journal article·2026-07-14Open access

Static and Dynamic Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printable Aligner Resins: An In Vitro Study with FTIR Chemical Characterization

Marco Serafin, Elisa Boccalari, Marina Borgese, Alberto Caprioglio, Mario Raspanti, Gilberto Binda, Piero Antonio Zecca

Abstract

Background: Directly printed aligners are advancing rapidly, but the mechanical behavior of the resins behind them is still only partly understood. This in vitro study compared the static flexural behavior, short-term stress relaxation, and FTIR profiles of five Class IIa-certified 3D-printable resins for direct orthodontic aligners. Methods: The five resins, TC-85, TA-28, DCA, Clear-A V2, and Ortho Flex, were printed as standardized rectangular bars and tested at 37 °C. Three-point bending to 1 mm deflection yielded the maximum flexural stress and the flexural modulus, while a 30 min hold at fixed deflection captured stress relaxation. FTIR added a qualitative chemical characterization. Results: Differences between resins were substantial. DCA led on every static measure, pairing the highest flexural stress and modulus with the highest final relaxation modulus and the best stiffness retention. Clear-A V2 was also statically stiff but retained force only intermediately, whereas TC-85 combined high stiffness with pronounced relaxation. Ortho Flex performed modestly under static loading yet held on to a moderate fraction of its stiffness, and TA-28 relaxed the most. Conclusions: Directly printed aligner resins are mechanically heterogeneous, and static bending alone did not predict short-term force stability. Relaxation metrics should therefore accompany static testing whenever a resin is selected for a specific clinical purpose.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics · Dental materials and restorations · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy

Department of Medicine and Innovative Technology, University of Insubria, 21000 Varese, Italy

IRCCS Fondazione Ca’ Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy

Department of Science and High Technology, University of Insubria, 22100 Como, Italy

Norwegian Institute for Water Research, 0001 Oslo, Norway

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. Emerging insights and new developments in clear aligner therapy: A review of the literature
2. Tartaglia, G.M., Mapelli, A., Maspero, C., Santaniello, T., Serafin, M., Farronato, M., and Caprioglio, A. (2021). Direct 3D Printing of Clear Orthodontic Aligners: Current State and Future Possibilities. Materials, 14.10.3390/ma14071799 ↗
3. Comparative analysis of mechanical properties of orthodontic aligners produced by different contemporary 3D printers10.1111/ocr.12537 ↗
4. Effect of printing orientation on mechanical properties of 3D-printed orthodontic aligners10.1007/s00056-023-00511-0 ↗
5. 3D-printed clear aligners: An emerging alternative to the conventional thermoformed aligners?-A systematic review10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105616 ↗
6. Jungbauer, R., Sabbagh, H., Rankovic, M.J., and Becker, K. (2024). 3D Printed Orthodontic Aligners: A Scoping Review. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app142210084 ↗
7. Dynamic mechanical and thermal properties of clear aligners after thermoforming and aging10.1186/s40510-021-00362-8 ↗
8. Albertini, P., Mazzanti, V., Mollica, F., Pellitteri, F., Palone, M., and Lombardo, L. (2022). Stress Relaxation Properties of Five Orthodontic Aligner Materials: A 14-Day In-Vitro Study. Bioengineering, 9.10.3390/bioengineering9080349 ↗
9. Variation of the modulus of elasticity of aligner foil sheet materials due to thermoforming10.1007/s00056-021-00327-w ↗
10. Effects of thermoforming on the physical and mechanical properties of thermoplastic materials for transparent orthodontic aligners10.4041/kjod.2018.48.5.316 ↗
11. Assessment of the Effect of Thermoforming Process and Simulated Aging on the Mechanical Properties of Clear Aligner Material
12. Physiochemical and mechanical characterization of orthodontic 3D printed aligner material made of shape memory polymers (4D aligner material)10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.106337 ↗
13. Khalil, A.S., and Zaher, A.R. (2025). Effect of printing orientation and resin thickness on flexural strength of direct 3D-printed aligners. BMC Oral Health, 25.10.1186/s12903-025-05556-8 ↗
14. Thermo-mechanical properties of 3D printed photocurable shape memory resin for clear aligners10.1038/s41598-022-09831-4 ↗
15. Comparison of mechanical properties of 3-dimensional printed and thermoformed orthodontic aligners10.1016/j.ajodo.2022.12.008 ↗
16. (2019). Plastics—Determination of flexural properties (Standard No. ISO Standard No. 178:2019).
17. Polymerization kinetics of 3D-printed orthodontic aligners under different UV post-curing conditions10.1186/s40510-024-00540-4 ↗
18. Šimunović, L., Marić, A.J., Bačić, I., Haramina, T., and Meštrović, S. (2024). Impact of UV Light Exposure During Printing on Thermomechanical Properties of 3D-Printed Polyurethane-Based Orthodontic Aligners. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14209580 ↗
19. Direct-printed aligners: A clinical status report
20. Staderini, E., Chiusolo, G., Guglielmi, F., Papi, M., Perini, G., Tepedino, M., and Gallenzi, P. (2024). Effects of Thermoforming on the Mechanical, Optical, Chemical, and Morphological Properties of PET-G: In Vitro Study. Polymers, 16.10.3390/polym16020203 ↗
21. Effect of thermomechanical aging on force transmission by orthodontic aligners made of different thermoformed materials: An experimental study10.1111/ocr.12825 ↗
22. Dynamic stress relaxation of orthodontic thermoplastic materials in a simulated oral environment10.4012/dmj.2013-131 ↗
23. Stress relaxation properties of four orthodontic aligner materials-A 24-hour in vitro study10.2319/113015-813.1 ↗
24. Lassila, L., Mangoush, E., He, J., Vallittu, P.K., and Garoushi, S. (2024). Effect of Post-Printing Conditions on the Mechanical and Optical Properties of 3D-Printed Dental Resin. Polymers, 16.10.3390/polym16121713 ↗
25. Mechanical and viscoelastic properties of a temperature-responsive photocurable resin for 3D printed orthodontic clear aligners10.1038/s41598-025-93026-0 ↗
26. Puchert, K., Ritzert, P., Wille, S., Naim, J., and Şen, S. (2025). Influence of Water Storage on the Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed Aligners: An In Vitro Study. Bioengineering, 13.10.3390/bioengineering13010021 ↗
27. Effect of post-curing conditions on surface characteriztics, physico-mechanical properties, and cytotoxicity of a 3D-printed denture base polymer10.1016/j.dental.2023.12.017 ↗
28. Intraoral aging of aligners and attachments: Adverse effects on clinical efficiency and release of biologically-active compounds10.4041/kjod24.085 ↗
29. Alqarawi, F.K. (2025). The Influence of Printing Orientation on the Properties of 3D-Printed Polymeric Provisional Dental Restorations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Funct. Biomater., 16.10.3390/jfb16080278 ↗
30. Alharbi, S., Alshabib, A., Algamaiah, H., Aldosari, M., and Alayad, A. (2025). Influence of Post-Printing Polymerization Time on Flexural Strength and Microhardness of 3D Printed Resin Composite. Coatings, 15.10.3390/coatings15020230 ↗
31. The Mechanical Properties of Orthodontic Aligners of Clear Aligner After Intraoral Use in Different Time Periods10.1111/ocr.12867 ↗
32. Leaching from a 3D-printed aligner resin10.1093/ejo/cjac056 ↗
33. Microplastics and orthodontic aligners: The concerns arising from the modernization of practice through polymers and plastics
34. De Stefano, A., Horodynski, M., and Galluccio, G. (2025). Can Clear Aligners Release Microplastics That Impact the Patient’s Overall Health? A Systematic Review. Materials, 18.10.3390/ma18112564 ↗
35. Comparative microscopic analysis of plastic dispersion from 3D-printed and thermoformed orthodontic aligners10.1093/ejo/cjaf014 ↗
36. Microscopic Acid-Induced Degradation and Elemental Release From Thermoformed and 3D-Printed Orthodontic Aligners in a Simulated Gastric Environment10.1002/jbm.b.35674 ↗
37. Mechanical properties of thermoformed and direct-printed aligner materials after immersion in 37 °C water: A 14-day in vitro study10.1038/s41598-026-36723-8 ↗
38. Avolese, S., Parrini, S., Lugas, A.T., Bignardi, C., Terzini, M., Cantù, V., Castroflorio, T., Grifalconi, E., Scotti, N., and Sanna, F. (2025). A Comparison Between the Expansion Force Exerted by Thermo-Printed Aligners and 3D Printed Aligners: An In Vitro Study. Bioengineering, 12.10.3390/bioengineering12090912 ↗
39. Force comparison between Perfitalign 4D aligners and thermoformed aligners for mandibular incisor retraction: An in vitro study10.1186/s40510-025-00591-1 ↗
40. Sanna, F., Es Sebar, L., Sannino, I., Avolese, S., Parrini, S., Posadino, M., Testa, P., Scotti, N., and Alovisi, M. (2026). Evaluating chemical and surface stability of thermoformed and 3D-printed clear aligners after intraoral exposure. PLoS ONE, 21.10.1371/journal.pone.0345179 ↗