Show source-provided references
2. Kim, Y.-H., Vijayavenkataraman, S., and Cidonio, G. (2024). Biomaterials and scaffolds for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. BMC Methods, 1.
10.1186/s44330-024-00002-7 ↗7. Mukasheva, F., Adilova, L., Dyussenbinov, A., Yernaimanova, B., Abilev, M., and Akilbekova, D. (2024). Optimizing scaffold pore size for tissue engineering: Insights across various tissue types. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 12.
10.3389/fbioe.2024.1444986 ↗8. Review on Porous Scaffolds Generation Process: A Tissue Engineering Approach
10. Picado-Tejero, D., Mendoza-Cerezo, L., Rodríguez-Rego, J.M., Carrasco-Amador, J.P., and Marcos-Romero, A.C. (2025). Recent Advances in 3D Bioprinting of Porous Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering: A Narrative and Critical Review. J. Funct. Biomater., 16.
10.3390/jfb16090328 ↗11. Wong, S.K., Yee, M.M.F., Chin, K.Y., and Ima-Nirwana, S. (2023). A Review of the Application of Natural and Synthetic Scaffolds in Bone Regeneration. J. Funct. Biomater., 14.
10.3390/jfb14050286 ↗16. Furko, M. (2025). Bioglasses Versus Bioactive Calcium Phosphate Derivatives as Advanced Ceramics in Tissue Engineering: Comparative and Comprehensive Study, Current Trends, and Innovative Solutions. J. Funct. Biomater., 16.
10.20944/preprints202504.0433.v1 ↗17. A tissue engineering approach based on the use of bioceramics for bone repair
10.1039/C2BM00071G ↗19. Brochu, B.M., Sturm, S.R., Kawase De Queiroz Goncalves, J.A., Mirsky, N.A., Sandino, A.I., Panthaki, K.Z., Panthaki, K.Z., Nayak, V.V., Daunert, S., and Witek, L. (2024). Advances in Bioceramics for Bone Regeneration: A Narrative Review. Biomimetics, 9.
10.3390/biomimetics9110690 ↗23. Akermanite bioceramics promote osteogenesis, angiogenesis and suppress osteoclastogenesis for osteoporotic bone regeneration
10.1038/srep22005 ↗25. Pei, B., Hu, M., Wu, X., Lu, D., Zhang, S., Zhang, L., and Wu, S. (2023). Investigations into the effects of scaffold microstructure on slow-release system with bioactive factors for bone repair. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 11.
10.3389/fbioe.2023.1230682 ↗27. Review on calcium- and magnesium-based silicates for bone tissue engineering applications
10.1002/jbm.a.36925 ↗31. A Review on Calcium Silicate Ceramics: Properties, Limitations, and Solutions for Their Use in Biomedical Applications
10.1007/s12633-022-02207-3 ↗32. Bioactive elements manipulate bone regeneration
33. Strategic incorporation of metal ions in bone regenerative scaffolds: Multifunctional platforms for advancing osteogenesis
10.1093/rb/rbaf068 ↗34. Tailoring of bioactive glass and glass-ceramics properties for in vitro and in vivo response optimization: A review
10.1039/D3BM01574B ↗38. Livage, J. (2004). Basic Principles of Sol-Gel Chemistry. Sol-Gel Technologies for Glass Producers and Users, Springer.
10.1007/978-0-387-88953-5_1 ↗39. Alecu, A.E., Costea, C.C., Surdu, V.A., Voicu, G., Jinga, S.I., and Busuioc, C. (2022). Processing of Calcium Magnesium Silicates by the Sol–Gel Route. Gels, 8.
10.3390/gels8090574 ↗40. Corrosion and transformation of solution combustion synthesized Co, Ni and CoNi nanoparticles in synthetic freshwater with and without natural organic matter
10.1038/s41598-021-87250-7 ↗41. Solution combustion synthesis of functional diopside, akermanite, and merwinite bioceramics: Excellent biomineralization, mechanical strength, and antibacterial ability
10.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.102365 ↗42. Huo, Y., Lu, Y., Meng, L., Wu, J., Gong, T., Zou, J., Bosiakov, S., and Cheng, L. (2021). A Critical Review on the Design, Manufacturing and Assessment of the Bone Scaffold for Large Bone Defects. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 9.
10.3389/fbioe.2021.753715 ↗45. Chen, H., Song, G., Xu, T., Meng, C., Zhang, Y., Xin, T., Yu, T., Lin, Y., and Han, B. (2024). Biomaterial Scaffolds for Periodontal Tissue Engineering. J. Funct. Biomater., 15.
10.3390/jfb15080233 ↗47. Patient-specific implants made of 3D printed bioresorbable polymers at the point-of-care: Material, technology, and scope of surgical application
10.1186/s41205-024-00207-0 ↗49. Enhanced vascularity in gelatin scaffolds via copper-doped magnesium–calcium silicates incorporation: In-vitro and ex-ovo insights
10.1016/j.ceramint.2024.07.369 ↗51. Åkermanite based bioactive ceramics: Structural and in-vitro bioactivity characterization
53. Fabricarea prin robocasting a scaffoldurilor pe baz ă de silicat de calciu ș i magneziu: Progresul imprim ării 3D pentru aplicații medicale robocasting of calcium magnesium silicate based scaffolds: Advancing 3D printing for biomedical applications
54. Nicoara, A.I., Alecu, A.E., Balaceanu, G.C., Puscasu, E.M., Vasile, B.S., and Trusca, R. (2023). Fabrication and Characterization of Porous Diopside/Akermanite Ceramics with Prospective Tissue Engineering Applications. Materials, 16.
10.3390/ma16165548 ↗56. Anuar, M.F., Fen, Y.W., Zaid, M.H.M., Omar, N.A.S., and Khaidir, R.E.M. (2020). Sintering Temperature Effect on Structural and Optical Properties of Heat Treated Coconut Husk Ash Derived SiO2 Mixed with ZnO Nanoparticles. Materials, 13.
10.3390/ma13112555 ↗57. Tavangarian, F., Zolko, C.A., Sadeghzade, S., Fayed, M., and Davami, K. (2020). Fabrication, Mechanical Properties and In-Vitro Behavior of Akermanite Bioceramic. Materials, 13.
10.3390/ma13214887 ↗58. A comparative study on the synthesis mechanism, bioactivity and mechanical properties of three silicate bioceramics
10.1016/j.msec.2016.11.084 ↗59. Vergnaud, F., Mekonnen, B., El Abbassi, A., Vichery, C., and Nedelec, J.M. (2023). Correlating the Effect of Composition and Textural Properties on Bioactivity for Pristine and Copper-Doped Binary Mesoporous Bioactive Glass Nanoparticles. Materials, 16.
10.3390/ma16206690 ↗61. Pellosi, D.S., Paiva, G.S.M., Vital, V.G., Mendes, A.L., Santos, N.G., Kuriki, F.K., Lira, K.D.L., Oliveira, G.C.M., Gomes, Y.R., and Lobo, F.G. (2025). Harnessing Copper Nanoparticles for Antimicrobial Applications: Advances and Challenges. Antibiotics, 14.
10.3390/antibiotics14111170 ↗