Compositional tailoring of indium-free GZO layers via plasma-enhanced atomic layer deposition for highly stable IGZO/GZO TFT
Source abstract
Abstract
Oxide semiconductor-based thin-film transistors (TFTs) are promising candidates for display backplanes and memory device applications. To achieve high device performance and sustain the electrical properties under prolonged operation, it is important to overcome the mobility–stability trade-off in oxide TFTs. Here, we propose a bilayer-structured semiconductor stack formed by plasma-enhanced atomic layer deposition (PEALD), where an indium-free gallium zinc oxide (GZO) film is grown on top of indium gallium zinc oxide (IGZO), to be implemented in top gate devices. Applying a GZO layer (with optimum Ga to Zn ratio) between the IGZO and the gate insulator (GI) resulted in two major effects: interface engineering and band alignment modulation. While maintaining a sufficiently large field effect mobility (31.9 cm2 V−1 s−1), considerable improvements in device reliability were observed concerning positive-bias thermal stress (PBTS) and negative-bias illumination stress (NBIS) compared to TFTs incorporating IGZO single layers. This suggests that proper composition control through PEALD in the bilayer oxide semiconductor TFT may help achieve an appropriate balance between mobility and reliability.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Thin-Film Transistor Technologies · ZnO doping and properties · Transition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Division of Materials Science and Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
R&D Center, Samsung Display, Yongin, Republic of Korea
Funding
Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nature0309010.1038/nature03090 ↗
2. 10.1143/JJAP.45.430310.1143/JJAP.45.4303 ↗
3. 10.1002/jsid.15510.1002/jsid.155 ↗
4. 10.1149/09001.0139ecst10.1149/09001.0139ecst ↗
5. 10.1002/adma.20221055410.1002/adma.202210554 ↗
6. 10.3390/electronics1101005310.3390/electronics11010053 ↗
7. 10.35848/1882-0786/ab9a9210.35848/1882-0786/ab9a92 ↗
8. 10.35848/1347-4065/abbf6510.35848/1347-4065/abbf65 ↗
9. 10.1021/am100908810.1021/am1009088 ↗
10. 10.1002/adma.20140052910.1002/adma.201400529 ↗
11. 10.1063/1.488985610.1063/1.4889856 ↗
12. 10.1039/C8TC06596A10.1039/C8TC06596A ↗
13. 10.1063/1.495244510.1063/1.4952445 ↗
14. 10.1109/LED.2015.250299010.1109/LED.2015.2502990 ↗
15. 10.1002/aelm.20190012510.1002/aelm.201900125 ↗
16. 10.1002/aelm.20200089610.1002/aelm.202000896 ↗
17. Y.S. Kim, W.B. Lee, H.J. Oh, T.H. Hong, and J.S. Park, Adv. Mater. Interfaces 9, 1 (2022).
18. 10.1088/0268-1242/28/3/03501010.1088/0268-1242/28/3/035010 ↗
19. 10.1186/1556-276X-10-110.1186/1556-276X-10-1 ↗
20. 10.1021/acsami.9b1431010.1021/acsami.9b14310 ↗
21. 10.1021/acsami.0c2267710.1021/acsami.0c22677 ↗
22. 10.1063/1.170783010.1063/1.1707830 ↗
23. 10.1063/1.170256010.1063/1.1702560 ↗
24. 10.1016/B978-0-08-102073-9.00021-710.1016/B978-0-08-102073-9.00021-7 ↗
25. 10.1038/am.2017.2010.1038/am.2017.20 ↗
26. 10.1039/C7TC00193B10.1039/C7TC00193B ↗
27. 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.11.04610.1016/j.proeng.2013.11.046 ↗
28. 10.1109/TED.2018.279882310.1109/TED.2018.2798823 ↗
29. 10.1109/TED.2017.269695610.1109/TED.2017.2696956 ↗
30. Y.Y. Zhang, L.X. Qian, W.B. Ge, P.T. Lai, and X.Z. Liu, Phys. Status Solidi Appl. Mater. Sci. 215, 1 (2018).
31. 10.1063/1.242502010.1063/1.2425020 ↗
32. Z. Zhu, W. Cao, X. Huang, Z. Shi, D. Zhou, and W. Xu, Micromachines 13, 1 (2022).
33. 10.1016/j.mee.2011.03.06910.1016/j.mee.2011.03.069 ↗
34. J. Zhang, P. Dong, K. Dang, Y. Zhang, Q. Yan, H. Xiang, J. Su, Z. Liu, M. Si, J. Gao, M. Kong, H. Zhou, and Y. Hao, Nat. Commun 13, 1 (2022).
35. 10.1557/jmr.2013.21410.1557/jmr.2013.214 ↗
36. 10.3390/app709088510.3390/app7090885 ↗
37. 10.1002/sdtp.1568310.1002/sdtp.15683 ↗