Show source-provided references
1. Marine litter plastics and microplastics and their toxic chemicals components: The need for urgent preventive measures
10.1186/s12302-018-0139-z ↗3. (2026, July 02). PlasticsEurope, Plastics—The Facts 2021, Brussels, Belgium, 2021. Available online: https://plasticseurope.org/knowledge-hub/plastics-the-facts-2021/.
4. Global projections of plastic use, end-of-life fate and potential changes in consumption, reduction, recycling and replacement with bioplastics to 2050
5. Micro- and nanoplastics (MNPs) and their potential toxicological outcomes: State of science, knowledge gaps and research needs
10.1016/j.impact.2023.100481 ↗7. Principles for a sustainable circular economy
10. Jha, S., Akula, B., Enyioma, H., Novak, M., Amin, V., and Liang, H. (2024). Biodegradable Biobased Polymers: A Review of the State of the Art, Challenges, and Future Directions. Polymers, 16.
10.3390/polym16162262 ↗11. Farjaminejad, S., Farjaminejad, R., Hasani, M., Garcia-Godoy, F., Abdouss, M., Marya, A., Harsoputranto, A., and Jamilian, A. (2024). Advances and Challenges in Polymer-Based Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering: A Path Towards Personalized Regenerative Medicine. Polymers, 16.
10.3390/polym16233303 ↗12. Wi, J., Choi, J., and Lee, S.-H. (2026). PLA-Based Biodegradable Polymer from Synthesis to the Application. Polymers, 18.
10.3390/polym18010121 ↗13. Dallaev, R., Papež, N., Allaham, M.M., and Holcman, V. (2025). Biodegradable Polymers: Properties, Applications, and Environmental Impact. Polymers, 17.
10.3390/polym17141981 ↗14. A new circulation in glycolysis of polyethylene terephthalate using MOF-based catalysts for environmental sustainability of plastic
10.1016/j.cej.2024.151667 ↗16. Czyżewski, W., Jachimczyk, J., Hoffman, Z., Szymoniuk, M., Litak, J., Maciejewski, M., Kura, K., Rola, R., and Torres, K. (2022). Low-Cost Cranioplasty—A Systematic Review of 3D Printing in Medicine. Materials, 15.
10.3390/ma15144731 ↗17. 3D Printing of Polyethylene Terephthalate Glycol–Sepiolite Composites with Nanoscale Orientation
10.1021/acsami.0c03830 ↗18. Freeland, B., McCarthy, E., Balakrishnan, R., Fahy, S., Boland, A., Rochfort, K.D., Dabros, M., Marti, R., Kelleher, S.M., and Gaughran, J. (2022). A Review of Polylactic Acid as a Replacement Material for Single-Use Laboratory Components. Materials, 15.
10.3390/ma15092989 ↗19. Paszkiewicz, S., Irska, I., and Piesowicz, E. (2020). Environmentally Friendly Polymer Blends Based on Post-Consumer Glycol-Modified Poly(Ethylene Terephthalate) (PET-G) Foils and Poly(Ethylene 2,5-Furanoate) (PEF): Preparation and Characterization. Materials, 13.
10.3390/ma13122673 ↗20. Hassan, M.H., Omar, A.M., Daskalakis, E., Hou, Y., Huang, B., Strashnov, I., Grieve, B.D., and Bártolo, P. (2020). The Potential of Polyethylene Terephthalate Glycol as Biomaterial for Bone Tissue Engineering. Polymers, 12.
10.3390/polym12123045 ↗23. Katschnig, M., Wallner, J., Janics, T., Burgstaller, C., Zemann, W., and Holzer, C. (2020). Biofunctional Glycol-Modified Polyethylene Terephthalate and Thermoplastic Polyurethane Implants by Extrusion-Based Additive Manufacturing for Medical 3D Maxillofacial Defect Reconstruction. Polymers, 12.
10.3390/polym12081751 ↗25. Cranioplasty with preoperatively customized polymethyl-methacrylate by using a 3-dimensional printed polyethylene terephthalate glycol mold
10.29328/journal.jnnd.1001016 ↗26. (2014). Parthasarathy, 3D modeling, custom implants and its future perspectives in craniofacial surgery. Ann. Maxillofac. Surg., 4, 9–18.
10.4103/2231-0746.133065 ↗27. Sultan, M.M., Aized, T., Farooq, M., Anwar, S., Ahmad, N., Tauseef, A., and Riaz, F. (2025). Optimization of PETG 3D printing parameters for the design and development of biocompatible bone implants. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 13.
10.3389/fbioe.2025.1549191 ↗28. 3D-printed PETG/BC scaffolds for bone tissue repair
29. Shilov, S.Y., Rozhkova, Y.A., Markova, L.N., Tashkinov, M.A., Vindokurov, I.V., and Silberschmidt, V.V. (2022). Biocompatibility of 3D-Printed PLA, PEEK and PETG: Adhesion of Bone Marrow and Peritoneal Lavage Cells. Polymers, 14.
10.3390/polym14193958 ↗30. Wang, M., Xu, Y., Cao, L., Xiong, L., Shang, D., Cong, Y., Zhao, D., Wei, X., Li, J., and Fu, D. (2025). Mechanical and biological properties of 3D printed bone tissue engineering scaffolds. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 13.
10.3389/fbioe.2025.1545693 ↗32. (2026, July 02). Coating (Surface Treatment) of Cell Culture Plastic. Available online: https://incelligence.de/en/cell-culture/cell-culture-plastic-ware/coating-surface-treatment.
33. Lattanzi, W., Parolisi, R., Barba, M., and Bonfanti, L. (2015). Osteogenic and Neurogenic Stem Cells in Their Own Place: Unraveling Differences and Similarities Between Niches. Front. Cell. Neurosci., 9.
10.3389/fncel.2015.00455 ↗34. Di Pietro, L., Barba, M., Prampolini, C., Ceccariglia, S., Frassanito, P., Vita, A., Guadagni, E., Bonvissuto, D., Massimi, L., and Tamburrini, G. (2020). GLI1 and AXIN2 Are Distinctive Markers of Human Calvarial Mesenchymal Stromal Cells in Nonsyndromic Craniosynostosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 21.
10.3390/ijms21124356 ↗35. Human Primary Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stromal Cells and Their in vitro Progenies Display Distinct Transcriptional Profile Signatures
10.1038/s41598-017-09449-x ↗38. Analysis of Relative Gene Expression Data Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT Method
10.1006/meth.2001.1262 ↗39. Katoh, K. (2024). Signal Transduction Mechanisms of Focal Adhesions: Src and FAK-Mediated Cell Response. Front. Biosci., 29.
10.31083/j.fbl2911392 ↗40. Vinculin Regulates the Recruitment and Release of Core Focal Adhesion Proteins in a Force-Dependent Manner
10.1016/j.cub.2013.01.009 ↗42. Doro, D.H., Grigoriadis, A.E., and Liu, K.J. (2017). Calvarial Suture-Derived Stem Cells and Their Contribution to Cranial Bone Repair. Front. Physiol., 8.
10.3389/fphys.2017.00956 ↗43. Two Distinct Controls of Mitotic Cdk1/Cyclin B1 Activity Requisite for Cell Growth Prior to Cell Division
10.4161/cc.6.12.4409 ↗45. Cyclin B1 is essential for mitosis in mouse embryos, and its nuclear export sets the time for mitosis
10.1083/jcb.201612147 ↗46. Moshkbid, E., Cree, D.E., Bradford, L., and Zhang, W. (2024). Biodegradable Alternatives to Plastic in Medical Equipment: Current State, Challenges, and the Future. J. Compos. Sci., 8.
10.3390/jcs8090342 ↗47. Recent advances in biomaterials for 3D scaffolds: A review
49. Eppendorf, S.E. (2026, July 02). Eppendorf Consumables BioBased. Available online: https://www.eppendorf.com/us-en/lab-academy/lab-solutions/eppendorf-consumables-biobased/.
50. Greiner Bio-One (2026, July 02). ACT® Certified Labware by Greiner Bio-One. Available online: https://www.gbo.com/en-int/sustainability/act-certified-labware-by-greiner-bio-one.
51. Corning, I. (2026, July 02). Creating New Lives for “Single-Use” Lab Plastics. Available online: https://www.corning.com/worldwide/en/the-progress-report/crystal-clear/creating-new-lives-for-single-use-lab-plastics.
52. Pérez Davila, S., González Rodríguez, L., Chiussi, S., Serra, J., and González, P. (2021). How to Sterilize Polylactic Acid Based Medical Devices?. Polymers, 13.
10.3390/polym13132115 ↗53. Negrete-Bolagay, D., and Guerrero, V.H. (2024). Opportunities and Challenges in the Application of Bioplastics: Perspectives from Formulation, Processing, and Performance. Polymers, 16.
10.3390/polym16182561 ↗54. Börner, T., and Zinn, M. (2024). Key challenges in the advancement and industrialization of biobased and biodegradable plastics: A value chain overarching perspective. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 12.
10.3389/fbioe.2024.1406278 ↗55. Sustainability performance of polyethylene terephthalate, clarifying challenges and opportunities
10.1002/pol.20210495 ↗56. Sustainable polymer reclamation: Recycling poly(ethylene terephthalate) glycol (PETG) for 3D printing applications
10.1186/s40712-024-00163-x ↗