Cycling Waveform Dependent Wake-Up and ON/OFF Ratio in Al2O3/Hf0.5Zr0.5O2Ferroelectric Tunnel Junction Devices
Source abstract
Abstract
-W ferroelectric tunnel junction (FTJ) devices were investigated for different wake-up voltage waveforms. We studied triangular and square waves, as well as square pulse trains of equal or unequal voltage amplitudes for positive and negative polarities. We find that the wake-up behavior in these FTJ stacks is highly influenced by the field cycling waveform. A square waveform is observed to provide wake-up with the lowest number of cycles, concomitantly resulting in higher remnant polarization and a higher ON/OFF ratio in the devices, compared to a triangular waveform. We further show that wake-up is dependent on the number of cycles rather than the total time of the applied electric field during cycling. We also demonstrate that different voltage magnitudes are necessary for positive and negative polarities during field cycling for efficient wake-up. Utilizing an optimized waveform with unequal magnitudes for the two polarities during field cycling, we achieve a reduction in wake-up cycles and a large enhancement of the ON/OFF ratio from ∼5 to ∼35 in our ferroelectric tunnel junctions.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices · Semiconductor materials and devices · Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Helmholtz-Zentrum-Berlin für Materialien und Energie, Institute “Functional Oxides for Energy Efficient Information Technology”, Hahn-Meitner Platz 1, 14109 Berlin, Germany
Physical Chemistry, Freie Universität Berlin, Arnimallee 22, 14195 Berlin, Germany
Funding
H2020 Future and Emerging Technologies
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1063/1.363405210.1063/1.3634052 ↗
2. 10.1021/nl302049k10.1021/nl302049k ↗
3. 10.1109/TED.2020.297614810.1109/TED.2020.2976148 ↗
4. 10.1038/s41598-019-56816-x10.1038/s41598-019-56816-x ↗
5. Mo, F.; Tagawa, Y.; Saraya, T.; Hiramoto, T.; Kobayashi, M. InScalability Study on Ferroelectric-HfO2Tunnel Junction Memory Based on Non-equilibrium Green Function Method, 19th Non-Volatile Memory Technology Symposium (NVMTS), 2019; pp 1–5.10.1109/NVMTS47818.2019.8986219 ↗
6. 10.1021/acsaelm.0c0083210.1021/acsaelm.0c00832 ↗
7. 10.1063/5.002951610.1063/5.0029516 ↗
8. 10.1038/s41586-020-2208-x10.1038/s41586-020-2208-x ↗
9. 10.1021/acsami.5b1165310.1021/acsami.5b11653 ↗
10. 10.1063/1.319507510.1063/1.3195075 ↗
11. Max, B.; Hoffmann, M.; Slesazeck, S.; Mikolajick, T. Ferroelectric Tunnel Junctions Based on Ferroelectric-Dielectric Hf0.5Zr0.5O2/Al2O3Capacitor Stacks, 48th European Solid-State Device Research Conference IEEE, 2018; pp 142–145.10.1109/ESSDERC.2018.8486882 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.sse.2021.10805410.1016/j.sse.2021.108054 ↗
13. 10.1002/adma.20080292410.1002/adma.200802924 ↗
14. 10.1109/JEDS.2019.293213810.1109/JEDS.2019.2932138 ↗
15. 10.1002/adfm.20160059010.1002/adfm.201600590 ↗
16. 10.1002/aelm.20200072810.1002/aelm.202000728 ↗
17. 10.1021/acsami.0c0357010.1021/acsami.0c03570 ↗
18. 10.1002/pssr.20210008610.1002/pssr.202100086 ↗
19. 10.1063/1.502642410.1063/1.5026424 ↗
20. 10.1039/C5NR05339K10.1039/C5NR05339K ↗
21. Walters, G. H. Scaling and Design of Thin Film Ferroelectric Hafnium Oxide for Memory and Logic Devices. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Florida, 2020.
22. 10.1063/1.494037010.1063/1.4940370 ↗
23. 10.1021/acsaelm.8b0004610.1021/acsaelm.8b00046 ↗
24. 10.1063/5.007810610.1063/5.0078106 ↗
25. 10.1109/TED.2022.317568410.1109/TED.2022.3175684 ↗
26. 10.3389/fnins.2021.61130010.3389/fnins.2021.611300 ↗
27. Gibertini, P.; Fehlings, L.; Lancaster, S.; Duong, Q. T.; Mikolajick, T.; Dubourdieu, C.; Slesazeck, S.; Covi, E.; Deshpande, V. A Ferroelectric Tunnel Junction-based Integrate-and-Fire Neuron. 2022, arXiv:2211.02598. arXiv.org e-Print archive. https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.02598 (accepted at 29th International Conference on Circuits and Systems 2022).10.1109/ICECS202256217.2022.9970799 ↗
28. 10.1063/5.001893710.1063/5.0018937 ↗
29. 10.1002/pssr.20200048110.1002/pssr.202000481 ↗
30. 10.3389/fnano.2022.93982210.3389/fnano.2022.939822 ↗
31. 10.1109/TED.2022.319025610.1109/TED.2022.3190256 ↗
32. 10.1021/acsaelm.9b0009210.1021/acsaelm.9b00092 ↗
33. 10.1088/1361-6528/ab9cf710.1088/1361-6528/ab9cf7 ↗
34. 10.1109/LED.2021.310222610.1109/LED.2021.3102226 ↗
35. 10.1002/pssr.20200052410.1002/pssr.202000524 ↗
36. 10.1002/aelm.20210139510.1002/aelm.202101395 ↗
37. 10.1002/adfm.20200263810.1002/adfm.202002638 ↗
38. 10.1021/acsami.6b1617310.1021/acsami.6b16173 ↗
39. 10.1002/aelm.20200107410.1002/aelm.202001074 ↗
40. 10.1021/acsaelm.1c0060410.1021/acsaelm.1c00604 ↗
41. 10.1063/1.497702810.1063/1.4977028 ↗
42. 10.1063/1.504003110.1063/1.5040031 ↗
43. 10.1088/1361-6528/ab746d10.1088/1361-6528/ab746d ↗