journal article·2026-06-15Open access

Fracture Resistance of 3D-Printed Partial and Conventional Veneers

Abdulrahman Alshabib, Silvia Rojas-Rueda, Saad Alotaibi, Carlos A. Jurado, Mark A. Antal, Brian R. Morrow, Franklin Garcia-Godoy

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate and compare the fracture resistance of 3D-printed partial veneers with finish lines at three different locations and conventional full veneers with finish lines at the gingival level. All restorations were digitally designed and 3D printed using a nanoceramic filled resin specifically developed for veneer restorations. Methods: Four maxillary right central incisor typodont teeth were prepared for labial veneers with finish lines at different locations: incisal third (InT), middle portion of the middle third (MmT), lower portion of the middle third (LmT), and conventional veneer with the finish line at the gingival level (CoV). Each preparation was scanned, and 15 casts were 3D printed from each scan. A total of 60 3D-printed veneers were fabricated (n = 15 per group) using a nanoceramic-filled resin designed for veneer restorations. The restorations were cemented to the 3D-printed dies using the manufacturer’s adhesive and resin cement. The specimens were artificially aged with 10,000 thermal cycles between 5 °C and 55 °C, with a dwell time of 30 s, and then loaded to failure using a universal testing machine. Fracture load values were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and the Tukey honestly significant difference post hoc test (α = 0.05). In addition, fracture patterns were evaluated using scanning electron microscopy images for descriptive purposes. Results: The mean fracture resistance of the 3D-printed partial and conventional labial veneers differed significantly depending on restoration design (p < 0.05). Among the partial veneers, the LmT group showed the highest fracture resistance (279.86 N), followed by the MmT group (266.92 N), while the InT group showed the lowest value (179.22 N). The conventional veneer group (CoV) demonstrated higher fracture resistance (404.07 N) than all partial veneer groups. Conclusions: The fracture resistance of 3D-printed partial and conventional labial veneers fabricated with nanoceramic-filled resins differed according to finish line location. Conventional veneers demonstrated higher fracture resistance than all partial veneer designs. The smallest partial veneer, with the margin located in the incisal third, showed lower fracture resistance than the partial veneer designs with finish lines in the middle third.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Dental Research and COVID-19 · Anatomy and Medical Technology

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Restorative Dental Science, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh 11545, Saudi Arabia

School of Dental Medicine, Ponce Health Sciences University, Ponce 00732, Puerto Rico

Department of Operative and Esthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary

Department of Bioscience Research, College of Dentistry, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN 382014, USA

Funding

King Saud University

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. A conservative approach for treating young adult patients with porcelain laminate veneers10.1111/j.1708-8240.2008.00184.x ↗
2. Adhesive Dentistry: Just Bond It!
3. Porcelain laminate veneers: Minimal tooth preparation by design10.1016/j.cden.2007.03.007 ↗
4. Caetano, G.M., Slomp, C., Andrade, J.P., Spohr, A.M., and Kunrath, M.F. (2023). Partial Ceramic Veneer Technique for Challenging Esthetic Frontal Restorative Procedures. Dent. J., 11.10.3390/dj11040101 ↗
5. The advantages of minimally invasive dentistry10.14219/jada.archive.2005.0088 ↗
6. Anterior Veneer Restorations—An Evidence-based Minimal-Intervention Perspective
7. Minimally Invasive Ceramic Laminate Veneers for Maxillary Anterior Esthetic Rehabilitation: A 12+ Years Follow-Up10.1111/jerd.70001 ↗
8. Clinical Performance Comparison of Prepless and Minimally Invasive Ceramic Laminate Veneer Restorations: A Prospective Clinical Study10.1111/jerd.70077 ↗
9. Tooth structure removal associated with various preparation designs for anterior teeth10.1067/mpr.2002.124094 ↗
10. Five year clinical outcomes and survival of chairside CAD/CAM ceramic laminate veneers—A retrospective study10.1016/j.jpor.2018.05.004 ↗
11. Minimally invasive ceramic laminate veneers. A 5-year CT evaluation of periodontal health
12. A Step-by-Step Conservative Approach for CAD-CAM Laminate Veneers
13. Selective Laser Melting Molding of Individualized Femur Implant: Design, Process, Optimization10.1007/s42235-021-0007-1 ↗
14. Advances in Dental Restorations: A Comprehensive Review of Machinable and 3D-Printed Ceramic-Reinforced Composites10.1111/jerd.13371 ↗
15. Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part II: CAD-CAM versus conventional laboratory procedures10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.09.031 ↗
16. Full-mouth rehabilitation in a completely digital workflow using partially adhesive monolithic zirconia restorations10.1111/jerd.13048 ↗
17. Simultaneous Replacement of Maxillary Central Incisors with CEREC Biogeneric Reference Technique: A Case Report
18. Treatment recommendations for single-unit crowns: Findings from The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network10.1016/j.adaj.2016.06.012 ↗
19. Novel translucent monolithic zirconia fixed restorations in the esthetic zone10.1002/ccr3.5499 ↗
20. Jeong, M., Radomski, K., Lopez, D., Liu, J.T., Lee, J.D., and Lee, S.J. (2023). Materials and Applications of 3D Printing Technology in Dentistry: An Overview. Dent. J., 12.10.20944/preprints202309.1965.v1 ↗
21. Three-dimensional (3D) printing in dental practice: Applications, areas of interest, and level of evidence10.1007/s00784-023-04983-7 ↗
22. Zhang, G., Li, J., Wang, H., Shangguan, C., Xie, J., and Zhou, Y. (2025). Research on the Impact Toughness of 3D-Printed CoCrMo Alloy Components Based on Fractal Theory. Biomimetics, 10.10.3390/biomimetics10050292 ↗
23. Unkovskiy, A., Huettig, F., Kraemer-Fernandez, P., and Spintzyk, S. (2021). Multi-Material 3D Printing of a Customized Sports Mouth Guard: Proof-of-Concept Clinical Case. Int. J. Env. Res. Public Health, 18.10.3390/ijerph182312762 ↗
24. Abad-Coronel, C., Ruano Espinosa, C., Ordóñez Palacios, S., Paltán, C.A., and Fajardo, J.I. (2023). Comparative Analysis between Conventional Acrylic, CAD/CAM Milled, and 3D CAD/CAM Printed Occlusal Splints. Materials, 16.10.3390/ma16186269 ↗
25. Characterization of 3D printed composite for final dental restorations10.1007/s00784-024-06003-8 ↗
26. Properties of 3D printed resins for definitive dental restorations: A systematic review10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.11.040 ↗
27. 8-year multicenter retrospective study on partial laminate veneers10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_22_00079 ↗
28. Villalobos-Tinoco, J., Jurado, C.A., Antal, M.A., Rojas-Rueda, S., and Nurrohman, H. (2026). Partial Ceramic Veneers as a Conservative Restorative Strategy: A Narrative Review with Case Report. Dent. J., 14.10.3390/dj14030186 ↗
29. Esthetic rehabilitation of the smile with partial laminate veneers in an older adult10.1002/ccr3.1593 ↗
30. Management of Compromised Spacing in the Esthetic Zone by Combining an Ultra-Thin Partial Ceramic Veneer and a Ceramic Implant Crown: A Case Report of a Multidisciplinary Approach and Technique Description10.11607/prd.6626 ↗
31. Influence of thermal aging on the marginal integrity of computer aided design/computer aided manufacturing fabricated crowns10.1016/j.jds.2023.07.009 ↗
32. Effect of Hydrothermal Aging on the Flexural Strength and Microhardness of Materials Used for Additive or Subtractive Manufacturing of Definitive Restorations10.11607/ijp.8847 ↗
33. Impact of endodontic access design on the fracture resistance of zirconia mandibular molar crowns10.1111/jopr.70047 ↗
34. Fracture resistance of premolar screw-retained implant-supported hybrid abutment crowns with monolithic restorations after thermomechanical aging10.4047/jap.2026.18.1.36 ↗
35. Fracture resistance of highly translucent zirconia laminate veneers with different finish line locations10.1038/s41598-025-25856-x ↗
36. Fracture resistance of partial and complete coverage veneers and ceramic crowns for maxillary central incisors10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.04.020 ↗
37. Fractographic Ceramic Failure Analysis Using the Replica Technique10.1016/j.dental.2006.12.002 ↗
38. ADM Guidance-Ceramics: Fracture Toughness Testing and Method Selection10.1016/j.dental.2017.03.006 ↗
39. The Effect of Preparation Design on Stress Distribution in Lithium Disilicate Laminate Veneer Using 3D Finite Element Analysis10.2174/0118742106243827230921095501 ↗
40. Ultimate tensile strength of tooth structures10.1016/S0109-5641(03)00110-6 ↗
41. Ultimate tensile strength of dentin: Evidence for a damage mechanics approach to dentin failure10.1002/jbm.10230 ↗
42. Mohamed, A.A., Morrow, B., Mireles, S., Jurado, C.A., Antal, M.A., Rojas-Rueda, S., Nurrohman, H., and Garcia-Godoy, F. (2026). Fracture Resistance of CAD/CAM Resin-Matrix Ceramic Overlays and Full-Coverage Crowns for Maxillary Premolars. Biomimetics, 11.10.3390/biomimetics11050291 ↗
43. Chen, P.H., Elamin, E., Sayed Ahmed, A., Givan, D.A., Fu, C.C., and Lawson, N.C. (2024). The Effect of Restoration Thickness on the Fracture Resistance of 5 mol% Yttria-Containing Zirconia Crowns. Materials, 17.10.3390/ma17020365 ↗
44. Sayed Ahmed, A., Lawson, N.C., Fu, C.C., Bora, P.V., Kee, E., and Nejat, A.H. (2024). The effect of die material on the crown fracture strength of zirconia crowns. Materials, 17.10.3390/ma17051096 ↗