Functional Adhesives for a Restorative Future
Source abstract
Abstract
Cementation of indirect restorations has undergone a profound change over the past century, evolving from a philosophy of purely mechanical cementation to sophisticated biomaterials science based on adhesion. The aim of this narrative review is to provide essential context for understanding contemporary clinical decision-making. A key aspect is the structural and compositional characteristics of enamel and dentin as bonding substrates, underlining why enamel remains the gold standard, while dentin continues to present significant challenges. The synthesis is based on evidence of adhesive strategies for the four main classes of contemporary restorative materials, such as glass-ceramics (lithium disilicate and leucite), polycrystalline zirconia, resin-matrix ceramics (hybrid ceramics), and indirect composites. Each material was detailed in terms of surface penetration (e.g., hydrofluoric acid etching and air abrasion), chemical coupling (e.g., silanization and MDP-based primers), and appropriate resin cement selection (light-cured, dual-cured, or self-adhesive). A step-by-step clinical protocol is synthesized based on current evidence, integrating critical techniques such as immediate dentin sealing and optimized polymerization. This review concludes that while adhesive resin cements provide predictable long-term results, significant challenges remain, guiding future clinical research and innovation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Dental Erosion and Treatment · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania
Oral Diagnosis and Radiology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
Private Clinic, 16674 Athens, Greece
Funding
This research received no external funding.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Özcan, M., Garcia, L.D.F.R., and Volpato, C.A.M. (2021). Bioactive Materials for Direct and Indirect Restorations: Concepts and Applications. Front. Dent. Med., 2.10.3389/fdmed.2021.647267 ↗
2. Heboyan, A., Vardanyan, A., Karobari, M.I., Marya, A., Avagyan, T., Tebyaniyan, H., Mustafa, M., Rokaya, D., and Avetisyan, A. (2023). Dental Luting Cements: An Updated Comprehensive Review. Molecules, 28.10.3390/molecules28041619 ↗
3. Dental Cements for Luting and Bonding Restorations10.1016/j.cden.2017.06.006 ↗
4. Current Perspectives on Dental Adhesion: (1) Dentin Adhesion–Not There Yet10.1016/j.jdsr.2020.08.004 ↗
5. Chemical Interaction Mechanism of 10-MDP with Zirconia10.1038/srep45563 ↗
6. Clinical Response Evaluation of Two Different Luting Cements Utilized for Cementing Metal Class II Inlays: An In Vivo Study10.5005/jp-journals-10015-2248 ↗
7. Abad-Coronel, C., Naranjo, B., and Valdiviezo, P. (2019). Adhesive Systems Used in Indirect Restorations Cementation: Review of the Literature. Dent. J., 7.10.3390/dj7030071 ↗
8. Investigating the Limits of Resin-Based Luting Composite Photopolymerization through Various Thicknesses of Indirect Restorative Materials10.1016/j.dental.2018.05.009 ↗
9. Sofan Classification Review of Dental Adhesive Systems: From the IV Generation to the Universal Type
10. From Buonocore’s Pioneering Acid-Etch Technique to Self-Adhering Restoratives. A Status Perspective of Rapidly Advancing Dental Adhesive Technology
11. Carrilho, E., Cardoso, M., Marques Ferreira, M., Marto, C.M., Paula, A., and Coelho, A.S. (2019). 10-MDP Based Dental Adhesives: Adhesive Interface Characterization and Adhesive Stability—A Systematic Review. Materials, 12.10.3390/ma12050790 ↗
12. Evaluation of Compressive Strength and Sorption/Solubility of Four Luting Cements
13. Comparative Evaluation of Antimicrobial Activities of Different Types of Luting Cements10.15218/edj.2024.23 ↗
14. Dental Cements: Bioactivity, Bond Strength and Demineralization Progression around Restorations
15. Rajput, G., Ahmed, S., Chaturvedi, S., Addas, M.K., Bhagat, T.V., Gurumurthy, V., Alqahtani, S.M., Alobaid, M.A., and Alsubaiy, E.F. (2022). Comparison of Microleakage in Nanocomposite and Amalgam as a Crown Foundation Material Luted with Different Luting Cements under CAD-CAM Milled Metal Crowns: An In Vitro Microscopic Study. Polymers, 14.10.3390/polym14132609 ↗
16. Effect on Physical and Mechanical Properties of Conventional Glass Ionomer Luting Cements by Incorporation of All-Ceramic Additives: An In Vitro Study10.1155/2020/8896225 ↗
17. Evaluation of Mechanical and Adhesion Properties of Glass Ionomer Cement Incorporating Nano-Sized Hydroxyapatite Particles10.1007/s10266-019-00427-5 ↗
18. Comparison of Three Luting Cements for Prefabricated Zirconia Crowns in Primary Molar Teeth: A 36-Month Randomized Clinical Trial
19. Evaluation of Microleakage of Stainless Steel Crowns and Pedo Jacket Crowns after Cementation with Different Luting Cements10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_584_22 ↗
20. Maletin, A., Knežević, M.J., Koprivica, D.Đ., Veljović, T., Puškar, T., Milekić, B., and Ristić, I. (2023). Dental Resin-Based Luting Materials—Review. Polymers, 15.10.3390/polym15204156 ↗
21. Curing Potential and Color Stability of Different Resin-Based Luting Materials10.1016/j.dental.2020.07.003 ↗
22. Degree of Conversion of Dual-Cured Composite Luting Agents: The Effect of Transition Metal-Based Touch-Cure Activators10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105147 ↗
23. 5-Year Clinical Performance of Ceramic Onlay and Overlay Restorations Luted with Light-Cured Composite Resin10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105258 ↗
24. Bonding Strength of Universal Adhesives to Indirect Substrates: A Meta-Analysis of in Vitro Studies10.1111/jopr.13147 ↗
25. Comparing Various Resin Luting Cement Systems in Different Etching Modes Through Bond Durability and Morphological Features10.2341/23-096-L ↗
26. Maravic, T., Mazzitelli, C., Mayer-Santos, E., Mancuso, E., Gracis, S., Breschi, L., and Fuzzi, M. (2025). Current Trends for Cementation in Prosthodontics: Part 1—The Substrate. Polymers, 17.10.3390/polym17050566 ↗
27. Influence of Bonding Surface and Bonding Methods on the Fracture Resistance and Survival Rate of Full-Coverage Occlusal Veneers Made from Lithium Disilicate Ceramic after Cyclic Loading10.1016/j.dental.2019.07.001 ↗
28. Adhesion to Eroded Enamel and Dentin: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis10.1016/j.dental.2021.09.014 ↗
29. Alghazzawi, T.F. (2024). Clinical Survival Rate and Laboratory Failure of Dental Veneers: A Narrative Literature Review. J. Funct. Biomater., 15.10.3390/jfb15050131 ↗
30. Popescu, M., Malița, M., Vorovenci, A., Ștețiu, A.A., Perieanu, V.Ș., Costea, R.C., David, M., Costea, R.M., Ștețiu, M.A., and Drăguș, A.C. (2025). Wet vs. Dry Dentin Bonding: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Adhesive Performance and Hybrid Layer Integrity. Oral, 5.10.3390/oral5030063 ↗
31. Does the Application of Anti-Erosive Substances on Eroded Dentin Affect Bond Strength? A Systematic Review
32. Mokeem, L.S., Garcia, I.M., and Melo, M.A. (2023). Degradation and Failure Phenomena at the Dentin Bonding Interface. Biomedicines, 11.10.3390/biomedicines11051256 ↗
33. Concept and Clinical Application of the Resin-Coating Technique for Indirect Restorations10.4012/dmj.2017-253 ↗
34. Immediate Dentin Sealing: Advancing Bonding Efficacy and Clinical Success
35. Immediate Dentin Sealing: A Literature Review10.2147/CCIDE.S307939 ↗
36. Reinforced Immediate Dentin Sealing vs. Conventional Immediate Dentin Sealing on Adhesive Behavior of Indirect Restorations: A Systematic Review10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3415 ↗
37. Wang, J., Song, W., Zhu, L., and Wei, X. (2019). A Comparative Study of the Microtensile Bond Strength and Microstructural Differences between Sclerotic and Normal Dentine after Surface Pretreatment. BMC Oral Health, 19.10.1186/s12903-019-0899-x ↗
38. Effect of Adhesive Strategy on Resin Cement Bonding to Dentin10.1111/jerd.12978 ↗
39. Dentin Bonding Agent with Improved Bond Strength to Dentin through Incorporation of Sepiolite Nanoparticles
40. Coelho, A., Vilhena, L., Antunes, M., Amaro, I., Paula, A., Marto, C.M., Saraiva, J., Ferreira, M.M., Carrilho, E., and Ramalho, A. (2022). Effect of Different Cavity Disinfectants on Adhesion to Dentin of Permanent Teeth. J. Funct. Biomater., 13.10.3390/jfb13040209 ↗
41. Adhesion Concepts and Techniques for Laboratory-Processed Indirect Dental Restorations10.1016/j.sdentj.2022.09.007 ↗
42. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Using Preheated Resin Composites as Luting Agents for Indirect Restorations10.1007/s00784-022-04406-z ↗
43. Microstructural Dependence of Mechanical Properties and Their Relationship in Modern Resin-Based Composite Materials10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103829 ↗
44. Skapska, A., Komorek, Z., Cierech, M., and Mierzwinska-Nastalska, E. (2022). Comparison of Mechanical Properties of a Self-Adhesive Composite Cement and a Heated Composite Material. Polymers, 14.10.3390/polym14132686 ↗
45. Assaf, J., Hardan, L., Kassis, C., Bourgi, R., Devoto, W., Amm, E., Moussa, C., Sawicki, J., and Lukomska-Szymanska, M. (2021). Influence of Resin Cement Thickness and Elastic Modulus on the Stress Distribution of Zirconium Dioxide Inlay-Bridge: 3D Finite Element Analysis. Polymers, 13.10.3390/polym13223863 ↗
46. Hajjaj, M.S., Alhowirini, L.F., Alghamdi, R.S., Merdad, Y.M., Filemban, H.K., Bawazir, M., Alothman, K.A., Turkestani, N.A., and Alzahrani, S.J. (2025). Effects of Preheating on the Mechanical Properties of Dental Composites. Crystals, 15.10.3390/cryst15070632 ↗
47. Time-Dependent Degree of Conversion, Martens Parameters, and Flexural Strength of Different Dual-Polymerizing Resin Composite Luting Materials10.1007/s00784-021-04091-4 ↗
48. Effect of a Diode Laser (445 nm) on Polymerization Efficiency of a Preheated Resin Composite Used for Luting of Indirect Composite Restorations10.2341/22-065-L ↗
49. Degree of Conversion of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement Containing Hydroxyapatite Nanoparticles
50. Ilie, N. (2021). Comparative Analysis of Static and Viscoelastic Mechanical Behavior of Different Luting Material Categories after Aging. Materials, 14.10.3390/ma14061452 ↗
51. Kim, D.Y., Aryan, N., Lawson, N.C., and Cheon, K. (2024). Comparison of Luting Cement Solubility: A Narrative Review. Dent. J., 12.10.20944/preprints202410.1540.v1 ↗
52. Comparison of the Solubility of Conventional Luting Cements with That of the Polyacid Modified Composite Luting Cement and Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1974 ↗
53. Comparative Evaluation of Fluoride Release from Two Different Glass Ionomer Cement and a Novel Alkasite Restorative Material-An in Vitro Study10.1590/pboci.2020.019 ↗
54. Fluoride Release from Restorative Materials10.1590/S0103-64402011000500001 ↗
55. Fluoride Ion Release of Self-Adhesive Resin Cements and Their Potential to Inhibit In Situ Enamel and Dentin Demineralization10.2341/16-115-L ↗
56. Influence of Luting Strategies on Dentin Bond Performance of Self-Adhesive Resin Luting Cement in Combination with a Universal Adhesive10.1007/s00784-024-05850-9 ↗
57. Preheated Composite Resin Used as a Luting Agent for Indirect Restorations: Effects on Bond Strength and Resin-Dentin Interfaces
58. Topdağı, B. (2025). Optimization of Bond Strength Between Heat-Polymerized PMMA and Contemporary CAD/CAM Framework Materials: A Comparative In Vitro Study. Polymers, 17.10.3390/polym17111488 ↗
59. Shear Bond Strength of Different Fifth-Generation Dentin Bonding Agents: An In Vitro Comparative Analysis
60. Comparative Analysis of Shear Bond Strength of Four Adhesive Systems on Primary Dentin10.1002/cre2.70205 ↗
61. Comino-Garayoa, R., Peláez, J., Tobar, C., Rodríguez, V., and Suárez, M.J. (2021). Adhesion to Zirconia: A Systematic Review of Surface Pretreatments and Resin Cements. Materials, 14.10.3390/ma14112751 ↗
62. Şenol, M., Gürbüz, A., and Oyar, P. (2025). Bond Strength of Conventional Resin-Based Adhesive Cement and Self-Adhesive Resin Cement to CAD-CAM Restorative Materials. BMC Oral Health, 25.10.1186/s12903-025-05527-z ↗
63. Degree of Conversion of Resin-Cements (Light-Cured/Dual-Cured) under Different Thicknesses of Vitreous Ceramics: Systematic Review10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_20_00090 ↗
64. Physicochemical and Mechanical Properties of Preheated Composite Resins for Luting Ceramic Laminates10.1007/s10266-023-00880-3 ↗
65. Petropoulou, A., Dimitriadi, M., Zinelis, S., Papathanasiou, I., and Eliades, G. (2025). Conversion and Tack-Curing of Light-Cured Veneer Luting Agents. J. Funct. Biomater., 16.10.3390/jfb16090307 ↗
66. Acid Resistance of Self-Adhesive Resin Luting Cements–Changes in Surface Texture Parameters and Microhardness10.1016/j.dental.2022.06.013 ↗
67. Comparative Evaluation of Bond Strengths Between Dual Cure Resin Cement and Light Cure Resin Cement in Root Surface Indirect Restorations: An In Vitro Analysis Study
68. Comparison of 2 Self-Adhesive Resin Cements with or without a Self-Etching Primer
69. Influence of Inorganic Filler Content of Resin Luting Agents and Use of Adhesive on the Performance of Bonded Ceramic10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.09.013 ↗
70. Selected Physical Properties of New Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Luting Cements10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.07.011 ↗
71. The Effectiveness of Various Functional Monomers in Self-Adhesive Resin Cements on Prosthetic Materials10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_50_22 ↗
72. To Compare and Evaluate the Sorption and Solubility of Four Luting Cements after Immersion in Artificial Saliva of Different pH Values10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_153_17 ↗
73. de Pre-Heating Mitigates Composite Degradation10.1590/1678-775720150284 ↗
74. Influence of Resin Cement Rigidity on the Stress Distribution of Resin-Bonded Fixed Partial Dentures10.1080/10255842.2019.1609456 ↗
75. Hajaj, T., Lile, I.E., Negru, R.M., Niculescu, S.T., Stuparu, S., Rominu, M., Sinescu, C., Albu, P., Titihazan, F., and Veja, I. (2025). Adhesive Performance of Zirconia and Lithium Disilicate Maryland Cantilever Restorations on Prepared and Non-Prepared Abutment Teeth: An In Vitro Comparative Study. Biomimetics, 10.10.3390/biomimetics10070413 ↗
76. Does Adhesive Luting Promote Improved Fatigue Performance of Lithium Disilicate Simplified Crowns?10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105373 ↗
77. Does Luting Strategy Affect the Fatigue Behavior of Bonded Y-TZP Ceramic?
78. The Effect of Hydrofluoric Acid and Resin Cement Formulation on the Bond Strength to Lithium Disilicate Ceramic10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0043 ↗
79. Influence of Different Luting Cements on the Shear Bond Strength of Pretreated Lithium Disilicate Materials10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2641 ↗
80. Color Match of Luting Composites and Try-in Pastes: The Impact on the Final Color of CAD/CAM Lithium Disilicate Restorations
81. Meister, J., Kaschuba, N., Romer, M., and Bourauel, C. (2023). Influence of Cementation on the Aesthetical Appearance of Full-Ceramic Restorations. Materials, 16.10.3390/ma16031236 ↗
82. Effect of Preheated Composite Resin Luting Agents on the Color of Ceramic Laminates
83. Microhardness, Diametral Tensile Strength and Color Stability of Heated Resin Composites Used for Luting Ceramic Veneers
84. Does Adhesive Luting Reinforce the Mechanical Properties of Dental Ceramics Used as Restorative Materials? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
85. Strengthening of Porcelain Provided by Resin Cements and Flowable Composites10.2341/15-025-L ↗
86. Comparison of the Color Change of Porcelain Laminate Veneers Produced by Different Materials After Luting with Three Resin Cements10.2341/21-099-L ↗
87. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Bond Strength Studies Associated with Self-Etching Primer and HF Acid Etching of Dental Glass-Ceramics10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2022.103216 ↗
88. Influence of Different Evaluation Pastes on the Bond of Resin Cement to Lithium Disilicate Ceramic: An in Vitro Study10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.10.031 ↗
89. Mazzitelli, C., Paolone, G., Sabbagh, J., Scotti, N., and Vichi, A. (2023). Color Stability of Resin Cements after Water Aging. Polymers, 15.10.3390/polym15030655 ↗
90. Survival of Fixed Prosthetic Restorations on Vital and Nonvital Teeth: A Systematic Review10.1111/jopr.13735 ↗
91. Mihali, S.G., and Hiller, A. (2025). State-of-the-Art Zirconia and Glass–Ceramic Materials in Restorative Dentistry: Properties, Clinical Applications, Challenges, and Future Perspectives. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app152312841 ↗
92. Is Zirconia Surface Etching a Viable Alternative to Airborne Particle Abrasion? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of in Vitro Studies10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105394 ↗
93. Comparison of Zirconia to Dentin Bonding Using Resin-Based Luting Cements and Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cement: In Vitro10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_779_21 ↗
94. Zirconia Restoration Types, Properties, Tooth Preparation Design, and Bonding. A Narrative Review10.1111/jerd.13151 ↗
95. Comparative Evaluation of Effect of One Coat 7 Universal and Tetric N-Bond Universal Adhesives on Shear Bond Strength at Resin–Zirconia Interface: An in Vitro Study10.4103/jcd.jcd_293_21 ↗
96. Investigating the Shear Bond Strength of Five Resin-Based Luting Agents to Zirconia Ceramics10.2334/josnusd.18-0480 ↗
97. Effects of an Etching Solution on the Adhesive Properties and Surface Microhardness of Zirconia Dental Ceramics10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.11.026 ↗
98. Conner, C., Andretti, F., Hernandez, A.I., Rojas-Rueda, S., Azpiazu-Flores, F.X., Morrow, B.R., Garcia-Godoy, F., Jurado, C.A., and Alshabib, A. (2025). Surface Evaluation of a Novel Acid-Etching Solution for Zirconia and Lithium Disilicate. Materials, 18.10.3390/ma18122912 ↗
99. Evaluation of Microleakage Using Different Luting Cements in Kedo Zirconia Crowns: An In Vitro Assessment
100. Fracture Resistance of Prefabricated Primary Zirconium Crowns Cemented with Different Luting Cements