Superconducting Proximity Effect in InAsSb Surface Quantum Wells with In Situ Al Contacts
Source abstract
Abstract
We demonstrate robust superconducting proximity effect in InAs$0.5$Sb$0.5$ quantum wells grown with epitaxial Al contact, which has important implications for mesoscopic and topological superconductivity. Unlike more commonly studied InAs and InSb semiconductors, bulk InAs$0.5$Sb$0.5$ supports stronger spin-orbit coupling and larger $g$-factor. However, these potentially desirable properties have not been previously measured in epitaxial heterostructures with superconductors, which could serve as a platform for fault-tolerant topological quantum computing. Through structural and transport characterization we observe high-quality interfaces and strong spin-orbit coupling. We fabricate Josephson junctions based on InAs$0.5$Sb$0.5$ quantum wells and observe strong proximity effect. These junctions exhibit product of normal resistance and critical current, $IcRN = \SI{270}{\micro V}$, and excess current, $IexRN = \SI{200}{\micro V}$ at contact separations of 500~nm. Both of these quantities demonstrate a robust and long-range proximity effect with highly-transparent contacts.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Topological Materials and Phenomena · Quantum and electron transport phenomena · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Center for Quantum Phenomena, Department of Physics, New York University, New York, New York 10003, United States
US Army Combat Capabilities Command, Army Research Laboratory, Adelphi, Maryland 20783, United States
Department of Physics, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York 14260, United States
Funding
Army Research Office · Office of Naval Research · Division of Electrical, Communications and Cyber Systems · Division of Materials Research
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.mattod.2018.05.00310.1016/j.mattod.2018.05.003 ↗
2. 10.1088/0034-4885/75/7/07650110.1088/0034-4885/75/7/076501 ↗
3. 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.2.04420210.1103/PhysRevMaterials.2.044202 ↗
4. 10.1103/PhysRevX.6.03101610.1103/PhysRevX.6.031016 ↗
5. 10.1038/s41578-018-0003-110.1038/s41578-018-0003-1 ↗
6. 10.1038/s41467-019-13133-110.1038/s41467-019-13133-1 ↗
7. 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.11540910.1103/PhysRevB.101.115409 ↗
8. Mayer W. · arXiv e-prints · 2019
9. 10.1038/s41586-019-1068-810.1038/s41586-019-1068-8 ↗
10. 10.1038/s41586-019-1148-910.1038/s41586-019-1148-9 ↗
11. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.07640310.1103/PhysRevLett.117.076403 ↗
12. 10.1088/1361-648X/ab38a110.1088/1361-648X/ab38a1 ↗
13. 10.1063/1.136815610.1063/1.1368156 ↗
14. 10.1063/1.493929310.1063/1.4939293 ↗
15. 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.24540210.1103/PhysRevB.97.245402 ↗
16. 10.1103/PhysRevB.63.15531510.1103/PhysRevB.63.155315 ↗
17. Winkler R. · 200310.1007/b13586 ↗
18. 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.23543710.1103/PhysRevB.95.235437 ↗
19. 10.1088/0268-1242/31/11/11500810.1088/0268-1242/31/11/115008 ↗
20. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b0329710.1021/acs.nanolett.6b03297 ↗
21. 10.1107/S002188981103897010.1107/S0021889811038970 ↗
22. 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.24520510.1103/PhysRevB.86.245205 ↗
23. 10.1063/1.365047310.1063/1.3650473 ↗
24. 10.1116/1.505398710.1116/1.5053987 ↗
25. 10.1088/0022-3727/49/10/10510110.1088/0022-3727/49/10/105101 ↗
26. 10.1007/978-1-4020-8425-6_910.1007/978-1-4020-8425-6_9 ↗
27. 10.1103/RevModPhys.51.10110.1103/RevModPhys.51.101 ↗
28. 10.1063/1.506736310.1063/1.5067363 ↗
29. 10.1038/ncomms1284110.1038/ncomms12841 ↗
30. Kulik I. O. · JETP Lett. · 1975 · 21 · 96
31. 10.1088/0953-2048/22/8/08501610.1088/0953-2048/22/8/085016 ↗
32. 10.1088/1361-6528/aa564310.1088/1361-6528/aa5643 ↗