journal article·2019-12-30

Reliability implications of partial shading on CIGS photovoltaic devices: A literature review

Klaas Bakker, Arthur Weeber, Mirjam Theelen

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 34· Issue 24
Publisher page

Abstract

Partial shading of Cu(In,Ga)(Se,S)2(CIGS) photovoltaic (PV) modules is getting more attention, as is witnessed by the increase in publications on this topic in recent years. This review will give an overview of shading tests executed on CIGS modules and focuses on the more fundamental aspects that are often studied on cells. Generally, CIGS modules display very attractive performance under predictable row-to-row shading. However, potential damage could occur under nonoptimal shading orientations: module output after shading tests could reduce due to the formation of local shunts, often called wormlike defects. The influence of many factors on the formation of these defects, including the internal currents and voltages and the shape and intensity of the shade, will be discussed. This review allows an increased insight in the degradation mechanisms caused by partial shading, which would ultimately lead to the introduction of more shade-tolerant CIGS PV products in the future.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films · Silicon and Solar Cell Technologies · solar cell performance optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. Wendlandt · 2016 · 2270
2. Herrmann · 2004
3. 10.1109/PVSC.2016.774974610.1109/PVSC.2016.7749746 ↗
4. 10.1109/PVSC.2017.836651410.1109/PVSC.2017.8366514 ↗
5. 10.1557/adv.2017.34510.1557/adv.2017.345 ↗
6. Puttnins · 2012 · 2219
7. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2017.269986010.1109/JPHOTOV.2017.2699860 ↗
8. 10.1109/PVSC.2011.618660510.1109/PVSC.2011.6186605 ↗
9. 10.1109/PVSC.2017.836675510.1109/PVSC.2017.8366755 ↗
10. 10.1002/pip.281110.1002/pip.2811 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.solener.2017.12.01910.1016/j.solener.2017.12.019 ↗
12. 10.1002/pip.317110.1002/pip.3171 ↗
13. 10.1002/pip.273810.1002/pip.2738 ↗
14. Silverman · 2017 · 1422
15. Characterization of Cu(In,Ga)Se2 photovoltaic modules10.1016/j.tsf.2006.12.065 ↗
16. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2017.271142910.1109/JPHOTOV.2017.2711429 ↗
17. 10.3390/app904067710.3390/app9040677 ↗
18. Philips · 2019
19. 10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.10410.1016/j.rser.2011.07.104 ↗
20. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2013.227034910.1109/JPHOTOV.2013.2270349 ↗
21. 10.1109/PVSC.2018.854776610.1109/PVSC.2018.8547766 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.renene.2011.03.01110.1016/j.renene.2011.03.011 ↗
23. Silverman · 2015 · 95630F
24. Silverman · 2018 · 3932
25. Wendlandt · 2018 · 1230
26. Sun · 2015 · 1
27. Tzikas · 2017 · 1593
28. Mack · 2008 · 2156
29. Richter · 2016 · 1116
30. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2016.259133010.1109/JPHOTOV.2016.2591330 ↗
31. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2015.247807110.1109/JPHOTOV.2015.2478071 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.tsf.2012.09.02210.1016/j.tsf.2012.09.022 ↗
33. Carolus · 2018 · 1343
34. 10.1016/j.solener.2016.10.00610.1016/j.solener.2016.10.006 ↗
35. Westin · 2009 · 2967
36. Puttnins · 2011 · 2432
37. Richter · 2017 · 1017
38. 10.1016/j.solmat.2013.09.03110.1016/j.solmat.2013.09.031 ↗