Correlation between Constitutive Behavior and Fracture Performance of PZT Ceramics
Source abstract
Abstract
The fracture properties of ferroelectrics directly determine their processability and reliability of devices made of them.However, both experimentally and theoretically reported fracture toughness of piezoelectric ceramic materials remains nearly the same as that reported 30 years ago, limiting the application of piezoelectric devices in situation where high reliability is required.Here, we try to reveal the parameters that could be used to optimize the fracture performance of ferroelectrics.Specifically, stress-strain curves, intrinsic fracture toughness and long-crack fracture toughness of three typical PZT ceramics were measured by uniaxial compression method, crack-tip opening displacement (COD) technique and single-side V-notch beam (SEVNB) technique, respectively.It is shown that the intrinsic fracture toughness is positively correlated with the Young's modulus of the material, which suggests that improving the Young's modulus of ferroelectrics is an effective way to improve their intrinsic fracture toughness.The long-crack fracture toughness is related to the intrinsic toughness and extrinsic ferroelastic domain switching/phase transformation toughening, which also suggests that optimizing the ferroelastic switching behavior of piezoelectric ceramics can improve their extrinsic effect.Compared to the hard doped PZT, the soft doped PZT has low coercive stress, high remanent strain and high shielding toughness.The fracture patterns observed in different PZT materials are related to the different ferroelastic switching behavior of the materials.Soft PZT ceramics exhibit intergranular fracture, while hard PZT with weak ferroelastic switching behavior exhibits transgranular fracture.In conclusion, fracture toughness of ferroelectrics is enhanced by optimizing Young's modulus and toughening of ferroelastic switching. Key words:
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials · Microwave Dielectric Ceramics Synthesis · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. AKSEL E, JONES J L. Advances in lead-free piezoelectric materials for sensors and actuators. Sensors, 2010, 10(3): 1935.10.3390/s100301935 ↗
2. RODEL J, WEBBER K G, DITTMER R, et al. Transferring lead-free piezoelectric ceramics into application. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 2015, 35(6):1659.10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2014.12.013 ↗
3. DAMJANOVIC D. Ferroelectric, dielectric and piezoelectric properties of ferroelectric thin films and ceramics. Rep. Prog. Physics, 1998, 61(9):1267.10.1088/0034-4885/61/9/002 ↗
4. RODEL J, LI F. Lead-free piezoceramics: status and perspectives. MRS Bull., 2018, 43(8):576.10.1557/mrs.2018.181 ↗
5. PISARENKO G, KOVALEV S P, CHUSHKO V M. Fracture toughness of piezoelectric ceramics. Strength Mater., 1980, 12(12):1492.10.1007/BF00762147 ↗
6. RODIG T, SCHONECKER A, GERLACH G. A survey on piezoelectric ceramics for generator applications. J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 2010, 93(4):901.10.1111/j.1551-2916.2010.03702.x ↗
7. GALLEGO-JUAREZ J A. Piezoelectric ceramics and ultrasonic transducers. J. Phys. E Sci. Instrum., 1989, 22(22):804.10.1088/0022-3735/22/10/001 ↗
8. PFERNER R A, THURN G, ALDINGER F. Mechanical properties of PZT ceramics with tailored microstructure. Mater. Chem. Phys., 1999, 61(1):24.10.1016/S0254-0584(99)00108-X ↗
9. LI F X, FANG D N, SOH A K. Theoretical saturated domain- orientation states in ferroelectric ceramics. Scr. Mater., 2006, 54(7):1241.10.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.12.025 ↗
10. CALDERON-MORENO J M, POPA M. Fracture Toughness Anisotropy by Indentation and SEVNB on Tetragonal PZT Polycrystals. 12th Meeting of the International Conference on the Strength of Materials (ICSMA 12), 2001, 319: 692.10.1016/S0921-5093(00)02020-7 ↗
11. LI Y W, LI F X. Large anisotropy of fracture toughness in mechanically poled/depoled ferroelectric ceramics. Scr. Mater., 2010, 62(5):313.10.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.11.032 ↗
12. CALDERON-MORENO J M, GUIU F, MEREDITH M, et al. Fracture toughness anisotropy of PZT. Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 1997, 234-236(1):1062.10.1016/S0921-5093(97)00296-7 ↗
13. MEHTA K, VIRKAR A V. Fracture mechanisms in ferroelectric- ferroelastic lead zirconate titanate (Zr: Ti=0.54:0.46) ceramics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 1990, 73(3):567.10.1111/j.1151-2916.1990.tb06554.x ↗
14. LUCATO SLDE; LUPASCU DC; RODEL J. Effect of poling direction on R-curve behavior in lead zirconate titanate. J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 2000, 83(2):424.10.1111/j.1151-2916.2000.tb01210.x ↗
15. FETT T, GLAZOUNOV A, HOFFMANN M J, et al. On the interpretation of different R-curves for soft PZT. Eng. Fract. Mech., 2001, 68(10):1207.10.1016/S0013-7944(01)00019-4 ↗
16. SEO Y H, VOGLER M, ISAIA D, et al. Temperature-dependent R-curve behavior of Pb(Zr1-xTix)O3. Acta Mater., 2013, 61(17):6418.10.1016/j.actamat.2013.07.020 ↗
17. SCHNEIDER G A. Influence of electric field and mechanical stresses on the fracture of ferroelectrics. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res., 2007, 37: 491.10.1146/annurev.matsci.37.052506.084213 ↗
18. LI Y W, LIU Y, OCHSNER P E, et al. Temperature dependent fracture toughness of KNN-based lead-free piezoelectric ceramics. Acta Mater., 2019, 174: 369.10.1016/j.actamat.2019.05.060 ↗
19. KUNA M. Fracture mechanics of piezoelectric materials-where are we right now? Eng. Fract. Mech., 2010, 77(2):309.10.1016/j.engfracmech.2009.03.016 ↗
20. WEBBER K G, VOGLER M, KHANSUR N H, et al. Review of the mechanical and fracture behavior of perovskite lead-free ferroelectrics for actuator applications. Smart Mater. Struct., 2017, 26(6):063001.10.1088/1361-665X/aa590c ↗
21. KIM S B, KIM D Y, KIM J J, et al. Effect of grain size and poling on the fracture mode of lead zirconate titanate ceramics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 1990, 73(1):161.10.1111/j.1151-2916.1990.tb05113.x ↗
22. GUILLON O, THIEBAUD F, PERREUX D, et al. New considerations about the fracture mode of PZT ceramics. J. Am. Eur. Soc., 2005, 25: 2421.10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2005.03.074 ↗
23. KUBLER J. Fracture toughness of ceramics using the SEVNB method a joint VAMSA/ESIS round robin. Fract. Mech. Ceram., 2002, 13: 437.10.1007/978-1-4757-4019-6_33 ↗
24. SALEM J A. Fracture toughness of advanced ceramics at room temperature. J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol., 1992, 97(5):579.10.6028/jres.097.026 ↗
25. VOGLER M, FETT T, RODEL J. Crack-tip toughness of lead-free (1-x)(Na1/2Bi1/2)TiO3-xBaTiO3 piezoceramics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 2018, 101(12):5304.10.1111/jace.15972 ↗
26. LI F X, SOH A K. An optimization-based computational model for domain evolution in polycrystalline ferroelastics. Acta Mater., 2010, 58(6): 2207.10.1016/j.actamat.2009.12.006 ↗
27. BERMEJO R, DELUCA M. Mechanical characterization of PZT ceramics for multilayer piezoelectric actuators. J. Ceram. Sci. Technol., 2012, 3(4):159.
28. BERMEJO R, GRUNBICHLER H, KREITH J, et al. Fracture resistance of a doped PZT ceramic for multilayer piezoelectric actuators: Effect of mechanical load and temperature. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 2010, 30(3):705.10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2009.08.013 ↗
29. JELITTO H, KEBLER H, SCHNEIDER G A, et al. Fracture behavior of poled piezoelectric PZT under mechanical and electrical loads. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 2005, 25(5):749.10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2004.02.022 ↗
30. DENKHAUS S M, VOGLER M, NOVK N, et al. Short crack fracture toughness in (1-x)(Na1/2Bi1/2)TiO3-xBaTiO3 relaxor ferroelectrics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 2017, 100(10):4760.10.1111/jace.15008 ↗