journal article·2020-04-02

Structural, morphological and optoelectronic properties of CdO:Ag films – precursor solution aging effect

N. Raja, V. S. Nagarethinam, A. R. Balu

Surface Engineering· Volume 36· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

Ag-doped CdO (CdO:Ag) thin films were prepared by spray technique using perfume atomizer from fresh and aged (1, 3 and 5 days) starting solutions. The as-deposited films were characterized by X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscope, energy dispersive spectroscopy and photoluminescence studies. Face-centred cubic structure and decreased crystallite size were observed with aging period of the precursor solution. Transparency and band gap value increase with aging period of the solution. The CdO:Ag film prepared from 3-days aged solution exhibits a minimum resistivity of 0.98 × 10−4 Ω cm. The aged CdO:Ag films exhibit increased figure of merit values. Thus, aging period of the precursor solution strongly influenced the structural, optical and electrical properties of the Ag-doped CdO thin films.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: ZnO doping and properties · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications · Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

PG and Research Department of Physics, AVVM Sri Pushpam College, Poondi, Tamil Nadu, India

Department of Physics, Anjalaiammal Mahalingam Engineering College, Kovilvenni, Tamil Nadu, India

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.11.18310.1016/j.ceramint.2017.11.183 ↗
2. 10.1007/s10854-015-3993-010.1007/s10854-015-3993-0 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.mseb.2005.04.01510.1016/j.mseb.2005.04.015 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ijleo.2016.10.07410.1016/j.ijleo.2016.10.074 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.02.14610.1016/j.jallcom.2014.02.146 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.03.13810.1016/j.ijleo.2018.03.138 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ijleo.2017.07.05510.1016/j.ijleo.2017.07.055 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.spmi.2016.01.03510.1016/j.spmi.2016.01.035 ↗
9. Usharani K · Acta Metall Sin (Eng Lett) · 2014 · 28 · 68
10. 10.1179/1433075X15Y.000000004510.1179/1433075X15Y.0000000045 ↗
11. 10.1007/s10854-017-8378-010.1007/s10854-017-8378-0 ↗
12. 10.1140/epjp/i2014-14263-310.1140/epjp/i2014-14263-3 ↗
13. 10.1080/02670844.2015.111155910.1080/02670844.2015.1111559 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2016.07.01210.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2016.07.012 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jpcs.2008.12.00910.1016/j.jpcs.2008.12.009 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.solmat.2006.03.00610.1016/j.solmat.2006.03.006 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ijleo.2016.08.10410.1016/j.ijleo.2016.08.104 ↗
18. Usharani K · J Appl Chem Res · 2015 · 9 · 47
19. Kaneva N · Int J Chem Mol Eng · 2015 · 9 · 406
20. 10.1016/j.tsf.2009.03.23110.1016/j.tsf.2009.03.231 ↗
21. 10.2174/187638710120501001510.2174/1876387101205010015 ↗
22. Marouj S · Mater Res · 2017 · 20 · 88
23. 10.1063/1.36904910.1063/1.369049 ↗
24. 10.1007/s10854-017-6454-010.1007/s10854-017-6454-0 ↗
25. 10.1016/S0925-3467(02)00269-010.1016/S0925-3467(02)00269-0 ↗
26. Balamurugan S · Paci Sci Rev A · 2016 · 18 · 228
27. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.01.17610.1016/j.jallcom.2011.01.176 ↗
28. 10.1063/1.32324010.1063/1.323240 ↗