journal article·2026-05-13Open access

Intraoperative Bioactivation of Bone Substitutes Using a Surgical Suction Handle: A Prospective Clinical Pilot Study

Eleftherios Papaeleftheriou, Andrea Sowislok, Emely Rehage, Alexander Wegner, Marcel Haversath, Melissa Jansen, Marcus Jäger

Abstract

Critical size bone defects (CSBD) remain a major challenge in orthopedic surgery. Autologous bone grafting is considered the gold standard but is limited by restricted availability and significant donor-site morbidity. Synthetic bone substitutes offer an alternative; however, these materials are avital and lack osteoinductive properties. This study evaluated whether intraoperative bioactivation of bone substitutes using a surgical suction handle can safely enhance their regenerative potential. Fifty patients with CSBD, non-unions, or high-risk defects were enrolled, and calcium phosphate-based ceramics were intraoperatively coated with autologous tissue via a surgical suction handle and implanted into the defects. Clinical outcomes—including pain, range of motion, and wound healing—were scored using a standardized system, with all patients achieving results in the “excellent” range (10–13 points). Radiographic follow-up showed progressive cortical and extracortical bone formation in all patients. Surgeons reported high ease-of-use for the device, and no device-related complications occurred. Although biomaterial resorption was incomplete in some cases (36% with <75% resorption at six months), no patient required revision surgery. Our data indicate that intraoperative bioactivation of bone substitutes using a surgical suction handle is safe, feasible, and promotes local bone regeneration, providing a minimally invasive and practical approach to enhance the performance of synthetic grafts in challenging defects.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Chair of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany

Department of Orthopedics, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, St. Marien Hospital Mülheim a.d. Ruhr, 45468 Mülheim a.d. Ruhr, Germany

Department of Trauma, Orthopedics and Hand Surgery, Klinikum Wolfsburg, 38440 Wolfsburg, Germany

Centre Arthroscopy and Arthroplasty, Städtisches Krankenhaus Nettetal GmbH, 41334 Nettetal, Germany

Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Osnabrück, 49090 Osnabrück, Germany

Department of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Katholisches Klinikum Essen Philippusstift, 45355 Essen, Germany

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. O’Hara, N.N., Isaac, M., Slobogean, G.P., and Klazinga, N.S. (2020). The socioeconomic impact of orthopaedic trauma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE, 15.10.1371/journal.pone.0227907 ↗
2. Global, regional, and national burden of bone fractures in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: A systematic analysis from the global burden of disease study 201910.1016/S2666-7568(21)00172-0 ↗
3. Osteonecrosis of the femoral head
4. A review of bone fracture healing modelling: From mechanobiological theory to personalized rehabilitation protocols10.1016/j.bone.2025.117688 ↗
5. Autologous bone graft: Is it still the gold standard?10.1016/j.injury.2021.01.043 ↗
6. Biomimetic bone grafts and substitutes: A review of recent advancements and applications10.1016/j.bea.2023.100107 ↗
7. State of the art for bone substitutes10.29245/2767-5130/2025/1.1215 ↗
8. β-tricalcium phosphate for bone substitution: Synthesis and properties10.1016/j.actbio.2020.06.022 ↗
9. Use of demineralized bone matrix in spinal fusion10.5312/wjo.v5.i1.30 ↗
10. Treatment of infected tibial non-unions using a bmac and s53p4 bag combination for reconstruction of segmental bone defects: A clinical case series10.1016/j.injury.2020.09.029 ↗
11. Bone regeneration strategies with bone marrow stromal cells in orthopaedic surgery
12. Treatment of severe post-traumatic bone defects with autologous stem cells loaded on allogeneic scaffolds
13. Orthobiologics: A review10.1007/s00264-023-05803-z ↗
14. Bone regeneration after marginal bone resection in two-stage treatment of chronic long bone infection-a combined histopathological and clinical pilot study10.1016/j.injury.2022.07.008 ↗
15. Rosenberg, M., Shilo, D., Galperin, L., Capucha, T., Tarabieh, K., Rachmiel, A., and Segal, E. (2019). Bone morphogenic protein 2-loaded porous silicon carriers for osteoinductive implants. Pharmaceutics, 11.10.3390/pharmaceutics11110602 ↗
16. Betz, O.B., Betz, V.M., Schroder, C., Penzkofer, R., Gottlinger, M., Mayer-Wagner, S., Augat, P., Jansson, V., and Muller, P.E. (2013). Repair of large segmental bone defects: Bmp-2 gene activated muscle grafts vs. Autologous bone grafting. BMC Biotechnol., 13.10.1186/1472-6750-13-65 ↗
17. Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 use in the off-label treatment of nonunions and acute fractures: A retrospective review10.1097/TA.0b013e318232cf5a ↗
18. Exosomes and exosome-loaded scaffolds: Characterization and application in modern regenerative medicine10.1016/j.tice.2022.102007 ↗
19. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell’s exosomes as key nanoparticles in osteogenesis and bone regeneration: Specific capacity based on cell type10.1007/s11033-022-07807-1 ↗
20. Leung, K.S., Shirazi, S., Cooper, L.F., and Ravindran, S. (2022). Biomaterials and extracellular vesicle delivery: Current status, applications and challenges. Cells, 11.10.3390/cells11182851 ↗
21. Rana, N., Suliman, S., Al-Sharabi, N., and Mustafa, K. (2022). Extracellular vesicles derived from primed mesenchymal stromal cells loaded on biphasic calcium phosphate biomaterial exhibit enhanced macrophage polarization. Cells, 11.10.3390/cells11030470 ↗
22. The regenerative effect of platelet-rich plasma on healing in large osteochondral defects10.1007/s00264-009-0793-2 ↗
23. Bone formation in a long bone defect model using a platelet-rich plasma-loaded collagen scaffold10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.10.039 ↗
24. Busch, A., Herten, M., Haversath, M., Kaiser, C., Brandau, S., and Jager, M. (2020). Ceramic scaffolds in a vacuum suction handle for intraoperative stromal cell enrichment. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 21.10.3390/ijms21176393 ↗
25. Surgical vacuum filter-derived stromal cells are superior in proliferation to human bone marrow aspirate10.1186/s13287-019-1461-0 ↗
26. Surgical suction filter-derived bone graft displays osteogenic mirna and mrna patterns10.1007/s00068-023-02350-5 ↗
27. Bioactivation of scaffolds in osteonecrosis
28. Intraoperative biologization of beta-tcp and pcl-tcp by autologous proteins10.3390/jfb16090340 ↗
29. Application of the radiographic union scale for tibial fractures (rust): Assessment of healing rate and time of tibial fractures managed with intramedullary nailing10.1016/j.otsr.2019.10.010 ↗
30. The radiographic union scale in tibial (rust) fractures: Reliability of the outcome measure at an independent centre10.1302/2046-3758.54.2000628 ↗
31. Elimination of the residual alveolar cleft by secondary bone grafting and subsequent orthodontic treatment
32. Fracture healing: Mechanisms and interventions10.1038/nrrheum.2014.164 ↗
33. The immunomodulatory role of bmp-2 on macrophages to accelerate osteogenesis10.1089/ten.tea.2017.0232 ↗
34. The role of macrophages in fracture healing: A narrative review of the recent updates and therapeutic perspectives10.21037/sci-2022-038 ↗
35. Impact of different cell types on the osteogenic differentiation process of mesenchymal stem cells10.1155/sci/5551222 ↗
36. Vascular endothelial growth factor control mechanisms in skeletal growth and repair10.1002/dvdy.24463 ↗
37. The roles of vascular endothelial growth factor in bone repair and regeneration10.1016/j.bone.2016.06.013 ↗
38. Osteoblast-derived vegf regulates osteoblast differentiation and bone formation during bone repair10.1172/JCI82585 ↗
39. Pdgf inhibits bmp2-induced bone healing10.1038/s41536-023-00276-5 ↗
40. Wu, K.A., Shenoy, D., Sachs, E., Somarelli, J.A., Pean, C., DeBaun, M., Brigman, B.E., Visgauss, J.D., and Eward, W.C. (2024). Exploring versatile applications of a vacuum-assisted bone harvester in orthopedic surgery. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord., 25.10.1186/s12891-024-07786-3 ↗
41. Reamer-irrigator-aspirator bone graft harvesting for treatment of segmental bone loss: Analysis of defect volume as independent risk factor for failure10.1007/s00068-017-0821-7 ↗
42. Bone graft substitution and augmentation10.1097/BOT.0000000000000464 ↗
43. Rehage, E., Sowislok, A., Busch, A., Papaeleftheriou, E., Jansen, M., and Jager, M. (2023). Surgical site-released tissue is potent to generate bone onto tcp and pcl-tcp scaffolds in vitro. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 24.10.3390/ijms242115877 ↗
44. Long-term follow-up of patients with large segmental bone defects treated with 3d-printed polycaprolactone/tricalcium phosphate scaffolds10.1007/s00068-025-02982-9 ↗
45. Intrasurgical protein layer on titanium arthroplasty explants: From the big twelve to the implant proteome10.1002/prca.201800168 ↗
46. Jager, M., Latosinska, A., Herten, M., Busch, A., Grupp, T., and Sowislok, A. (2022). The implant proteome-the right surgical glue to fix titanium implants in situ. J. Funct. Biomater., 13.10.3390/jfb13020044 ↗