Reddy, P. Naveen, and G. H. Vardhan, “Exploring Machine Learning Models for Solar Energy Output Forecasting,” pp. 210–217, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48888-7_18.10.1007/978-3-031-48888-7_18 ↗
46. Wen H, Du Y, Chen X, Lim EG, Wen H, Yan K (2023) A regional solar forecasting approach using generative adversarial networks with solar irradiance maps. Renew Energy 216:119043. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RENENE.2023.11904310.1016/J.RENENE.2023.119043 ↗
47. Torres-Barrán A, Alonso Á, Dorronsoro JR (2019) Regression tree ensembles for wind energy and solar radiation prediction. Neurocomputing 326–327:151–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2017.05.10410.1016/j.neucom.2017.05.104 ↗
48. Godasiaei SH, Chamkha AJ (2024) Numerical heat transfer, part A : applications advancing heat transfer modeling through machine learning: a focus on forced convection with nanoparticles. Numer Heat Transf Part A Appl. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407782.2023.229973410.1080/10407782.2023.2299734 ↗
49. Mohammadpour J, Husain S, Salehi F, Lee A (2022) Machine learning regression-CFD models for the nanofluid heat transfer of a microchannel heat sink with double synthetic jets. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 130:105808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2021.10580810.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2021.105808 ↗
50. Wang X et al (2023) Characterization and mapping of photovoltaic solar power plants by Landsat imagery and random forest: a case study in Gansu Province, China. J Clean Prod 417:138015. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2023.13801510.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2023.138015 ↗
51. Motahar S (2020) Experimental study and ANN-based prediction of melting heat transfer in a uniform heat flux PCM enclosure. J Energy Storage 30:101535. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EST.2020.10153510.1016/J.EST.2020.101535 ↗
52. Godasiaei SH, Chamkha AJ (2024) Exploring novel heat transfer correlations: machine learning insights for molten salt heat exchangers exploring novel heat transfer correlations: machine learning. Numer Heat Transf Part A Appl. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407782.2024.232152410.1080/10407782.2024.2321524 ↗
53. Nidhul K, Thummar D, Yadav AK, Anish S (2023) Machine learning approach for optimization and performance prediction of triangular duct solar air heater: a comprehensive review. Sol Energy 255:396–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2023.02.02210.1016/j.solener.2023.02.022 ↗
54. Godasiaei SH, Kamali H (2024) Water jet angle prediction in supersonic crossflows: EULER—Lagrange and machine. Eur Phys J Plus. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-024-05047-910.1140/epjp/s13360-024-05047-9 ↗
55. Rodriguez-Galiano V, Sanchez-Castillo M, Chica-Olmo M, Chica-Rivas M (2015) Machine learning predictive models for mineral prospectivity: an evaluation of neural networks, random forest, regression trees and support vector machines. Ore Geol Rev 71:804–818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2015.01.00110.1016/j.oregeorev.2015.01.001 ↗
56. Kedam N, Uglanov DA, Blagin EV, Gorshkalev AA, Panshin RA, Liu J (2024) Unified ANN model for heat transfer factor (j) and friction factor (f) prediction in offset strip and wavy fin PFHEs. Case Stud Therm Eng 53:103845. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CSITE.2023.10384510.1016/J.CSITE.2023.103845 ↗
57. Alizamir M et al (2023) Improving the accuracy of daily solar radiation prediction by climatic data using an efficient hybrid deep learning model: long short-term memory (LSTM) network coupled with wavelet transform. Eng Appl Artif Intell 123:106199. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGAPPAI.2023.10619910.1016/J.ENGAPPAI.2023.106199 ↗
58. Maciel JN, Ledesma JJ, Junior OH (2024) Hybrid prediction method of solar irradiance applied to short-term photovoltaic energy generation. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 192:114185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.11418510.1016/j.rser.2023.114185 ↗
59. Ramezan CA, Warner TA, Maxwell AE (2019) Evaluation of sampling and cross-validation tuning strategies for regional-scale machine learning classification. Remote Sens. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs1102018510.3390/rs11020185 ↗
60. Bergmeir C, Benítez JM (2012) On the use of cross-validation for time series predictor evaluation. Inf Sci (Ny) 191:192–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2011.12.02810.1016/j.ins.2011.12.028 ↗
61. Abriha D, Srivastava PK, Szabó S (2023) Smaller is better? Unduly nice accuracy assessments in roof detection using remote sensing data with machine learning and k-fold cross-validation. Heliyon 9(3):e14045. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HELIYON.2023.E1404510.1016/J.HELIYON.2023.E14045 ↗
62. King RD, Orhobor OI, Taylor CC (2021) Cross-validation is safe to use. Nat Mach Intell 3(4):276. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-021-00332-z10.1038/s42256-021-00332-z ↗
63. Ashrafian A, Shokri F, Taheri Amiri MJ, Yaseen ZM, Rezaie-Balf M (2020) Compressive strength of foamed cellular lightweight concrete simulation: new development of hybrid artificial intelligence model. Constr Build Mater 230:117048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11704810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117048 ↗
64. Yaseen ZM et al (2018) Predicting compressive strength of lightweight foamed concrete using extreme learning machine model. Adv Eng Softw 115(2017):112–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2017.09.00410.1016/j.advengsoft.2017.09.004 ↗
65. Young BA, Hall A, Pilon L, Gupta P, Sant G (2019) Can the compressive strength of concrete be estimated from knowledge of the mixture proportions? New insights from statistical analysis and machine learning methods. Cem Concr Res 115(2018):379–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.09.00610.1016/j.cemconres.2018.09.006 ↗
66. Yaseen ZM, Keshtegar B, Hwang HJ, Nehdi ML (2019) Predicting reinforcing bar development length using polynomial chaos expansions. Eng Struct 195(2018):524–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.06.01210.1016/j.engstruct.2019.06.012 ↗