journal article·2026-07-09Open access

Copper-Doped Silicate Porous Architectures for Hard Tissue Engineering

Cristina Cristea, Maria-Eliza Puscasu, Gabriela-Olimpia Isopencu, Ovidiu-Cristian Oprea, Vasile-Adrian Surdu, Mihaela Bacalum, Roberta Moisa, Sorin-Ion Jinga, Cristina Busuioc

Abstract

Porous silicate scaffolds represent a promising class of grafting materials for hard tissue engineering due to their superior bioactivity, adjustable degradation rates, and ability to stimulate both osteogenesis and angiogenesis. In this work, scaffolds based on an akermanite-targeted (Ca2MgSi2O7) starting composition, including copper-doped variants, were synthesized using sol–gel and combustion routes, followed by 3D printing to achieve porous architectures with controlled pore size and interconnectivity. The powders were characterized by scanning electron microscopy, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, and thermal analysis to evaluate their morphology, composition, and crystalline phases. The scaffolds were further assessed in terms of bioactivity by immersion in simulated body fluid (SBF), antibacterial activity, and in vitro cellular response. The results confirmed that copper doping enhanced antibacterial properties, while maintaining favorable biological behavior. Comparative analysis revealed differences between the two synthesis methods, with sol–gel providing more homogeneous structures and combustion leading to highly porous morphologies. These findings highlight copper-doped silicate scaffolds as promising candidates for bone tissue regeneration, combining architectural integrity with biological functionality.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Cellular and Composite Structures · Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Medical Engineering, National University of Science and Technology Politehnica Bucharest, RO-060042 Bucharest, Romania

Faculty of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnologies, National University of Science and Technology Politehnica Bucharest, RO-060042 Bucharest, Romania

National Center of Micro and Nanomaterials, National University of Science and Technology Politehnica Bucharest, RO-060042 Bucharest, Romania

Department of Materials Science, Faculty of Materials Science and Engineering, Transilvania University of Brasov, 29 Eroilor Blvd., RO-500036 Brasov, Romania

Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering, RO-077125 Magurele, Romania

References (63)

Show source-provided references
1. Topological design and additive manufacturing of porous metals for bone scaffolds and orthopaedic implants: A review10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.01.012 ↗
2. Kim, Y.-H., Vijayavenkataraman, S., and Cidonio, G. (2024). Biomaterials and scaffolds for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. BMC Methods, 1.10.1186/s44330-024-00002-7 ↗
3. Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: A year in review10.1089/ten.teb.2013.0668 ↗
4. Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: History, progress, and challenges10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-061010-114257 ↗
5. Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine: Perspectives and Challenges10.1002/mco2.70192 ↗
6. Bone tissue engineering using 3D printing10.1016/j.mattod.2013.11.017 ↗
7. Mukasheva, F., Adilova, L., Dyussenbinov, A., Yernaimanova, B., Abilev, M., and Akilbekova, D. (2024). Optimizing scaffold pore size for tissue engineering: Insights across various tissue types. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 12.10.3389/fbioe.2024.1444986 ↗
8. Review on Porous Scaffolds Generation Process: A Tissue Engineering Approach
9. A review on pore and porosity in tissue engineering10.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.661 ↗
10. Picado-Tejero, D., Mendoza-Cerezo, L., Rodríguez-Rego, J.M., Carrasco-Amador, J.P., and Marcos-Romero, A.C. (2025). Recent Advances in 3D Bioprinting of Porous Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering: A Narrative and Critical Review. J. Funct. Biomater., 16.10.3390/jfb16090328 ↗
11. Wong, S.K., Yee, M.M.F., Chin, K.Y., and Ima-Nirwana, S. (2023). A Review of the Application of Natural and Synthetic Scaffolds in Bone Regeneration. J. Funct. Biomater., 14.10.3390/jfb14050286 ↗
12. Biomaterials for bone tissue engineering scaffolds: A review10.1039/C9RA05214C ↗
13. Review of bone graft and bone substitutes with an emphasis on fracture surgeries10.1186/s40824-019-0157-y ↗
14. A systematic review of decellularized allograft and xenograft–derived scaffolds in bone tissue regeneration10.1016/j.tice.2021.101494 ↗
15. Bone regenerative medicine: Classic options, novel strategies, and future directions10.1186/1749-799X-9-18 ↗
16. Furko, M. (2025). Bioglasses Versus Bioactive Calcium Phosphate Derivatives as Advanced Ceramics in Tissue Engineering: Comparative and Comprehensive Study, Current Trends, and Innovative Solutions. J. Funct. Biomater., 16.10.20944/preprints202504.0433.v1 ↗
17. A tissue engineering approach based on the use of bioceramics for bone repair10.1039/C2BM00071G ↗
18. A review of bioceramic porous scaffolds for hard tissue applications: Effects of structural features10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.03.192 ↗
19. Brochu, B.M., Sturm, S.R., Kawase De Queiroz Goncalves, J.A., Mirsky, N.A., Sandino, A.I., Panthaki, K.Z., Panthaki, K.Z., Nayak, V.V., Daunert, S., and Witek, L. (2024). Advances in Bioceramics for Bone Regeneration: A Narrative Review. Biomimetics, 9.10.3390/biomimetics9110690 ↗
20. Nanohydroxyapatite and its composite scaffold for bone tissue engineering application: A systematic review10.1007/s10856-025-06928-w ↗
21. A review of bioactive silicate ceramics10.1088/1748-6041/8/3/032001 ↗
22. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of akermanite bioceramics for bone regeneration10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.05.077 ↗
23. Akermanite bioceramics promote osteogenesis, angiogenesis and suppress osteoclastogenesis for osteoporotic bone regeneration10.1038/srep22005 ↗
24. Silicate Bioceramics for Bone Tissue Regeneration10.3724/SP.J.1077.2013.12241 ↗
25. Pei, B., Hu, M., Wu, X., Lu, D., Zhang, S., Zhang, L., and Wu, S. (2023). Investigations into the effects of scaffold microstructure on slow-release system with bioactive factors for bone repair. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 11.10.3389/fbioe.2023.1230682 ↗
26. Advances in the use of calcium silicate-based materials in bone tissue engineering10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.03.063 ↗
27. Review on calcium- and magnesium-based silicates for bone tissue engineering applications10.1002/jbm.a.36925 ↗
28. A Review on the Role of Wollastonite Biomaterial in Bone Tissue Engineering10.1155/2022/4996530 ↗
29. Bioactive calcium silicate ceramics and coatings10.1016/j.biopha.2008.07.051 ↗
30. Facile synthesis and structural insight of nanostructure akermanite powder10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.01.097 ↗
31. A Review on Calcium Silicate Ceramics: Properties, Limitations, and Solutions for Their Use in Biomedical Applications10.1007/s12633-022-02207-3 ↗
32. Bioactive elements manipulate bone regeneration
33. Strategic incorporation of metal ions in bone regenerative scaffolds: Multifunctional platforms for advancing osteogenesis10.1093/rb/rbaf068 ↗
34. Tailoring of bioactive glass and glass-ceramics properties for in vitro and in vivo response optimization: A review10.1039/D3BM01574B ↗
35. Effect of copper doping on the characterization, bioactivity, antibacterial, and cytotoxicity of akermanite-based glass ceramic10.21608/ijtar.2023.193677.1019 ↗
36. Copper as an antimicrobial agent: Recent advances10.1039/D1RA02149D ↗
37. Sol–gel technology for innovative fabric finishing—A Review10.1007/s10971-016-4027-y ↗
38. Livage, J. (2004). Basic Principles of Sol-Gel Chemistry. Sol-Gel Technologies for Glass Producers and Users, Springer.10.1007/978-0-387-88953-5_1 ↗
39. Alecu, A.E., Costea, C.C., Surdu, V.A., Voicu, G., Jinga, S.I., and Busuioc, C. (2022). Processing of Calcium Magnesium Silicates by the Sol–Gel Route. Gels, 8.10.3390/gels8090574 ↗
40. Corrosion and transformation of solution combustion synthesized Co, Ni and CoNi nanoparticles in synthetic freshwater with and without natural organic matter10.1038/s41598-021-87250-7 ↗
41. Solution combustion synthesis of functional diopside, akermanite, and merwinite bioceramics: Excellent biomineralization, mechanical strength, and antibacterial ability10.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.102365 ↗
42. Huo, Y., Lu, Y., Meng, L., Wu, J., Gong, T., Zou, J., Bosiakov, S., and Cheng, L. (2021). A Critical Review on the Design, Manufacturing and Assessment of the Bone Scaffold for Large Bone Defects. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 9.10.3389/fbioe.2021.753715 ↗
43. Progress of structural scaffold biomaterials for bone tissue defect repair: A cutting-edge review10.1016/j.compstruct.2024.118542 ↗
44. Application of additively manufactured bone scaffold: A systematic review10.1088/1758-5090/ad35e8 ↗
45. Chen, H., Song, G., Xu, T., Meng, C., Zhang, Y., Xin, T., Yu, T., Lin, Y., and Han, B. (2024). Biomaterial Scaffolds for Periodontal Tissue Engineering. J. Funct. Biomater., 15.10.3390/jfb15080233 ↗
46. Ceramic Robocasting: Recent Achievements, Potential, and Future Developments10.1002/adma.201802404 ↗
47. Patient-specific implants made of 3D printed bioresorbable polymers at the point-of-care: Material, technology, and scope of surgical application10.1186/s41205-024-00207-0 ↗
48. Characterization and evaluation of copper-doped akermanite ceramic10.1088/1757-899X/943/1/012008 ↗
49. Enhanced vascularity in gelatin scaffolds via copper-doped magnesium–calcium silicates incorporation: In-vitro and ex-ovo insights10.1016/j.ceramint.2024.07.369 ↗
50. How useful is SBF in predicting in vivo bone bioactivity?10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.017 ↗
51. Åkermanite based bioactive ceramics: Structural and in-vitro bioactivity characterization
52. Effect of various fuels used in combustion synthesis on the bioactivity of akermanite10.1088/2053-1591/acb1f5 ↗
53. Fabricarea prin robocasting a scaffoldurilor pe baz ă de silicat de calciu ș i magneziu: Progresul imprim ării 3D pentru aplicații medicale robocasting of calcium magnesium silicate based scaffolds: Advancing 3D printing for biomedical applications
54. Nicoara, A.I., Alecu, A.E., Balaceanu, G.C., Puscasu, E.M., Vasile, B.S., and Trusca, R. (2023). Fabrication and Characterization of Porous Diopside/Akermanite Ceramics with Prospective Tissue Engineering Applications. Materials, 16.10.3390/ma16165548 ↗
55. Atomic number and crystallographic contrast images with the SEM: A review of backscattered electron techniques10.1180/minmag.1987.051.359.02 ↗
56. Anuar, M.F., Fen, Y.W., Zaid, M.H.M., Omar, N.A.S., and Khaidir, R.E.M. (2020). Sintering Temperature Effect on Structural and Optical Properties of Heat Treated Coconut Husk Ash Derived SiO2 Mixed with ZnO Nanoparticles. Materials, 13.10.3390/ma13112555 ↗
57. Tavangarian, F., Zolko, C.A., Sadeghzade, S., Fayed, M., and Davami, K. (2020). Fabrication, Mechanical Properties and In-Vitro Behavior of Akermanite Bioceramic. Materials, 13.10.3390/ma13214887 ↗
58. A comparative study on the synthesis mechanism, bioactivity and mechanical properties of three silicate bioceramics10.1016/j.msec.2016.11.084 ↗
59. Vergnaud, F., Mekonnen, B., El Abbassi, A., Vichery, C., and Nedelec, J.M. (2023). Correlating the Effect of Composition and Textural Properties on Bioactivity for Pristine and Copper-Doped Binary Mesoporous Bioactive Glass Nanoparticles. Materials, 16.10.3390/ma16206690 ↗
60. In-vitro biomineralization of magnesium and copper co-doped wollastonite10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39573 ↗
61. Pellosi, D.S., Paiva, G.S.M., Vital, V.G., Mendes, A.L., Santos, N.G., Kuriki, F.K., Lira, K.D.L., Oliveira, G.C.M., Gomes, Y.R., and Lobo, F.G. (2025). Harnessing Copper Nanoparticles for Antimicrobial Applications: Advances and Challenges. Antibiotics, 14.10.3390/antibiotics14111170 ↗
62. Antibacterial activity of silicate bioceramics10.1007/s11595-011-0202-8 ↗
63. Dose-response relationships between copper and its biocompatibility/antibacterial activities10.1016/j.jtemb.2019.06.015 ↗