journal article·2013-02-28

The essence and efficiency limits of bulk-heterostructure organic solar cells: A polymer-to-panel perspective

Muhammad A. Alam, Biwajit Ray, Mohammad Ryyan Khan, Sourabh Dongaonkar

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 28· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

Bulk-heterojunction organic photovoltaic (BHJ-OPV) technology promises high efficiency at ultralow cost and weight, with potential for nontraditional applications such as building-integrated photovoltaic (PV). There is a widespread presumption that the complexity of morphology makes carrier transport in OPV irreducibly complicated and, possibly, beyond predictive modeling. However, understanding the complex morphology is important because it not only dictates cell efficiency but also the panel performance and the operating lifetime. In this paper, we derive the fundamental thermodynamic as well as morphology-specific practical limits of BHJ-OPV efficiency and lifetime. We find that performance improvement relies not only on morphology engineering but also on increasing the effective mobility–lifetime (μτ) product, the cross-gap between donor/acceptors, and reducing the series resistance. Even if the OPV fails to achieve the highest efficiency anticipated by the thermodynamic limit, its novel form factor, lightweight, and transparency can make it a commercially viable option for many applications.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Conducting polymers and applications · Thin-Film Transistor Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Roles of donor and acceptor nanodomains in 6% efficient thermally annealed polymer photovoltaics
2. 10.1116/1.356975710.1116/1.3569757 ↗
3. End-to-end modeling for variability and reliability analysis of thin film PV
4. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2011.217403010.1109/JPHOTOV.2011.2174030 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.solmat.2009.07.01510.1016/j.solmat.2009.07.015 ↗
6. 10.1364/OE.18.00A27210.1364/OE.18.00A272 ↗
7. 10.1002/aenm.20110009410.1002/aenm.201100094 ↗
8. Achieving fill factor above 80% in organic solar cells by charged interface
9. 10.1038/nmat295110.1038/nmat2951 ↗
10. 10.1063/1.358586310.1063/1.3585863 ↗
11. 10.1063/1.364146910.1063/1.3641469 ↗
12. Balanced carrier transport in organic solar cells employing embedded indium-tin-oxide nanoelectrodes
13. 10.1002/adfm.20070043810.1002/adfm.200700438 ↗
14. 10.1063/1.363323610.1063/1.3633236 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.362458810.1063/1.3624588 ↗
16. 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.04520810.1103/PhysRevB.85.045208 ↗
17. 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.12520310.1103/PhysRevB.85.125203 ↗
18. 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.08520310.1103/PhysRevB.81.085203 ↗
19. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.21660110.1103/PhysRevLett.93.216601 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.solmat.2008.06.00110.1016/j.solmat.2008.06.001 ↗
21. 10.1126/science.121774510.1126/science.1217745 ↗
22. 10.1002/adfm.20110163210.1002/adfm.201101632 ↗
23. 10.1021/jz101458y10.1021/jz101458y ↗
24. Effect of long time annealing and incident light intensity on the performance of polymer: Fullerene solar cells10.1109/TNANO.2009.2027120 ↗
25. 10.1088/0953-8984/20/47/47520310.1088/0953-8984/20/47/475203 ↗
26. Dependence of recombination mechanisms and strength on processing conditions in polymer solar cells
27. 10.1063/1.291905810.1063/1.2919058 ↗
28. 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.12520410.1103/PhysRevB.82.125204 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.20530710.1103/PhysRevB.81.205307 ↗
30. 10.1002/adfm.20080096810.1002/adfm.200800968 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.295668910.1063/1.2956689 ↗
32. 10.1117/1.366246710.1117/1.3662467 ↗
33. 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.08520710.1103/PhysRevB.74.085207 ↗
34. 10.1021/ma902046710.1021/ma9020467 ↗
35. 10.1073/pnas.100436310710.1073/pnas.1004363107 ↗
36. 10.1021/nn101106b10.1021/nn101106b ↗
37. 10.1021/jp907167u10.1021/jp907167u ↗
38. 10.1021/nl204421p10.1021/nl204421p ↗
39. 10.1016/S0379-6779(02)01311-510.1016/S0379-6779(02)01311-5 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.solmat.2010.09.00410.1016/j.solmat.2010.09.004 ↗
41. Mark · 2006
42. Stauffer · 1994
43. 10.1016/j.solmat.2008.11.00110.1016/j.solmat.2008.11.001 ↗
44. 10.1063/1.471180610.1063/1.4711806 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.solmat.2008.01.01610.1016/j.solmat.2008.01.016 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.solmat.2010.09.00710.1016/j.solmat.2010.09.007 ↗
47. 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.16531110.1103/PhysRevB.83.165311 ↗
48. 10.1002/aenm.20100002110.1002/aenm.201000021 ↗
49. 10.1038/nmat331010.1038/nmat3310 ↗
50. 10.1038/nature0194910.1038/nature01949 ↗
51. 10.1021/nl200552r10.1021/nl200552r ↗
52. 10.1063/1.292412910.1063/1.2924129 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2011.12.01210.1016/j.commatsci.2011.12.012 ↗
54. 10.1002/047174931110.1002/0471749311 ↗
55. 10.1063/1.43980910.1063/1.439809 ↗
56. 10.1021/nl803676e10.1021/nl803676e ↗
57. 10.1063/1.297319910.1063/1.2973199 ↗
58. 10.1557/mrs2010.58210.1557/mrs2010.582 ↗
59. 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.15530510.1103/PhysRevB.82.155305 ↗
60. 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.08520510.1103/PhysRevB.72.085205 ↗
61. 10.1063/1.355376410.1063/1.3553764 ↗
62. 10.1021/nl801402210.1021/nl8014022 ↗
63. 10.1002/pip.102410.1002/pip.1024 ↗
64. Fundamentals of PV efficiency interpreted by a two-level model
65. 10.1038/nmat326310.1038/nmat3263 ↗
66. 10.1063/1.173603410.1063/1.1736034 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.solmat.2011.11.04210.1016/j.solmat.2011.11.042 ↗
68. 10.1063/1.361046010.1063/1.3610460 ↗
69. 10.1016/0022-3697(61)90054-310.1016/0022-3697(61)90054-3 ↗
70. 10.1103/PhysRevE.85.02110910.1103/PhysRevE.85.021109 ↗
71. 10.1063/1.324398610.1063/1.3243986 ↗
72. 10.1021/jz100522510.1021/jz1005225 ↗
73. Sze · 1981
74. 10.1016/j.solmat.2011.07.00610.1016/j.solmat.2011.07.006 ↗
75. 10.1002/adfm.20080168410.1002/adfm.200801684 ↗
76. 10.1021/jp022507x10.1021/jp022507x ↗
77. 10.1088/0034-4885/73/9/09640110.1088/0034-4885/73/9/096401 ↗
78. 10.1002/adfm.20050021110.1002/adfm.200500211 ↗
79. 10.1038/nmat150010.1038/nmat1500 ↗
80. 10.1002/adfm.20039001110.1002/adfm.200390011 ↗
81. 10.1063/1.134583410.1063/1.1345834 ↗
82. 10.1063/1.369205010.1063/1.3692050 ↗
83. 10.1021/jp036467o10.1021/jp036467o ↗
84. 10.1016/j.orgel.2012.03.00710.1016/j.orgel.2012.03.007 ↗
85. 10.1557/mrs2005.510.1557/mrs2005.5 ↗
86. 10.1016/j.tsf.2003.11.02210.1016/j.tsf.2003.11.022 ↗
87. 10.1002/adma.20060109310.1002/adma.200601093 ↗
88. 10.1016/j.solmat.2006.10.01910.1016/j.solmat.2006.10.019 ↗
89. 10.1063/1.367222110.1063/1.3672221 ↗
90. 10.1557/mrs2009.2710.1557/mrs2009.27 ↗
91. 10.1039/c0sm01502d10.1039/c0sm01502d ↗
92. 10.1002/anie.20100405510.1002/anie.201004055 ↗
94. 10.1021/nn203196310.1021/nn2031963 ↗
95. 10.1126/science.270.5243.178910.1126/science.270.5243.1789 ↗
96. 10.1021/jp906292h10.1021/jp906292h ↗
97. 10.1063/1.360907910.1063/1.3609079 ↗
98. 10.1016/j.orgel.2009.08.00110.1016/j.orgel.2009.08.001 ↗
99. 10.1021/nl201715q10.1021/nl201715q ↗
100. 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.11532710.1103/PhysRevB.75.115327 ↗