journal article·2026-05-20Open access

Structural Behavior Analysis of a Bone-Scaffold System According to the Elastic Modulus of Bone Cement and Pore Size in the Proximal Femur

Han Kyu Lee, Jun Won Choi, Jung Jin Kim

Abstract

Bone scaffolds are porous artificial structures that replace damaged bone tissue and promote bone regeneration. In clinical settings, bone cement is used to provide initial fixation stability between the bone scaffold and surrounding bone tissue. To analyze the performance of bone scaffolds more accurately, the cement mantle should be considered. This study considers the cement mantle between the bone scaffold and surrounding bone tissue and the structural behavior according to variations in the elastic modulus of the cement mantle and the pore size of the bone scaffold. The results showed that the cement mantle energy ratio increased with increasing pore size, particularly in the femoral head and intertrochanteric region. In the femoral head with a pore size of 1.50 mm, increasing the cement mantle elastic modulus from 7 to 24 GPa reduced the mean strain energy within the bone scaffold from 3.79 μJ to 2.51 μJ, corresponding to a decrease of approximately 33.8%. These findings suggest that as cement mantle stiffness increases, external loads may not be sufficiently transferred to the bone scaffold interior, and the proportion of the load borne by the cement mantle may increase. In the femoral neck, the cement mantle energy ratio also increased with increasing pore size; however, the magnitude of this change was more limited than that in the other regions of interest. These findings highlight the mechanical importance of the cement mantle and suggest that both cement stiffness and scaffold pore size should be jointly considered to ensure appropriate load sharing for bone regeneration.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Bone fractures and treatments

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Keimyung University, 1095 Dalgubeol-daero, Dalseo-gu, Daegu 42601, Republic of Korea

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea

References (53)

Show source-provided references
1. Porous Scaffolds for Bone Regeneration10.1016/j.jsamd.2020.01.007 ↗
2. A Review of Biomimetic Scaffolds for Bone Regeneration: Toward a Cell-Free Strategy10.1002/btm2.10206 ↗
3. Scaffolds for Bone-Tissue Engineering10.1016/j.matt.2022.06.003 ↗
4. Dorati, R., DeTrizio, A., Modena, T., Conti, B., Benazzo, F., Gastaldi, G., and Genta, I. (2017). Biodegradable Scaffolds for Bone Regeneration Combined with Drug-Delivery Systems in Osteomyelitis Therapy. Pharmaceuticals, 10.10.3390/ph10040096 ↗
5. Peptide-Conjugated Biodegradable Polyester Scaffolds for Bone Regeneration10.1016/j.biomaterials.2025.123919 ↗
6. A Computational Approach to Investigate the Structural Behavior of Bone Scaffold-Implanted Proximal Femur in Routine Clinical Resolution10.1002/cnm.70072 ↗
7. Finite Element Analysis of a Personalized Femoral Scaffold with Designed Microarchitecture10.1243/09544119JEIM633 ↗
8. Strategies for the Patient-Specific Implant Angle of Bone Scaffolds Using Optimization10.1007/s13770-025-00730-z ↗
9. Design of Patient Specific Bone Stiffness Mimicking Scaffold10.1177/09544119211030715 ↗
10. Wu, P.K., Lee, C.W., Sun, W.H., and Lin, C.L. (2022). Biomechanical Analysis and Design Method for Patient-Specific Reconstructive Implants for Large Bone Defects of the Distal Lateral Femur. Biosensors, 12.10.3390/bios12010004 ↗
11. Qiu, G., Huang, M., Ke, D., Liu, J., Weir, M.D., Ma, T., Wang, P., Oates, T.W., Schneider, A., and Xia, Y. (2022). Novel Injectable Calcium Phosphate Scaffold with Human Periodontal Ligament Stem Cell Encapsulation in Microbeads for Bone Regeneration. Front. Mater., 9.10.3389/fmats.2022.977853 ↗
12. Xia, Y., Wang, H., Li, Y., and Fu, C. (2022). Engineered Bone Cement Trigger Bone Defect Regeneration. Front. Mater., 9.10.3389/fmats.2022.929618 ↗
13. Calcium Phosphate Cements for Bone Engineering and Their Biological Properties10.1038/boneres.2017.56 ↗
14. Novel Bioactive Glass Based Injectable Bone Cement with Improved Osteoinductivity and Its in Vivo Evaluation10.1038/s41598-017-03207-9 ↗
15. Chen, J., Ma, X., Li, Z., Fan, W., and Ma, L. (2025). Biomechanical Impact of Enoxaparin Sodium-Chitosan-PMMA Bone Cement in Hip Arthroplasty: A Preliminary Finite Element Analysis. Front. Surg., 12.10.3389/fsurg.2025.1615456 ↗
16. Finite Element Analysis of Vertebroplasty in the Osteoporotic T11-L1 Vertebral Body: Effects of Bone Cement Formulation10.1002/jbm.b.35359 ↗
17. Enhancing Effects of Radiopaque Agent BaSO4 on Mechanical and Biocompatibility Properties of Injectable Calcium Phosphate Composite Cement10.1016/j.msec.2020.110904 ↗
18. Calcium Phosphate Cement: Review of Mechanical and Biological Properties10.1111/j.1532-849X.2006.00129.x ↗
19. Qiao, Q., Zhao, Q., Wang, J., Li, M., Zhou, H., and Yang, L. (2025). The Effects of Calcium Phosphate Bone Cement Preparation Parameters on Injectability and Compressive Strength for Minimally Invasive Surgery. Bioengineering, 12.10.3390/bioengineering12080834 ↗
20. Formation of Macropores in Calcium Phosphate Cement Implants10.1023/A:1008917910468 ↗
21. Calcium Phosphate Cements for Bone Substitution: Chemistry, Handling and Mechanical Properties10.1016/j.actbio.2013.11.001 ↗
22. Design of Bioresorbable Calcium Phosphate Cement with High Porosity via the Addition of Bioresorbable Polymers10.1177/08853282241277477 ↗
23. Relationship between Site-Specific Bone Mineral Density in the Proximal Femur and Instability of Proximal Femoral Fractures: A Retrospective Study10.1016/j.otsr.2022.103496 ↗
24. Lower Bone Mineral Density Is Associated with Intertrochanteric Hip Fracture
25. Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head: An Updated Review of ARCO on Pathogenesis, Staging and Treatment10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e177 ↗
26. Computational Study of Wolff’s Law with Trabecular Architecture in the Human Proximal Femur Using Topology Optimization10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.05.037 ↗
27. Application of Design Space Optimization to Bone Remodeling Simulation of Trabecular Architecture in Human Proximal Femur for Higher Computational Efficiency10.1016/j.finel.2009.11.003 ↗
28. Image Resolution Enhancement for Healthy Weight-Bearing Bones Based on Topology Optimization10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.06.012 ↗
29. Image-Based Finite-Element Modeling of the Human Femur10.1080/10255842.2020.1789863 ↗
30. Finite Element Models with Automatic Computed Tomography Bone Segmentation for Failure Load Computation10.1038/s41598-024-66934-w ↗
31. Homeostasis-Based Aging Model for Trabecular Changes and Its Correlation with Age-Matched Bone Mineral Densities and Radiographs10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.07.027 ↗
32. Computational Study of Estimating 3D Trabecular Bone Microstructure for the Volume of Interest from CT Scan Data10.1002/cnm.2950 ↗
33. Kim, J., and Kim, J.J. (2022). Topology Optimization-Based Localized Bone Microstructure Reconstruction for Image Resolution Enhancement: Accuracy and Efficiency. Bioengineering, 9.10.3390/bioengineering9110644 ↗
34. Comparison of Micro-Level and Continuum-Level Voxel Models of the Proximal Femur10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.10.027 ↗
35. Use of Stereolithography to Manufacture Critical-Sized 3D Biodegradable Scaffolds for Bone Ingrowth10.1002/jbm.b.10485 ↗
36. Design Optimization of Functionally Graded Dental Implant for Bone Remodeling10.1016/j.compositesb.2009.04.015 ↗
37. Recent Developments Concerning Saint-Venant’s Principle: An Update10.1115/1.3152414 ↗
38. Recent Developments Concerning Saint-Venant’s Principle10.1016/S0065-2156(08)70244-8 ↗
39. Elastic Properties and Strain-to-Crack-Initiation of Calcium Phosphate Bone Cements: Revelations of a High-Resolution Measurement Technique10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.06.023 ↗
40. Mechanical Characterization of Brushite and Hydroxyapatite Cements10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00041-2 ↗
41. Epidemiology of Proximal Femoral Fractures in South Korea10.1007/s11657-013-0157-9 ↗
42. Avascular Necrosis of Femoral Head: A Metabolomic, Biophysical, Biochemical, Electron Microscopic and Histopathological Characterization10.1038/s41598-017-10817-w ↗
43. An Approach for Time-Dependent Bone Modeling and Remodeling—Application: A Preliminary Remodeling Simulation10.1002/jor.1100080507 ↗
44. Kim, J., Chun, B.J., and Kim, J.J. (2023). Quantitative Load Dependency Analysis of Local Trabecular Bone Microstructure to Understand the Spatial Characteristics in the Synthetic Proximal Femur. Biology, 12.10.3390/biology12020170 ↗
45. An Approach for Time-Dependent Bone Modeling and Remodeling—Theoretical Development10.1002/jor.1100080506 ↗
46. The Behavior of Adaptive Bone-Remodeling Simulation Models10.1016/0021-9290(92)90056-7 ↗
47. Prediction of Stress Shielding around an Orthopedic Screw: Using Stress and Strain Energy Density as Mechanical Stimuli10.1016/j.compbiomed.2013.07.032 ↗
48. Savio, D., and Bagno, A. (2022). When the Total Hip Replacement Fails: A Review on the Stress-Shielding Effect. Processes, 10.10.3390/pr10030612 ↗
49. Kim, S.M., Choi, J.W., and Kim, J.J. (2024). Personalized Stem Length Optimization in Hip Replacement: A Microscopic Perspective on Bone—Implant Interaction. Bioengineering, 11.10.3390/bioengineering11111074 ↗
50. Impact of Porosity and Stiffness of 3D Printed Polycaprolactone Scaffolds on Osteogenic Differentiation of Human Mesenchymal Stromal Cells and Activation of Dendritic Cells10.1021/acsbiomaterials.4c01108 ↗
51. Chen, S., Liao, K., Yang, Y., Chen, H., and Huang, R. (2025). Influence of Porosity Gradient Distribution on Mechanical and Biological Properties of Gyroid-Based Zn-2Mg Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering. Materials, 18.10.3390/ma18184399 ↗
52. Zhang, C., Lyu, Y., Semenova, A., and Li, Z. (2025). Influence of Load-Bearing Angle, Structural Topology, and Porosity Gradient on the Energy Absorption Capability of TPMS-Based Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 13.10.3389/fbioe.2025.1638143 ↗
53. Material Properties and Progress in Modification of Hydrogel-Based Self-Expandable Poly(Methyl Methacrylate) Bone Cement10.1039/D5RA00592B ↗