journal article·2026-06-01Open access

Development of a Scaffold from the Cob of Zea mays L. “Choclo” to Obtain an In Vitro Bone Tissue Model

Rafael Carbajal-Valverde, Luz Pérez-Tulich, Franco Huaccha-Cáceres, Giulianna Travi-Antonio, Julio Valdivia-Silva

Abstract

The lack of accessible in vitro 3D bone tissue models puts developing countries at a disadvantage in terms of research capacity and healthcare access. In this study, a decellularized corn cob scaffold was functionalized with GTMAC by adding quaternary ammonium groups and coating it with an alginate–gelatin hydrogel to promote mesenchymal stem cell adhesion, offering a low-cost platform for bone disease modeling. Systematic characterization of the scaffold demonstrated that decellularization reduced DNA content by over 80%. Chemical treatment affected the mechanical properties of the matrix, while the hydrogel coating and the functionalized surface of the scaffold promoted cell adhesion and morphology comparable to that observed in 3D cell cultures. MTT analysis showed a subtle reduction in metabolic signal in functionalized scaffolds, which may reflect changes in cell distribution and adhesion within the 3D matrix rather than cytotoxic effects.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Centro de Investigación en Bioingeniería, Universidad de Ingenieria y Tecnologia (UTEC), Lima 15063, Peru

Funding

PROCIENCIA

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. Exploration of biomaterial and stem cell-based strategies for promoting neuronal regeneration and creating engineered 3D in-vitro disease models10.1186/s12967-025-07266-9 ↗
2. Premjit, Y., Lawrence, M., Goyal, A., Ferreira, C., Jones, E.A., and Ganguly, P. (2025). Biomimetic three-dimensional (3D) scaffolds from sustainable biomaterials: Innovative green medicine approach to bone regeneration. J. Funct. Biomater., 16.10.3390/jfb16070238 ↗
3. Bone tissue engineering10.1007/s40610-015-0022-2 ↗
4. The horizon of bone organoid: A perspective on construction and application
5. Direct comparison of 3D and 2D cultivation reveals higher osteogenic capacity of elderly osteoblasts in 3D10.1186/s13018-020-02153-z ↗
6. Dedifferentiated chondrocytes reexpress the differentiated collagen phenotype when cultured in agarose gels10.1016/0092-8674(82)90027-7 ↗
7. Orthopedic implants and devices for bone fractures and defects: Past, present and perspective
8. Cellulose-based composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering and localized drug delivery
9. Harris, A.F., Lacombe, J., and Zenhausern, F. (2021). The emerging role of decellularized plant-based scaffolds as a new biomaterial. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 22.10.3390/ijms222212347 ↗
10. Anazodo, U.G.N. (1980). Mechanical Properties of Corn Cobs. [Master’s Thesis, McGill University]. Available online: https://escholarship.mcgill.ca/concern/theses/6q182m06k.
11. Percival, K.M., Paul, V., and Husseini, G.A. (2024). Recent advancements in bone tissue engineering: Integrating smart scaffold technologies and bio-responsive systems for enhanced regeneration. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 25.10.3390/ijms25116012 ↗
12. Fabrication and evaluation of a 3D decellularized-plant scaffold modified with composite hydrogel for bone tissue engineering10.1186/s40712-025-00336-2 ↗
13. Vargas-Ovalle, M.I., Demitri, C., and Madaghiele, M. (2025). Plant-based scaffolds for tissue engineering: A review. Polymers, 17.10.3390/polym17192705 ↗
14. Induced osteogenesis in plants decellularized scaffolds10.1038/s41598-019-56651-0 ↗
15. Negrini, N.C., Toffoletto, N., Faré, S., and Altomare, L. (2020). Plant tissues as 3D natural scaffolds for adipose, bone and tendon tissue regeneration. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 8.10.3389/fbioe.2020.00723 ↗
16. Bioengineered functional scaffolds co-loaded with osteonectin and HA-internalizing osteoblasts for boosting bone regeneration10.1016/j.cej.2026.174134 ↗
17. Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática (INEI) (2025, February 22). Producción de Maíz Amiláceo Creció 25,8% y Totalizó 78 mil 285 Toneladas Durante Julio del 2022. Available online: https://m.inei.gob.pe/prensa/noticias/produccion-de-maiz-amilaceo-crecio-258-y-totalizo-78-mil-285-toneladas-durante-julio-del-2022-13924/.
18. The effect of microstructure on mechanical properties of corn cob10.1016/j.micron.2021.103070 ↗
19. Scheinpflug, J., Pfeiffenberger, M., Damerau, A., Schwarz, F., Textor, M., Lang, A., and Schulze, F. (2018). Journey into bone models: A review. Genes, 9.10.3390/genes9050247 ↗
20. Biomechanics in bone regeneration and mechanobiology in osteoblasts: Fundamental concepts and recent progress10.1016/j.engmed.2025.100057 ↗
21. Beisekenov, N., Sadenova, M., Azamatov, B., and Syrnev, B. (2025). Analysis of biomechanical characteristics of bone tissues using a Bayesian neural network: A narrative review. J. Funct. Biomater., 16.10.3390/jfb16050168 ↗
22. Bone Mechanical Properties in Healthy and Diseased States10.1146/annurev-bioeng-062117-121139 ↗
23. Comparison of the elastic and yield properties of human femoral trabecular and cortical bone tissue10.1016/S0021-9290(03)00257-4 ↗
24. Elastic modulus and hardness of cortical and trabecular bone lamellae measured by nanoindentation in the human femur
25. Young’s modulus of trabecular and cortical bone material: Ultrasonic and microtensile measurements10.1016/0021-9290(93)90042-D ↗
26. The elastic moduli of human subchondral, trabecular, and cortical bone tissue and the size-dependency of cortical bone modulus10.1016/0021-9290(90)90003-L ↗
27. Distribution of Young’s modulus at various sampling points in a human lumbar spine vertebral body10.1016/j.spinee.2020.06.013 ↗
28. Devi, S., Poonia, P.K., Kumar, V., Tiwari, A., Meena, R.K., Kumar, U., Gulnaz, A., and Al-Sadoon, M.K. (2022). Characterization of natural fiber extracted from corn (Zea mays L.) stalk waste for sustainable development. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su142416605 ↗
29. Decellularization and oxidation process of bamboo stem enhance biodegradation and osteogenic differentiation10.1016/j.msec.2020.111500 ↗
30. Engineered osteochondral scaffolds with bioactive cartilage zone for enhanced articular cartilage regeneration10.1007/s10439-024-03655-1 ↗
31. Shevchuk, O.I., Korcheva, V.V., Moskalenko, N.S., Kyryk, V.M., Kot, K.V., and Krasnienkov, D.S. (2025). Application of decellularization methods for scaffold production: Advantages, disadvantages, biosafety and modifications. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 13.10.3389/fbioe.2025.1621641 ↗
32. Decellularized extracellular matrix: Advanced bioplatforms for functional tissue restoration via innovative decellularization techniques10.1016/j.bmt.2025.100131 ↗
33. Seaweed cellulose scaffolds derived from green macroalgae for tissue engineering10.1038/s41598-021-90903-2 ↗
34. Surface modified cellulose scaffolds for tissue engineering10.1007/s10570-016-1111-y ↗
35. Corn cob valorization: Synthesis of a polymer based on crystalline cellulose with poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate and N-vinylcaprolactam10.1016/j.clet.2025.101019 ↗
36. Modulating cell response on cellulose surfaces; tunable attachment and scaffold mechanics10.1007/s10570-017-1612-3 ↗
37. Enhancing osteogenic potential in bone tissue engineering: Optimizing pore size in alginate–gelatin composite hydrogels10.1002/adem.202400247 ↗
38. Optimization of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell isolation and culture methods10.1007/s10616-012-9528-0 ↗
39. (2010). Cell Culture Basics Handbook, Thermo Fisher Scientific. [3rd ed.].
40. In vitro osteoblastic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells generates cell layers with distinct properties10.1186/s13287-018-0942-x ↗
41. The MTT assay: A method for error minimization and interpretation in measuring cytotoxicity and estimating cell viability10.1007/978-1-0716-3052-5_2 ↗
42. (2015). Standard Test Method for Compressive Properties of Rigid Plastics (Standard No. ASTM D695-15).
43. Efficacy of fungicide alternatives against late wilt disease of maize and their influence on plant morphogenesis and yield characters
44. Hijacking plant skeletons for biomedical applications: From regenerative medicine and drug delivery to biosensing10.1039/D4BM00982G ↗
45. Customizing the shape and microenvironment biochemistry of biocompatible macroscopic plant-derived cellulose scaffolds
46. Plant decellularization by chemical and physical methods for regenerative medicine: A review article
47. Harnessing natural polymers for nano-scaffolds in bone tissue engineering: A comprehensive overview of bone disease treatment10.3390/cimb46010038 ↗