journal article·2024-01-28Open access

Pressure-dependent mechanical properties of thin films under uniaxial strain via the layer compression test

Aaron D. Sinnott, Adam Kelly, Cian Gabbett, Matthias Moebius, Jonathan N. Coleman, Graham L. W. Cross

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 39· Issue 2

Abstract

Amorphous materials can exhibit strong nonlinear mechanical properties in comparison to crystalline metals and ceramics, largely due to their non equilibrium state which depends on the means of sample preparation history. For example, glassy polymer structure is highly dependent on the speed of quenching through the glass transition which determines the degree of free volume within the system. Porous materials and composites often exhibit similar void space dependencies on preparation, for example with extrusion or spraying parameters. This can lead to variations in mechanical response of a material with strain, as the material density will change due to the alteration of free volume. While this remains challenging to quantifying comprehensively in bulk materials, it remains almost completely unaddressed in the case of thin films where current mechanical testing techniques struggle to apply and monitor well characterised application of stress and strain required to adequately probe such effects. Given the central importance of thin film materials across many modern technologies, ranging from semiconductors to medical devices and sensors, there exists a need to adequately monitor and describe changes in amorphous thin film properties under a changing mechanical state. In this work we present the effect of elasticity and yield pressure dependence during aligned flat punch nanoindentation of amorphous thin films in the layer compression test. Supported by finite element simulations of a pressure dependent material, we show continuous in-situ stiffening of polystyrene and sprayed graphene nanosheet networks films throughout uniaxial strain compression. We also demonstrate yielding of thin film PMMA in this geometry through the injection of additional shear within the layer compression test, which may allow exploration of yield in thin films of materials with highly pressure sensitive yield surfaces.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (39)

Show source-provided references
1. M.L. Falk, J.S. Langer, Dynamics of viscoplastic deformation in amorphous solids. Phys. Rev. E 57(6), 7192 (1998)10.1103/PhysRevE.57.7192 ↗
2. M.L. Falk, Molecular-dynamics study of ductile and brittle fracture in model noncrystalline solids. Phys. Rev. B 60(10), 7062 (1999)10.1103/PhysRevB.60.7062 ↗
3. J.S. Langer, Shear-transformation-zone theory of deformation in metallic glasses. Scripta Mater. 54(3), 375 (2006)10.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.10.005 ↗
4. C.W. Allen, K.C. Liao, Dislocation models for shear transformations. Physica Status Solidi (a) 74(2), 673 (1982)10.1002/pssa.2210740236 ↗
5. S. Takeuchi, K. Edagawa, Atomistic simulation and modeling of localized shear deformation in metallic glasses. Prog. Mater. Sci. 56(6), 785 (2011)10.1016/j.pmatsci.2011.01.007 ↗
6. R.O. Davis, A.P. Selvadurai, Plasticity and Geomechanics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001)
7. S.M.A. Kazimi, Solid Mechanics (Tata McGraw-Hill, New York, 2001)
8. J.W. Kim, G.A. Medvedev, J.M. Caruthers, Observation of yield in triaxial deformation of glassy polymers. Polymer 54(11), 2821 (2013)10.1016/j.polymer.2013.03.042 ↗
9. C.B. Roth, Polymer Glasses (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2016), pp.134–13510.4324/9781315305158 ↗
10. I.M. Ward, Review: the yield behaviour of polymers. J. Mater. Sci. 6(11), 1397 (1971)10.1007/BF00549685 ↗
11. K.H. Roscoe and J. Burland: On the generalized stress-strain behaviour of wet clay, (1968).
12. K. Roscoe, A. Schofield, A. Thurairajah, Yielding of clays in states wetter than critical. Geotechnique 13(3), 211 (1963)10.1680/geot.1963.13.3.211 ↗
13. K. Ravi-Chandar, Z. Ma, Inelastic deformation in polymers under multiaxial compression. Mech. Time-Depend. Mater. 4, 333 (2000)10.1023/A:1026570826226 ↗
14. C. Roland, S. Hensel-Bielowka, M. Paluch, R. Casalini, Supercooled dynamics of glass-forming liquids and polymers under hydrostatic pressure. Rep. Prog. Phys. 68(6), 1405 (2005)10.1088/0034-4885/68/6/R03 ↗
15. D. Fujimoto, O. Brazil, W. Oliver, M. Jadidi, A. Sinnott, I. McKenzie, A. Chatzichristos, M. Dehn, V. Karner, R. Kiefl, 8Li spin relaxation as a probe of the modification of molecular dynamics by inelastic deformation of glassy polystyrene. J. Phy.: Conf. Series 2462, 012053 (2023)
16. E. Jones Parry, D. Tabor, Pressure dependence of the shear modulus of various polymers. J. Mater. Sci. 9, 289 (1974)10.1007/BF00550953 ↗
17. C.L. Liao, T.C. Chan, A.S. Suiker, C.S. Chang, Pressure-dependent elastic moduli of granular assemblies. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 24(3), 265 (2000)10.1002/(SICI)1096-9853(200003)24:3<265::AID-NAG65>3.0.CO;2-X ↗
18. M.J. Mehl, Pressure dependence of the elastic moduli in aluminum-rich Al-Li compounds. Phys. Rev. B 47(5), 2493 (1993)10.1103/PhysRevB.47.2493 ↗
19. D. Assimaki, E. Kausel, An equivalent linear algorithm with frequency-and pressure-dependent moduli and damping for the seismic analysis of deep sites. Soil Dynam. Earthq. Eng. 22(9–12), 959 (2002)10.1016/S0267-7261(02)00120-3 ↗
20. A.D. Sinnott, O. Brazil, G.L. Cross, The effect of contact aspect ratio and film to substrate elastic modulus ratio on stress vs strain up to the point of yield during flat punch thin film indentation of an elastic-plastic film. Front. Mater. 9, 906204 (2022)10.3389/fmats.2022.906204 ↗
21. O. Brazil, J.P. de Silva, M. Chowdhury, H. Yoon, G.B. McKenna, W.C. Oliver, J. Kilpatrick, J.B. Pethica, G.L.W. Cross, In situ measurement of bulk modulus and yield response of glassy thin films via confined layer compression. J. Mater. Res. 35(6), 644 (2020)10.1557/jmr.2020.42 ↗
22. D.S. Hughes, J.L. Kelly, Second-order elastic deformation of solids. Phys. Rev. 92(5), 1145 (1953)10.1103/PhysRev.92.1145 ↗
23. J.W. Kim, G.A. Medvedev, J.M. Caruthers, Mobility evolution during tri-axial deformation of a glassy polymer. Polymer 55(6), 1570 (2014)10.1016/j.polymer.2014.02.013 ↗
24. R. Quinson, J. Perez, M. Rink, A. Pavan, Yield criteria for amorphous glassy polymers. J. Mater. Sci. 32(5), 1371 (1997)10.1023/A:1018525127466 ↗
25. D. Stephens, H. Heard and R. Schock (1972) High-pressure mechanical properties of polymethylmethacrylate, (California Univ., Livermore (USA). Lawrence Livermore Lab.10.2172/4249322 ↗
26. C.K.K. Lun, S.B. Savage, D.J. Jeffrey, N. Chepurniy, Kinetic theories for granular flow: inelastic particles in Couette flow and slightly inelastic particles in a general flowfield. J. Fluid Mech. 140, 223 (1984)10.1017/S0022112084000586 ↗
27. H.M. Jaeger, S.R. Nagel, R.P. Behringer, Granular solids, liquids, and gases. Rev. Modern Phys. 68(4), 1259 (1996)10.1103/RevModPhys.68.1259 ↗
28. Z. Liu, J.Z. Liu, Y. Cheng, Z. Li, L. Wang, Q. Zheng, Interlayer binding energy of graphite: A mesoscopic determination from deformation. Phys. Rev. B 85(20), 205418 (2012)10.1103/PhysRevB.85.205418 ↗
29. M. van Hecke, Jamming of soft particles: geometry, mechanics, scaling and isostaticity. J. Phy.: Condensed Matter. 22(3), 033101 (2009)
30. E. Han, J. Yu, E. Annevelink, J. Son, D.A. Kang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Ertekin, P.Y. Huang, A.M. van der Zande, Ultrasoft slip-mediated bending in few-layer graphene. Nat. Mater. 19(3), 305 (2020)10.1038/s41563-019-0529-7 ↗
31. E.D. Cubuk, R. Ivancic, S.S. Schoenholz, D. Strickland, A. Basu, Z. Davidson, J. Fontaine, J.L. Hor, Y.-R. Huang, Y. Jiang, Structure-property relationships from universal signatures of plasticity in disordered solids. Science 358(6366), 1033 (2017)10.1126/science.aai8830 ↗
32. A.S. Argon, The Physics of Deformation and Fracture of Polymers. MRS Bullet. 39(8), 747 (2014)
33. A.J.L. Crook, S.M. Willson, J.G. Yu, D.R.J. Owen, Predictive modelling of structure evolution in sandbox experiments. J. Struct. Geology 28(5), 729 (2006)10.1016/j.jsg.2006.02.002 ↗
34. D. Bigoni, A. Piccolroaz, Yield criteria for quasibrittle and frictional materials. Int. J. Solids Struct. 41(11), 2855 (2004)10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2003.12.024 ↗
35. C. Backes, T.M. Higgins, A. Kelly, C. Boland, A. Harvey, D. Hanlon, J.N. Coleman, Guidelines for Exfoliation, characterization and processing of layered materials produced by liquid exfoliation. Chem. Mater. 29(1), 243 (2017)10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b03335 ↗
36. A.G. Kelly, T. Hallam, C. Backes, A. Harvey, A.S. Esmaeily, I. Godwin, J. Coelho, V. Nicolosi, J. Lauth, A. Kulkarni, S. Kinge, L.D.A. Siebbeles, G.S. Duesberg, J.N. Coleman, All-printed thin-film transistors from networks of liquid-exfoliated nanosheets. Science 356(6333), 69 (2017)10.1126/science.aal4062 ↗
37. Y. Hernandez, V. Nicolosi, M. Lotya, F.M. Blighe, Z. Sun, S. De, I.T. McGovern, B. Holland, M. Byrne, Y.K. Gun’Ko, J.J. Boland, P. Niraj, G. Duesberg, S. Krishnamurthy, R. Goodhue, J. Hutchison, V. Scardaci, A.C. Ferrari, J.N. Coleman, High-yield production of graphene by liquid-phase exfoliation of graphite. Nat. Nanotechnol. 3(9), 563 (2008)10.1038/nnano.2008.215 ↗
38. K.R. Paton, E. Varrla, C. Backes, R.J. Smith, U. Khan, A. O’Neill, C. Boland, M. Lotya, O.M. Istrate, P. King, T. Higgins, S. Barwich, P. May, P. Puczkarski, I. Ahmed, M. Moebius, H. Pettersson, E. Long, J. Coelho, S.E. O’Brien, E.K. McGuire, B.M. Sanchez, G.S. Duesberg, N. McEvoy, T.J. Pennycook, C. Downing, A. Crossley, V. Nicolosi, J.N. Coleman, Scalable production of large quantities of defect-free few-layer graphene by shear exfoliation in liquids. Nat. Mater. 13(6), 624 (2014)10.1038/nmat3944 ↗
39. J.N. Coleman, Liquid exfoliation of defect-free graphene. Acc. Chem. Res. 46(1), 14 (2013)10.1021/ar300009f ↗