journal article·2026-06-24Open access

Biomechanical Evaluation of Ultra-Short Posterior Implants as Adjuncts to Two-Implant Mandibular Overdentures in the Atrophic Edentulous Mandible: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis Study

Ata Mert Yaşa, Ceyda Özçakır Tomruk

Abstract

Progressive alveolar resorption complicates prosthetic rehabilitation of the atrophic edentulous mandible, and the conventional two-implant mandibular overdenture concentrates occlusal forces on anterior fixtures through extended posterior cantilevers. This study evaluated and compared the biomechanical performance of a conventional two-implant-supported mandibular overdenture with configurations incorporating additional ultra-short (4 mm) posterior implants at varying positions using three-dimensional finite element analysis. A 3D atrophic edentulous mandible model was generated from Visible Human Project computed tomography data. Six configurations were analyzed: Model 1 (control; two 4.1 × 12 mm Ti-15Zr implants at 33 and 43) and Models 2–6, which supplemented the control with two 4.1 × 4 mm ultra-short Ti-15Zr implants at 35–45, 36–46, 35–46, 35–47, and 36–47, respectively. All models were subjected to bilateral oblique (100 N at 45°) and vertical (200 N, 300 N) loading. Von Mises stress, maximum principal stress (P1), and minimum principal stress (P3) were evaluated on all implants. All experimental configurations reduced anterior implant stress compared with the control. Models 5 (35–47) and 4 (35–46) achieved the greatest anterior stress reduction, while Model 6 (36–47) exhibited the most favorable overall stress distribution, with the lowest posterior peak von Mises stress (14.49 MPa). Oblique loading produced higher anterior stress than vertical loading across all models despite its lower magnitude. All stresses remained below the yield strength of Ti-15Zr. Ultra-short posterior implants reduced anterior implant stress and improved load distribution. Asymmetric configurations with a wider anteroposterior spread demonstrated the most favorable biomechanical profiles, supporting their use as minimally invasive adjuncts to standard overdenture protocols.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Dental Radiography and Imaging · Facial Trauma and Fracture Management

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Yeditepe University, Istanbul 34755, Türkiye

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. A classification of the edentulous jaws10.1016/S0901-5027(88)80047-X ↗
2. A 2003 update of bone physiology and Wolff’s law for clinicians
3. Two implant retained overdentures-A review of the literature supporting the McGill and York consensus statements10.1016/j.jdent.2011.08.017 ↗
4. The McGill consensus statement on overdentures. Mandibular two-implant overdentures as first choice standard of care for edentulous patients
5. The effect of mandibular 2-implant overdentures on oral health-related quality of life: An international multicentre study10.1111/clr.12205 ↗
6. Influence of implant positions and occlusal forces on peri-implant bone stress in mandibular two-implant overdentures: A 3-dimensional finite element analysis10.1563/aaid-joi-D-17-00170 ↗
7. Effect of cantilever length on stress distribution around implants in mandibular overdentures supported by two and three implants10.4103/1305-7456.184152 ↗
8. Assessment of the efficacy of posterior extra-short implant support for an interforaminal implant-supported fixed full-arch mandibular prosthesis
9. Four-millimeter-long posterior-mandible implants: 5-year outcomes of a prospective multicenter study10.1111/cid.12252 ↗
10. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution on short implants with different bone conditions and osseointegration rates10.1186/s12903-023-02945-9 ↗
11. Cumulative success rate of short and ultrashort implants supporting single crowns in the posterior maxilla: A 3-year retrospective study10.1155/2017/8434281 ↗
12. Biomechanical behavior of all-on-4 concept and alternative designs under different occlusal load configurations for completely edentulous mandible: A 3-D finite element analysis10.1007/s10266-024-00941-1 ↗
13. Finite element analysis of stress distribution around short and long implants in mandibular overdenture treatment10.4103/1735-3327.276231 ↗
14. In vitro reliability and stress distribution of wide diameter extra-short implants as support for single crowns and fixed partial dentures10.1002/jbm.b.35560 ↗
15. Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: A review of the literature10.1067/mpr.2001.115251 ↗
16. Finite element analysis in implant dentistry: State of the art and future directions10.1016/j.dental.2023.04.002 ↗
17. A complete finite element model of a mandibular implant-retained overdenture with two implants: Comparison between rigid and resilient attachment configurations10.1016/j.medengphy.2007.02.005 ↗
18. Mechanical characterisation and biomechanical and biological behaviours of Ti-Zr binary-alloy dental implants
19. Microstructure and mechanical properties of Ti-15Zr alloy used as dental implant material10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.05.008 ↗
20. Determination of oral mucosal Poisson’s ratio and coefficient of friction from in-vivo contact pressure measurements10.1080/10255842.2015.1028925 ↗
21. Effect of different mucosa thickness and resiliency on stress distribution of implant-retained overdentures-2D FEA10.1016/j.cmpb.2008.07.009 ↗
22. Zafar, M.S. (2020). Prosthodontic Applications of Polymethyl Methacrylate (PMMA): An Update. Polymers, 12.10.3390/polym12102299 ↗
23. Biting and chewing in overdentures, full dentures, and natural dentitions10.1177/00220345000790071501 ↗
24. Maximum voluntary bite force, occlusal contact points and associated stresses on posterior teeth10.1080/03036758.2019.1691612 ↗
25. Didier, P., Piotrowski, B., Le Coz, G., Joseph, D., Bravetti, P., and Laheurte, P. (2020). Finite element analysis of the stress field in peri-implant bone: A parametric study of influencing parameters and their interactions for multi-objective optimization. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10175973 ↗
26. Static, dynamic and fatigue behaviors of dental implant using finite element method10.1016/j.advengsoft.2006.02.004 ↗
27. The mechanical behaviors of various dental implant materials under fatigue10.1155/2018/5047319 ↗
28. Influence of implant number on the biomechanical behaviour of mandibular implant-retained/supported overdentures: A three-dimensional finite element analysis10.1016/j.jdent.2012.11.008 ↗
29. FEM analysis of mandibular prosthetic overdenture supported by dental implants: Evaluation of different retention methods
30. Mandibular implant-supported fixed complete dental prostheses on implants with ultrashort and standard length: A pilot treatment10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.04.013 ↗
31. Full-arch treatment of atrophic edentulous mandible using short implants with immediate loading: Case report10.1563/aaid-joi-D-24-00104 ↗
32. Influence of implant distribution on the biomechanical behaviors of mandibular implant-retained overdentures: A three-dimensional finite element analysis10.1186/s12903-024-04146-4 ↗
33. A finite element study on stress distribution of two different attachment designs under implant supported overdenture10.1016/j.sdentj.2015.03.001 ↗
34. Evaluation with finite element analysis of a ball attachment overdenture prosthesis of a patient10.4012/dmj.2024-252 ↗
35. Finite element analysis of different framework materials on maxillary palateless implant-supported overdenture prosthesis10.1007/s40846-023-00786-z ↗
36. The evaluation of stress on bone level and tissue level short implants: A finite element analysis (FEA) study10.1016/j.jormas.2022.09.019 ↗
37. Finite element analysis of the stress distributions in peri-implant bone in modified and standard-threaded dental implants10.1080/13102818.2015.1083887 ↗
38. Evaluation of stress distribution on mandibular implant-supported overdentures with different bone heights and attachment types: A 3D finite element analysis10.1563/aaid-joi-D-19-00076 ↗
39. Finite element analysis of the stress distribution associated with different implant designs for different bone densities10.1111/jopr.13539 ↗
40. Anitua, E., Larrazabal Saez De Ibarra, N., Morales Martín, I., and Saracho Rotaeche, L. (2021). Influence of dental implant diameter and bone quality on the biomechanics of single-crown restoration. A finite element analysis. Dent. J., 9.10.3390/dj9090103 ↗
41. Finite element analysis of stress distributions for mandibular dental implant-supported overdentures with magnetic attachments in osteoporotic and normal bone10.11607/ijp.7839 ↗
42. Effect of attachment types and number of implants supporting mandibular overdentures on stress distribution: A computed tomography-based 3D finite element analysis10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.10.022 ↗