Investigation of Optimal Architecture of MoS2 Channel Field-Effect Transistors on a Sub-2 nm Process Node
Source abstract
Abstract
In this work, performance comparison of various architectures of field-effect transistors (FETs) introduced with transition metal dichalcogenide (TMDC) MoS 2 channels, which is attracting attention as one of the technologies that will enable beyond-silicon technology, was performed. By performing circuit-level benchmark for dynamic logic circuit operation in sub-2 nm dimension, it is observed that the optimal FET structure differs according to MoS 2 layer numbers. When two or more multilayer MoS 2 is applied to a double-gate and multistacked channel FET structure, the capacitance increases due to the increase in structure complexity, but the improvement of the current is greater, and the circuit operation speed increases. It is similar to the scaling-down trend of silicon-based FETs. However, in the case of monolayer MoS 2, a simple single-gate planar FET structure shows optimal circuit characteristics, which is analyzed to be due to the excellent short-channel effect immunity of the monolayer MoS 2 channel and small parasitic capacitance. Layout effects such as fan-out numbers and wiring load in integrated logic circuits were also investigated in various MoS 2 -FET structures. In addition, reliability analysis was performed through electrothermal simulation of thermal issues related to the multigate transistor structure.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: 2D Materials and Applications · Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices · Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Republic of Korea
Data and Information Tech. (DIT) Center, Samsung Electronics, Hwasung-Si 18448, Republic of Korea
Funding
Samsung · National Research Foundation of Korea
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1109/JPROC.1998.65876210.1109/JPROC.1998.658762 ↗
2. 10.1109/JSSC.1974.105051110.1109/JSSC.1974.1050511 ↗
3. Luo Z. · 2004 · 66110.1109/IEDM.2004.1419254 ↗
4. Chen X. · 2008 · 8810.1109/VLSIT.2008.4588573 ↗
5. Lee H. J. · 2018 · 1
6. Wu S. Y. · 2013 · 1
7. 10.1109/TED.2017.269545510.1109/TED.2017.2695455 ↗
8. Yakimets D. · 2017 · 4
9. 10.1038/nature1067610.1038/nature10676 ↗
10. Lee H. · 2006 · 5810.1109/VLSIT.2006.1705215 ↗
11. He X. · 2017 · 20
12. 10.15407/spqeo23.03.22710.15407/spqeo23.03.227 ↗
13. Loubet N. · 2017 · T23010.23919/VLSIT.2017.7998183 ↗
14. Sicard, E. Introducing 14-nm FinFET Technology in Microwind, 2017.
15. Sicard, E. Introducing 10-nm FinFET Technology in Microwind, 2017.
16. Sicard, E. Introducing 7-nm FinFET Technology in Microwind, 2017.
17. Sicard, E. Introducing 5-nm FinFET Technology in Microwind, 2021.
18. Sicard, E. Introducing 3-nm nano-sheet fet technology in Microwind, 2021.
19. Thean A. V. · 2015 · T2610.1109/VLSIT.2015.7223689 ↗
20. 10.1109/TED.2016.258650510.1109/TED.2016.2586505 ↗
21. 10.1145/291479010.1145/2914790 ↗
22. 10.1109/TED.2022.314132710.1109/TED.2022.3141327 ↗
23. 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.5210.1038/natrevmats.2016.52 ↗
24. 10.1038/s41467-020-20732-w10.1038/s41467-020-20732-w ↗
25. 10.1038/s41586-021-03472-910.1038/s41586-021-03472-9 ↗
26. 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.03543510.1103/PhysRevB.92.035435 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.cocom.2020.e0049410.1016/j.cocom.2020.e00494 ↗
28. Ahmed Z. · 2020 · 5
29. 10.1038/s41598-021-85968-y10.1038/s41598-021-85968-y ↗
30. 10.3390/nano1213229910.3390/nano12132299 ↗
31. Agarwal T. · 2017 · 5
32. 10.1038/s41467-022-35760-x10.1038/s41467-022-35760-x ↗
33. 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.319550610.1109/ACCESS.2022.3195506 ↗
34. Cheng K. · 2020 · 1
35. 10.1038/s41699-018-0050-x10.1038/s41699-018-0050-x ↗
36. Yan J. Y. · 2016 · 6
37. 10.1109/TED.2019.291242610.1109/TED.2019.2912426 ↗
38. 10.1021/jp402509w10.1021/jp402509w ↗