journal article·2024-05-28Open access

Antenna Effect in Large Area Palladium-Coated Electrostatically Formed Silicon Nanowire for Ppb Level Hydrogen Sensing

Idan ShemTov, Anwesha Mukherjee, Zoe Musafi, Evgeny Pikhay, Doron Greental, Yakov Roizin, Yarden Mazor, Yossi Rosenwaks

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide An electrostatically formed nanowire (EFN) with an electrostatically formed channel is a highly sensitive and selective sensor for detecting various gases and volatile organic compounds. We report here on a specially designed large-area sensing antenna EFN that improves the response of the conventional EFN by several orders of magnitude, thus allowing the sensing of very low analyte concentrations. We have fabricated an EFN with a large area (∼3500 μm 2 ) palladium sensing layer and show that its response in a dry air atmosphere to 30 ppb H 2 is ∼90% at 60 °C. We show that this unprecedented sensitivity is due to the antenna effect, which causes the charged H 2 species to drift to the region right above the EFN transistor channel. Electrostatic modeling shows good agreement with the measured antenna effect and predicts that this design paves the way to an ultrasensitive very-large-scale integration (VLSI) based gas sensing platform.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanowire Synthesis and Applications · Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design · Semiconductor materials and devices

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physical Electronics, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo, 6139001, Israel

Tower Semiconductor, Migdal HaEmeq, 2310502, Israel

Funding

Israel Innovation Authority · Office of Naval Research

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/advs.20230261410.1002/advs.202302614 ↗
2. 10.1007/s10512-006-0184-310.1007/s10512-006-0184-3 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.joule.2020.05.01610.1016/j.joule.2020.05.016 ↗
4. 10.1007/s00216-013-7606-610.1007/s00216-013-7606-6 ↗
5. 10.1136/gut.2005.07512710.1136/gut.2005.075127 ↗
6. 10.1080/14733315.2012.1168396110.1080/14733315.2012.11683961 ↗
7. 10.3390/s1804105210.3390/s18041052 ↗
8. 10.1007/s11947-008-0154-y10.1007/s11947-008-0154-y ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.08.05210.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.08.052 ↗
10. 10.1038/nbt113810.1038/nbt1138 ↗
11. 10.1021/nn203653h10.1021/nn203653h ↗
12. 10.1021/nl070901710.1021/nl0709017 ↗
13. 10.1038/am.2012.7510.1038/am.2012.75 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.snb.2021.13050910.1016/j.snb.2021.130509 ↗
15. 10.1021/acssensors.8b0004410.1021/acssensors.8b00044 ↗
16. 10.1063/5.016754610.1063/5.0167546 ↗
17. 10.3390/bios1104012110.3390/bios11040121 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.snb.2020.12924010.1016/j.snb.2020.129240 ↗
19. 10.1063/1.486122810.1063/1.4861228 ↗
20. 10.1021/acsami.9b1511110.1021/acsami.9b15111 ↗
21. 10.1126/sciadv.160255710.1126/sciadv.1602557 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.snb.2022.13225710.1016/j.snb.2022.132257 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.vlsi.2011.05.00210.1016/j.vlsi.2011.05.002 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.snb.2020.12919410.1016/j.snb.2020.129194 ↗
25. 10.1021/am302855310.1021/am3028553 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.03.18510.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.03.185 ↗
27. 10.1021/acssensors.6b0009610.1021/acssensors.6b00096 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.snb.2017.03.15010.1016/j.snb.2017.03.150 ↗
29. 10.1021/acssensors.7b0075410.1021/acssensors.7b00754 ↗
30. Shem Tov, I.; Mukherjee, A.; Hayon, J.; Hargreaves, L.; Shluger, A.; Rosenwaks, Y. Hydrogen Induced Dipole Layer in Pd-SiO2 Based Gas Sensors. 2022 IEEE Sensors Applications Symposium, SAS 2022 - Proceedings; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2022. 10.1109/SAS54819.2022.9881358.10.1109/SAS54819.2022.9881358 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.snb.2023.13355110.1016/j.snb.2023.133551 ↗
32. 10.3390/s1919427610.3390/s19194276 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.carbon.2021.04.07610.1016/j.carbon.2021.04.076 ↗
34. 10.1021/acssensors.8b0000610.1021/acssensors.8b00006 ↗
35. 10.1039/C5NR06193H10.1039/C5NR06193H ↗
36. 10.1016/j.matlet.2013.12.10410.1016/j.matlet.2013.12.104 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.snb.2020.12907910.1016/j.snb.2020.129079 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.snb.2022.13228010.1016/j.snb.2022.132280 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.snb.2014.08.01810.1016/j.snb.2014.08.018 ↗
40. 10.1021/acsami.5b0185810.1021/acsami.5b01858 ↗
41. 10.1002/smll.20230265210.1002/smll.202302652 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.chempr.2020.07.01510.1016/j.chempr.2020.07.015 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.10.10110.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.10.101 ↗
44. 10.1021/acssensors.0c0201910.1021/acssensors.0c02019 ↗
45. 10.1016/0039-6028(77)90059-010.1016/0039-6028(77)90059-0 ↗
46. 10.1016/0039-6028(76)90288-010.1016/0039-6028(76)90288-0 ↗
47. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.52.180610.1103/PhysRevLett.52.1806 ↗
48. Markus L. · Recent Developments in Vacuum Science and Technology · 2003 · 111