journal article·2004-07

Finite Element Modeling of Polarization Rotation Around an Elongated Elliptic Cavity

Hannes Kessler, Marc Kamlah, Herbert Balke

Publisher page

Abstract

Electromechanical loading of piezoelectric devices with high electric field and mechanical stress concentrations near electrode and crack tips may lead to a localized inhomogeneous polarization switching response which is responsible for device degradation. We present an approximate constitutive law for polarization rotation of fully poled materials in load cases which do not initiate depolarization of the material. In other words, the local poling direction is changed but the material remains poled to saturation. The structure of the constitutive law resembles incremental plasticity theory: The “yield surface” is postulated, based on an energy criterion for 90°-switching of the randomly oriented crystallites in a material point, and the energy barrier of polarization switching corresponds to the yield stress. The constitutive model is implemented into the finite element code PSU and validated for the plane sample problem of an elongated elliptic cavity in a ferroelectric material. Some implications for crack shielding models are discussed.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Numerical methods in engineering · Fatigue and fracture mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Dresden University of Technology, Institute of Solid Mechanics, D-01062 Dresden, Germany,

Karlsruhe Research Center, Institute for Materials Research II, 76021 Karlsruhe, Germany

Dresden University of Technology, Institute of Solid Mechanics, D-01062 Dresden, Germany

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/nme.162002020210.1002/nme.1620020202 ↗
2. 10.1080/0015019990822613610.1080/00150199908226136 ↗
3. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1980.tb10712.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1980.tb10712.x ↗
4. Huber, J.E. · 288
5. 10.1016/S0022-5096(98)00122-710.1016/S0022-5096(98)00122-7 ↗
6. 10.1080/0015019980823234210.1080/00150199808232342 ↗
7. 10.1016/S0020-7683(98)00051-110.1016/S0020-7683(98)00051-1 ↗
8. 10.1117/12.38822410.1117/12.388224 ↗
9. Irwin, G.R. · 463
10. 10.1016/S0020-7683(00)00055-X10.1016/S0020-7683(00)00055-X ↗
11. 10.1088/0964-1726/8/4/30210.1088/0964-1726/8/4/302 ↗
12. 10.1016/S0020-7683(98)00040-710.1016/S0020-7683(98)00040-7 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2003.08.00210.1016/j.commatsci.2003.08.002 ↗
14. Kamlah, M. · 144
15. 10.1016/S0022-5096(00)00073-910.1016/S0022-5096(00)00073-9 ↗
16. Kessler, H. · 250
17. 10.1117/12.38820710.1117/12.388207 ↗
18. 10.1016/S0022-5096(01)00021-710.1016/S0022-5096(01)00021-7 ↗
19. 10.1016/S0013-7944(01)00109-610.1016/S0013-7944(01)00109-6 ↗
20. Lange, K. (ed.) 1993. PSU: Prozeßsimulation in der Umformtechnik, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.10.1007/978-3-642-58047-5_13 ↗
21. Lübbing, C. 1997. “Zur Stabilitat von gestaffelten Finite-Elemente Berechnungen,” Berichte aus dem Institut für Statik und Dynamik der Luft- und Raumfahrtkonstruktionen, Vol. 18-97, Ph.D. thesis, Stuttgart University, Stuttgart.
22. Lübbing, Ch., Keck, P., Hessenberger, K. and Herrmann, M. 1994. “Das PSU-Programmsystem - aktueller Stand und Anwendungen,” Numerische und experimentelle Methoden in der Statik und Dynamik, Institut fur Statik und Dynamik der Luft-und Raumfahrtkonstruktionen, Stuttgart University, Stuttgart.
23. 10.1007/BF0094586710.1007/BF00945867 ↗
24. 10.1016/S0013-7944(99)00068-510.1016/S0013-7944(99)00068-5 ↗
25. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1982.tb10426.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1982.tb10426.x ↗
26. Muskhelishvili, N.I. · 1975
27. 10.1088/0964-1726/10/2/30510.1088/0964-1726/10/2/305 ↗
28. 10.1016/S1359-6454(97)00123-710.1016/S1359-6454(97)00123-7 ↗