Show source-provided references
1. Robles, D., Brizuela, A., Fernández-Domínguez, M., and Gil, J. (2023). Osteoblastic and bacterial response of hybrid dental implants. J. Funct. Biomater., 14.
10.3390/jfb14060321 ↗4. In Vitro interactions between bacteria, osteoblast-like cells and macrophages in the pathogenesis of biomaterial-associated infections
5. Osteoblast integration of dental implant materials after challenge by subgingival pathogens: A co-culture study in vitro
10.1038/ijos.2015.45 ↗6. Chu, L., Yang, Y., Yang, S., Fan, Q., Yu, Z., Hu, X.L., James, T.D., He, X.P., and Tang, T. (2018). Preferential colonization of osteoblasts over co-cultured bacteria on a bifunctional biomaterial surface. Front. Microbiol., 9.
10.3389/fmicb.2018.02219 ↗7. Lucaciu, O., Soriţău, O., Gheban, D., Ciuca, D.R., Virtic, O., Vulpoi, A., Dirzu, N., Câmpian, R., Băciuţ, G., and Popa, C. (2015). Dental follicle stem cells in bone regeneration on titanium implants. BMC Biotechnol., 15.
10.1186/s12896-015-0229-6 ↗8. Cell signaling and transcriptional regulation of osteoblast lineage commitment, differentiation, bone formation, and homeostasis
10.1038/s41421-024-00689-6 ↗10. Anderson, H.C. (2009). Bone structure, development and bone biology: Bone pathology. Bone Pathology, Humana Press.
11. Camargo, S.E.A., Roy, T., Carey, P.H., Fares, C., Clark, A.E., and Esquivel-Upshaw, J.F. (2020). Novel coatings to minimize bacterial adhesion and promote osteoblast activity for titanium implants. J. Funct. Biomater., 11.
10.3390/jfb11020042 ↗14. Zaatreh, S., Wegner, K., Strauß, M., Pasold, J., Mittelmeier, W., Podbielski, A., Kreikemeyer, B., and Bader, R. (2016). Co-culture of S. epidermidis and human osteoblasts on implant surfaces: An advanced in vitro model for implant-associated infections. PLoS ONE, 11.
10.1371/journal.pone.0151534 ↗15. Biofilm formation and antimicrobial resistance in Enterococcus
16. Strong biofilm production, antibiotic multi-resistance and high gelE expression in epidemic clones of Enterococcus faecalis from orthopaedic implant infections
10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.10.008 ↗19. Sá, A.M., Mendes, J.M., Silva, A.S., Gonçalves, M.P., Cardoso, M., and Coelho, C. (2023). Opportunistic pathogens isolated from peri-implant and periodontal subgingival plaque from adjacent teeth. Appl. Sci., 13.
10.3390/app13169078 ↗20. Conforte, J.J., Sousa, C.A., da Silva, A.C.R., Ribeiro, A.V., Duque, C., and Assunção, W.G. (2023). Effect of Enterococcus faecalis biofilm on corrosion kinetics in titanium grade 4 alloys with different surface treatments. Materials, 16.
10.3390/ma16134532 ↗22. Insight into antibacterial effect of titanium nanotubular surfaces with focus on Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa
10.1038/s41598-024-68266-1 ↗23. The role of implant coronal surface properties on early adhesion of Streptococcus oralis—An in vitro comparative study
10.1002/jbm.a.37866 ↗25. Blank, E., Grischke, J., Winkel, A., Eberhard, J., Kommerein, N., Doll, K., Yang, I., and Stiesch, M. (2021). Evaluation of biofilm colonization on multi-part dental implants in a rat model. BMC Oral Health, 21.
10.1186/s12903-021-01665-2 ↗26. Ionescu, A.C., Brambilla, E., Azzola, F., Ottobelli, M., Pellegrini, G., and Francetti, L.A. (2018). Laser microtextured titanium implant surfaces reduce in vitro and in situ oral biofilm formation. PLoS ONE, 13.
10.1371/journal.pone.0202262 ↗27. Kligman, S., Ren, Z., Chung, C.H., Perillo, M.A., Chang, Y.C., Koo, H., Zheng, Z., and Li, C. (2021). The impact of dental implant surface modifications on osseointegration and biofilm formation. J. Clin. Med., 10.
10.3390/jcm10081641 ↗28. Impact of surface characteristics on the peri-implant microbiome in health and disease
10.1002/JPER.23-0205 ↗29. Effect of dental implant surface roughness in patients with a history of periodontal disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis
10.1186/s40729-019-0156-8 ↗