journal article·2022-05Open access

Macroscopic constitutive model for ergodic and non-ergodic lead-free relaxors

Friedemann A Streich, Alexander Martin, Kyle G Webber, Marc Kamlah

Abstract

A fully electromechanically coupled, three dimensional phenomenological constitutive model for relaxor ferroelectric materials was developed for the use in a finite-element-method (FEM) solution procedure. This macroscopic model was used to simulate the macroscopic electromechanical response of lead-free ergodic [Formula: see text] and non-ergodic [Formula: see text] relaxor materials. The presented constitutive model is capable of accounting for the observed pinched hysteretic response as well as non-deviatoric polarization induced strain and internal order transitions. Time integration of the history dependent internal variables is done with a predictor-corrector integration scheme. The adaptability of the constitutive model regarding the pinching of the hystereses is shown. Simulations are compared to experimental observations.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Acoustic Wave Resonator Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Baden-Württemberg, Germany

Nagoya Institute of Technology, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan

Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Bayern, Germany

Funding

deutsche forschungsgemeinschaft

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1143/JJAP.50.05580210.1143/JJAP.50.055802 ↗
2. 10.1007/BF0117685110.1007/BF01176851 ↗
3. 10.1063/1.318267910.1063/1.3182679 ↗
4. 10.1002/adfm.20120059210.1002/adfm.201200592 ↗
5. 10.1177/1045389X0504965010.1177/1045389X05049650 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.matlet.2013.10.04110.1016/j.matlet.2013.10.041 ↗
7. Franzbach DJ · 2014
8. 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.01410310.1103/PhysRevB.88.014103 ↗
9. 10.1117/12.27652910.1117/12.276529 ↗
10. Harper JE · 1999
11. Holzapfel GA · 2008
12. 10.1016/j.cossms.2006.05.00110.1016/j.cossms.2006.05.001 ↗
13. Ikeda T · 1990
14. 10.1063/1.312120310.1063/1.3121203 ↗
15. 10.1007/s00161010005210.1007/s001610100052 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2003.08.00210.1016/j.commatsci.2003.08.002 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.03.00810.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.03.008 ↗
18. 10.1016/S0022-5096(01)00021-710.1016/S0022-5096(01)00021-7 ↗
19. 10.1063/1.477037210.1063/1.4770372 ↗
20. 10.1063/1.362187810.1063/1.3621878 ↗
21. 10.1111/jace.1271510.1111/jace.12715 ↗
22. Linnemann K · 2008
23. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.25760210.1103/PhysRevLett.103.257602 ↗
24. 10.1177/1045389X980090070710.1177/1045389X9800900707 ↗
25. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2011.04670.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2011.04670.x ↗
26. Martin A, Maier J, Webber KG (2021) The importance of strain-coupling in 2-2 composite structures. In Preparation -(-): –.
27. 10.1063/1.508425510.1063/1.5084255 ↗
28. Maugin GA · 1988 · 33
29. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2011.05.00510.1016/j.ijplas.2011.05.005 ↗
30. 10.1016/0025-5408(78)90161-710.1016/0025-5408(78)90161-7 ↗
31. 10.1007/s10853-009-3643-010.1007/s10853-009-3643-0 ↗
32. Peng P · Journal of the American Ceramic Society · 2018 · 102 · 256910.1111/jace.16069 ↗
33. 10.1080/0015019740823804210.1080/00150197408238042 ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.13411110.1103/PhysRevB.93.134111 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2011.10.01510.1016/j.ijsolstr.2011.10.015 ↗
36. Simo JC · 2000
37. 10.1143/JJAP.30.223610.1143/JJAP.30.2236 ↗
38. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2011.04917.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2011.04917.x ↗
39. 10.1002/aelm.20180071010.1002/aelm.201800710 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.06.03710.1016/j.actamat.2009.06.037 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.actamat.2008.02.00610.1016/j.actamat.2008.02.006 ↗
42. 10.1088/1361-665X/aa590c10.1088/1361-665X/aa590c ↗
43. 10.1063/1.278320010.1063/1.2783200 ↗