Distinct Structural Determinants of Failure in Morse Taper and Internal Hex Implant Systems
Source abstract
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the influence of implant–abutment connection design, implant diameter, and simulated marginal bone loss on fracture resistance and failure patterns of dental implant systems. Materials and Methods: A total of 180 implant–abutment assemblies were tested, including Morse taper (MT) and internal hex (IH) connections with diameters of 3.5, 4.0, and 5.0 mm. Implants were embedded at two simulated bone levels (0 and 3 mm) and loaded at 30° until failure, in accordance with ISO 14801:2015. Fracture resistance (N) was analyzed using three-way ANOVA. Results: Connection type, implant diameter, bone level, and their interactions significantly affected fracture resistance (p < 0.001). Internal hex implants showed a marked diameter-dependent increase in resistance and greater reduction under simulated bone loss, particularly in reduced diameters. In contrast, Morse taper implants demonstrated similar resistance values regardless of implant diameter or bone level. Failure patterns also differed between systems: internal hex implants exhibited cervical implant fractures in reduced diameters, whereas Morse taper implants showed progressive abutment deformation and/or abutment fracture without implant body fracture. Conclusions: Implant fracture resistance is strongly influenced by implant–abutment connection geometry. Within the limitations of this static in vitro study, MT systems demonstrated diameter-independent mechanical stability and prosthetic-controlled failure patterns, whereas IH systems were highly sensitive to diameter reduction and simulated bone loss.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Pharmaceutical Science, School of Health Sciences, Universidade do Vale do Itajai, Itajai 88302-901, Brazil
Department of Implantology, Bioface/Postgrados en Odontologia/Universidad Catolica de Murcia, Montevideo 11100, Uruguay
Department of Implantology, Be Dental School, Universidade do Vale do Itajai (UNIVALI), Saint Joseph 88102-700, Brazil
Department of Innovative Technologies in Medicine & Dentistry, University of Chieti-Pescara, 66013 Chieti, Italy
GF10 Foundation, St. Louis, MO 63104, USA
Periodontics, Bitonte College of Dentistry, Northeast Ohio Medical University (NEOMED), Rootstown, OH 44272, USA
Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Health (CIIS), Universidade Católica Portuguesa, 3504-505 Viseu, Portugal
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Raz, P., Kantzuker, O., Slutzkey, G., and Beitlitum, I. (2025). Clinical Performance of Narrow Versus Standard Diameter Dental Implants: A Comparative Retrospective Split-Mouth Study. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants, 1–21.10.11607/jomi.11490 ↗
2. The Clinical Performance of Narrow Diameter Implants Versus Regular Diameter Implants: A Meta-Analysis10.1563/aaid-joi-D-19-00025 ↗
3. Narrow-diameter implants versus regular-diameter implants for rehabilitation of the anterior region: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1016/j.ijom.2020.10.001 ↗
4. Influence of Dental Implant Diameters on Prosthesis Complications: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
5. González-Valls, G., Roca-Millan, E., Céspedes-Sánchez, J.M., González-Navarro, B., Torrejon-Moya, A., and López-López, J. (2021). Narrow Diameter Dental Implants as an Alternative Treatment for Atrophic Alveolar Ridges. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Materials, 14.10.3390/ma14123234 ↗
6. Tallarico, M., Lee, S.Y., Cho, Y.J., Noh, K.T., Chikahiro, O., Aguirre, F., Uzgur, R., Noè, G., Cervino, G., and Cicciù, M. (2025). Prosthetic Guidelines to Prevent Implant Fracture and Peri-Implantitis: A Consensus Statement from the Osstem Implant Community. Prosthesis, 7.10.20944/preprints202506.0690.v1 ↗
7. Five-year retrospective study on success, survival and incidence of complications of single crowns supported by dental implants10.1111/clr.12843 ↗
8. Manfredini, M., Poli, P.P., Giboli, L., Beretta, M., Maiorana, C., and Pellegrini, M. (2024). Clinical Factors on Dental Implant Fractures: A Systematic Review. Dent. J., 12.10.3390/dj12070200 ↗
9. Narrow- and regular-diameter implants in the posterior region of the jaws to support single crowns: A 3-year split-mouth randomized clinical trial10.1111/clr.13076 ↗
10. Narrow-diameter implants for treatment with fixed restorations in the posterior region: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1111/jopr.14057 ↗
11. Influence of bone insertion level of the implant on the fracture strength of different connection designs: An in vitro study10.1007/s00784-013-1039-7 ↗
12. Effects of different switched or not-switched implant and abutment platform designs and marginal bone loss on fracture strength: An in vitro study10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.11.038 ↗
13. Effect of solid abutment diameter and implant placement depth on stress distribution in the posterior mandible: A finite element analysis study10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.109911 ↗
14. Effect of internal connection parameters on the fatigue limit of narrow-diameter implants—A finite element study10.1016/j.jdent.2026.106510 ↗
15. Biomechanical behavior of implants with different diameters in relation to simulated bone loss—An in vitro study10.1007/s00784-023-05199-5 ↗
16. Biomechanical behavior of three different types of internal tapered connections after cyclic and static loading tests: Experimental in vitro10.1186/s40729-020-00228-4 ↗
17. Körtvélyessy, G., Szabó, Á.L., Pelsőczi-Kovács, I., Tarjányi, T., Tóth, Z., Kárpáti, K., Matusovits, D., Hangyási, B.D., and Baráth, Z. (2023). Different Conical Angle Connection of Implant and Abutment Behavior: A Static and Dynamic Load Test and Finite Element Analysis Study. Materials, 16.10.3390/ma16051988 ↗
18. The influence of the connection, length and diameter of an implant on bone biomechanics10.3109/00016357.2014.961957 ↗
19. García-González, M., Blasón-González, S., García-García, I., Lamela-Rey, M.J., Fernández-Canteli, A., and Álvarez-Arenal, Á. (2020). Optimized Planning and Evaluation of Dental Implant Fatigue Testing: A Specific Software Application. Biology, 9.10.3390/biology9110372 ↗
20. Random spectrum loading of dental implants: An alternative approach to functional performance assessment
21. Preload and friction in an implant–abutment–screw complex including a carbon-coated titanium alloy abutment screw: An in vitro study10.1186/s40729-023-00473-3 ↗
22. (2016). Dentistry—Implants—Dynamic Fatigue Test for Endosseous Dental Implants (Standard No. ISO 14801:2015).
23. Mechanical complications of implant-supported restorations with internal conical connection implants: A 14-year retrospective study10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.06.053 ↗
24. Treatment strategies for dental implant removal: A literature review10.1016/j.jdsr.2024.01.002 ↗
25. Clinical audit of Ankylos implant abutment fractures for a ten-year period in practice10.1038/s41415-024-8009-0 ↗
26. Fernández-Asián, I., Torres-Lagares, D., Serrera-Figallo, M.-Á., and Gutiérrez-Pérez, J.-L. (2025). Relationship Between Implant Connection and Implant Fracture: Systematic Review. Bioengineering, 12.10.3390/bioengineering12040333 ↗
27. Biomechanical Analysis of Various Connector Designs of Dental Implant Complex: A Numerical Finite Element Study10.1016/j.identj.2025.100873 ↗
28. Stress Distribution in Peri-implant Bone in the Replacement of Molars with One or Two Implants: A Finite Element Analysis
29. One-year follow-up of titanium/zirconium alloy X commercially pure titanium narrow-diameter implants placed in the molar region of the mandible: A randomized controlled trial10.1111/clr.12561 ↗
30. Pesce, P., Del Fabbro, M., Modenese, L., Sandron, S., Francetti, L., Isola, G., Canullo, L., and Menini, M. (2023). Influence of implant diameter on implant survival rate and clinical outcomes in the posterior area: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Oral Health, 23.10.1186/s12903-023-02962-8 ↗
31. Performance of conical abutment (Morse Taper) connection implants: A systematic review10.1002/jbm.a.34709 ↗
32. Stability of external and internal implant connections after a fatigue test10.4103/1305-7456.115407 ↗