Transition Metal Dichalcogenides as Nanoscale 2D Interconnects: Performance Analysis of MoTe2, TaS2, WTe2, NbSe2, and TaSe2 Nanoribbons
Source abstract
Abstract
This study evaluates the potential of transition metal dichalcogenide (TMD) nanoribbons, specifically MoTe 2, TaS 2, WTe 2, NbSe 2, and TaSe 2 as nanoscale interconnects to address scaling challenges in semiconductor technology. Six configurations, 1T′ MoTe 2, 1T TaS 2, 1T′ WTe 2, 1T NbSe 2, and 2H TaSe 2 (in both armchair and zigzag orientations), are assessed in terms of key performance metrics such as propagation delay, crosstalk-induced delay, noise performance, energy-delay product (EDP), stability, and frequency response. To ensure a comprehensive analysis of structural variations, three distinct edge termination configurations have been investigated for each of the TMD (MX 2 ) materials: C1, with both edges terminated by metal (M) atoms; C2, with one edge terminated by a M atom and the other by a chalcogen (X) atom; and C3, with both edges terminated by X atoms. Interconnect behavior is simulated using a π-type equivalent single conductor (ESC) model in conjunction with a driver-interconnect-load (DIL) setup. The ESC circuit parameters, derived from the number of conducting channels and Fermi velocity calculated via first-principles simulations, facilitated detailed delay and noise calculations, while the open-loop transfer function provided insights into frequency response, Nyquist plots, and damping factors. In addition to our six proposed configurations (each with three distinct edge configurations), nine configurations reported in the literature are compared in terms of the same performance parameters, thereby evaluating a total of twenty-seven configurations. Among these, TaS 2 nanoribbon-based configurations outperformed the others overall, with MoTe 2, WTe 2, and NbSe 2 also showing competitive performance; TaSe 2 configurations, despite their poorer interconnect performance, demonstrated superior stability. These findings indicate that TaS 2, along with NbSe 2, WTe 2, and MoTe 2, is a promising candidate for future nanoscale interconnect applications at reduced dimensions.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: 2D Materials and Applications · Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures · Graphene research and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology
References (70)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.4313/teem.2010.11.3.09310.4313/teem.2010.11.3.093 ↗
2. 10.1038/s41565-024-01695-110.1038/s41565-024-01695-1 ↗
3. 10.1021/nn506583e10.1021/nn506583e ↗
4. 10.1063/1.170384410.1063/1.1703844 ↗
5. 10.1002/adfm.20160564710.1002/adfm.201605647 ↗
6. Jin, M.; Oh, D.; Kim, J. Delay Impact on Process Variation of Interconnect throughout Technology Scaling. In 2022 19th International SoC Design Conference (ISOCC); IEEE: Gangneung-si, Korea, Republic of, 2022, pp 388–389.10.1109/ISOCC56007.2022.10031498 ↗
7. 10.1063/1.513367110.1063/1.5133671 ↗
8. 10.1039/D1TC05872J10.1039/D1TC05872J ↗
9. 10.1007/s10825-021-01714-710.1007/s10825-021-01714-7 ↗
10. 10.1109/TED.2018.285800610.1109/TED.2018.2858006 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsnano.6b0236810.1021/acsnano.6b02368 ↗
12. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b0095810.1021/acs.nanolett.9b00958 ↗
13. 10.1109/TNANO.2020.304873410.1109/TNANO.2020.3048734 ↗
14. 10.1021/nl504500710.1021/nl5045007 ↗
15. 10.1021/nl502557g10.1021/nl502557g ↗
16. 10.1038/s41598-018-32387-110.1038/s41598-018-32387-1 ↗
17. 10.1038/ncomms1103810.1038/ncomms11038 ↗
18. 10.1038/s41557-018-0035-610.1038/s41557-018-0035-6 ↗
19. 10.1021/acsnano.0c0593610.1021/acsnano.0c05936 ↗
20. 10.1038/s41535-021-00320-x10.1038/s41535-021-00320-x ↗
21. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c0048110.1021/acs.nanolett.1c00481 ↗
22. 10.1021/acsnano.1c0601210.1021/acsnano.1c06012 ↗
23. 10.1126/sciadv.abi633910.1126/sciadv.abi6339 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.physb.2011.03.04410.1016/j.physb.2011.03.044 ↗
25. 10.1021/nn502716410.1021/nn5027164 ↗
26. 10.1002/adma.20180461610.1002/adma.201804616 ↗
27. 10.1088/2053-1583/aa592110.1088/2053-1583/aa5921 ↗
28. 10.1038/s41699-017-0044-010.1038/s41699-017-0044-0 ↗
29. 10.1021/acsaelm.3c0080910.1021/acsaelm.3c00809 ↗
30. 10.1007/BF0079588910.1007/BF00795889 ↗
31. 10.1038/ncomms1103810.1038/ncomms11038 ↗
32. 10.1038/ncomms1067210.1038/ncomms10672 ↗
33. 10.3762/bjnano.8.2810.3762/bjnano.8.28 ↗
34. 10.1109/JEDS.2017.278125010.1109/JEDS.2017.2781250 ↗
35. ITRS(2013). https://www.dropbox.com/sh/qz9gg6uu4kl04vj/AADD7ykFdJ2ZpCR1LAB2XEjIa?dl=0 (accessed 03–10, 2024).
36. 10.1109/TNANO.2021.314004110.1109/TNANO.2021.3140041 ↗
37. 10.1007/s10825-020-01558-710.1007/s10825-020-01558-7 ↗
38. 10.1080/03772063.2019.163778810.1080/03772063.2019.1637788 ↗
39. Kumbhare V. R. · J. Comput. Electron. · 2023 · 22 · 50
40. 10.1002/cta.238410.1002/cta.2384 ↗
41. The International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors (ITRS): https://www.semiconductors.org/resources/2013international-technology-roadmap-for-semiconductors-itrs/ 2013.
42. 10.1038/s41467-023-44093-210.1038/s41467-023-44093-2 ↗
43. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b0044310.1021/acs.nanolett.8b00443 ↗
44. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.413610.1103/PhysRevLett.86.4136 ↗
45. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c0203310.1021/acs.nanolett.3c02033 ↗
46. 10.1103/PhysRevB.102.11516110.1103/PhysRevB.102.115161 ↗
47. 10.1088/1361-648X/ab400710.1088/1361-648X/ab4007 ↗
48. 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.15530210.1103/PhysRevB.93.155302 ↗
49. 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.16540110.1103/PhysRevB.65.165401 ↗
50. 10.1039/D2CP03417D10.1039/D2CP03417D ↗
51. 10.1021/acsanm.8b0200810.1021/acsanm.8b02008 ↗
52. 10.1063/1.496266210.1063/1.4962662 ↗
53. 10.1038/srep1664610.1038/srep16646 ↗
54. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b0134210.1021/acs.nanolett.6b01342 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2023.15775410.1016/j.apsusc.2023.157754 ↗
56. 10.1186/s40580-018-0139-010.1186/s40580-018-0139-0 ↗
57. 10.3390/mi1307114810.3390/mi13071148 ↗
58. 10.1007/s10825-022-01976-910.1007/s10825-022-01976-9 ↗
59. Agrawal, S.; Srivastava, A.; Kaushal, G. DFT Analysis of Different Shaped Cu Nanowires for Interconnect Application. Proc. 6th Int. Conf. Inf. Technol. High-Perform. Comput. 2021, 2930, 70–78.
60. 10.1109/ojnano.2022.322315110.1109/ojnano.2022.3223151 ↗
61. 10.1109/TNANO.2023.331406810.1109/TNANO.2023.3314068 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2023.11257010.1016/j.commatsci.2023.112570 ↗
63. 10.1109/tnano.2022.323257510.1109/tnano.2022.3232575 ↗
64. 10.1109/LED.2006.87376510.1109/LED.2006.873765 ↗
65. Kaushik, B. K.; Sarkar, S.; Agarwal, R. P.; Joshi, R. C. Crosstalk Analysis of Simultaneously Switching Coupled Interconnects Driven by Unipolar Inputs through Heterogeneous Resistive Drivers; IEEE: Rawalpindi, Pakistan, 2007; pp 278–283. 2007 International Conference on Emerging Technologies10.1109/ICET.2007.4516358 ↗
66. 10.1109/TNANO.2015.240835310.1109/TNANO.2015.2408353 ↗
67. 10.1039/C7NR08636A10.1039/C7NR08636A ↗
68. 10.1007/s10008-023-05691-810.1007/s10008-023-05691-8 ↗
69. 10.1049/mnl.2013.074210.1049/mnl.2013.0742 ↗
70. 10.1109/TED.2024.340878010.1109/TED.2024.3408780 ↗