Machine-learned interatomic potentials: Recent developments and prospective applications
Source abstract
Abstract
High-throughput generation of large and consistent ab initio data combined with advanced machine-learning techniques are enabling the creation of interatomic potentials of near ab initio quality. This capability has the potential of dramatically impacting materials research: (i) while classical interatomic potentials have become indispensable in atomistic simulations, such potentials are typically restricted to certain classes of materials. Machine-learned potentials (MLPs) are applicable to all classes of materials individually and, importantly, to any combinations of them; (ii) MLPs are by design reactive force fields. This Focus Issue provides an overview of the state of the art of MLPs by presenting a range of impressive applications including metallurgy, photovoltaics, proton transport, nanoparticles for catalysis, ionic conductors for solid state batteries, and crystal structure predictions. These investigations provide insight into the current challenges, and they present pathways for their solutions, thus setting the stage for exciting perspectives in computational materials research.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography · Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. E. Madelung, Molekulare Eigenschwingungen. Physikal. Zs. 11, 898 (1910)
2. M. Born, J.E. Mayer, Zur Gittertheorie der Ionenkristalle. Z. Physik 75, 1 (1932)10.1007/BF01340511 ↗
3. A. Rahman, Correlations in the motion of atoms in liquid argon. Phys. Rev. 136, A405 (1964)10.1103/PhysRev.136.A405 ↗
4. S. Lifson, A.T. Hagler, P. Dauber, Consistent force field studies of intermolecular forces in hydrogen–bonded crystals. 1. carboxylic acids, amides, and the C=O…H–hydrogen bonds. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 101, 5111 (1979)10.1021/ja00512a001 ↗
5. N.L. Allinger, J.T. Sprague, Calculation of the structures of hydrocarbons containing delocalized electronic systems by the molecular mechanics method. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 95, 3893 (1973)10.1021/ja00793a012 ↗
6. J.R. Maple, U. Dinur, A.T. Hagler, Derivation of force fields for molecular mechanics and dynamics from ab initio energy surfaces. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85, 5350 (1988)10.1073/pnas.85.15.5350 ↗
7. M.W. Finnis, J.E. Sinclair, A simple empirical N-body potential for transition metals. Phil. Mag. A 50, 45 (1984)10.1080/01418618408244210 ↗
8. D.G. Pettifor, New many-body potential for the bond order. Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 2480 (1989)10.1103/PhysRevLett.63.2480 ↗
9. J.K. Nørskov, N.D. Lang, Effective-medium theory of chemical binding: application to chemisorption. Phys. Rev. B 21, 2131 (1980)10.1103/PhysRevB.21.2131 ↗
10. M.S. Daw, M.I. Baskes, Embedded-atom method: derivation and application to impurities, surfaces, and other defects in metals. Phys. Rev. B 29, 6443 (1984)10.1103/PhysRevB.29.6443 ↗
11. G. Bonny, R. C. Pasianot, D. Terentyev, L. Malerba, Interatomic potential to simulate radiation damage in Fe-Cr alloys. (Open Report of the Belgian Nuclear Research Centre, 2011).
12. M. Christensen, W. Wolf, C. Freeman, E. Wimmer, R.B. Adamson, L. Hallstadius, P.E. Cantonwine, E.V. Mader, Diffusion of point defects, nucleation of dislocation loops, and effect of hydrogen in hcp-Zr: ab initio and classical simulations. J. Nucl. Mater. 460, 82 (2015)10.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.02.013 ↗
13. E. Wimmer, M. Christensen, W. Wolf, W.H. Howland, B. Kammenzind, R.W. Smith, Hydrogen in zirconium: atomistic simulations of diffusion and interaction with defects using a new embedded atom method potential. J. Nucl. Mater. 532, 152055 (2020)10.1016/j.jnucmat.2020.152055 ↗
14. M.I. Baskes, Determination of Modified embedded atom method parameters for nickel. Mater. Chem. Phys. 50, 152 (1997)10.1016/S0254-0584(97)80252-0 ↗
15. T. Liang, Y.K. Shin, Y.-T. Cheng, D.E. Yilmaz, K.G. Vishnu, O. Verners, C. Zou, S.R. Phillpot, S.B. Sinnott, A.C.T. van Duin, Reactive potentials for advanced atomistic simulations. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 43, 109 (2013)10.1146/annurev-matsci-071312-121610 ↗
16. E. Madelung, Das elektrische Feld in Systemen von regelmäßig angeordneten Punktladungen. Physikal. Zs. 19, 524 (1918)
17. G.V. Lewis, C.R.A. Catlow, Potential models for ionic oxides. J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 18, 1149 (1985)10.1088/0022-3719/18/6/010 ↗
18. S.M. Tomlinson, C.R.A. Catlow, J.H. Harding, Computer modelling of the defect structure of non-stoichiometric binary transition metal oxides. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 51, 477 (1990)10.1016/0022-3697(90)90155-9 ↗
19. R. Asahi, C.M. Freeman, P. Saxe, E. Wimmer, Thermal expansion, diffusion and melting of Li2O using a compact forcefield derived from ab initio molecular dynamics. Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 22, 075009 (2014)10.1088/0965-0393/22/7/075009 ↗
20. K. Hornik, M. Stinchcombe, H. White, Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators. Neural Netw. 2, 359 (1989)10.1016/0893-6080(89)90020-8 ↗
21. H. Gassner, M. Probst, A. Lauenstein, K. Hermansson, Representation of intermolecular potential functions by neural networks. J. Phys. Chem. A 102, 4596 (1998)10.1021/jp972209d ↗
22. S. Manzhos, T. Carrington, A random-sampling high dimensional model representation neural network for building potential energy surfaces. J. Chem. Phys. 125, 084109 (2006)10.1063/1.2336223 ↗
23. G. Li, J. Hu, S.-W. Wang, P.G. Georgopoulos, J. Schoendorf, H. Rabitz, Random sampling-high dimensional model representation (RS-HDMR) and orthogonality of its different order component functions. J. Phys. Chem. A 110, 2474 (2006)10.1021/jp054148m ↗
24. J. Behler, M. Parrinello, Generalized neural-network representation of high-dimensional potential-energy surfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 146401 (2007)10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.146401 ↗
25. A.P. Bartók, M.C. Payne, R. Kondor, G. Csányi, Gaussian approximation potentials: the accuracy of quantum mechanics, without the electrons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 136403 (2010)10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.136403 ↗
26. J. Behler, Atom-centered symmetry functions for constructing high-dimensional neural networks. J. Chem. Phys. 134, 074106 (2011)10.1063/1.3553717 ↗
27. J. Behler, Neural network potential-energy surfaces in chemistry: a tool for large-scale simulations. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 13, 17930 (2011)10.1039/c1cp21668f ↗
28. J. Behler, Representing potential energy surfaces by high-dimensional neural network potentials. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 26, 183001 (2014)
29. J. Behler, Constructing High-dimensional neural network potentials: a tutorial review. Int. J. Quant. Chem. 115, 1032 (2015)10.1002/qua.24890 ↗
30. J. Behler, Perspective: Machine learning potentials for atomistic simulations. J. Chem. Phys. 145, 170901 (2016), J. Chem. Phys. 145, 219901 (2016)10.1063/1.4971792 ↗
31. J. Behler, First Principles Neural Network Potentials for Reactive Simulations of Large molecules and Condensed Systems. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 12828 (2017), Angew. Chem. 129, 13006 (2017)10.1002/anie.201703114 ↗
32. C.M. Handley, P.L.A. Popelier, Potential energy surfaces fitted by artificial neural networks. J. Phys. Chem. A 114, 3371 (2010)10.1021/jp9105585 ↗
33. A. P. Bartók, R. Kondor, and G. Csányi, On representing chemical environments. Phys. Rev. B 87, 184115 (2013)10.1103/PhysRevB.87.184115 ↗
34. Phys. Rev. B 87, 219902 (2013), Phys. Rev. B 96, 019902(E) (2017)
35. S.N. Pozdnyakov, M.J. Willatt, A.P. Bartók, C. Orthner, G. Csányi, M. Ceriotti, On the completeness of atomic structure representations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 166001 (2020)10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.166001 ↗
36. A.P. Thompson, L.P. Swiler, C.R. Trott, S.M. Foiles, G.J. Tucker, Spectral neighbor analysis method for automated generation of quantum-accurate interatomic potentials. J. Comp. Phys. 285, 316 (2015)10.1016/j.jcp.2014.12.018 ↗
37. M.A. Cusentino, M.A. Wood, A.P. Thompson, Explicit multielement extension of the spectral neighbor analysis potential for chemically complex systems. J. Phys. Chem. A 124, 5456 (2020)10.1021/acs.jpca.0c02450 ↗
38. A. Rohskopf, C. Sievers, N. Lubbers, M.A. Cusentino, J. Goff, J. Jansen, M. McCarthy, D. Montes de Oca Zapiain, S. Nikolov, K. Sargsyan, D. Sema, E. Sikorski, L. Williams, A.P. Thompson, M.A. Wood, FitSNAP: atomistic machine learning with LAMMPS. J. Open Source Softw. 8, 5118 (2023)10.21105/joss.05118 ↗
39. M.A. Wood, A.P. Thompson, Extending the accuracy of the SNAP interatomic potential form. J. Chem. Phys. 148, 241721 (2018)10.1063/1.5017641 ↗
40. A.V. Shapeev, Moment tensor potentials: a class of systematically improvable interatomic potentials. Multiscale Model. Simul. 14, 1153 (2016)10.1137/15M1054183 ↗
41. I.I. Novoselov, A.V. Yanilkin, A.V. Shapeev, E.V. Podryabinkin, Moment tensor potentials as a promising tool to study diffusion processes. Comput. Mat. Sci. 164, 46 (2019)10.1016/j.commatsci.2019.03.049 ↗
42. I.S. Novikov, K. Gubaev, E.V. Podryabinkin, A.V. Shapeev, The MLIP package: moment tensor potentials with MPI and active learning. Mach. Learn.: Sci. Technol. 2, 025002 (2021)
43. R. Drautz, Atomic cluster expansion for accurate and transferable interatomic potentials. Phys. Rev. B 99, 014104 (2019), Phys. Rev. B 100, 249901(E) (2019)10.1103/PhysRevB.100.249901 ↗
44. R. Drautz, Atomic cluster expansion of scalar, vectorial, and tensorial properties including magnetism and charge transfer. Phys. Rev. B 102, 024104 (2020)10.1103/PhysRevB.102.024104 ↗
45. R. Drautz, From Electrons to Interatomic Potentials for Materials Simulations, in: Topology, Entanglement, and Strong Correlations. ed. by E. Pavarini, E. Koch (Jülich, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 2020)
46. Y. Lysogorskiy, C. van den Oord, A. Bochkarev, S. Menon, M. Rinaldi, T. Hammerschmidt, M. Mrovec, A. Thompson, G. Csányi, C. Ortner, R. Drautz, Performant implementation of the atomic cluster expansion (PACE) and application to copper and silicon. npj Comput. Mater. 7, 97 (2021)10.1038/s41524-021-00559-9 ↗
47. A. Bochkarev, Y. Lysogorskiy, S. Menon, M. Qamar, M. Mrovec, R. Drautz, Efficient parameterization of the atomic cluster expansion. Phys. Rev. Mater. 6, 013804 (2022)10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.6.013804 ↗
48. Y. Lysogorskiy, A. Bochkarev, M. Mrovec, R. Drautz, Active learning strategies for atomic cluster expansion models. Phys. Rev. Mater. 7, 043801 (2023)10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.7.043801 ↗
49. A.P. Thompson et al., LAMMPS—a flexible simulation tool for particle-based materials modeling at the atomic, meso, and continuum scales. Comp. Phys. Comm. 271, 10817 (2022)10.1016/j.cpc.2021.108171 ↗
50. A.D. Vita, R. Car, A novel scheme for accurate MD simulations of large systems. MRS Proc. 491, 473 (1997)10.1557/PROC-491-473 ↗
51. Z. Li, J.R. Kermode, A. De Vita, Molecular dynamics with on-the-fly machine learning of quantum-mechanical forces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 096405 (2015)10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.096405 ↗
52. R. Jinnouchi, J. Lahnsteiner, F. Karsai, G. Kresse, M. Bokdam, Phase transitions of hybrid perovskites simulated by machine-learning force fields trained on the fly with Bayesian inference. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 225701 (2019)10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.225701 ↗
53. R. Jinnouchi, F. Karsai, G. Kresse, On-the-fly machine learning force field generation: application to melting points. Phys. Rev. B 100, 014105 (2019)10.1103/PhysRevB.100.014105 ↗
54. R. Jinnouchi, K. Miwa, F. Karsai, G. Kresse, R. Asahi, On-the-fly active learning of interatomic potentials for large-scale atomistic simulations. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 11, 6946 (2020)10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c01061 ↗
55. P. Liu, C. Verdi, F. Karsai, G. Kresse, α-β phase transition of zirconium predicted by on-the-fly machine-leared force field. Phys. Rev. Materials 5, 053804 (2021)10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.5.053804 ↗
56. C. Verdi, F. Karsai, P. Liu, R. Jinnouchi, G. Kresse, Thermal transport and phase transitions of zirconia by on-the-fly machine-learned interatomic potentials. npj Comput. Mater. 7, 156 (2021)10.1038/s41524-021-00630-5 ↗
57. P. Liu, C. Verdi, F. Karsai, G. Kresse, Phase transitions of zirconia: machine-learned force fields beyond density functional theory. Phys. Rev. B 105, L060102 (2022)10.1103/PhysRevB.105.L060102 ↗
58. E.V. Podryabinkin, A.V. Shapeev, Active learning of linearly parametrized interatomic potentials. Comput. Mater. Sci. 140, 171 (2017)10.1016/j.commatsci.2017.08.031 ↗
59. K. Gubaev, E.V. Podryabinkin, G.L.W. Hart, A.V. Shapeev, Accelerating high-throughput searches for new alloys with active learning of interatomic potentials. Comput. Mater. Sci. 156, 148 (2019)10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.09.031 ↗
60. R.M. Balabin, E.I. Lomakina, Neural network approach to quantum-chemistry data: accurate prediction of density functional theory energies. J. Chem. Phys. 131, 074104 (2009)10.1063/1.3206326 ↗
61. R. Ramakrishnan, P.O. Dral, M. Rupp, O.A. von Lilienfeld, Big data meets quantum chemistry approximations: the Δ-machine learning approach. J. Chem. Theor. Comput. 11, 2087 (2015)10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00099 ↗
62. A.P. Bartók, M.J. Gillan, F.R. Manby, G. Csányi, Machine-learning approach for one- and two-body corrections to density functional theory: applications to molecular and condensed water. Phys. Rev. B 88, 054104 (2013)10.1103/PhysRevB.88.054104 ↗
63. A.P. Bartók, S. De, C. Poelking, N. Bernstein, J.R. Kermode, G. Csányi, M. Ceriotti, Machine learning unifies the modeling of materials and molecules. Sci. Adv. 3, e1701816 (2017)10.1126/sciadv.1701816 ↗
64. D. Dragoni, T.D. Daff, G. Csányi, N. Marzari, Achieving DFT accuracy with a machine-learning interatomic potential: thermomechanics and defects in bcc ferromagnetic iron. Phys. Rev. Mater. 2, 013808 (2018)10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.2.013808 ↗
65. I.S. Novikov, B. Grabowski, F. Körmann, A.V. Shapeev, Magnetic moment tensor potentials for collinear spin-polarized materials reproduce different magnetic states of bcc Fe. npj Comput. Mater. 8, 13 (2022)10.1038/s41524-022-00696-9 ↗
66. S. Nikolov, M.A. Wood, A. Cangi, J.-B. Maillet, M.-C. Marinica, A.P. Thompson, M.P. Desjarlais, J. Tranchida, Quantum-accurate magneto-elastic predictions with classical spin-lattice dynamics. npj Compt. Mater. 7, 153 (2021)10.1038/s41524-021-00617-2 ↗
67. M. Eckhoff, K.N. Lausch, P.E. Blöchl, J. Behler, Predicting oxidation and spin states by high-dimensional neural networks: applications to lithium manganese oxide spinels. J. Chem. Phys. 153, 164107 (2020)10.1063/5.0021452 ↗
68. M. Eckhoff, J. Behler, High-dimensional neural network potentials for magnetic systems using spin-dependent atom-centered symmetry functions. npj Compt. Mater. 7, 170 (2021)10.1038/s41524-021-00636-z ↗
69. M. Rinaldi, M. Mrovec, A. Bochkarev, Y. Lysogorskiy, R. Drautz, Non-collinear magnetic atomic cluster expansion for iron. https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.15137v1 (2023)10.1038/s41524-024-01196-8 ↗
70. K. Nguyen-Cong, J.T. Willman, S.G. Moore, A.B Belonoshko, R. Gayatri, E. Weinberg, M.A. Wood, A.P. Thompson, I.I. Oleynik, Billion atom molecular dynamics simulations of carbon at extreme conditions and experimental time and length scales, in: Proc. Intern. Conf. High Perf. Comput. Network, Storage and Analysis 1 (2021)10.1145/3458817.3487400 ↗
71. U. Shaidu, E. Küçükbenli, R. Lot, F. Pellegrini, E. Kaxiras, S. De Gironcoli, A systematic approach to generating accurate neural network potentials: the case of carbon. npj Comput. Mater. 7, 52 (2021)10.1038/s41524-021-00508-6 ↗
72. H. Zong, G. Pilania, Z. Ding, G.J. Ackland, T. Lookman, Developing an interatomic potential for martensitic phase transformations in zirconium by machine learning. npj Comput. Mater. 4, 48 (2018)10.1038/s41524-018-0103-x ↗
73. X. Qian, R. Yang, Temperature effect on the phonon dispersion stability of zirconium by machine learning driven atomistic simulations. Phys. Rev. B 98, 224108 (2018)10.1103/PhysRevB.98.224108 ↗
74. J. Byggmästar, A. Hamedani, K. Nordlund, F. Djurabekova, Machine-learning interatomic potential for radiation damage and defects in tungsten. Phys. Rev. B 100, 144105 (2019)10.1103/PhysRevB.100.144105 ↗
75. H. Babaei, R. Guo, A. Hashemi, S. Lee, Machine-learning-based interatomic potential for phonon transport in perfect crystalline Si and crystalline Si with vacancies. Phys. Rev. Mater. 3, 074603 (2019)10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.3.074603 ↗
76. M. Stricker, B. Yin, E. Mak, W.A. Curtin, Machine learning for metallurgy II. A neural-network potential for magnesium. Phys. Rev. Mater. 4, 103602 (2020)10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.4.103602 ↗
77. M. Liyanage, D. Reith, V. Eyert, W.A. Curtin, Machine learning for metallurgy V: a neural-network potential for zirconium. Phys. Rev. Mater. 6, 063804 (2022)10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.6.063804 ↗
78. L. Zhang, H. Wang, R. Car, W. E., Phase diagram of a deep potential water model. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 236001 (2021)10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.236001 ↗
79. J.M. Choi, K. Lee, S. Kim, M. Moon, W. Jeong, S. Han, Accelerated computation of lattice thermal conductivity using neural network interatomic potentials. Comput. Mater. Sci. 211, 111472 (2022)10.1016/j.commatsci.2022.111472 ↗
80. H. Kimizuka, B. Tomsen, M. Shiga, Artificial neural netwok-based path integral simulations of hydrogen isotope diffusion in palladium. J. Phys. Energy 4, 034004 (2022)10.1088/2515-7655/ac7e6b ↗
81. H. Kwon, M. Shiga, H. Kimizuka, T. Oda, Accurate description of hydrogen diffusity in bcc metals using machine-learning moment tensor potentials and path-integral methods. Acta Mater. 247, 118739 (2023)10.1016/j.actamat.2023.118739 ↗
82. S. Zhao, Application of machine learning in understanding the irradation damage mechanism of high-entropy materials. J. Nucl. Mater. 559, 153462 (2022)10.1016/j.jnucmat.2021.153462 ↗
83. J. Schmidt, M.R.G. Marques, S. Botti, M.A.L. Marques, Recent advances and applications of machine learning in solid-state materials science. npj Comput. Mater. 5, 83 (2019)10.1038/s41524-019-0221-0 ↗
84. Y. Zuo, C. Chen, X. Li, Z. Deng, Y. Chen, J. Behler, G. Csányi, A.V. Shapeev, A.P. Thompson, M.A. Wood, S.P. Ong, Performance and cost assessment of machine learning interatomic potentials. J. Phys. Chem. A 124, 731 (2020)10.1021/acs.jpca.9b08723 ↗
85. Y. Hu, W.A. Curtin, Modeling of precipitate strengthening with near-chemical accuracy: case study of Al 6xxx alloys. Acta Mater. 237, 118144 (2022)10.1016/j.actamat.2022.118144 ↗
86. A. Seko, A. Takahashi, I. Tanaka, First-principles interatomic potentials for ten elemental metals via compressed sensing. Phys. Rev. B 92, 054113 (2015)10.1103/PhysRevB.92.054113 ↗
87. H. Eshet, R.Z. Khaliullin, T.D. Kühne, J. Behler, M. Parrinello, Ab initio quality neural-network potential for sodium. Phys. Rev. B 81, 184107 (2010)10.1103/PhysRevB.81.184107 ↗
88. K.V.J. Jose, N. Artrith, J. Behler, Construction of high-dimensional neural network potentials using environment-dependent atom pairs. J. Chem. Phys. 136, 194111 (2012)10.1063/1.4712397 ↗
89. I. Kruglov, O. Sergeev, A. Yanilkin, A.R. Oganov, Energy-free machine learning force field for aluminum. Sci. Rep. 7, 8512 (2017)10.1038/s41598-017-08455-3 ↗
90. V. Botu, R. Batra, J. Chapman, R. Ramprasad, Machine learning force fields: construction, validation, and outlook. J. Phys. Chem. C 121, 511 (2017)10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b10908 ↗
91. X.-G. Li, C. Chen, H. Zheng, Y. Zuo, S.P. Ong, Complex strengthening mechanisms in the NbMoTaW multi-principal element alloy. njp Compt. Mater. 6, 70 (2020)
92. S. Yin, Y. Zuo, A. Abu-Odeh, H. Zheng, X.-G. Li, J. Ding, S.P. Ong, M. Asta, R.O. Ritchie, Atomistic simulations of dislocation mobility in refractory high-entropy alloys and the effect of chemical short-range order. Nat. Commun. 12, 4873 (2021)10.1038/s41467-021-25134-0 ↗
93. Y.-S. Lin, G.P. Purja Pun, Y. Mishin, Development of a physically-informed neural network potential for tantalum. J. Compt. Mater. Sci. 205, 111180 (2022)10.1016/j.commatsci.2021.111180 ↗
94. F. Maresca, D. Dragoni, G. Csányi, N. Marzari, W.A. Curtin, Screw dislocation structure and mobility in bondy-centered cubic Fe predicted by a Gaussian Approximation Potential. npj Comput. Mater. 4, 69 (2018)10.1038/s41524-018-0125-4 ↗
95. M. Hodapp, A. Shapeev, In operando active learning of interatomic interaction during large-scale simulations. Mach. Learn.: Sci. Technol. 1, 045005 (2020)
96. M.S. Nitol, D.E. Dickel, C.D. Barrett, Machine learning models for predictive materials science from fundamental physics: an application to titanium and zirconium. Acta Mater. 224, 117347 (2022)10.1016/j.actamat.2021.117347 ↗
97. D. Marchand, W.A. Curtin, Machine learning for metallurgy IV: a neural network potential for Al–Cu–Mg and Al–Cu–Mg–Zn. Phys. Rev. Mater. 6, 053803 (2022)10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.6.053803 ↗
98. X. Liu, M.R. Niazi, T. Liu, B. Yin, W.A. Curtin, A low-temperature prismate slip instability in Mg understood using machine learning potentials. Acta Mater. 243, 118490 (2023)10.1016/j.actamat.2022.118490 ↗
99. V.L. Deringer, G. Csanyi, Machine learning based interatomic potential for amorphous carbon. Phys. Rev. B 95, 094203 (2017)10.1103/PhysRevB.95.094203 ↗
100. S.A. Ghasemi, A. Hofstetter, S. Saha, S. Goedecker, Interatomic potentials for ionic systems with density functional accuracy based on charge densities obtained by a neural network. Phys. Rev. B 92, 045131 (2015)10.1103/PhysRevB.92.045131 ↗