journal article·2013-01-14

Size-, shape-, and orientation-dependent properties of SiC nanowires of selected bulk polytypes

Ming Yu, C.S. Jayanthi, S.Y. Wu

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 28· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

SiC nanowires (NWs) designed from selected bulk polytypes are investigated using quantum mechanics-based simulations (both ab initio and semiempirical methods), and their structure–property relationships examined vis-à-vis their size, shape, and orientation. It is found that 2H–SiC NWs of hexagonal morphology oriented along the <0001> direction are the most stable ones compared to NWs designed using other bulk polytypes (e.g., 3C, 4H, or 6H) and other morphologies (round, square, rhombus, etc.) for diameters with 1 nm NWs exhibit semiconductor-like characteristics (akin to their bulk counterparts), even when their diameters approach 1 nm. On the other hand, SiC NWs designed from 3C, 4H, and 6H bulk polytypes, regardless of their morphology, exhibit gapless features for diameters less than 3.5 nm. Undoubtedly, these novel properties of SiC NWs can be exploited in the fabrication of nanoscale devices.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Silicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0921-5107(98)00507-810.1016/S0921-5107(98)00507-8 ↗
2. 10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-010.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
3. Nanostructure and EELS characterization of catalyst assisted SiC nanorods generated from single-walled carbon nanotubes10.1017/S1431927603441676 ↗
4. 10.1002/adfm.20070016210.1002/adfm.200700162 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.physe.2009.08.02410.1016/j.physe.2009.08.024 ↗
6. 10.1063/1.239890210.1063/1.2398902 ↗
7. 10.1103/PhysRevB.13.518810.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188 ↗
8. 10.1007/s00339-002-1961-z10.1007/s00339-002-1961-z ↗
9. 10.1016/S0370-1573(01)00035-710.1016/S0370-1573(01)00035-7 ↗
10. 10.1103/PhysRevB.48.1311510.1103/PhysRevB.48.13115 ↗
11. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2005.00460.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2005.00460.x ↗
12. 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.16530310.1103/PhysRevB.74.165303 ↗
13. 10.1016/S0925-8388(02)01111-810.1016/S0925-8388(02)01111-8 ↗
14. 10.1021/jp000124y10.1021/jp000124y ↗
15. 10.1103/PhysRevB.41.789210.1103/PhysRevB.41.7892 ↗
16. 10.2320/matertrans.45.144210.2320/matertrans.45.1442 ↗
17. 10.1016/S0921-4526(02)01203-610.1016/S0921-4526(02)01203-6 ↗
18. 10.1063/1.182860110.1063/1.1828601 ↗
19. 10.1063/1.312482710.1063/1.3124827 ↗
20. 10.1063/1.12423110.1063/1.124231 ↗
21. 10.1021/nl062768910.1021/nl0627689 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.msec.2005.09.08310.1016/j.msec.2005.09.083 ↗
23. 10.1166/jctn.2009.104810.1166/jctn.2009.1048 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.15540810.1103/PhysRevB.74.155408 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.tsf.2004.06.07710.1016/j.tsf.2004.06.077 ↗
26. 10.1103/PhysRevB.57.379910.1103/PhysRevB.57.3799 ↗
27. Bimburg · 1982 · 17
28. 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.07540710.1103/PhysRevB.82.075407 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.physb.2005.12.22210.1016/j.physb.2005.12.222 ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
31. 10.1002/1521-3951(199707)202:1<63::AID-PSSB63>3.0.CO;2-E10.1002/1521-3951(199707)202:1<63::AID-PSSB63>3.0.CO;2-E ↗
32. 10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2007.10.02010.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2007.10.020 ↗
33. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.100010.1103/PhysRevLett.82.1000 ↗
34. 10.1021/ja027399710.1021/ja0273997 ↗
35. 10.1002/1521-4095(200008)12:16<1186::AID-ADMA1186>3.0.CO;2-F10.1002/1521-4095(200008)12:16<1186::AID-ADMA1186>3.0.CO;2-F ↗
36. 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.20540510.1103/PhysRevB.71.205405 ↗
37. 10.1002/adma.20050009410.1002/adma.200500094 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2005.07.03110.1016/j.apsusc.2005.07.031 ↗
39. 10.1103/PhysRevB.43.679610.1103/PhysRevB.43.6796 ↗
40. 10.1103/PhysRevB.47.1014210.1103/PhysRevB.47.10142 ↗
41. 10.1103/PhysRevB.44.1329810.1103/PhysRevB.44.13298 ↗
42. Wu · 2005
43. 10.1016/j.cap.2007.10.07410.1016/j.cap.2007.10.074 ↗