journal article·2026-05-02Open access

Effects of Yttria Content and Margin Design on the Fracture Resistance of Monolithic Zirconia Crowns

Beyza Güney, Elif Yılmaz Biçer, Dilan Gizem Doğan, Merve Bankoğlu Güngör

Abstract

Background: Zirconia ceramics are generally used in monolithic restorations, and their microstructural, mechanical, and optical properties continue to improve. Several factors affect the mechanical properties of these restorations; however, the combined effects of yttria content and margin design on the fracture resistance remain unclear. Methods: Sixty monolithic zirconia crowns were fabricated and assigned to six groups (n = 10) based on three different yttria contents (strength-gradient multilayer zirconia containing 3 mol% yttria tetragonal zirconia polycrystals in the dentin region and 5 mol% yttria-partially stabilized zirconia in the occlusal region: 3Y-TZP/5Y-PSZ [ZP], 3 mol% yttria tetragonal zirconia polycrystals: 3Y-TZP [HTML], and 4 mol% yttria-partially stabilized zirconia: 4Y-PSZ [STML]), and two different margin designs (chamfer and rounded shoulder). Crowns were adhesively bonded to standardized 3-dimensional-printed resin dies and subjected to thermal and mechanical aging (10,000 thermocycles at 5–55 °C, and 1.2 million mechanical cycles at 50 N, 1.6 Hz). Fracture resistance values were recorded in Newtons, and fracture types were evaluated. Data were analyzed using a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and Bonferroni adjustment was used for multiple comparisons (α = 0.05). Results: A significant interaction between yttria content and margin design was found (p = 0.005). In the chamfer margin design groups, ZP (2208.5 ± 501.9 N) and HTML (2069.6 ± 463.3 N) showed significantly higher fracture resistance than STML (1444 ± 303.2 N) (p < 0.05). In the rounded shoulder margin design groups, no significant differences were observed among ZP (1662.8 ± 293.8 N), HTML (1940.9 ± 341.6 N), and STML (1795.6 ± 529.6 N) (p > 0.05). ZP and HTML showed higher fracture resistance values with the chamfer margin design, while STML showed higher fracture resistance with the rounded shoulder margin design. Conclusions: The fracture resistance of zirconia restorations is influenced by both the margin design and the yttria content. Designing the margin geometry based on the type of zirconia to be used can enhance the mechanical properties of the restorations and support clinical decision-making.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Gazi University, 06490 Ankara, Türkiye

Funding

Gazi University, Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. Ban, S. (2021). Classification and properties of dental zirconia as implant fixtures and superstructures. Materials, 14.10.3390/ma14174879 ↗
2. Pöppel, M.L., Rosentritt, M., Sturm, R., Beuer, F., Hey, J., Schmid, A., and Schmidt, F. (2022). Fracture load and fracture patterns of monolithic three-unit anterior fixed dental prostheses after in vitro artificial aging—A comparison between color-gradient and strength-gradient multilayer zirconia materials with varying yttria content. J. Clin. Med., 11.10.3390/jcm11174982 ↗
3. Comparison between novel strength-gradient and color-gradient multilayered zirconia using conventional and high-speed sintering10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103977 ↗
4. Bruhnke, M., Awwad, Y., Müller, W.D., Beuer, F., and Schmidt, F. (2022). Mechanical properties of new generations of monolithic, multi-layered zirconia. Materials, 16.10.3390/ma16010276 ↗
5. The influence of the cervical finish line designs on the fracture resistance of CAD/CAM monolithic zirconia crowns: An in vitro study
6. Performance of stereolithography and milling in fabricating monolithic zirconia crowns with different finish line designs10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.104255 ↗
7. Effect of marginal designs on fracture strength of high translucency monolithic zirconia crowns
8. Influence of the preparation design and artificial aging on the fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia crowns10.4047/jap.2016.8.1.30 ↗
9. Influence of preparation design on fracture resistance of different monolithic zirconia crowns: A comparative study10.4047/jap.2019.11.6.324 ↗
10. Fracture load of different zirconia types: A mastication simulation study10.1111/jopr.13242 ↗
11. Survivability and fracture resistance of monolithic and multi-yttria-layered zirconia crowns as a function of yttria content: A mastication simulation study10.1111/jerd.12907 ↗
12. Fatigue resistance of monolithic strength-gradient zirconia materials10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104504 ↗
13. Fracture resistance and fracture behaviour of monolithic multi-layered translucent zirconia fixed dental prostheses with different placing strategies of connector: An in vitro study10.2147/CCIDE.S344941 ↗
14. Effect of dynamic loading on fracture resistance of gradient zirconia fixed partial denture frameworks10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.09.027 ↗
15. Klotz, A.L., Halfmann, J., Rues, S., Bömicke, W., Rammelsberg, P., and Zenthöfer, A. (2024). Fracture resistance of posterior tooth-supported cantilever fixed dental prostheses of different zirconia generations and framework thicknesses: An in vitro study. Materials, 17.10.3390/ma17010263 ↗
16. Fracture characteristics and translucency of multilayer monolithic zirconia crowns of various thicknesses10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105023 ↗
17. Prott, L.S., Harlaß, M., Marksteiner, A., Spitznagel, F.A., Langner, R., Zhang, Y., Blatz, M.B., and Gierthmuehlen, P.C. (J. Prosthodont. Res., 2025). Fatigue performance and failure load of minimally-invasive occlusal veneers made of lithium disilicate and composition-gradient multilayered zirconia: An in vitro study, J. Prosthodont. Res., in press.10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_25_00068 ↗
18. Spitznagel, F.A., Marksteiner, A., Prott, L.S., Zhang, Y., Blatz, M.B., Alves, L.M.M., Campos, T.M.B., and Gierthmuehlen, P.C. (J. Esthet. Restor. Dent., 2025). Fatigue performance and failure loads of composition-gradient multilayer zirconia: Partial-coverage restorations versus single crowns at different thicknesses, J. Esthet. Restor. Dent., in press.10.1111/jerd.70066 ↗
19. Kim, S.H., Yeo, M.Y., Choi, S.Y., and Park, E.J. (2022). Fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia crowns depending on different marginal thicknesses. Materials, 15.10.3390/ma15144861 ↗
20. Comparative effect of no finish line, heavy chamfer, and shoulder marginal designs on the fracture resistance of zirconia (Cercon) ceramic restoration: An in vitro study
21. Marginal fit and fracture resistance of vertical versus horizontal margins in monolithic zirconia crowns10.1002/cre2.70064 ↗
22. A comparative assessment of fracture resistance of zirconia crowns prepared with different finish line designs—An in vitro study10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1820_24 ↗
23. Zirconia restoration types, properties, tooth preparation design, and bonding: A narrative review10.1111/jerd.13151 ↗
24. Koo, P.J., Lee, J.H., Ha, S.R., Seo, D.G., Ahn, J.S., and Choi, Y.S. (2025). Changes in the properties of different zones in multilayered translucent zirconia used in monolithic restorations during aging process. J. Funct. Biomater., 16.10.3390/jfb16030096 ↗
25. Comparative fracture resistance analysis of translucent monolithic zirconia dioxide milled in a CAD/CAM system10.3390/ceramics6020071 ↗
26. Koletsi, D., Iliadi, A., Eliades, T., and Eliades, G. (2019). In vitro simulation and in vivo assessment of tooth wear: A meta-analysis of in vitro and clinical research. Materials, 12.10.3390/ma12213575 ↗
27. Monolithic zirconia crowns: Effect of thickness reduction on fatigue behavior and failure load10.4047/jap.2021.13.5.269 ↗
28. Flexural strength of translucent zirconia materials produced with different multilayer technologies: An in vitro study10.1155/2024/8410101 ↗
29. Mechanical properties–translucency–microstructure relationships in commercial monolayer and multilayer monolithic zirconia ceramics10.1016/j.dental.2022.04.011 ↗
30. Kongkiatkamon, S., Booranasophone, K., Tongtaksin, A., Kiatthanakorn, V., and Rokaya, D. (2021). Comparison of fracture load of the four translucent zirconia crowns. Molecules, 26.10.3390/molecules26175308 ↗
31. Fracture resistance of monolithic gradient zirconia crowns with different finish line designs and cement spaces
32. Effect of preparation design on the fracture resistance of zirconia crown copings10.4012/dmj.27.362 ↗
33. Fracture resistance and wear behavior of ultra-thin occlusal veneers made from translucent zirconia ceramics bonded to different tooth substrates10.1111/jerd.13409 ↗
34. Fracture resistance of bi-layered and translucent zirconia after thermo-mechanical fatigue10.21608/edj.2024.270327.2941 ↗